wild story, but i feel like the man was the main character here. i wish there was more on the 'women who rebuild us', as i felt that the chain metaphor was a bit weak and felt like an afterthought.
This was really beautifully written and I felt like every line lacked its own punch. It was very thought provoking and covered some really important and personal moments. It was very raw and honest and I liked how it included other women’s stories but I think it lacked this slightly as it promised to take the focus away from the man which I felt it could have doubled down on. But I would really recommend
A (horrific) story that needed to be told but perhaps not like this… the writing is clunky and jumps around and the storyline is hard to follow with buzz words thrown in every now and again. Putting ‘him’ in italics I don’t think does what it intends to and the whole thing almost reads like an exposé rather than an account of how women saved each other. An exposé is needed (legal issues aside) but I think this story needs to be rewritten after years of distance between the situations that happened, to truly emphasise the chain of women and the way we carry each other through, rather than just a nod to it within a story that almost (and rightly so) bitterly centres a man.
Sorry, I didn’t love this. The story and the concept of the chain is very interesting. The structure and execution was weak, felt like it should be either more story driven, memoir-ish, or if speaking about broad sweeping issues it ought to be backed up by statistics or research. The man was the main character and the chain was only sometimes alluded to.