Thank you @manilla_press for the ARC!
I really really enjoyed this, but to give context to this review (which will be very positive, so keep reading), I'll open with my biggest criticism, and it's not even about the book but the way it's marketed: I had no idea this wasn't going to be a standalone. Therefore I was looking forward to reading about her whole life, including, as you can guess if you've been following me a while, her marriage to Antonius. When I reached the halfway point and she was still in the early days of her marriage to Clodius, I realised there was no way this would cover her whole life and I was disappointed. In the end, it's fine; Parker did a fantastic job painting this first part of her life and I'm sure she'll do the same with the next book(s?). I just wish I'd known; I'd have read it anyway, but without the anticipation of events that would not happen in this book, which led to completely unnecessary disappointment.
Now that's out of the way, let's get into what IS in this book, and that's a fantastic story! Parker did a phenomenal job at recreating ancient Rome with its vivid atmosphere, ruthless politics and quietly ambitious women. Fulvia's relationship with first husband Clodius is beautifully written. We also see her relationships with other Roman women, so that she's not the only overlooked character getting her chance to shine. This is a young Fulvia, who's not yet the masterful politician we know she became, but we see her grow towards it. And I loved that the book is narrated by the experienced Fulvia looking back on her life rather than telling it as she lives it: it created a wonderful sense of anticipation.
Plus, if you are anything like me and weirdly obsessed with Rome circa 1st century BCE/1st century CE, this is a delight. Every time a new major player was mentioned for the first time it was like unlocking a new level in a game. Here's Marcus Antonius! Here's Julius Caesar! Here's Servilia!
Now, I didn't necessarily like the inclusion of some gossip as fact, the relationship between Curio and Antonius for example. I understand why it made for a compelling plotline but slander was very much a political tool in Rome as Parker shows admirably so giving some of it credit rubbed me the wrong way a bit. Not that it couldn't conceivably have been true, but we have no proof. Also, boo to using the word triumvirate, a fairly modern term and not one that was used at the time to describe what we now know as the First Triumvirate, although many scholars are moving away from calling it that and rightly so. No I'm kidding we're not booing of course but I simply must live up to my reputation as an extremely picky reviewer 😬 But! Antonius is called Antonius!! And that alone made my heart happy (if you're a recent follower: I hate seeing him called Mark Antony with every fiber of my being).
Overall, setting aside these minor points I wasn't a fan of, I had a great time reading Fulvia and I'm so excited to see her story continue through Parker's words. I absolutely recommend it to anyone who loves historical fiction and ambitious women! ❤️