1.5 stars rounded to 2
“The most important things are the hardest to say. They are the things you get ashamed of, because words diminish them -- words shrink things that seemed limitless when they were in your head to no more than living size when they're brought out. But it's more than that, isn't it? The most important things lie too close to wherever your secret heart is buried, like landmarks to a treasure your enemies would love to steal away. And you may make revelations that cost you dearly only to have people look at you in a funny way, not understanding what you've said at all, or why you thought it was so important that you almost cried while you were saying it. That's the worst, I think. When the secret stays locked within not for want of a teller but for want of an understanding ear.”
Stephen King
Secrets are a part and parcel of our lives and to hide them we often take the help of lies to ensure that these secrets stay hidden and protected. This is almost everyone’s story and I honestly feel that each person is entitled to their secrets and lies. What man does not lie? It could be those small white lies said to make others happy or even the big ones, told majorly to ensure some secrets are kept safe and no damage occurs to their lives and the lives of their loved ones? Can these people honestly be blamed for those lies that are often disguised, maybe badly, as ways to help keep their loved ones safe? Can people be blamed for keeping secrets that when revealed would lead to their persecution? Human nature is tuned in such a way that it will do anything, absolutely anything, to escape their own persecution or the persecution of those they love and therefore lying in such a context doesn’t seem like a major sin to them. Or maybe they feel that they are justified in telling such lies and don’t fear the consequences that they will face because of it. As in the quote above ‘a secret stays a secret until it finds an understanding ear’.
So also with these nine people who form the main core group of this group, a company of liars as they are called, secrets are abound and lies are told aplenty. The difference being, they are persecuted because of the lies that they have told or the secrets that they have kept. Karen Maitland’s book deals with the onslaught of persecution of liars in the backdrop of the plague. The fact that each of them dies is something that is given in the blurb. How and why they die is what this book is all about. An extremely interesting premise, which when combined with the fact that it is set in the medieval times and is also called ‘a story of the plague’, made me extremely excited to read it. And read it, I did, in fact, finished the whole book in a single day, which is quite a thing as I haven’t done something like that in ages. However, I was disappointed, completely disappointed with the whole thing. The only thing which made me give it a 1.5 star rating rounded off to 2 was the fact that I loved the way the whole group came together and some of their story telling was fantastical in nature. It had a lilt of poetry and fairy tale in some places, which kind of kept my interest going together with the fact that I wanted to know what happened at the end.
Let’s first talk about what I liked in this book. The book had a fascinating array of characters, ranging from a Camelot to a magician to musicians to a healer and a rune teller and some others. Each of them had a hidden secret and each of them were lying about themselves. Moreover, it was set in the backdrop of the plague (oh this is a grouse as well, which I shall dwell upon later) that beset England during the medieval times. And that’s about it – that’s exactly what I loved about it, the premise. It truly went downhill from there and never recovered.
“Perhaps that is where our choice lies -- in determining how we will meet the inevitable end of things, and how we will greet each new beginning.”
- Elana K. Arnold, Burning
Isn’t this a fact of life? With such a motley cast, you would expect the author to create a magnum opus but unfortunately Ms. Maitland disappoints. Her characters, though with a lot of depth thanks to their secrets, are never developed beyond the fact that they reveal their true selves and then die. There is no learning curve, there is no development curve and worse there is no depth to these stories, which at times feel like they were put there just to give these characters something to say or some back history for the sake of it. While some of their stories are almost akin to fairy tales and are quite interesting, some fall flat, especially that of the magician. While the entire book is recited from the point of view of the Camelot, there is much that could have been done but hasn’t been. In fact, I felt the lack of different POVs acutely in this book. A book where there are many different characters should ideally have different POVs, which would have made it more interesting and definitely more vibrant. However, it’s lack makes the book flat and quite monotonous and often repetitive in nature.
Now to my second and perhaps the biggest grouse about this book. On the cover it is written that this is and I quote ‘a novel of the plague’. However, the plague and the medievalism forms the backdrop of the novel and not the main course. It could have been titled ‘a novel in the backdrop of the plague’ and it would have been more accurate. For the plague forms a reason for these people to band together and doesn’t affect them in the least. Of course, the author does talk about the plague raging England at that time and its effect on the populace but it is in passing. It is more to create a path for these people to move along than anything else. Neither are they shown fighting it nor do the actual people form a part of this story. Why then make it a novel of the plague? Honestly, I don’t know.
“The plague of mankind is the fear and rejection of diversity: monotheism, monarchy, monogamy and, in our age, monomedicine. The belief that there is only one right way to live, only one right way to regulate religious, political, sexual, medical affairs is the root cause of the greatest threat to man: members of his own species, bent on ensuring his salvation, security, and sanity.”
Thomas Szasz
Being a novel set in the medieval times, it is often difficult not to touch upon the politics and religion and their nexus. However, here again I was disappointed. Don’t get me wrong, Ms. Maitland does cover all these topics and more but it is again merely in passing than with any depth. We do get involved with the exigencies put by the Church on the people, the narrowness of thought during that time, the fear of the Church in the minds of the people, the sheer callousness of the bishops and the priests but what was lacking was depth. It felt like reading a news item where we learn about facts but not the thought process. In a book that is set in the medieval times and a book that is quite lengthy in its prose, I felt that there should have been more information or description rather than mere actions. The facts are so obvious that even a person not well versed in the history of those times will be able to tell you all about them. What makes a book different is how it handles those facts and how it portrays the period. Here again Ms. Maitland disappoints with her pure factual narration that is synced with the story line, making the writing dry and quite unimpressive.
Not all is bad in this book, for the suspense factor is maintained throughout. By this I don’t mean that we don’t know the murderer, in fact we do. However, the why of those murders and why does this person murder the others is kept a suspense throughout. Unfortunately though, it remains a mystery even at the end. No reason, no conclusion, nothing is provided by the author and it is left to the reader to fathom. While I don’t usually mind such narratives, this one irked me a lot. It felt as if the author took us readers for a ride, promising a lot of things but not delivering it. I felt completely let down and felt that I had actually wasted a lot of time reading this book. It was the end that kept me going through all the boring and repetitive parts, it was the hope that there would be some clarifications, but I got naught. In fact, at that point, I would have settled for a fantastical if implausible ending but I didn’t even get that. What I got was a stereotyped ending, which did nothing to endear me to this book.
I would end by saying that this book had a lot going for it but it was not followed upon. Most of the twists were something that I had already figured out, so it held no mystery for me. Neither was the writing so great that I could write reams on it. All in all, a disappointment for me. I wouldn’t recommend it to anyone but if you feel like taking a dip into these waters, please do so. Who knows, you might end up liking it, as tastes always differ.
PS - My initial rating was 2.5 rounded off to 3 but while writing this review I felt that I had more grouses than likes, which is why I changed it to 1.5 rounded off to 2.