THE ACTIVIST SHARES HER PASSIONATE THOUGHTS ON HER EXILE
Taslima Nasrin is a Bangladeshi-Swedish writer, physician, and human rights activist. She has been living in exile since 1994—first in Europe and the U.S., United States, then in India. She wrote in the Preface to this 2016 book, “In [this book] I wrote about the series of events leading to my ouster from West Bengal… and eventually India, my house arrest, and the anxious days I had had to spend in the government safe house, beset by a scheming array of bureaucrats and ministers desperate to see me gone… I had been a lone, exiled, dissenting voice up against the entire state machinery with only my wits and determination at my disposal. But there was one thing I was sure of---I hadn’t done anything wrong, so why should I be punished unfairly? Why wouldn’t I, a citizen of the world, be allowed to live in a country I love? Why would a nation that prides itself on being a secular democracy bow down to the dictates of a section of dishonest, misogynist, intolerant zealots, and banish an honest, secular writer?
“Despite being forced to leave, I have … come back to India. I have come because I have nothing else but India, and because I hope India will one day truly encourage free thought. I wish to live in this country and be allowed the freedom to express my opinions even if they are contrary to others’… A politics built on sycophancy is the first sign of a rotting democracy. Aren’t our political mavericks aware that fanatics seek to plunge society into darkness, that they are against human rights and women’s rights, and that they consider any opinion contrary to theirs a sort of violation?” (Pg. vii-ix)
She continues, “I was forced to leave the country and that was the beginning of what today’s Bangladesh is---a medieval and intolerant nation of bigots, extremists, and fanatics. Without allowing criticism of Islam, it will be difficult for Muslim countries to separate the State and religion, to make personal laws based on equality, or to have a secular education system. If this does not happen, Muslim countries will forever remain in darkness, breeding and training people indoctrinated by religion to not tolerate any differences, and where women will never enjoy the right to live as complete human beings… The time has come for people to unequivocally tell the truth and be willing to listen to it too… Islam isn’t compatible with democracy, human rights, women’s rights, freedom of expression. You will not be able to kill terrorism by killing terrorists. You have to kill its root cause. You have to stop brainwashing children with religion… The good and sensible must break their silence; the inaction of the good is the asset of the malevolent.” (Pg. xii-xiii)
She says, “It has been pointed out that though I was perfectly within my rights to harm my own reputation, I had no right to toy with someone else’s… why do people who are so sensitive regarding their reputation do things that they know will harm it?... The fact of the matter remains that the men who were accusing me of breach of personal contract were the ones who were anxious about their quasi-divine reputations being irrevocably tarnished if their dirty secrets were to tumble out… What if I truly believe that these incidents should be revealed?... Only I alone have the final say in what I wish to include in my autobiography and not any random person who has arbitrarily assumed the guardianship of good taste!... The other accusation is that I have deliberately hurt religious sentiments… Since organized religion is almost entirely patriarchal, the agents of patriarchy would obviously not take kindly to insults against their religious texts and ideologues. These custodians have driven me out of my country, yet another price that I have to pay for speaking the truth.” (Pg. 21-23)
She states, “I have stared death in the face; I have seen how they kill, how they destroy and pillage in plain sight without any fear of repercussions in the name of the Prophet. It was indeed miraculous how I survived… I have bene nurtured by love, love of countless readers from India and the rest of the world, love of many rational, liberal and tolerant individuals… I do not feel alone anymore because I have come to realize that all of us who believe in the ideas of a just democracy and freedom of expression are larger in number while the intolerant, violent radicals who seek to undermine freedom of speech and human rights are far fewer.” (Pg. 41-42)
She acknowledges, “right from my childhood, I have never been religious---this has led me to consciously invest in ideals of humanism and feminism… That is how I grew up, overcoming superstitions, customs and institutions steeped in misogyny.” (Pg. 89)
She says sarcastically, “Then let them be free. Throw open the arsenals for them to stock up on guns and swords and bombs and the holy word of Islam. Let them go out into the world and behead the sinful non-believers. Let them kill the women and let them put the women, head bowed, in burqas and force them back inside. Let there be rape, often, to ensure that only sons are born… Let our statesmen pay homage at the holy altar of Islam and crown each and every terrorist. Let our statemen fold their hands in prayer and let the fundamentalists absolve them of their sins.” (Pg. 139-140)
She asks, “Is it not time yet to ascertain who the true enemies of society are? Is it not time yet for my freedom from this irrational captivity? Have I been completely foolish in trying to spread the word of humanity and free thought in India? What am I being punished for?... That I should die, homeless, stateless, without a society or any friends? What am I being punished for in this secular democratic country?” (Pg. 219)
She wrote in her diary, “My fight for my freedom of speech and expression is also how I fight for the same rights on behalf of others. I want this freedom to be recognized in the state or the country I had been driven out of. I want this freedom to be recognized the world over…. I wish that the country … will no longer had to suffer the ills of misogyny, intolerance, superstitions, dogma, stupidity and prejudice… My only hope is that humanity will last for generations, learning to live in peace, harmony, security and tolerance. Let the future of humanity be free of religion and false customs… Let it thrive and let it learn how to love.” (Pg. 279-280)
She laments, “I don’t know this India. There have been a few dissenters who have stood by me---writers, journalists, intellectuals… However, the new face of India that has terrorized me is the inability to organize collective action for seeking justice and rights. At such instances, I have encountered only a deafening silence. Is this the new India or is this how India has always been?” (Pg. 302) Later, she adds, “Most of my friends too cut off their ties with me, leaving me completely alone in this vast country. I could not help but wonder if any author had ever been so summarily excommunicated by their own people.” (Pg. 329)
She concludes, “The entire expanse of human history is a fleeting instant, a footnote in the history of time. Not a soul in the universe will ever flip through its pages. Is it not enough that even amidst this infinite insignificance, I am still swimming against the surge?” (Pg. 335)
This passionate (and rather undiplomatic) book will be of keen interest to those concerned with free speech issues, or studying modern India.