I enjoy the writing of Sarah Moss to the point that I read most of her back catalogue by now, but I would also be the first person to point out some major issues with it. I both immensely enjoyed and was somewhat disappointed by Ripeness, her latest fiction offering. On the whole, her shorter pieces (Ghost Wall, Summerwater) tend to work a bit better for me, as her longer work (The Tidal Zone, Bodies of Light, Sights for Lost Children) tends to somewhat suffer from a lack of focus. The greatest strength of her writing, brilliantly exhibited in Ripeness, is her power of observation. Her comments on the half-tones of her characters' development, her thoughts on a range of contemporary issues, her precise and lyrical, a rare combination, descriptions of walking are often worth underlining and re-reading, However, the trees do not always come together into a coherent forest.
Ripeness explores quite interesting concepts and scenarios. It follows the story of Edith, a 17-year old teenager in the 1960s and an older divorced woman in the present day. Edith, a daughter of a Holocaust refugee and an English farmer, ends up spending most of her adult life in Ireland. As a teenager, however, she has a brief stint in rural Italy, where she helps her pregnant sister, a ballet dancer, prepare for the birth of the child she is set to give up to maintain her career.
Everything and anything is mixed up in this book. It touches on refugee experiences, Jewishness, rape culture, abortions, Irishness, Magdalene Laundries, the war in Ukraine, toxic ballet culture, and many many other things. It felt like the author wanted to say something about almost every single thing happening in the world. As those things are said by the narrator, Edith, it made her appear quite an unlikable know it all older white woman. The set up of a daughter of a Jewish refugee whose family left Eastern Europe because of gentile antisemitism work through her ambivalence towards presumed gentile Ukrainian refugees, the very people who drove her family out of their homes a century ago, is interesting. Edith's comments on the different attitudes to Ukrainian and Middle Eastern refugees in Ireland today are superimposed on the story of her mother, who, as a Holocaust refugee, did not get the luxury of a refugee visa scheme and whose entire family was killed by the Nazis (with a heavy implication that they could have been saved, more could have been done for them). It is a conversation worth having, and it is a theme I have seen in the public discourses of Ukrainian Jews today, who, although fiercely anti-war, can also feel ambivalent about Ukraine and their place there. I feel that this conversation needs to be led by Ukrainian Jews with first-hand experience of Ukrainian attitudes to Jews, though, and as far as I know, Sarah Moss is not a Ukrainian Jew.
Edith goes on to discuss ideas of belonging and migration, basically coming to the conclusion that a piece of soil cannot be a home, that ethnonationalism is rooted in biological determinism and that we should all be free to make a home where we want. Which is all well and good, but the character is an English person living in Ireland. The discussion of this in relation to Ireland is wrapped up in a narrative of Edith, living in Ireland for 40 years, still being seen as a foreigner, whereas a Magdalene Laundry adopted baby who lived his entire life in the USA is, in her mind, seen as properly from this village and properly Irish in a way she would never be. Edith pays some lip service to acknowledge the different colonial power dynamics play a role in her argument, as it can be read as an endorsement of settler colonialism. She does not seem to take them seriously, though, and she sure as hell does not discuss the state of Israel, the place her mother ended up in as a settler. The words Palestine or Palestinians are not mentioned once in the novel. At best, this presents Edith as a hypocrite, and at worst, as a staunch Zionist, whose talk about the right to belong anywhere is, in reality, a call for the native and indigenous people to make space for her on their land. As a result, all the seemingly pro-immigration arguments Edith is making get drowned in the context of her words, which are easily interpreted as yet another metropolitan imperial woman deeming local anticolonial movements too unbecoming and barbarous for her progressive, enlightened and liberal ways.
Couple this with a very weird throwaway discussion of how she really enjoyed having a purely sexual relationship with her Oxford professor and how she does not see himself as a victim, and Edith turns into almost a caricature of a particular type of a liberal white woman (think Catherine Deneuve or Mary Beard). The thing is, I am really not sure that Sarah Moss intended Edith to be a caricature or even a commentary on that specific type of white woman. Throughout the novel I was under the impression that we are supposed to, overall, sympathise with Edith, and I think the narrative would have been stronger and more impactful if it had been intended as a commentary.
A minor point, but the pacing is also quite off. The novel feels far too long. The narrative of the 1960s sections tries to explain the pace and makes it clear that the slowness is very deliberate, but, in my opinion, it was still not justified.
Overall, loved the writing, often didn't love what it was saying.