What do you think?
Rate this book


292 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 1997

"If the American abroad is puzzled by the English attachment to cricket, he is dumbfounded by the Indian passion for it."
"Ambrose came to the wicket looking as if he resented even being there. He glanced around with dull, irritated eyes. Once again, his team-mates had let him down. Was he expected to win the match with bat as well as ball?"
"Whatever else Prasad learned at Dennis Lillee’s feet while studying at the MRF Pace Academy in Madras, he had perfected the fast bowler’s glare; he turned it now on Sohail."
"He invited me to a meal at the home occupied by his extended family in Cavalry Colony. I was confronted by a remarkable gang of ageing leftist intellectuals who plied me with Scotch (freely available despite prohibition) and probed me on the state of cricket and the struggle for socialism."
"In one sat the Australian and English journalists. In the other, the Indians and Pakistanis. No one had enforced this apartheid and there were perfectly good professional reasons for journalists from the same country to stick together, but it struck me as sad confirmation that this World Cup, which had been born amid such rancour at Lord’s three years before, had done little to bring together the cricket cultures of the first and third worlds."
"For the English, the Eden Gardens ‘riot’ confirmed what they had always believed: the subcontinent was no place to stage a World Cup. Its denizens had been derided as volatile fanatics since the days of Empire and their inability to cope with defeat proved that they were still beyond the pale of civilisation (and its English epitome, the game of cricket)."
"Watching Ranatunga, Warne and umpire David Shepherd standing together at the non-strikers’ end, I reflected that despite modern training regimes this could still be a game for rotund men."
"Bevan was listed on the scoreboard simply as ‘Michael’, a Pakistani payback for the countless times their names had been muddled by commentators abroad."
"The English cricket establishment had fought a bitter battle to stop the 1996 World Cup being held in the sub-continent, and it had lost. In the Daily Telegraph, Christopher Martin-Jenkins argued that England was 'the ideal venue' whose advantages' cannot be matched by the rival bidders from a vast and unruly sub-continent'. He decried the ICC decision as a triumph for 'money and politics' over cricket. In so doing, he rewrote two hundred years of cricket history, dominated as they had been by English money and politics. When national pride is pricked, facts and logic are quickly superseded by myth and emotion."
"Sub-continental cricket's biggest problem is the emerging conflict between two cultures, between those who adore cricket for its own sake and those for whom it is primarily a means to an end, to either personal or national self-aggrandisement, or increasingly, some venomous cocktail of the two. This is not a conflict of generations or between moderisers and traditionalists, or between a sophisticated elite and lumpen mass - all used to explain the events in Dehli and later in Calcutta. At Dehli it seemed to me the war was between the VIPs and the OCFs (Ordinary Cricket Fans) and that if the VIPs were victorious, cricket would be reduced to a grotesque charade, a medium for the expression of insecurity, both national and individual."