What do you think?
Rate this book
Visões e ilusões políticas: uma análise e crítica cristã das ideologias contemporâneas
Livro premiado em primeiro lugar na categoria não ficção/cultura pela The Word Guild Canadian Writing Awards.
Nesta obra, o cientista político David Koyzis examina as principais ideologias de nossos dias, incluindo o liberalismo, o conservadorismo, o nacionalismo, a democracia e o socialismo. Koyzis oferece uma análise bastante cuidadosa e crítica de cada ideologia, com a finalidade de explicitar as questões espinhosas inerentes a cada cosmovisão. São apresentados tanto os pontos fortes como os fracos de cada ideologia. Em sua conclusão, o autor propõe modelos alternativos que desafiam sobretudo os cristãos que trabalham na esfera pública, bem como os cientistas políticos e estudantes do pensamento político moderno.
Nesta obra, o cientista político David Koyzis examina as principais ideologias de nossos dias, incluindo o liberalismo, o conservadorismo, o nacionalismo, a democracia e o socialismo. Koyzis oferece uma análise bastante cuidadosa e crítica de cada ideologia, com a finalidade de explicitar as questões espinhosas inerentes a cada cosmovisão. São apresentados tanto os pontos fortes como os fracos de cada ideologia. Em sua conclusão, o autor propõe modelos alternativos que desafiam sobretudo os cristãos que trabalham na esfera pública, bem como os cientistas políticos e estudantes do pensamento político moderno.
352 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 2003
171 people are currently reading
1052 people want to read
About the author
David T. Koyzis
8 books15 followersDavid T. Koyzis holds the PhD in government and international studies from the University of Notre Dame. He taught undergraduate political science for thirty years.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 73 reviews
May 28, 2013
Koyzis's thesis is that politics is dominated by various ideologies. From a Christian perspective, these ideologies are idolatrous. Thus Christians must therefore transcend the ideologies and approach politics with an eye firmly fixed on the biblical themes of creation, fall, and redemption.
Political ideologies are idolatrous because they seize on one aspect of the way God made the world and make it ultimate. If only the ideology could take root, the thinking goes, then the nation or community or world could be saved by the evil which threatens it. The "fundamental evil" identified by the various ideologies is often itself another aspect of God's creation. As a result of deifying one part of the creation and demonizing others, the ideologies developed warped soteriologies that often lead to more evil and suffering because governing moral principles built by God into his world are subverted by the salvific goal set up by the ideology. This does not mean that the ideologies are all wrong or equally wrong. Because they are deifying parts of creation, they each have grasped fragments of truth, to greater or lesser extents. Thus the ideologies must be examined. Koyzis proposes six evaluative questions:
"First, what is their creational basis? Second, what facets of God's creation have they rightly focused on even as they have effectively deified them? Third, what inconsistencies have led to internal tensions within the ideology itself? Fourth, what do they see as a source of evil? Fifth, where do they locate the source of salvation? Sixth and finally, to what extent are they able to account for the distinct place of politics in God's world?"
In the central section of the book Koyzis surveys and critiques various ideologies. He begins with liberalism. As used here, liberalism embraces both contemporary American conservatives (classical liberalism) and liberals (reformist or revisionist liberalism / social democrats). In Koyzis's analysis the "sovereignty of the individual" is the cornerstone of the liberal ideology. The classical liberals focused on restricting the state from infringing on personal liberties. At first liberals focused on protecting individuals rights to self and property. The state's role was to ensure a fair playing field for individuals. But as non-government entities (e.g., business monopolies) gained power reform liberals began to use government power to protect individual freedom from these entities. Others pointed out that poverty limits people's opportunity, and thus reform liberals seek to use government to level a playing field that is unequal by virtue of the different ways individuals have used their freedoms. Already the tensions within the liberal ideology are apparent. Also in the later stages of liberalism is the concern for laws not to infringe on the moral choices that citizens make; to do so infringes on individual liberty. Yet individual moral choices have social consequences, and the government is often invoked to mitigate those social consequences. Liberalism's chief evil is authority located outside the human self, and its soteriology is a quest for freedom from external authority. It's fatal flaw is its refusal to submit to God's standards of justice, and this leads to the internal contradictions between classical and reformist liberals. On the other hand, liberals have rightly recognized the importance of the individual and the significance of human rights.
From liberalism, Koyzis turns to conservatism. He acknowledges up front that conservatism is not as ideological as the other ideologies covered. Indeed, in some respects it opposes ideologies (it is important to note at this point that Koyzis locates much of American conservatism on the right wing of liberalism; Reagan's "optimistic view of human nature," "his celebration of limitless material progress," and "his devotion to the free market" are all marks of classical liberalism rather than traditional conservatism). Nonetheless, conservatism can be defined with enough specificity to invite evaluation. In the first place conservatives have a deep sense of the human tendency to evil and thus oppose all utopianism. This means that if a tradition is working adequately, the conservative will oppose a sweeping change to fix an evil because he is sure that the sweeping change will have negative side effects. The conservative must be convinced that the benefits of the change will outweigh the inevitable negative side effects. The conservative is not opposed to any change, but he prefers to see the changes take place on a local level where the negative effects are constrained. If the experiment works it can be implemented more broadly. At its best conservatism remains rooted in traditions that work while making necessary adjustments to fix what is not working. At its worst, conservatism can lapse into a traditionalism in which the traditions cease to carry meaning and a romanticism which projects a utopia into the past. This leads to Koyzis's first critique: the traditions of any society are "inevitably a 'mixed bag' . . . . The wisdom of past generations is intermingled with a large measure of folly." But conservatism lacks "a generally accepted transhistorical criterion by which to distinguish what in a tradition is worthy saving and what ought to be discarded." Koyzis's second critique centers on the need for genuine progress. He notes that "God's creation is not static but contains great potential for development and improvement." The Christian ought to support progress, but he should do so cautiously (recognizing with the conservative the potential for evil side-effects) and with a careful evaluation of the direction of the change. Is it directed to greater conformity to God's norms or away from such conformity. Overall, Koyzis renders a more favorable evaluation of conservatism while still warning about idolizing tradition and locating evil in the kinds of progress that societies should experience.
Koyzis next considers nationalism. On the positive side Koyzis argues that nationalism values the real communities of which people find themselves a part. There is something good in sharing "love for the cultural traditions of one's own ethnic community" or in sharing a commitment as a citizen to the government of one's nation. But nationalism becomes an ideology when it is elevated to the place of supreme importance over other loyalties such as family, region, or religion. As with liberalism, autonomy is the ultimate goal (in this case the autonomy of the national community) and rule by the other (whether the racial, cultural, or linguistic other) is the ultimate evil. The falsity of this claim is demonstrated by the great evils done by dictators who liberated their states from colonial powers. This observation in no way justifies colonialism, but it does demonstrate the folly of identifying ultimate evil in being ruled by the other and ultimate redemption in national liberation. Nationalism also becomes dangerous when it takes the place of religion, "complete with its own liturgical ceremonies, Te Deums, sacraments, icons and feast days." This can be especially dangerous for certain American Christians who link Old Testament promises to Israel to the United States.
Democracy, though "merely a form of government" in some ways, becomes ideological when "it embodies a belief in the near infallibility of the vox populi—the voice of the people. A limited democracy can be argued for on Christian principles. Thus because of the fall, power should be diversified instead of centralized. A fallen person with unlimited power is a great danger. But democracy as an ideology is grounded on anti-Christian ideas. As with liberalism, the autonomous self is the great good. The great evil is any authority that rules over the individual without his consent. Thus "the people" become the highest authority by which anything is justified. This stands against the conservative principle that a representative is a trustee who is to use his knowledge and wisdom to act in the best interest of those he represents; he does not necessarily simply do whatever they desire. Without checks such as this, democracy too can become totalitarian. The majority may run roughshod over the minority. Or, democracy may become totalitarian by insisting that all of life, not only the government, must be run on democratic principles. In the end, the Christian must recognize that democracy is not the only, or even always the best, form of government for bringing about justice. And when democracy is the form of government chosen, the people must recognize they still exist under the authority of divine Law.
Socialism is the final ideology that Koyzis covers. He does an excellent job of walking readers through the different varieties of socialism with their different approaches for implementing their program. Socialism sees inequality as the great evil and it promises salvation in the form of radical social change. Koyzis is willing to grant socialism some real insights. In the first place he grants the reality of communal ownership (he gives the family as an example). He also grants that socialists have sometimes highlighted real economic evils. He grants that a nation's economic system may prevent a good number of people from owning productive property, and may permit the exploitation of labor. These are real evils. But socialism goes further to locate evil in any division of labor and in any inequality. Its salvation is communal ownership of everything. But, Koyzis, notes God designed the world to work with various forms of individual and communal ownership. Thus a totalizing, state-managed communal ownership runs up against creational limits. The communist nations must attempt to force the soteriology to work, and this is leads to the totalitarianism by which such nations are known: "Ideologies are typically motivated to achieve some overarching goal deemed to take precedence over other legitimate human concerns. The ultimate danger, of course, is that followers will come to believe that the end justifies the means and that this goal could demand the sacrifice of millions of human lives."
Koyzis closes the book with two chapters in which he seeks to offer a way to transcend the ideologies. In this section he examines both the Catholic idea of subsidiary and the Kuyperian idea of sphere sovereignty. He finds both useful, but prefers the less hierarchical sphere sovereignty.
Political ideologies are idolatrous because they seize on one aspect of the way God made the world and make it ultimate. If only the ideology could take root, the thinking goes, then the nation or community or world could be saved by the evil which threatens it. The "fundamental evil" identified by the various ideologies is often itself another aspect of God's creation. As a result of deifying one part of the creation and demonizing others, the ideologies developed warped soteriologies that often lead to more evil and suffering because governing moral principles built by God into his world are subverted by the salvific goal set up by the ideology. This does not mean that the ideologies are all wrong or equally wrong. Because they are deifying parts of creation, they each have grasped fragments of truth, to greater or lesser extents. Thus the ideologies must be examined. Koyzis proposes six evaluative questions:
"First, what is their creational basis? Second, what facets of God's creation have they rightly focused on even as they have effectively deified them? Third, what inconsistencies have led to internal tensions within the ideology itself? Fourth, what do they see as a source of evil? Fifth, where do they locate the source of salvation? Sixth and finally, to what extent are they able to account for the distinct place of politics in God's world?"
In the central section of the book Koyzis surveys and critiques various ideologies. He begins with liberalism. As used here, liberalism embraces both contemporary American conservatives (classical liberalism) and liberals (reformist or revisionist liberalism / social democrats). In Koyzis's analysis the "sovereignty of the individual" is the cornerstone of the liberal ideology. The classical liberals focused on restricting the state from infringing on personal liberties. At first liberals focused on protecting individuals rights to self and property. The state's role was to ensure a fair playing field for individuals. But as non-government entities (e.g., business monopolies) gained power reform liberals began to use government power to protect individual freedom from these entities. Others pointed out that poverty limits people's opportunity, and thus reform liberals seek to use government to level a playing field that is unequal by virtue of the different ways individuals have used their freedoms. Already the tensions within the liberal ideology are apparent. Also in the later stages of liberalism is the concern for laws not to infringe on the moral choices that citizens make; to do so infringes on individual liberty. Yet individual moral choices have social consequences, and the government is often invoked to mitigate those social consequences. Liberalism's chief evil is authority located outside the human self, and its soteriology is a quest for freedom from external authority. It's fatal flaw is its refusal to submit to God's standards of justice, and this leads to the internal contradictions between classical and reformist liberals. On the other hand, liberals have rightly recognized the importance of the individual and the significance of human rights.
From liberalism, Koyzis turns to conservatism. He acknowledges up front that conservatism is not as ideological as the other ideologies covered. Indeed, in some respects it opposes ideologies (it is important to note at this point that Koyzis locates much of American conservatism on the right wing of liberalism; Reagan's "optimistic view of human nature," "his celebration of limitless material progress," and "his devotion to the free market" are all marks of classical liberalism rather than traditional conservatism). Nonetheless, conservatism can be defined with enough specificity to invite evaluation. In the first place conservatives have a deep sense of the human tendency to evil and thus oppose all utopianism. This means that if a tradition is working adequately, the conservative will oppose a sweeping change to fix an evil because he is sure that the sweeping change will have negative side effects. The conservative must be convinced that the benefits of the change will outweigh the inevitable negative side effects. The conservative is not opposed to any change, but he prefers to see the changes take place on a local level where the negative effects are constrained. If the experiment works it can be implemented more broadly. At its best conservatism remains rooted in traditions that work while making necessary adjustments to fix what is not working. At its worst, conservatism can lapse into a traditionalism in which the traditions cease to carry meaning and a romanticism which projects a utopia into the past. This leads to Koyzis's first critique: the traditions of any society are "inevitably a 'mixed bag' . . . . The wisdom of past generations is intermingled with a large measure of folly." But conservatism lacks "a generally accepted transhistorical criterion by which to distinguish what in a tradition is worthy saving and what ought to be discarded." Koyzis's second critique centers on the need for genuine progress. He notes that "God's creation is not static but contains great potential for development and improvement." The Christian ought to support progress, but he should do so cautiously (recognizing with the conservative the potential for evil side-effects) and with a careful evaluation of the direction of the change. Is it directed to greater conformity to God's norms or away from such conformity. Overall, Koyzis renders a more favorable evaluation of conservatism while still warning about idolizing tradition and locating evil in the kinds of progress that societies should experience.
Koyzis next considers nationalism. On the positive side Koyzis argues that nationalism values the real communities of which people find themselves a part. There is something good in sharing "love for the cultural traditions of one's own ethnic community" or in sharing a commitment as a citizen to the government of one's nation. But nationalism becomes an ideology when it is elevated to the place of supreme importance over other loyalties such as family, region, or religion. As with liberalism, autonomy is the ultimate goal (in this case the autonomy of the national community) and rule by the other (whether the racial, cultural, or linguistic other) is the ultimate evil. The falsity of this claim is demonstrated by the great evils done by dictators who liberated their states from colonial powers. This observation in no way justifies colonialism, but it does demonstrate the folly of identifying ultimate evil in being ruled by the other and ultimate redemption in national liberation. Nationalism also becomes dangerous when it takes the place of religion, "complete with its own liturgical ceremonies, Te Deums, sacraments, icons and feast days." This can be especially dangerous for certain American Christians who link Old Testament promises to Israel to the United States.
Democracy, though "merely a form of government" in some ways, becomes ideological when "it embodies a belief in the near infallibility of the vox populi—the voice of the people. A limited democracy can be argued for on Christian principles. Thus because of the fall, power should be diversified instead of centralized. A fallen person with unlimited power is a great danger. But democracy as an ideology is grounded on anti-Christian ideas. As with liberalism, the autonomous self is the great good. The great evil is any authority that rules over the individual without his consent. Thus "the people" become the highest authority by which anything is justified. This stands against the conservative principle that a representative is a trustee who is to use his knowledge and wisdom to act in the best interest of those he represents; he does not necessarily simply do whatever they desire. Without checks such as this, democracy too can become totalitarian. The majority may run roughshod over the minority. Or, democracy may become totalitarian by insisting that all of life, not only the government, must be run on democratic principles. In the end, the Christian must recognize that democracy is not the only, or even always the best, form of government for bringing about justice. And when democracy is the form of government chosen, the people must recognize they still exist under the authority of divine Law.
Socialism is the final ideology that Koyzis covers. He does an excellent job of walking readers through the different varieties of socialism with their different approaches for implementing their program. Socialism sees inequality as the great evil and it promises salvation in the form of radical social change. Koyzis is willing to grant socialism some real insights. In the first place he grants the reality of communal ownership (he gives the family as an example). He also grants that socialists have sometimes highlighted real economic evils. He grants that a nation's economic system may prevent a good number of people from owning productive property, and may permit the exploitation of labor. These are real evils. But socialism goes further to locate evil in any division of labor and in any inequality. Its salvation is communal ownership of everything. But, Koyzis, notes God designed the world to work with various forms of individual and communal ownership. Thus a totalizing, state-managed communal ownership runs up against creational limits. The communist nations must attempt to force the soteriology to work, and this is leads to the totalitarianism by which such nations are known: "Ideologies are typically motivated to achieve some overarching goal deemed to take precedence over other legitimate human concerns. The ultimate danger, of course, is that followers will come to believe that the end justifies the means and that this goal could demand the sacrifice of millions of human lives."
Koyzis closes the book with two chapters in which he seeks to offer a way to transcend the ideologies. In this section he examines both the Catholic idea of subsidiary and the Kuyperian idea of sphere sovereignty. He finds both useful, but prefers the less hierarchical sphere sovereignty.
February 7, 2025
Photo of Jeremy Corbyn by Garry Knight.
You Raise Me Up
With the inauguration of a new US President, there are sincere Christians both celebrating and lamenting US politics with all the heart-felt euphoria and anger of any major sporting final. It has happened in other times and places and will most certainly happen again. Yet just how are followers of Jesus to relate their faith to the ideologies and politics of the times? David Koyzis’ book brings his valuable, nay, desperately needed, insights into this arena.
To avoid fleeing from political engagement completely, or blending your faith with another ideology, or simply falling headlong into the polarised political tribalism of these and other times, the believer needs a measure of discernment based on a fuller understanding of biblical Christianity.
‘The key to approaching ideologies lies in an initial effort to understand their appeal and hence their legitimate creational underpinnings,’ says Koyzis. He encourages us to recognise that which is good in an ideology before it is dismissed outright. Simply put, ideologies are based on taking something out of creation and making a God of it capable of saving us.
The conservative looks to history as a source of norms. ‘A conservative has a heightened sense that with change of any sort comes loss, often of something good that cannot be replaced’ he writes. He reminds us that there can be conservative socialists as well as conservative capitalists, who can be ‘simply people who lament the erosion of a political or economic system from which they have long benefitted’, but that their insights should not simply be dismissed as such per se.
He notes that Christian socialists are likely to argue the scriptural commands to care for the poor and oppressed require the implementation of a socialist agenda, but in doing so pick up spiritual underpinnings including the ‘salvific working class capable of eschatological consummation’ that cannot be realised.
Liberalism, he writes, for all the good it has accomplished in encouraging the protection of genuine human rights, fails first and foremost in that it offers a false salvation rooted in a fundamentally religious assertion of human autonomy - to govern oneself in accordance with a law one has chosen for oneself - against external authority. For the liberal the sovereignty of the individual is of ultimate importance, but for the Christian it should be the sovereignty of the Sovereign.
‘Christians cannot simply join with one or more of these ideologies and champion their agendas,’ he writes, as many have done and are clearly doing. ‘They should be in a position to discern correctly the differences between idolatry and a more modest estimation of the thing being idolised.’
Ideologies deny God’s normative creation order and ‘tie their transformative agendas to their own subjective dreams and aspirations’ he writes. God’s good and life-giving norms within His Creation are readable both in general and special revelation as true points of ultimate reference. As Calvin famously said: ‘Scripture gives us the spectacles through which we look to see the world with greater clarity.’ Koyzis’ book is a truly valuable read helping us use the Scriptural framework of ‘Creation – Fall – Redemption’ to see with greater clarity through the fake and inflated spirits of the ages.
By this reviewer:
July 15, 2021
Let me start by saying, this book was challenging for me to get through. This wouldn’t have been a book I would have been drawn to read except for it being part of a class, so I had to keep persevering.
However, I did find parts fascinating and I learned much about different political ideologies and how easy it is for us to make them the ultimate thing and thus an idol. No political ideology is all good or all bad, even though news sources and social media might want you to believe otherwise.
This book and author highlight positives and negatives and a Christian critique of major political views and I found this helpful in the midst of our political divides found today.
However, I did find parts fascinating and I learned much about different political ideologies and how easy it is for us to make them the ultimate thing and thus an idol. No political ideology is all good or all bad, even though news sources and social media might want you to believe otherwise.
This book and author highlight positives and negatives and a Christian critique of major political views and I found this helpful in the midst of our political divides found today.
May 18, 2021
What do you believe about politics? Does it really matter? In Political Visions & Illusions, David T. Koyzis takes us on a survey and Christian critique of contemporary ideologies.
The thesis of this book is that ideologies are modern manifestations of idolatry. They have their own soteriology and eschatology. We can assess them from a Christian standpoint to see their positive features and what they can teach us. God remains faithful to his creation despite our idolatry of ideologies.
Interestingly, Koyzis dislikes the terms “left” and “right” and prefers “progressive” and “conservative.” By focusing on political ideologies, Koyzis looks at politics and its place in human life – specifically about how the community, citizens, and government go about doing and maintaining justice.
Liberalism, Conservatism, and Nationalism
Liberalism holds to the sovereignty of the individual. We see that no ideology remains static, and adherents of the same ideology frequently find themselves opponents of each other. Human autonomy and the freedom to govern themselves is the basic principle of liberalism. Koyzis identifies five stages of liberalism, beginning with Hobbesian Commonwealth and ending with the Choice Enhancement State. Liberalism fails because it offers a false salvation rooted in a fundamentally religious assertion of human autonomy against external authority. Also, it is unable to distinguish adequately the state as an authoritative community irreducible to the voluntary consent of its constituent individuals.
Koyzis acknowledges that conservatives may be prone to profess Christianity because it is part of the Western cultural heritage. Conservatism looks to history as a source of norms. Koyzis’ words cut and sting when he says that perhaps conservatives wish to conserve their own power and privilege in society. Conservatism fails as political theory because there is nothing inherently Christian about it, and it offers nothing in the way of a coherent view of the state as a specialized, differentiated community within human society.
Nationalism recognizes that people seek their identities in communities, which make claims on their loyalties and demands personal sacrifice for their collective well-being. Christian nationalism fails because it unduly applies biblical promises intended for the body of Christ as a whole to one geographic people, it imperfectly identifies and applies norms from and for a specific period of time, it gives homage to a nation instead of God, and it sees the nation as unlimited.
A Biblical Understanding of Politics
What Koyzis is able to do exceptionally well is frame the story of each ideology. And while he makes generalizations (”Many conservatives dislike pop or rock music and prefer, say, the baroque pieces of Bach or Telemann.”) – I can understand in most instances how it is necessary for his work. The book actually claims that there is overlap between the different ideologies.
Democratism, socialism, and a look at pluralism are also included. All are idolatrous and fail to live up to God’s standard. Koyzis presents us with an alternative ideology, arguing for a biblical understanding of politics – which looks at creational and redemptive aspects. He proposes a government that seeks to do justice but also one that calls on and empowers individuals to seek it out in all spheres of life – including “families, churches, businesses, labor unions, schools, and so forth.”
In a Concluding Ecclesiological Postscript, Koyzis surprisingly looks to the power of preaching and the pulpit to communicate truth to God’s people who will live out Gospel justice and truth in their communities. The church as an institution can also address political governments and policies while still being proper and ultimately focused on God’s people. As politics continues to play an important and powerful part in our society, God’s people can be sure that we are governed ultimately by God’s Word as we live out lives of true and authentic worship.
I received a media copy of Political Visions & Illusions and this is my honest review.
The thesis of this book is that ideologies are modern manifestations of idolatry. They have their own soteriology and eschatology. We can assess them from a Christian standpoint to see their positive features and what they can teach us. God remains faithful to his creation despite our idolatry of ideologies.
Interestingly, Koyzis dislikes the terms “left” and “right” and prefers “progressive” and “conservative.” By focusing on political ideologies, Koyzis looks at politics and its place in human life – specifically about how the community, citizens, and government go about doing and maintaining justice.
Liberalism, Conservatism, and Nationalism
Liberalism holds to the sovereignty of the individual. We see that no ideology remains static, and adherents of the same ideology frequently find themselves opponents of each other. Human autonomy and the freedom to govern themselves is the basic principle of liberalism. Koyzis identifies five stages of liberalism, beginning with Hobbesian Commonwealth and ending with the Choice Enhancement State. Liberalism fails because it offers a false salvation rooted in a fundamentally religious assertion of human autonomy against external authority. Also, it is unable to distinguish adequately the state as an authoritative community irreducible to the voluntary consent of its constituent individuals.
Koyzis acknowledges that conservatives may be prone to profess Christianity because it is part of the Western cultural heritage. Conservatism looks to history as a source of norms. Koyzis’ words cut and sting when he says that perhaps conservatives wish to conserve their own power and privilege in society. Conservatism fails as political theory because there is nothing inherently Christian about it, and it offers nothing in the way of a coherent view of the state as a specialized, differentiated community within human society.
Nationalism recognizes that people seek their identities in communities, which make claims on their loyalties and demands personal sacrifice for their collective well-being. Christian nationalism fails because it unduly applies biblical promises intended for the body of Christ as a whole to one geographic people, it imperfectly identifies and applies norms from and for a specific period of time, it gives homage to a nation instead of God, and it sees the nation as unlimited.
A Biblical Understanding of Politics
What Koyzis is able to do exceptionally well is frame the story of each ideology. And while he makes generalizations (”Many conservatives dislike pop or rock music and prefer, say, the baroque pieces of Bach or Telemann.”) – I can understand in most instances how it is necessary for his work. The book actually claims that there is overlap between the different ideologies.
Democratism, socialism, and a look at pluralism are also included. All are idolatrous and fail to live up to God’s standard. Koyzis presents us with an alternative ideology, arguing for a biblical understanding of politics – which looks at creational and redemptive aspects. He proposes a government that seeks to do justice but also one that calls on and empowers individuals to seek it out in all spheres of life – including “families, churches, businesses, labor unions, schools, and so forth.”
In a Concluding Ecclesiological Postscript, Koyzis surprisingly looks to the power of preaching and the pulpit to communicate truth to God’s people who will live out Gospel justice and truth in their communities. The church as an institution can also address political governments and policies while still being proper and ultimately focused on God’s people. As politics continues to play an important and powerful part in our society, God’s people can be sure that we are governed ultimately by God’s Word as we live out lives of true and authentic worship.
I received a media copy of Political Visions & Illusions and this is my honest review.
Read
July 3, 2025Read for class but will be returning to this book!! I was very challenged and convicted by his critiques of different political ideologies while growing so much in my understanding of them. I was really excited to read his “so what now?” Chapters but was disappointed with his lack of a clear way forward because he stayed in analyzing mode the entire time.
December 28, 2020
This is a high-quality primer on the various ideologies that are dominating today's scene. Koyzis does a good job of showing how various ideologies tell a reductionistic story of redemption and how the gospel is a better story.
March 18, 2024
I enjoyed this book more than I expected to. The author does a good job of identifying the idolatrous nature of contemporary ideologies while also encouraging Christians to recognize the appealing good in each of them. I’m not sure he does enough to propose a distinctly Christian political theory, and there is much more to be said about how churches handle political issues.
August 5, 2025
Some interesting insights; some valid critiques. Written from a very specific point of view and therefore not particularly relatable for anyone outside that perspective. Kind of wish I’d read it quicker (started in 2018, finished in 2025), but I also doubt it would have made much difference when I read it, in relation to its potential impact.
April 3, 2022
2022 reads: 09
Rating: 4 stars.
A very good survey and introduction to political thought.
Rating: 4 stars.
A very good survey and introduction to political thought.
June 29, 2024
Ngl, he lost me at times especially in the last few chapters. But stellar in defining, critiquing, evaluating liberalism, conservatism, socialism, etc etc from a Christian perspective.
I understand why so many have said that every Christian in America needs to read this.
I understand why so many have said that every Christian in America needs to read this.
July 14, 2025
In "Political Visions & Illusions", David Koyzis examines prevailing ideologies of the modern worldwide political sphere, and how Christians should interact with it. The first six chapters of this book examine liberalism, conservatism, nationalism, democratism, and socialism. The author explores the history of each ideology, and how it has morphed into its latest strain. All ideologies flow from a gnostic, simplistic, idolatrous worldview that ascribes ultimate evil to something in creation and in response, seeks for salvation amidst creation as well. The author defines this as "ontological ultimacy" ascribed to something that can only be ascribed to God himself. Koyzis asks and answers a few questions each chapter:
What is the ideology's creational basis? (What has the ideology rightly focused on?)
What does the ideology see as a source of evil?
Where does the ideology place its salvation? And what redemptive story does it tell?
What inconsistencies have led to inward turmoil within the ideology?
Building on the groundwork of the first 6 chapters, Koyzis moves onto an answer, or what is supposed to be one. He spends 3 chapters transcending the ideologies towards a nonideological Christian approach. In doing so he asks what role the true redemption story plays and how creation order is involved. Pluralism, or rather pluriformity, adds another curveball; where are the actual lines of structural diversity drawn? How are the spheres of our lives (Family, Work, Economy, State, Church, Unions, Orchestras, Rec Soccer Leagues) defined? What does a hierarchy of these spheres look like? And what role does that state play in all of this? Where does the church interact?
The books answer to ideological idolatry is not really an "answer", which is understandable. Almost any simplified "Do This!" directive would most certainly be biased and likely point the reader back toward one of the ideologies. So while the last three chapters are rather underwhelming in that sense, I think they will live rent-free in my brain for months to come as I continue to digest them.
This book will challenge you to consider how your faith relates and informs your political interaction. I finished reading with a much broader understanding of my own country's politics, and the strains of ideology that intermingle within the political parties of my home. It will probably make your vote next election a more difficult decision, which I think the author would say that is a good thing. The author's longstanding position in academia shines through in the near exhaustive historical journey of nearly every idea introduced, which is fascinating, but takes a lot of time to wade through. All in all, this is the best book, article, sermon, or other form of writing I have engaged with in the Christian realm on how to interact with politics, government and the state. If you are going to read it, make sure to get the 2019 updated version.
What is the ideology's creational basis? (What has the ideology rightly focused on?)
What does the ideology see as a source of evil?
Where does the ideology place its salvation? And what redemptive story does it tell?
What inconsistencies have led to inward turmoil within the ideology?
Building on the groundwork of the first 6 chapters, Koyzis moves onto an answer, or what is supposed to be one. He spends 3 chapters transcending the ideologies towards a nonideological Christian approach. In doing so he asks what role the true redemption story plays and how creation order is involved. Pluralism, or rather pluriformity, adds another curveball; where are the actual lines of structural diversity drawn? How are the spheres of our lives (Family, Work, Economy, State, Church, Unions, Orchestras, Rec Soccer Leagues) defined? What does a hierarchy of these spheres look like? And what role does that state play in all of this? Where does the church interact?
The books answer to ideological idolatry is not really an "answer", which is understandable. Almost any simplified "Do This!" directive would most certainly be biased and likely point the reader back toward one of the ideologies. So while the last three chapters are rather underwhelming in that sense, I think they will live rent-free in my brain for months to come as I continue to digest them.
This book will challenge you to consider how your faith relates and informs your political interaction. I finished reading with a much broader understanding of my own country's politics, and the strains of ideology that intermingle within the political parties of my home. It will probably make your vote next election a more difficult decision, which I think the author would say that is a good thing. The author's longstanding position in academia shines through in the near exhaustive historical journey of nearly every idea introduced, which is fascinating, but takes a lot of time to wade through. All in all, this is the best book, article, sermon, or other form of writing I have engaged with in the Christian realm on how to interact with politics, government and the state. If you are going to read it, make sure to get the 2019 updated version.
November 2, 2020
Video Review: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nJ3gO...
Really excellent survey, overview, exploration and critique of the major political ideologies of our day. Each chapter gives balanced, well-researched and compelling insights into what is both correct and lacking in the major political streams of thought: liberalism, conservatism, nationalism, democracy and socialism. Every chapter is worth reading, but I particularly found the discussions of 'conservatism' and 'socialism' helpful. Koyzis also brings a remarkably-global perspective. The politics of the US are discussed, but never truly 'centered.' I very much appreciated his fluency in other world governments, and his ability to critique a wide variety of approaches.
Koyzis also provides a few closing chapters, drawing together the surveys outlined earlier, and provides a very lucid presentation of what he sees as the two most plausible, explicitly-Christian political theories: the Catholic doctrine of 'subsidiarity' and the Reformed (Kuyperian) notion of 'spheres of sovereignty.' Both are given fair argument and defense, though Koyzis himself prefers the Reformed approach. This section is, just like the earlier chapters, masterful, clear, extremely well-researched, and insightful. I will be returning to this section over and over again!
Finally, I read the second edition, which includes a short 'postscript' with some thoughts for ministers and church leaders as it relates to handling political issues in ministry. This addition is also extremely helpful as a directive to point to the deeper idolatries/ideologies in culture, rather than focusing on the surface-level policies. It's challenging stuff, but I loved the deep thinking Koyzis brings. I would put this on the level of must-read for pastors and denominational leaders today, especially in the midst of such mass political illiteracy in the church and dramatic political upheaval that we find ourselves in.
Really excellent survey, overview, exploration and critique of the major political ideologies of our day. Each chapter gives balanced, well-researched and compelling insights into what is both correct and lacking in the major political streams of thought: liberalism, conservatism, nationalism, democracy and socialism. Every chapter is worth reading, but I particularly found the discussions of 'conservatism' and 'socialism' helpful. Koyzis also brings a remarkably-global perspective. The politics of the US are discussed, but never truly 'centered.' I very much appreciated his fluency in other world governments, and his ability to critique a wide variety of approaches.
Koyzis also provides a few closing chapters, drawing together the surveys outlined earlier, and provides a very lucid presentation of what he sees as the two most plausible, explicitly-Christian political theories: the Catholic doctrine of 'subsidiarity' and the Reformed (Kuyperian) notion of 'spheres of sovereignty.' Both are given fair argument and defense, though Koyzis himself prefers the Reformed approach. This section is, just like the earlier chapters, masterful, clear, extremely well-researched, and insightful. I will be returning to this section over and over again!
Finally, I read the second edition, which includes a short 'postscript' with some thoughts for ministers and church leaders as it relates to handling political issues in ministry. This addition is also extremely helpful as a directive to point to the deeper idolatries/ideologies in culture, rather than focusing on the surface-level policies. It's challenging stuff, but I loved the deep thinking Koyzis brings. I would put this on the level of must-read for pastors and denominational leaders today, especially in the midst of such mass political illiteracy in the church and dramatic political upheaval that we find ourselves in.
May 19, 2021
My, this book was not for the faint of heart. I read it upon the recommendation of Tim Keller on his Twitter feed in response to the political upheaval of the past year. The book walks through common ideologies -- nationalism, socialism, etc. -- explaining how each ideology falls short of the gospel message and cannot be followed by anyone who claims to follow Christ. I appreciate that he set up the book to be about this broadly speaking but did not bring the message full circle until the very end of each chapter and ultimately the end of the book. He explained each ideology through the best possible view but then deconstructed why each fails overall because it does not align with the gospel. I also appreciate that he takes a historical lens of how Roman Catholicism and Calvinism both approach the church and state dilemma. He ends the book by discussing the idea of justice from an eschatological lens -- again, a sensible way to wrap up the book in my view.
I rate it probably a 3.5, mostly because it's not an easily digestible book, and he writes in overly long sentences, making the problem worse.
Any Christian who is a fan of political theory and likes philosophy will probably find this book thought-provoking.
I rate it probably a 3.5, mostly because it's not an easily digestible book, and he writes in overly long sentences, making the problem worse.
Any Christian who is a fan of political theory and likes philosophy will probably find this book thought-provoking.
September 26, 2022
I don’t blame you if it’s the last thing you want to be reading these days, but I recently finished Political Visions & Illusions: A Survey & Christian Critique of Contemporary Ideologies by David Koyzis. The author, who taught political science at Redeemer University College in Ontario for many years, cuts through the noise to assess five prevailing isms: liberalism, conservatism, nationalism, democratism, and socialism.
Core to his argument is the conviction that while each of these ideologies contains elements of truth, at the center of each is a “religious” story that ultimately constitutes idolatry. It’s a radical argument to make, but I’m (mostly) persuaded, even if I find some of the ideologies to be more compatible with my faith than others. In the latter chapters of the book, Koyzis points to some political alternatives (not ideologies as such) that I find especially compelling.
Give yourself permission not to read it right now. But given the state of our union, I think you’ll find this book to be helpful – and hopeful – if and when you do make time for it.
Core to his argument is the conviction that while each of these ideologies contains elements of truth, at the center of each is a “religious” story that ultimately constitutes idolatry. It’s a radical argument to make, but I’m (mostly) persuaded, even if I find some of the ideologies to be more compatible with my faith than others. In the latter chapters of the book, Koyzis points to some political alternatives (not ideologies as such) that I find especially compelling.
Give yourself permission not to read it right now. But given the state of our union, I think you’ll find this book to be helpful – and hopeful – if and when you do make time for it.
October 27, 2020
If I were asked to recommend a book on political theology, and I could only recommend one, it would be this one. It’s a great introduction yet it avoids being shallow or conclusory. One of the main features that sets this book apart is its breakdown of the many political philosophies from a biblical perspective, without resorting to caricatures or straw men. Koyzis persuasively shows that each of the current political ideologies are defective (some more than others) and that a Christian must look elsewhere in searching for a system to ground his political thought. For all of these systems locate their ultimate authority in something other than God. “Christians understand that God is God and that individuals, nations, states, economic classes, and so forth are radically dependent on him for their very existence. They are creatures and he is Creator.” This must have an impact on politics.
For Koyzis, Abraham Kuyper’s sphere sovereignty/neo-Calvinism is the best articulation or a Christian political philosophy (he also points to the Roman Catholic doctrine of subsidiarity as another option that recognizes the sovereignty of God ). This book does not provide a comprehensive discussion of Kuyper’s political philosophy and it leaves several questions left unanswered, but it does a great job of laying the groundwork.
After analyzing the various ideologies, Koyzis develops the case for a uniquely Christian view of the state, one that “transcends the ideologies”. He does this first by stating the need for Christians to address themselves to the public square. “God created humankind is his one image (Gen. 1:26-27)...Humans are cultural beings who, in the normal course of living, cultivate or develop the world around them.” We have been given a cultural mandate, to fill the earth and subdue it (Gen. 1:28). Although we are fallen and sinful, Jesus came to redeem us from sin and death, and in so doing He redeems “the whole range of human cultural activities”, including political life. Though some call for Christians to separate from the world and politics, or for treating the two as separate kingdoms, in doing so “they effectively narrow the scope of redemption and fundamentally alter its relationship to both sin and creation.” And besides, it is an impossible task—“[w]e are inescapably part of creation” and we “continue to shape culture, even when [we] have supposedly withdrawn from it.”
Next, he addresses common objections and the problem of pluralism. He shows the necessity of understanding God and his will for the world prior to effecting political change. Scripture is a vital part of this task of understanding our world and man’s place in it. “[W]hen God tells us that we are to do justice, and to love kindness, and to walk humbly with [our] God’ (Mic. 6:8), he is asking us to live as we are created to live.” How then should we love politically? To begin with, [a nonidolatrous approach to society and politics] properly and unquestionably acknowledges the sovereignty of God over the whole of life and his plan for redeeming his fallen creation through Jesus Christ.” But, some say, not everyone believes in God as Christians do. That is true. “This suggests that the one nonidolatrous alternative left is a kind of pluralism that spurns the reductive monism of the idoleogies. Indeed, if God is sovereign, then any attempt to locate an earthly sovereignty...is rooted in nothing less than a false religion.” Here we see the religious nature of liberalism and secularism, which Koyzis has unmasked earlier in the book.
The difficulty for Christians is to develop a consistent system that balances the need for freedom of conscience and religious liberty, while also maintaining that God is sovereign over all of life, even politics. On this topic, Koyzis does not say all there is to be said, but he does make a start. He provides the Christian with the necessary framework by giving several helpful distinctions. First, he notes that “[t]his is a question of justice—not of final justice, to be sure, but of penultimate justice well short of what God will accomplish on the last day. Such penultimate justice means that even if we disagree with others on basic issues concerning the nature of the world, our place within it, and our responsibility to God and to others, we are obligated to protect their freedom to believe and, to a large extent, to live out their beliefs in their daily lives.” This is not motivated by “indifference or skepticism toward our own ultimate beliefs but out of a recognition that in the present age, in [Lesslie] Newbegin’s words, God wills to provide a space and time for people freely to give their allegiance to his kingdom. The state this refrains from prematurely foreclosing on this divinely permitted freedom. This implies tolerance of religious diversity between the times.”
Second, he clarifies that such religious tolerance is “limited.” Meaning, no human sacrifices. But more particularly, this limitation recognizes that though “directional diversity” (spiritual pluralism) is important “it does not mean that all battles come to an end; it does mean that such battles are waged peacefully through proper, constitutionally based procedures.” So, for instance, the issue of abortion is not dissolved because of pluralism. The Christian has warrant to fight for truth and for justice as he knows it, even though the spirit of the age says that his biblical beliefs should not be forced on to others who do not hold to Christian teachings.
Third, tolerance is not only limited but “it must also be understood to be a normed tolerance governed by principles appropriate to specific communal context.” So the state rightly allows for religious diversity but the institutional church does not. Tolerance must be understood in context, and not subjected to a general rule applicable across the board.”
After discussing what may be called principled pluralism, Koyzis moves on the heart of the “nonideological alternative”. He first discusses the Roman Catholic approach and then contrasts it with the Reformed view developed by John Calvin and Johannes Althusius, which saw the state not as underneath the church but as separate from the church while still being directly under God. Kuyper’s political ideas spring from the Reformed view of the state, but he made several important contributions to Reformed political thought, three of which are primary: (1) his view of antithesis, (2) his view of common grace, and (3) the doctrine of sphere sovereignty or differentiated responsibility. On this third point, Koyzis summarizes its most important implications: “that (1) ultimate sovereignty belongs to God alone, (2) all earthly sovereignties are subsidiary to God’s sovereignty, and (3) there is no penultimate locus of sovereignty in this world from which others are derivative.” This means that society is, by God’s design, “pluriform and consists of a variety of responsible agents, both communal and individual, whose legitimate range of activity is rooted immediately in God’s sovereignty and which exist within normative limits he has placed on them.”
This also means that the state is delegated authority directly by God and that its task is limited by God. Koyzis spends time arguing for the proper role of the state, which is “to protect the differentiated responsibilities of the various spheres of society, including individuals and communities.” He also qualifies true justice, biblical justice, from the justice that is sought by the other various ideologies. “People seek justice as they understand it.” Once again, we are faced with the impossibility of neutrality. Secularism and unbounded (or misunderstood) religious freedom does not avoid this issue, they merely resolve the dilemma in a way that fails to account for the world in which we live.
Spread throughout the book are several gems that make the book even more interesting, including:
1. Why are Democrats called “liberals” when their policies generally restrict individual freedom?
2. What’s the common tie between classical liberals and modern day liberals?
3. What constitutes a political community? What are its distinctive features and what are it’s boundaries?
4. What role should patriotism play in society?
5. How should we think about the market and the division of labor in society? What are the sources of economic collectivism?
6. What role should the doctrine of popular sovereignty play in government?
7. Does the representative of the people act as a designated head-counter/poller of the popular opinion among his constituents? Does he act as a trustee of the public interest? Or a bearer of principle?
I highly recommend this book to anyone interested in a distinctly Christian approach to politics, and to anyone desiring to bring their Christian beliefs to bear on politics.
For Koyzis, Abraham Kuyper’s sphere sovereignty/neo-Calvinism is the best articulation or a Christian political philosophy (he also points to the Roman Catholic doctrine of subsidiarity as another option that recognizes the sovereignty of God ). This book does not provide a comprehensive discussion of Kuyper’s political philosophy and it leaves several questions left unanswered, but it does a great job of laying the groundwork.
After analyzing the various ideologies, Koyzis develops the case for a uniquely Christian view of the state, one that “transcends the ideologies”. He does this first by stating the need for Christians to address themselves to the public square. “God created humankind is his one image (Gen. 1:26-27)...Humans are cultural beings who, in the normal course of living, cultivate or develop the world around them.” We have been given a cultural mandate, to fill the earth and subdue it (Gen. 1:28). Although we are fallen and sinful, Jesus came to redeem us from sin and death, and in so doing He redeems “the whole range of human cultural activities”, including political life. Though some call for Christians to separate from the world and politics, or for treating the two as separate kingdoms, in doing so “they effectively narrow the scope of redemption and fundamentally alter its relationship to both sin and creation.” And besides, it is an impossible task—“[w]e are inescapably part of creation” and we “continue to shape culture, even when [we] have supposedly withdrawn from it.”
Next, he addresses common objections and the problem of pluralism. He shows the necessity of understanding God and his will for the world prior to effecting political change. Scripture is a vital part of this task of understanding our world and man’s place in it. “[W]hen God tells us that we are to do justice, and to love kindness, and to walk humbly with [our] God’ (Mic. 6:8), he is asking us to live as we are created to live.” How then should we love politically? To begin with, [a nonidolatrous approach to society and politics] properly and unquestionably acknowledges the sovereignty of God over the whole of life and his plan for redeeming his fallen creation through Jesus Christ.” But, some say, not everyone believes in God as Christians do. That is true. “This suggests that the one nonidolatrous alternative left is a kind of pluralism that spurns the reductive monism of the idoleogies. Indeed, if God is sovereign, then any attempt to locate an earthly sovereignty...is rooted in nothing less than a false religion.” Here we see the religious nature of liberalism and secularism, which Koyzis has unmasked earlier in the book.
The difficulty for Christians is to develop a consistent system that balances the need for freedom of conscience and religious liberty, while also maintaining that God is sovereign over all of life, even politics. On this topic, Koyzis does not say all there is to be said, but he does make a start. He provides the Christian with the necessary framework by giving several helpful distinctions. First, he notes that “[t]his is a question of justice—not of final justice, to be sure, but of penultimate justice well short of what God will accomplish on the last day. Such penultimate justice means that even if we disagree with others on basic issues concerning the nature of the world, our place within it, and our responsibility to God and to others, we are obligated to protect their freedom to believe and, to a large extent, to live out their beliefs in their daily lives.” This is not motivated by “indifference or skepticism toward our own ultimate beliefs but out of a recognition that in the present age, in [Lesslie] Newbegin’s words, God wills to provide a space and time for people freely to give their allegiance to his kingdom. The state this refrains from prematurely foreclosing on this divinely permitted freedom. This implies tolerance of religious diversity between the times.”
Second, he clarifies that such religious tolerance is “limited.” Meaning, no human sacrifices. But more particularly, this limitation recognizes that though “directional diversity” (spiritual pluralism) is important “it does not mean that all battles come to an end; it does mean that such battles are waged peacefully through proper, constitutionally based procedures.” So, for instance, the issue of abortion is not dissolved because of pluralism. The Christian has warrant to fight for truth and for justice as he knows it, even though the spirit of the age says that his biblical beliefs should not be forced on to others who do not hold to Christian teachings.
Third, tolerance is not only limited but “it must also be understood to be a normed tolerance governed by principles appropriate to specific communal context.” So the state rightly allows for religious diversity but the institutional church does not. Tolerance must be understood in context, and not subjected to a general rule applicable across the board.”
After discussing what may be called principled pluralism, Koyzis moves on the heart of the “nonideological alternative”. He first discusses the Roman Catholic approach and then contrasts it with the Reformed view developed by John Calvin and Johannes Althusius, which saw the state not as underneath the church but as separate from the church while still being directly under God. Kuyper’s political ideas spring from the Reformed view of the state, but he made several important contributions to Reformed political thought, three of which are primary: (1) his view of antithesis, (2) his view of common grace, and (3) the doctrine of sphere sovereignty or differentiated responsibility. On this third point, Koyzis summarizes its most important implications: “that (1) ultimate sovereignty belongs to God alone, (2) all earthly sovereignties are subsidiary to God’s sovereignty, and (3) there is no penultimate locus of sovereignty in this world from which others are derivative.” This means that society is, by God’s design, “pluriform and consists of a variety of responsible agents, both communal and individual, whose legitimate range of activity is rooted immediately in God’s sovereignty and which exist within normative limits he has placed on them.”
This also means that the state is delegated authority directly by God and that its task is limited by God. Koyzis spends time arguing for the proper role of the state, which is “to protect the differentiated responsibilities of the various spheres of society, including individuals and communities.” He also qualifies true justice, biblical justice, from the justice that is sought by the other various ideologies. “People seek justice as they understand it.” Once again, we are faced with the impossibility of neutrality. Secularism and unbounded (or misunderstood) religious freedom does not avoid this issue, they merely resolve the dilemma in a way that fails to account for the world in which we live.
Spread throughout the book are several gems that make the book even more interesting, including:
1. Why are Democrats called “liberals” when their policies generally restrict individual freedom?
2. What’s the common tie between classical liberals and modern day liberals?
3. What constitutes a political community? What are its distinctive features and what are it’s boundaries?
4. What role should patriotism play in society?
5. How should we think about the market and the division of labor in society? What are the sources of economic collectivism?
6. What role should the doctrine of popular sovereignty play in government?
7. Does the representative of the people act as a designated head-counter/poller of the popular opinion among his constituents? Does he act as a trustee of the public interest? Or a bearer of principle?
I highly recommend this book to anyone interested in a distinctly Christian approach to politics, and to anyone desiring to bring their Christian beliefs to bear on politics.
October 18, 2020
This book offers what I believe to be the most pointed and insightful approach to politics of any Christian author I have read. Koyzis’ overall thesis is that every political ideology is inherently idolatrous. However, rather than treat this as an invitation to remove oneself from politics, he argues instead for a moderate approach built around discernment.
Throughout the majority of the book, Koyzis addresses various ideologies, identifies the redemptive narratives they tell, and shows us in what ways they are misaligned. He does a particularly good job getting under the surface and discovering the implicit story of each ideology. And while each ideology grows out of sense of need, and offers needed reminders to the church about what needs to be addressed, it also unduly lifts up a piece of God’s good creation as an idol, and produces excesses that can endanger the testimony of the faithful. Two particular stand-outs include nationalism (a much better fit for the Bible Belt in the Trump era than conservatism) and democratism (being a social studies teacher, we tend to have a semi-religious awe reserved for the institutions of our government).
Koyzis’ exploration of a Christian alternative is no less intriguing, if a bit denser. The heart of his argument against the various ideologies is that they fail to account for the diversity formed by different historical and cultural contexts. He makes the point that, good, bad, or neutral, diversity is a fact of life that we must account for. And even if a particular system claims to welcome diversity (liberalism comes to mind) it tends to act more monolithically in practice, creating structures that privilege those who buy into its redemptive narrative. Near the end of the book, Koyzis proposes a Kuyperian political philosophy of separate spheres of sovereignty. Essentially, we are all a part of various interconnected, and at times competing, institutions that hold some degree of authority over us, even if all of them ultimately fall under the sovereignty of God.
While Koyzis’ conclusions are ingenious from a philosophical perspective, if you want a book that will actually help you make this a lived reality, this is not the book for you. The postscript to the second edition addresses this shortcoming some, but only in the most basic of ways. And for this book, I believe the absence is intentional. Koyzis rightly makes the point that navigating political realities as people of faith is complex. He also implies that different times call for different methods of engagement on behalf of the church. He would rather build up the bones of the church’s belief about politics. Any book that addresses the cultural moment has an expiration date as the moment will eventually transition on to something new. This is still a helpful book in the sense that it helps reorient your thinking, but you’ll need to find a follow-up to get more practical ideas.
Throughout the majority of the book, Koyzis addresses various ideologies, identifies the redemptive narratives they tell, and shows us in what ways they are misaligned. He does a particularly good job getting under the surface and discovering the implicit story of each ideology. And while each ideology grows out of sense of need, and offers needed reminders to the church about what needs to be addressed, it also unduly lifts up a piece of God’s good creation as an idol, and produces excesses that can endanger the testimony of the faithful. Two particular stand-outs include nationalism (a much better fit for the Bible Belt in the Trump era than conservatism) and democratism (being a social studies teacher, we tend to have a semi-religious awe reserved for the institutions of our government).
Koyzis’ exploration of a Christian alternative is no less intriguing, if a bit denser. The heart of his argument against the various ideologies is that they fail to account for the diversity formed by different historical and cultural contexts. He makes the point that, good, bad, or neutral, diversity is a fact of life that we must account for. And even if a particular system claims to welcome diversity (liberalism comes to mind) it tends to act more monolithically in practice, creating structures that privilege those who buy into its redemptive narrative. Near the end of the book, Koyzis proposes a Kuyperian political philosophy of separate spheres of sovereignty. Essentially, we are all a part of various interconnected, and at times competing, institutions that hold some degree of authority over us, even if all of them ultimately fall under the sovereignty of God.
While Koyzis’ conclusions are ingenious from a philosophical perspective, if you want a book that will actually help you make this a lived reality, this is not the book for you. The postscript to the second edition addresses this shortcoming some, but only in the most basic of ways. And for this book, I believe the absence is intentional. Koyzis rightly makes the point that navigating political realities as people of faith is complex. He also implies that different times call for different methods of engagement on behalf of the church. He would rather build up the bones of the church’s belief about politics. Any book that addresses the cultural moment has an expiration date as the moment will eventually transition on to something new. This is still a helpful book in the sense that it helps reorient your thinking, but you’ll need to find a follow-up to get more practical ideas.
April 8, 2023
A balanced political book looking at different ideologies from a Christian perspective. I was pleasantly surprised by the level of balanced demonstrated by the book in the assessment of the different ideologies. The only real critique in it is the focus on a sort of post-ideology framework rather than focusing on the pluralism that it mentioned in one of the chapters. Also, many people (myself included) and political parties themselves are influenced by multiple different ideologies. Whilst it is correct that there are conflicts between different ideologies, many of these conflicts are exaggerated. I am influenced by liberalism, socialism and Conservativism to an extent, as are many people in Britain.
But overall an interesting book to consider reading for a Christian perspective of political ideologies.
But overall an interesting book to consider reading for a Christian perspective of political ideologies.
Read
April 28, 2025The premise of this book is that every political worldview and ideology is ultimately idolatrous and cannot fulfill its promises. People identify certain problems with the world, choose the perceived best political solution to that problem, and put their hope in state power (or lack thereof) to solve that problem. However, in all of human history, a problem-less society has yet to be achieved - why? Because all of these political ideologies fall short.
So what is the solution? It is not to divorce yourself from the world and its political systems, but rather as a Christian to put your hope in the fact that Christ is on the throne, and be immersed in Christian living and thought so as to contribute more fully to this broken world. Take hope! (And stop idolizing politicians and ideas while you’re at it)
So what is the solution? It is not to divorce yourself from the world and its political systems, but rather as a Christian to put your hope in the fact that Christ is on the throne, and be immersed in Christian living and thought so as to contribute more fully to this broken world. Take hope! (And stop idolizing politicians and ideas while you’re at it)
March 7, 2018
MUITO bom! Texto bem cientifico/Academico e com uma otimá analise critica bíblica.
September 20, 2020
Eye opening. Brilliant.
November 1, 2020
An excellent survey of the current political ideologies, through a biblical lens, with care to identify their idols and their strengths.
August 15, 2022
An excellent primer that lays the foundation for a Christian political theory and public theology.
Koyzis’ critiques of various political theories are helpful, though it often feels like he only scratches the surface in fleshing out certain parts of his arguments.
Particularly wonderful things about this book include 1) an explanation of liberalism and its dominance in both extremes of the American political divide (this might not mean what you think it means as conservatism is not his proposed alternative), 2) a steady global perspective throughout, 3) a framework that understands political philosophies as spiritual, 4) a nuanced warning on the dangers of “democratism” and 5) the wealth of resources referenced in the footnotes and bibliography.
Koyzis dedicates the last third of the book to the task of laying out Christian alternatives to the ideologies. He introduces concepts like subsidiarity in Roman Catholic thought and sphere sovereignty in Reformed Protestant thought as well as thinkers like Abraham Kuyper and Herman Dooyeweerd. He ends with a chapter about ecclesiology and politics that gives some principles for how the church should and shouldn’t address political issues.
Like the chapters critiquing liberalism, conservatism, nationalism, democratism and socialism, it provides a great starting point for thinking about important issues, though it will disappoint those looking for a detailed political approach.
Koyzis’ critiques of various political theories are helpful, though it often feels like he only scratches the surface in fleshing out certain parts of his arguments.
Particularly wonderful things about this book include 1) an explanation of liberalism and its dominance in both extremes of the American political divide (this might not mean what you think it means as conservatism is not his proposed alternative), 2) a steady global perspective throughout, 3) a framework that understands political philosophies as spiritual, 4) a nuanced warning on the dangers of “democratism” and 5) the wealth of resources referenced in the footnotes and bibliography.
Koyzis dedicates the last third of the book to the task of laying out Christian alternatives to the ideologies. He introduces concepts like subsidiarity in Roman Catholic thought and sphere sovereignty in Reformed Protestant thought as well as thinkers like Abraham Kuyper and Herman Dooyeweerd. He ends with a chapter about ecclesiology and politics that gives some principles for how the church should and shouldn’t address political issues.
Like the chapters critiquing liberalism, conservatism, nationalism, democratism and socialism, it provides a great starting point for thinking about important issues, though it will disappoint those looking for a detailed political approach.
September 25, 2019
O tema das ideologias políticas é de extrema importância na contemporaneidade, por pelo menos duas razões. A primeira tem a ver com a profunda polarização, agravada pela facilitação do acesso à informação e à comunicação, principalmente por conta das redes sociais. A segunda razão decorre da dificuldade de definir uma palavra tão pequena, mas tão (mal) utilizada quanto a ideologia. Por isso, devemos dar boas vindas às tentativas de esclarecer esse conceito.
Nisto reside o mérito de David Koyzis em Visões & Ilusões Políticas. Seu ponto de partida é a recuperação da categoria de “idolatria” para entender o fenômeno da ideologia. Mais especificamente, a dinâmica das ideologias consiste, tal como a idolatria, em tomar um elemento da criação de Deus e colocá-lo acima de qualquer outra coisa, como critério último de compreensão da realidade e de ação nesta realidade. Dentro da coerência mútua da criação de Deus, esse elemento é bom. No entanto, tendo passado pelo processo de ressignificação ideológico, assume o aspecto de um ídolo, com todas as consequências destrutivas para o indivíduo e para a sociedade. Na maior parte do livro, Koyzis dedica-se a analisar as principais ideologias contemporâneas – liberalismo, conservadorismo, nacionalismo, democracia e socialismo – utilizando-se dessas ferramentas teórico-conceituais. Em sua crítica às ideologias de hoje, ele sempre busca identificar seus elementos de verdade, suas incoerências internas, a fonte do mal e a fonte da salvação para cada uma delas, e, por fim, como o Estado deve proceder diante de tudo isso.
Após formular sua crítica, Koyzis passa a propor uma forma de enxergar a política e o papel do Estado não ideológica e eminentemente bíblica. Fiando-se na teoria social neocalvinista, que tem em Abraham Kuyper e seu princípio da soberania das esferas sua pedra angular, o autor analisa de que modo a cosmovisão cristã enxerga a realidade plural em que vivemos, esclarece os tipos de pluralismo da sociedade contemporânea, descreve a proposta kuyperiana de compreensão das responsabilidades diferenciadas das instituições e a aplica à identificação da missão interna do Estado com a promoção da justiça. Esta propõe que a cada instituição que compõe o tecido social da civilização – a escola, o hospital, a família, a igreja, as associações voluntárias, a empresa, o sindicato – deve ser protegida na sua tentativa de levar a cabo sua vocação dada por Deus.
É um livro brilhante. Escrito com muita leveza, mas com precisão acadêmica, a análise que ele faz das ideologias e das suas tensões internas é bastante perspicaz. O livro é recheado de exemplos, tanto hipotéticos quanto históricos, o que torna a compreensão muito mais descomplicada. E a sua proposta final, de uma teoria política cristã bíblica, é tão bem estruturada, conjugando base bíblica com esforço teórico rigoroso, que a sensação, ao término do livro, é de que realmente estamos preparados para entender e debater minimamente a respeito desses tópicos. Uma das coisas que mais me chamaram a atenção é a coragem de utilizar uma categoria bíblica fundamental – a de idolatria – para estudar um fenômeno que, na mente dos reducionistas, sejam eles cristãos ou ateus, deveria ser estudado de um ponto de vista “neutro”. O trabalho de David Koyzis é fundamental para munir aqueles que desejam desenvolver uma cosmovisão bíblica com boas ferramentas especificamente cristãs, sem que seja necessário que nos valhamos de filosofias políticas pagãs e seculares.
Uma ressalva importante: a fluidez da escrita de Koyzis é outra forma de dizer que o argumento de cada capítulo não segue uma lógica bem definida. Isso é algo que ele deixa claro na introdução do livro, e o leitor não será pego de surpresa. Mas é importante saber que é necessário fazer um esforço de cavar em meio às suas críticas às ideologias contemporâneas pelas respostas às seis perguntas que norteiam sua análise, listadas na introdução. Esse trabalho, contudo, é extremamente recompensador. Visões & Ilusões Políticas é um sério candidato a ser o manual básico em português para os cristãos que desejam se aprofundar no assunto, que, a bem da verdade, considerando o contexto em que vivemos, deveriam ser em maior quantidade que temos hoje.
Nisto reside o mérito de David Koyzis em Visões & Ilusões Políticas. Seu ponto de partida é a recuperação da categoria de “idolatria” para entender o fenômeno da ideologia. Mais especificamente, a dinâmica das ideologias consiste, tal como a idolatria, em tomar um elemento da criação de Deus e colocá-lo acima de qualquer outra coisa, como critério último de compreensão da realidade e de ação nesta realidade. Dentro da coerência mútua da criação de Deus, esse elemento é bom. No entanto, tendo passado pelo processo de ressignificação ideológico, assume o aspecto de um ídolo, com todas as consequências destrutivas para o indivíduo e para a sociedade. Na maior parte do livro, Koyzis dedica-se a analisar as principais ideologias contemporâneas – liberalismo, conservadorismo, nacionalismo, democracia e socialismo – utilizando-se dessas ferramentas teórico-conceituais. Em sua crítica às ideologias de hoje, ele sempre busca identificar seus elementos de verdade, suas incoerências internas, a fonte do mal e a fonte da salvação para cada uma delas, e, por fim, como o Estado deve proceder diante de tudo isso.
Após formular sua crítica, Koyzis passa a propor uma forma de enxergar a política e o papel do Estado não ideológica e eminentemente bíblica. Fiando-se na teoria social neocalvinista, que tem em Abraham Kuyper e seu princípio da soberania das esferas sua pedra angular, o autor analisa de que modo a cosmovisão cristã enxerga a realidade plural em que vivemos, esclarece os tipos de pluralismo da sociedade contemporânea, descreve a proposta kuyperiana de compreensão das responsabilidades diferenciadas das instituições e a aplica à identificação da missão interna do Estado com a promoção da justiça. Esta propõe que a cada instituição que compõe o tecido social da civilização – a escola, o hospital, a família, a igreja, as associações voluntárias, a empresa, o sindicato – deve ser protegida na sua tentativa de levar a cabo sua vocação dada por Deus.
É um livro brilhante. Escrito com muita leveza, mas com precisão acadêmica, a análise que ele faz das ideologias e das suas tensões internas é bastante perspicaz. O livro é recheado de exemplos, tanto hipotéticos quanto históricos, o que torna a compreensão muito mais descomplicada. E a sua proposta final, de uma teoria política cristã bíblica, é tão bem estruturada, conjugando base bíblica com esforço teórico rigoroso, que a sensação, ao término do livro, é de que realmente estamos preparados para entender e debater minimamente a respeito desses tópicos. Uma das coisas que mais me chamaram a atenção é a coragem de utilizar uma categoria bíblica fundamental – a de idolatria – para estudar um fenômeno que, na mente dos reducionistas, sejam eles cristãos ou ateus, deveria ser estudado de um ponto de vista “neutro”. O trabalho de David Koyzis é fundamental para munir aqueles que desejam desenvolver uma cosmovisão bíblica com boas ferramentas especificamente cristãs, sem que seja necessário que nos valhamos de filosofias políticas pagãs e seculares.
Uma ressalva importante: a fluidez da escrita de Koyzis é outra forma de dizer que o argumento de cada capítulo não segue uma lógica bem definida. Isso é algo que ele deixa claro na introdução do livro, e o leitor não será pego de surpresa. Mas é importante saber que é necessário fazer um esforço de cavar em meio às suas críticas às ideologias contemporâneas pelas respostas às seis perguntas que norteiam sua análise, listadas na introdução. Esse trabalho, contudo, é extremamente recompensador. Visões & Ilusões Políticas é um sério candidato a ser o manual básico em português para os cristãos que desejam se aprofundar no assunto, que, a bem da verdade, considerando o contexto em que vivemos, deveriam ser em maior quantidade que temos hoje.
November 20, 2021
Would love to do a discussion group on this book with a mix of Republicans and Democrats. One of the few books I've read on politics and faith. It was dense in a good a way...showed how vastly complex and layered our political perspectives and traditions are. Yet made it accessible with seeing idealogical idolatries, making one thing ultimate, at the root of 5 major strands: Liberalism, Conservatism, Nationalism, Democratism, & Socialism. Van Til-like analysis. Especially appreciated the chapter on Convervatism. Made me understand a lot more why I lean this way:
"Conservatives are not ultimately united by their views on the role of government, the nature of community, or the status of the individual. They certainly have opinions on all these matters, but this is not what makes them conservative. What makes them conservative is their common attitude toward tradition and change in the context of the developing human community.10 More basically, conservatives have a heightened awareness of the fragility of human undertakings and the tendency of human beings to fall into evil and chaotic behavior." (p. 68).
"If reforms are to be attempted, they must be small in scale, incremental in pace, and firmly grounded in past experience. The conservative prefers to see people attempt to alleviate poverty in their own neighborhoods than to try to eliminate it nationwide. Because of its local nature, the former is a more realistic and manageable effort than the latter and is thus more likely to meet with success."
(p. 69).
"Conservatives are generally thought to be localists rather than globalists, patriotic rather than cosmopolitan, family- and village-oriented rather than state-oriented.."
“the capacity for loyalty is stretched too thin when it tries to attach itself to the hypothetical solidarity of the whole human race. It needs to attach itself to specific people and places, not to an abstract ideal of universal human rights. We love particular men and women, not humanity in general.”(p. 71)
The whole idea of locality and suspicion of rapid change is definitely where I was at but I never really thought of that as specifically conservative. Anyway, excellent book. Would love to read it again for a discussion group!
"Conservatives are not ultimately united by their views on the role of government, the nature of community, or the status of the individual. They certainly have opinions on all these matters, but this is not what makes them conservative. What makes them conservative is their common attitude toward tradition and change in the context of the developing human community.10 More basically, conservatives have a heightened awareness of the fragility of human undertakings and the tendency of human beings to fall into evil and chaotic behavior." (p. 68).
"If reforms are to be attempted, they must be small in scale, incremental in pace, and firmly grounded in past experience. The conservative prefers to see people attempt to alleviate poverty in their own neighborhoods than to try to eliminate it nationwide. Because of its local nature, the former is a more realistic and manageable effort than the latter and is thus more likely to meet with success."
(p. 69).
"Conservatives are generally thought to be localists rather than globalists, patriotic rather than cosmopolitan, family- and village-oriented rather than state-oriented.."
“the capacity for loyalty is stretched too thin when it tries to attach itself to the hypothetical solidarity of the whole human race. It needs to attach itself to specific people and places, not to an abstract ideal of universal human rights. We love particular men and women, not humanity in general.”(p. 71)
The whole idea of locality and suspicion of rapid change is definitely where I was at but I never really thought of that as specifically conservative. Anyway, excellent book. Would love to read it again for a discussion group!
July 11, 2021
Wow. This was marvelous. I need to write a longer summary to capture all of Koyzis' fantastic insights!
He begins by defining idolatry and gnosticism. All sub-Christian ideologies take something in creation and elevate it to the level of the Creator. As a result, offer an alternative to the biblical doctrine of humanity. As a result, they tell a different version of the "creation-fall-redemption-consummation story-- one in which both evil (sin) and salvation come from something within the creation itself.
Then he moves through five political ideologies and summarizes their "salvation story." Liberalism's ultimate good is the rights of the individual. Therefore, the essence of evil is oppression of the individual and salvation comes from political liberation. Since it absolutizes the individual, it will miss the importance of the community. Conservatism's ultimate good is tradition. Therefore, the essence of evil is radical human innovation, and salvation comes by returning to a time in a nation's past. Since it absolutizes the past, it will devolve into a mythology that does not take seriously the evils in every community's history. Nationalism's ultimate good is an ethnic or geo-political identity. Therefore the essence of evil is oppression from an outsider (nation or ethnic group). Since it absolutizes the nation, it is prone to devolve into racism or empirical tendencies. Democratism's ultimate good is the people. Therefore the essence of evil is the rule of the elite. Since it absolutizes the people, it devolves into the tyranny of the majority. Finally, socialism's ultimate good is economic equality. Therefore the essence of evil is inequality which comes from private property. Since it absolutizes equality, it moves toward totalitarian government.
Chapter 7 is a defense of political engagement as a consequence of the Christian doctrines of creation and cosmic redemption. This is probably the best concise articulation of these doctrines I have read: superb! Finally he looks at Catholic social teaching and Kuyperian sphere sovereignty (preferring the latter) as a framework for Christian political participation.
He begins by defining idolatry and gnosticism. All sub-Christian ideologies take something in creation and elevate it to the level of the Creator. As a result, offer an alternative to the biblical doctrine of humanity. As a result, they tell a different version of the "creation-fall-redemption-consummation story-- one in which both evil (sin) and salvation come from something within the creation itself.
Then he moves through five political ideologies and summarizes their "salvation story." Liberalism's ultimate good is the rights of the individual. Therefore, the essence of evil is oppression of the individual and salvation comes from political liberation. Since it absolutizes the individual, it will miss the importance of the community. Conservatism's ultimate good is tradition. Therefore, the essence of evil is radical human innovation, and salvation comes by returning to a time in a nation's past. Since it absolutizes the past, it will devolve into a mythology that does not take seriously the evils in every community's history. Nationalism's ultimate good is an ethnic or geo-political identity. Therefore the essence of evil is oppression from an outsider (nation or ethnic group). Since it absolutizes the nation, it is prone to devolve into racism or empirical tendencies. Democratism's ultimate good is the people. Therefore the essence of evil is the rule of the elite. Since it absolutizes the people, it devolves into the tyranny of the majority. Finally, socialism's ultimate good is economic equality. Therefore the essence of evil is inequality which comes from private property. Since it absolutizes equality, it moves toward totalitarian government.
Chapter 7 is a defense of political engagement as a consequence of the Christian doctrines of creation and cosmic redemption. This is probably the best concise articulation of these doctrines I have read: superb! Finally he looks at Catholic social teaching and Kuyperian sphere sovereignty (preferring the latter) as a framework for Christian political participation.
March 22, 2023
David T. Koyzis's is not a light read but an important read for Christians living in secularized and post-Christian world. There is a lot of historical, cultural, and political references that may be hard to pick up for someone who is new to political science and Christian cultural studies. At the same time, I think Christians need to be more versed in the discussion of politics, and I think Koyzis provides the necessary foundation for Christians trying to shift through various political ideologies that sometimes become more of an idol rather than a tool to bring shalom and practice biblical justice in our society.
One of the greatest contribution of this book, I would argue, is that this book clearly shows how the different political ideologies ultimately provide different metanarratives of creation, fall, redemption, and consummation that the biblical worldview is trying to provide. Koyzis is no fan of one ideology, and he shows where liberalism, conservatism, nationalism, democratism, and socialism all promise and fail to provide the true salvation that can only be found in Christ. Although these ideologies can provide some insights into where our systems have failed, the ultimate goals of these ideologies will run counter to what the biblical metanarrative looks like.
I also enjoyed his discussion of Abraham Kuyper as an example of how Christians can practice freedom in a pluralistic society, and the book calls for Christians to genuinely engage in various ideologies with a biblical mindset to create the shalom that God calls for in our society. The neo-Calvinistic backdrop of this book is evident, and I would recommend it to any supposed Christians of Reformed tradition to read through the book. Even for Christians of other traditions and various political leanings will have a lot to gain from reading this book as well. Solid work of Christian political science and cultural studies.
One of the greatest contribution of this book, I would argue, is that this book clearly shows how the different political ideologies ultimately provide different metanarratives of creation, fall, redemption, and consummation that the biblical worldview is trying to provide. Koyzis is no fan of one ideology, and he shows where liberalism, conservatism, nationalism, democratism, and socialism all promise and fail to provide the true salvation that can only be found in Christ. Although these ideologies can provide some insights into where our systems have failed, the ultimate goals of these ideologies will run counter to what the biblical metanarrative looks like.
I also enjoyed his discussion of Abraham Kuyper as an example of how Christians can practice freedom in a pluralistic society, and the book calls for Christians to genuinely engage in various ideologies with a biblical mindset to create the shalom that God calls for in our society. The neo-Calvinistic backdrop of this book is evident, and I would recommend it to any supposed Christians of Reformed tradition to read through the book. Even for Christians of other traditions and various political leanings will have a lot to gain from reading this book as well. Solid work of Christian political science and cultural studies.
January 7, 2018
Falar de política é quase sempre um tabu, ainda mais dentro da maioria das igrejas no Brasil. Foi criado essa cultura e ela já amadureceu na mente dos cristãos de maneira bem enraizada. Simplesmente é dito: "Cristianismo e Política não combinam" ou "Política e Religião não são passíveis de discussão". E se eu lhe disser que isso não condiz com a vida cristã? Pois é, a Bíblia diz que o cristão é (ou pelo menos deveria ser) sal e luz em um mundo decaído. Esse livro apresenta justamente a importância de um debate político sadio e o quanto ele é necessário para um amadurecimento, não só na vida cristã, mas também na vida social. Sem discutir e sem exercer os cristãos não têm como serem instrumentos da revelação de Deus. Em primeira instância Koyzis faz uma análise crítica (positiva e negativa) das 5 principais perspectivas políticas contemporâneas (ideologia é o termo utilizado por ele), mostrando que na verdade as perspectivas políticas que defendemos envolve muito mais da nossa crença religiosa do que imaginamos. Em um segundo momento ele faz um critica (incrível) sobre a cosmovisão que os cristãos têm comparando com a que eles deveriam ter. No fim Koyzis apresenta dois modelos de compreensão política, um proveniente da perspectiva tomista e outro da perspectiva calvinista. Vale o "tapa na cara" dos ditos calvinistas que tem suas áreas de atuação apenas no Facebook e só sabem falar sobre predestinação e eleição. Através da ideia de Kuyper denominada "Soberania das Esferas" e um leve apreço pela Democracia (sendo reconstituída por Koyzis) é demonstrado que o cristão tem a obrigação de se envolver no mundo e fazer a diferença.
"Cada ato que promove a justiça, seja ele na política ou em qualquer outro âmbito da atividade humana, aponta para a plenitude final do reino da justiça de Deus no novo céu e na nova terra."
"Cada ato que promove a justiça, seja ele na política ou em qualquer outro âmbito da atividade humana, aponta para a plenitude final do reino da justiça de Deus no novo céu e na nova terra."
February 13, 2021
4.5. This book is an incredible introduction to political ideologies. Koyzis identifies the prevailing principles, visions, and idolatrous tendencies of several political visions in order to show each of them insufficient as an all-encompassing Christian view. This book is dense, yet very accessible. It broadened my understanding of political philosophy while also providing some base-line principles by which to understand and evaluate them.
The major drawback for me was that Koyzis does not provide a specific, compelling vision for a Christian political philosophy. I realize this was not his goal. Instead, he provides (as the subtitle reads) “A Survey and Christian Critique of Contemporary Ideologies.” This is exactly what Koyzis provides. Along the way, he provides various biblical principles by which to make such an assessment and critique. However, I would’ve liked to see how these principles might come together in more specific, concrete ways. Specifically, how does a Christian political vision understand the moral and spiritual significance of various institutions like the family over and against the state? Koyzis rightly articulates how these two institutions occupy differentiating spheres of responsibility, but is there a degree of moral and communal significance that should be assigned to one over the other. Perhaps this was simply outside the scope of Koyzis’ work, so I digress.
This drawback aside, I think Political Visions and Illusions does a phenomenal job mapping the ideological terrain of contemporary ideologies. I walked away with a better sense of history, philosophy, and the call for justice in public life. Any Christian who is tired of overly simplistic, totalizing political narratives should pick up this book and assess the ideological foundations for themselves. Highly recommend.
The major drawback for me was that Koyzis does not provide a specific, compelling vision for a Christian political philosophy. I realize this was not his goal. Instead, he provides (as the subtitle reads) “A Survey and Christian Critique of Contemporary Ideologies.” This is exactly what Koyzis provides. Along the way, he provides various biblical principles by which to make such an assessment and critique. However, I would’ve liked to see how these principles might come together in more specific, concrete ways. Specifically, how does a Christian political vision understand the moral and spiritual significance of various institutions like the family over and against the state? Koyzis rightly articulates how these two institutions occupy differentiating spheres of responsibility, but is there a degree of moral and communal significance that should be assigned to one over the other. Perhaps this was simply outside the scope of Koyzis’ work, so I digress.
This drawback aside, I think Political Visions and Illusions does a phenomenal job mapping the ideological terrain of contemporary ideologies. I walked away with a better sense of history, philosophy, and the call for justice in public life. Any Christian who is tired of overly simplistic, totalizing political narratives should pick up this book and assess the ideological foundations for themselves. Highly recommend.
August 5, 2019
I'll be using this excellent textbook by David Koyzis once again in my Political Ideas and Ideologies course this semester, and I wanted to put a brief note up about the excellence of this new edition. I haven't always used Koyzis's book in the class, but I've used it a lot over the years--not because I fully agree with his overall framing of the study of ideologies (as a Mormon very much of the left of the political spectrum, a brief self-description that includes two matters Koyzis himself would likely have serious difficulty fully respecting or taking seriously, I look at the question of how worldviews are constructed quite differently than he does), but because I like very much how he tells the stories which he sees within liberalism, conservatism, socialism, and the like. This updated edition of his book only makes his claims about the implicit narratives contained within ideological systems even more clearly, and his concluding chapters which situate those narratives in the context of Christian ideas of subsidiarity and social pluriformity are excellent. The only real failure in the book is, I think, his failure to give appropriate space to the anti-statist/anarchist/libertarian positions one can find scattered throughout the ideologies he examines; he mentions them, but never really puts them together as genuine argument that exists within his various narratives. In any case, though, a fine textbook. It probably couldn't ever really work in a secular or state university, but at a religious school like Friends, arguing with Koyzis's book, and getting the students to argue with it as well, should be a lot of fun.
Read
November 28, 2022As a survey of political ideologies, Koyzis' book is probably not the best resource, since he doesn't do much in the way of charting the histories of each ideology. But this book should probably be viewed more as a work of theology. The unique feature of the book is Koyzis' attempt to find (1) a creational grounds for each ideology and (2) the ways in which each ideology warps that creational grounding and turns it into idolatry.
It would be beneficial for Christians to reflect on politics in this way. I've used this book to teach a Sunday school course on the topic and I think it would be good for other churches as well. Too often our attention is drowned out by the issues of the day. This is understandable, but it leaves us with little time to reflect on the philosophical underpinnings of our ideas. This may be one reason, for instance, why many American evangelicals can't get themselves to disassociate "Christian" from "conservative." Having subsumed their political ideology so deeply into their religious identity, there is no need to probe.
There was much here for me to chew on. As a classical liberal, it was good to read Koyzis critique classical liberalism even while admitting that he felt it was the best political philosophy on offer right now. Whether you are a conservative, a socialist, or a classical liberal (or some other ideology), it's always helpful to examine the ways in which your political commitments may rub against the claims of Christ.
It would be beneficial for Christians to reflect on politics in this way. I've used this book to teach a Sunday school course on the topic and I think it would be good for other churches as well. Too often our attention is drowned out by the issues of the day. This is understandable, but it leaves us with little time to reflect on the philosophical underpinnings of our ideas. This may be one reason, for instance, why many American evangelicals can't get themselves to disassociate "Christian" from "conservative." Having subsumed their political ideology so deeply into their religious identity, there is no need to probe.
There was much here for me to chew on. As a classical liberal, it was good to read Koyzis critique classical liberalism even while admitting that he felt it was the best political philosophy on offer right now. Whether you are a conservative, a socialist, or a classical liberal (or some other ideology), it's always helpful to examine the ways in which your political commitments may rub against the claims of Christ.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 73 reviews