An engaging and informative cultural history of glasses that explores their origins, stigmas, future in technology, and more. Eyeglasses have become so commonplace we hardly think about them-unless we can't find them. Yet glasses have been controversial throughout history. Roger Bacon pioneered using lenses to see and then spent a decade in a medieval prison for advocating that he could “fix” God's creations by improving our eyesight. Even today, people take off their glasses before having their picture taken, despite how necessary they are.
A Four-Eyed How Glasses Changed the Way We See is the first book to investigate the experience of wearing glasses and contacts and their role in culture. David King Dunaway encourages readers to take a look at how they literally see the world through what they wear. He explores everything from the history of deficient eyesight and how glasses are made to portrayals of those who wear glasses in media, the stigma surrounding them, and the future of augmented and virtual reality glasses, highlighting how glasses have shaped, and continue to shape, who we are. Interwoven is Dunaway's own experience of spending a week without his glasses, which he has used since childhood, to see the world around him and his newfound appreciation for his visual aids.
This is the story of how we see the world and how our ability to see things has evolved, ultimately How have two cloudy, quarter-sized discs of crystal or glass originally riveted together become so essential to human existence? Shakespeare famously said eyes are windows to the soul, but what about people who see only by covering theirs with glasses? Readers will find out together through this fascinating and insightful cultural history of one of humanity's greatest inventions.
David King Dunaway received the first Ph.D. in American Studies at the University of California, Berkeley, in folklore, history, and literature. For the last thirty years he has been documenting the life and work of Pete Seeger, resulting in How Can I Keep From Singing: Pete Seeger, published initially by McGraw Hill in 1981 and currently revised, updated, and republished by Villard Press at Random House in March, 2008. He has served as a visiting lecturer and Fulbright Scholar at the Universities of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Copenhagen University, Nairobi University, and the Universidad Nacional de Columbia. Author of a half dozen volumes of history and biography, his specialty is the presentation of folklore, literature, and history via broadcasting. Over the last decade he has been executive producer in a number of national radio series for Public Radio International; his reporting appears in NPRs Weekend Edition and All Things Considered. He is currently Professor of English at the University of New Mexico and Professor of Broadcasting at San Francisco State University. "
I know the expression that a book teaches you how to read it, but this seems to be particularly on the nose.
This is a book about eyeglasses, and thus about visual impingement in general. It blends the history and science of eyeglasses, cultural and sociological impressions about them, the business of their manufacture and sale, and personal stories about them. It closes with discussions of what the future might bring for eyeglasses (augmented reality and similar).
The history is fluffy but inoffensive. The cultural survey of looking at eyeglasses in media sounds tedious but ends up interesting. While there are plenty of well-recognized examples, there are some incredibly weird implementations of eyeglasses as a sort of metaphor or magic that have come up, frequently by otherwise recognizable authors in their less recognizable works. Here we also have the strangest of historical takes. The sections on the discrimination that glasses-wearers face is in equal parts surprising and dull. On one hand, I did not understand the degree that anti-glasses sentiment was still globally prevalent. On the other, it is repetitive, and does not justify a man-on-the-street segment.
The business and futurism sections are fine: worth their own books. The author takes a neutral stance on both, which is worth the read for its novelty if nothing else. The stand out section is the sociological ones, particularly those around eugenics. I think that the author is too quick to dismiss most negative views as sort of lingering religious prejudice, so when the eugenics section comes in with its whole other take on why glasses are morally incorrect, it makes for good reading. If nothing else, it becomes some talking points for when you are arguing with your Dark Enlightenment loving brother-in-law.
The ‘wait, what?’ part of the book is where the author includes an experiment in his going without his eyeglasses for a week. As he has a strong correction, this impacts his life a lot. This attempt to go all A. J. Jacobs is both maddening and uninteresting. We know – or you should be able to guess – what happens and what the revelations are. It is both too much (if I wrote a book on depression where I quit my SSRIs, it would both be a lousy book and what would I even be making as a point?) and too little (there is something there about disability and accommodation, and what we do not think about in our social structure, but everything here is one-note).
It is not the book that I expected. In specific, it is much lighter and observational. It starts off slow, but I warmed to it in the end.
My thanks to the author, David King Dunaway, for writing the book, and to the publisher, Bloomsbury Academic, for making the ARC available to me.
A history of glasses - from the church's refusal to accept this visual aid (shocker) to Smart glasses and beyond.
Overall, pretty good. Interesting and almost conversational in its writing. It felt like it was lacking something though. What seemed like an interesting concept, a week without glasses, was pretty uneventful and didn't include anything I wouldn't expect (can't see, spilled food, stubbed toes).
Interesting book that’s written in easy to read writing/tone. I liked the dividing up between fact & experience, though as someone almost as short sighted, it did make me wince to read his diary.
Personally, I’d have liked the author to have included even more of what it’s like for glasses wearers in other countries, as I feel I’d have related to it even more.
Thanks to the author, publishers & NetGalley for access to this ARC, in return for my review.
"A Four-Eyed World" was somewhat of a disappointment: I really enjoyed the first chapter on the history of glasses, but after that the author somewhat lost me.
The "experiment" of going without glasses was just nonsensical to me (I can't tell a pole from a person without my glasses), which is why I skipped these chapters, which seemed to consist mostly of personal anecdotes.
The other fact-based chapters were okay, but they also didn't really seem all that objective and / or did not really add any new information.