I have an interest in both history and China, and this books is part of a course I'm taking.
The author has done a painstaking job of collecting material for this book, and does a good job in analyzing and criticizing various sources. However, the focus is very awkward:
-A lot of attention is paid to old novels. Not just commenting on them, but spending many pages retelling the whole story, which eventually yields some minuscule conclusion of little historical relevance. A typical example: "...The story is not necessarily true; the official who wrote the book delighted in collecting strange tales. But the tale certainly circulated in the decades after the southward shift of the capital, and it captured the mood of the time." (p. 257) How could a fictitious story "capture the mood of the time" and how relevant is that?
-Overly focusing on some categories of people makes it seems like China was built by poets and concubines.
-Lots of meta-history: the history of earlier historians and excavations etc.
-Very little room is left for telling actual history.
Another problem is that this book lacks pedagogy. Browsing through the book index I found that the book introduces 237(!) names in total, still you will never get any reminder of who that person introduced 100 pages ago, and now suddenly reappearing, is. This makes the reading feel very heavy & confusing. Words such as fructiferous, laicization, tanistry, prolix, zither, chiaroscuro, clepsydra and hagiography doesn't help either.
Having read this book I've learned a lot about Chinese poetry, clothes, classical novels, buildings, pottery design, etc., but very little about history.