Kelly's Koffee Shop is a cosy mystery book by Dianne Harman. It has 24 chapters, as well as some recipes, and there are a 153 pages, according to the information on the storepage. The book focuses on Kelly, who owns “Kelly’s Koffee Shop”, which is located in Cedar Bay. The book begins with Kelly opening up her shop and we get to go through a bit of the history about the town, the shop and introductions of a few different characters. However, as the morning progresses, there’s a bit of worry setting in; Amber has not come in, and she didn’t turn up at class, either. It later turns out that Amber had been murdered that morning. Kelly and her partner, the local sheriff, investigate the death.
Before going into the review, I’ll mention some content warnings. There’s a lot of the plot central to drugs and drug dealing; marijuana in particular. There’s stuff in the book about abortion and references to child abuse/ molestation. If you are sensitive to topics like this, I recommend avoiding the book because, the stuff about the abortion is definitely a prominent section of the book. There’s a lot of religious aspects (Catholicism), and it has strong themes throughout the book; so if that’s something you want to avoid, I recommend skipping the book.
I thought the introductory chapter work was pretty okay. I appreciated that the author took some time to talk about the history of the town, and how the “Kelly’s Koffee Shop” began. I think it’s a positive thing the author has done because it creates a little bit of atmosphere for the story, and gives us an impression of what the town is like, and presents it almost as if it is its own character. I wasn’t necessarily a fan of the way the author was describing the characters; it didn’t feel like it flowed as well as it could have. And I’ll admit that sometimes a lot of the description work felt like she was just listing facts about the characters, rather than working these things into the story.
And some of the descriptions felt really awkward, if I’m honest. Such as the description of the sheriff’s ex-wife. It just felt like the author was trying to be degrading about skinny women; “He had never been a fan of skinny women. His ex-wife had been thin and hungry, hungry for the things a county sheriff could never give a woman.” It felt really creepy. It was also very stereotypical. It’s as if the author was trying to make us think more highly of Kelly while being degrading towards the ex-wife. Especially considering that we never get to hear the ex-wife’s side of the story. And it wasn’t just this ex-wife thing. The author made extra sure to mock financial affairs of Ginger and Bob a multitude of times, in a similar way. Making sure we know that Kelly is doing really well financially, but making sure we know how poor that Ginger and Bob are.
And, as we move on to learning more about the boyfriend of Amber, Brandon, we learn more about his parents. The author is pretty nasty about describing them as well; “Everyone in the small town knew that Marcy Black liked to spend money and some said that her husband, Jeff, was pompous and thought he was far better than the other citizens…” But firstly, if Marcy wants to spend a bit of cash, that’s fine. If they have the money to spend, nothing wrong with that, because it would keep a bunch of shops in town in business. And as for the pompousness of Jeff? I personally did not see that from his character. If anything, Kelly is definitely pompous thought; the thoughts she has about all sorts of characters are very mean spirited. She mocks people for their financial situations, their appearances and just because they’re “mysterious” and don’t share details of their lives with her. She’s not a very nice character. Even as she’s informing people of the death, she makes a mental note that she needs to hire someone to replace Amber. Yikes. That just felt nasty and callous; she only just found out a few hours ago that the girl died, and she’s already very eager to find a replacement.
Similarly, Kelly mentions Madison, who is apparently Amber’s “nemesis”. And I felt like Kelly was somewhat of an unreliable narrator about it all. Because, again, she builds up Amber to be this person that can do no wrong, and is degrading about Madison, informing us that Madison is Amber’s enemy. A little while later, Kelly hires her as Amber’s replacement at the store, and Kelly remarks to her waitress, Roxie, “I guess she and Amber weren’t the best of friends, but the way it looks, her life’s already at a dead end. I feel sorry for her.” It just feels like Kelly is a nasty person. Madison had been wanting to start cosmetology school, and is wanting to work at the shop for the money for it. So it honestly sounds like Madison has some high hopes for herself, and has a goal in life. Yet Kelly is degrading about it. And later on, one of Amber’s friends comes along with negative remarks about Madison as well. But a lot of that is just hearsay and assumptions. Stuff happens to Amber, but she and Amber assumed a lot of it was Madison, rather than having proof. Not to mention, the stuff she was saying about Madison was downright creepy; implying that Madison had sex with the entirety of the football team? It seemed like hearsay, and gossip; Amber’s friend just wanting to degrade someone else.
Honestly, I don’t think the characters are as bad as the author is making them out to be. It kind of feels like Kelly and her judgemental nature are the problem. And there’s also Roxie who is a pretty negative character, and it felt like she was racist as well. So we meet “Chief Many Trees”, who comes into the shop, and is a very stereotyped Native American man. However, Roxie doesn’t like having to hear about the Chief and the tribal land. So she gets Kelly to deliver him his food instead. It all felt really racist, in my opinion.
I felt like some of the characters could have been introduced a little better. Such as Amber, Ginger and Bob. For a lot of the early bits, they were all mentioned, but I wasn’t sure of who any of them were, and it wasn’t obvious to me. All I knew about Amber was a student that was meant to be at the shop. It wasn’t until later that I found out she was Kelly’s goddaughter. And, similarly, Ginger and Bob were mentioned several times when they were checking up on Amber, but it wasn’t clear that they were her parents. And I was multiple chapters into the book when I reread the Amazon store page description for it and found out that Amber is Kelly’s goddaughter. It was not clear from reading the actual book; until chapter 21, which is more than a hundred pages into the book.
Mike, the sheriff is Kelly’s partner. He checks in with a few people, after Kelly informs him that Amber didn’t show up for work. He is over at her place later that day, when he gets a phone call, informing him that Amber’s body had been found. The weird thing is that he then tells Kelly that she needs to go and inform the parents… But… What? That’s something that would be his, or another police officer’s, official duty. Why would an official task like that be given to Kelly? Even if she knows the people, it would not be appropriate for her to be given this task. Especially considering that there are things officers generally need to do in that situation, such as asking questions about the death, letting the parents ask questions of the officers, etc. This was a huge red flag for me that the author didn’t really do their research about police procedure. And similarly, after visiting the parents, Kelly begins calling all sorts of other people about the death, giving multiple other people the information. But… What if the information needed to be kept confidential? What if the police needed to keep details out of the public eye? I felt it was highly inappropriate for her to do this, especially considering the early nature of the information she did have. She oughtn’t have been spreading any of it to the newspaper; which was one of her primary calls. And then she goes and informs the boyfriend, Brandon, and his parents, of the death. But, again, this is something the police should have been doing; not some random civilian, regardless of how well she knew the victim or not.
And it just felt weird how much information Mike was giving Kelly. Considering that Kelly did know, and was boss to, the deceased, surely she ought to be considered a suspect. So why is Mike calling her up and informing Kelly of how the body was found, cause of death, what type of bag was used to kill her, etc? Again, this feels like the author has no real understanding of the logic of police procedure. Oh and it gets even more ridiculous. So Mike has suspicions that the ranch run by Jeff (Brandon’s dad) is being used to grow marijuana; though it’s just assumption on his part, and there’s no real evidence early on. However, Kelly’s dog used to work for a drug officer. So they come up with a plan to use the dog, Rebel, to try and find drugs on the ranch. To test whether the dog can find marijuana, Mike decides to go to the police station, get marijuana from the evidence locker, which he is “holding it as evidence in a pending case”, and the bring it back to Kelly’s home. What? No. Just no. That is all kinds of inappropriate. Firstly, if it’s being held as evidence in a pending case, it should not be removed from the station, especially so it can be taken home by the sheriff. If I were a defense attorney on that case, and found out about this, I would definitely make sure that gets chucked out of court for being inadmissible as evidence now that it has been tampered with. Also, after he gets the autopsy report, Mike informs Kelly about details of it. But he then says “This is a criminal investigation and I’ve sealed the autopsy report until the case is solved.” If it’s meant to be so secretive, why the heck is he telling Kelly about it? She is a civilian. And, honestly, in any real life investigation, she’d likely be considered a suspect, considering she knew and had close access to the victim. Then later, when she finds the victim’s missing journal, does she take it immediately to the police and turn it in as evidence? No. She takes it home, despite the fact that it could theoretically have evidence of people (apart from the victim) touching it, etc. And, also, considering the private nature of the information, she should not be reading it. And then she carries it around with her in her purse… Despite it being an important part of evidence? And later on, she has figured out who the killer is, and then illegally searches someone’s boat at the dock. Something which is criminal. Even if she were in law enforcement, it wouldn’t be legal for her to do that. And, sure she found evidence. But the thing is, that likely wouldn’t stand up in court because the defense attorney could simply argue that she had placed it there, and the fact that it was an illegal search in the first place. And then, of course, we get a confession from the person who did it, even though it doesn’t make any sense the way they explain it. And the confession recording would be pretty suspicious in court, as well; considering she’s giving him the details at certain points during the conversation, rather than him saying them. It makes her seem more suspicious, in my opinion.
Oh, and it got pretty gross. At one point, it turns out that a certain person has been found with highly inappropriate child material on their computer. And the sheriff decides NOT to arrest him. What? But this person is around the young folk of town pretty often. So the sheriff doesn’t want to protect the children? What if this person were to do something awful? And after discussing this stuff with Kelly, she pays a visit to this person. The very next morning, the very first thing, she decides to take this person some strawberry tart as a present, and they have a joyful conversation. Is she rewarding them or something? What the heck? I know the author is trying to make it out as if Kelly is just snooping for evidence, but she clearly has a lot of respect for them and seems really happy to spend time with them, which is just gross. And the weird thing is that this person never even gets arrested or charged with it? What? By the last time we see this person in the book, both the sheriff and Kelly are on pretty good terms with them. Did they forget what this person had done?
The romance aspect is something I wanted to like about the book. But it just felt inappropriate at times because of the way they were using each other for information about the death. And it felt creepy because it kind of seemed like they were taking enjoyment from the death, and excited about it. Neither of them felt sad about it; they both seemed really eager to talk about it to each other. And that’s what made the relationship feel really gross. Even if I ignore that, the way Mike treats her and speaks to her feels really off, in my opinion. It feels like he’s just using her for information and because he wants to get fed.
There are several recipes at the back of the book; more than half a dozen. I felt that they could have been written better. The author leaves out important details; the size of the eggs, the type of flour to use, etc. And I think they needed better formatting. For multiple lots of steps in the directions, it was clumped together as really large paragraphs. I definitely wouldn’t like to eat these recipes. Maybe you might, though.
I originally chose to read this book because I’m looking for mystery books and wanting to find a series to enjoy. But this failed miserably, in my opinion. The book started off being okay, but then it got worse and worse. The author did really badly with writing characters, and it made look Kelly look like an absolute jerk; she kept trying to imply that so many people are bad, yet it was really mostly her being judgemental, rather than other characters being at fault of something. The mystery didn’t have any suspense to it, in my opinion. It felt like it was a really generic type murder mystery, and it wasn’t very well thought through by the author. One of my main problems is that the author clearly knows nothing about police procedure, such as the chain of evidence, admissibility of evidence or the need of privacy for the details relating to the case. And, honestly, a lot of the evidence they do end up with probably wouldn’t be admissible in court. A bunch of it is just hearsay and gossip, rather than evidence directly pointing towards someone. Even the confession Kelly obtained at the end probably would not be accepted in court, because of the way she was manipulating the conversation. Overall, it was a pretty bad book. There weren’t any characters I liked, and there wasn’t much creativity to them anyway. A lot of them were just stereotypes, rather than original characters. I got it back in 2019, when it was free during a promotional period. I’m so glad I didn’t pay money for it.