a delightful and charming collage/beastiary chronicling the shifting meanings of cats (and lions, tigers, panthers, etc) alongside the emergence and development of global capitalism -- and its contestation by radicals. i wasn't entirely sure what to expect from this book, even though i knew that i wanted to read it and that La Berge is an exquisite and precise thinker. wasn't the very idea of Marx for Cats trivializing - even domesticating - the gravity and necessity of our global struggle for revolution? almost 300 pages into the book, La Berge poses this question back to herself: "are cats only signs? Is this history of Marx and cats a random one?"
the preceding chapters could appear that way, but our charge is to read and contest the way cats are deployed (as signs and as beings) in economic life. La Berge's method is a kind of Benjaminian montage, similar to Theweleit's Male Fantasies (mentioned) or WJT Mitchell's Last Dinosaur Book (somehow, not!). beginning with pre-capitalist Feudalism, La Berge traces how lions became symbols of royalty while black cats associated with witchcraft and deviance more generally, deserving of massacre. from there, the birth pangs of capitalism and its class, the bourgeoisie, alight and exacerbate these anti-cat sentiments. Lynxs and wildcats are marked for eradication, while deployed as symbols of entrepreneurial freedom and even as money itself. revolutionaries are devious tigers who need to be quelled, while ultimately domestic cats become commodities for the bourgeois themselves. because of this cat 'dialectic', felines also became rehabilitated as symbols of kin, cunning and defiance - as in the IWW's 'sabo-tabby' (real name!!) and of course the eponymous Black Panther. Along the way, La Berge gives readers a crash course in economic history and in radical and marxist critique.
La Berge's eye is particularly sharp in bringing to light not just the avowed marxists and revolutionaries you might expect, but also abolitionists, socialists and communists, feminists, queers, and even a few anarchists. La Berge is also rather harsh on marxists for missing these 'feline' connections, and for dismissing animal liberation and ecological politics more generally (at times, I felt like this charge was somewhat overstated, or unwarranted - but this could also be because I am invested in reading the debates concerning 'lively commodities' for several years now, and perhaps these are esoteric). though La Berge is keen on rehabilitating the racial and class politics of EuroAmerican marxism (e.g., CLR James and Angela Davis feature prominently), the study is somewhat surprisingly limited to the Atlantic world. this isn't entirely a failing, just demonstrating that a complementary examination of say third worldist deployments of cats could be out there.
ultimately, La Berge answers her own question posed above that cats should *not* be taken to be completely random or contingent. this is for two reasons in my reading. first, symbolically, because cats have been potent symbols, we ought to struggle over their meaning. we shouldn't let the bourgeoise, commodified, capitalist, or even aristocatic (hehe) meanings overshadow the potentially potent meaning to which we could still ascribe cats. and second, because actual cats ought to be taken as our actual comrades - to learn from cats (as Louise Michel and Rosa Luxumbourg intimate) is to also learn how to fight for care and against domination in human sociality as well.