What do you think?
Rate this book
Lost: Amelia Earhart's Three Mysterious Deaths and One Extraordinary Life
Unravel one of history's greatest mysteries in this spellbinding narrative exploring three leading theories of Amelia Earhart’s tragic disappearance.
When Amelia Earhart’s plane disappeared in 1937, the clues poured in, attracting wild conspiracies about her tragic fate.
In Lost, former National Geographic reporter Rachel Hartigan delves into Earhart’s disappearance, introducing a host of eccentric characters who have become obsessed with finding the truth. Did the great aviator crash land near the Marshall Islands, only to be captured by Japanese soldiers? Did she manage to land on Nikumaroro Island but die of injury or starvation? Or did she run out of fuel and crash into the ocean?
Interspersed with the search for Earhart is the story of her extraordinary her unstable childhood, her itinerant early career, and how a PR-savvy publisher transformed her into an aviation icon and became her husband in an unconventional marriage.
In the spirit of nonfiction blockbusters like The Lost City of Z, Hartigan draws us into the world of Earhart's devotees and unspools a beguiling tale. The theories lead Hartigan from the pilot's birthplace of Atchison, Kansas to an expedition on a remote Pacific Island, where forensic dogs attempt to recover a potential sample of Earhart’s DNA.
As tantilizing new evidence mounts, Hartigan and her fellow investigators descend deeper into a world of conspiracy and obsession. Through its irresistible characters and prodigious research, Lost reveals not just why we remember Amelia Earhart as a trailblazer and adventurer, but why unsolved mysteries keep us forever searching for answers.
When Amelia Earhart’s plane disappeared in 1937, the clues poured in, attracting wild conspiracies about her tragic fate.
In Lost, former National Geographic reporter Rachel Hartigan delves into Earhart’s disappearance, introducing a host of eccentric characters who have become obsessed with finding the truth. Did the great aviator crash land near the Marshall Islands, only to be captured by Japanese soldiers? Did she manage to land on Nikumaroro Island but die of injury or starvation? Or did she run out of fuel and crash into the ocean?
Interspersed with the search for Earhart is the story of her extraordinary her unstable childhood, her itinerant early career, and how a PR-savvy publisher transformed her into an aviation icon and became her husband in an unconventional marriage.
In the spirit of nonfiction blockbusters like The Lost City of Z, Hartigan draws us into the world of Earhart's devotees and unspools a beguiling tale. The theories lead Hartigan from the pilot's birthplace of Atchison, Kansas to an expedition on a remote Pacific Island, where forensic dogs attempt to recover a potential sample of Earhart’s DNA.
As tantilizing new evidence mounts, Hartigan and her fellow investigators descend deeper into a world of conspiracy and obsession. Through its irresistible characters and prodigious research, Lost reveals not just why we remember Amelia Earhart as a trailblazer and adventurer, but why unsolved mysteries keep us forever searching for answers.
320 pages, Hardcover
Published March 3, 2026
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 133 reviews
Read
January 4, 2026I have read other books about Amelia Earhart. This is a really great book and the best I have read about Earhart. A very informative and interesting book. There will always be a mystery of what really happened. A very intriguing book. Highly recommend.
March 8, 2026
A brilliant book about the endlessly fascinating mystery of Amelia Earhart and the incredibly interesting woman it revolved around.
Rachel Hartigan deftly balances a biography of Earhart's life with the mystery that has consumed the world since her disappearance in 1937. The book alternates chapters between meticulously curated details about Earhart's childhood, early life, and her trajectory into aviation, and all the hypotheses about the actual disappearance of the flight and the self-motivated people who tried to find it even decades later. There are several theories about where Earhart's Electra ended up, each with a microscopic amount of evidence, and it is fascinating to learn how the mystery is still being decoded.
I didn't know much about Earhart other than the fact that she was one of the pioneers of aviation in its early days, a feminist icon, and disappeared in a tragic, unexplained incident as she flew over the ocean. This book was perfect for someone even slightly curious about Earhart, like me, and managed to be both informative and truly entertaining, which is rare for a non-fiction book. It reads both like a biography and a compelling mystery drama: highly recommended!
Thank you, Netgalley and National Geographic, for a copy of the ARC in exchange for an honest review!
Rachel Hartigan deftly balances a biography of Earhart's life with the mystery that has consumed the world since her disappearance in 1937. The book alternates chapters between meticulously curated details about Earhart's childhood, early life, and her trajectory into aviation, and all the hypotheses about the actual disappearance of the flight and the self-motivated people who tried to find it even decades later. There are several theories about where Earhart's Electra ended up, each with a microscopic amount of evidence, and it is fascinating to learn how the mystery is still being decoded.
I didn't know much about Earhart other than the fact that she was one of the pioneers of aviation in its early days, a feminist icon, and disappeared in a tragic, unexplained incident as she flew over the ocean. This book was perfect for someone even slightly curious about Earhart, like me, and managed to be both informative and truly entertaining, which is rare for a non-fiction book. It reads both like a biography and a compelling mystery drama: highly recommended!
Thank you, Netgalley and National Geographic, for a copy of the ARC in exchange for an honest review!
Read
March 2, 20263.5 ⭐
What is it about Amelia Earhart and her missing plane that fascinates us all?
Author Rachel Hartigan shares how hopes were escalated in 2019 when an underwater vehicle discovered an object at 4800m below sea level just off the coast of the “island of Nikumaroro, an uninhabited coral atoll just shy of the equator” where Earhart and Noonan’s Lockheed Electra 10e was said to have likely disappeared in 1937.
She shares about the limitations of the sonar imaging used to locate the wreck, checking the dimensions of the object to see if they match those of the Electra, that researchers still claim the wreck is roughly on Earhart’s flight route and will send equipment down to the site again, and that there are claims the two may have been captured and killed in Saipan, Japan, by a firing squad. Each theory is discussed and questions are raised. I didn’t feel like anything was too technical and I felt that the information was reliable. I’ll admit to being as frustrated looking for answers when I finished the book as before I started.
Part biography, part a search for answers, this book will appeal to those who've been curious about the disappearance and those who recall hearing about a possible discovery.
Hartigan asks a thought-provoking question:
“Amelia’s closest relatives endured the unresolved nature of her death and their grief for the rest of their days. Why can’t we?”
I was gifted this copy and was under no obligation to provide a review.
What is it about Amelia Earhart and her missing plane that fascinates us all?
Author Rachel Hartigan shares how hopes were escalated in 2019 when an underwater vehicle discovered an object at 4800m below sea level just off the coast of the “island of Nikumaroro, an uninhabited coral atoll just shy of the equator” where Earhart and Noonan’s Lockheed Electra 10e was said to have likely disappeared in 1937.
She shares about the limitations of the sonar imaging used to locate the wreck, checking the dimensions of the object to see if they match those of the Electra, that researchers still claim the wreck is roughly on Earhart’s flight route and will send equipment down to the site again, and that there are claims the two may have been captured and killed in Saipan, Japan, by a firing squad. Each theory is discussed and questions are raised. I didn’t feel like anything was too technical and I felt that the information was reliable. I’ll admit to being as frustrated looking for answers when I finished the book as before I started.
Part biography, part a search for answers, this book will appeal to those who've been curious about the disappearance and those who recall hearing about a possible discovery.
Hartigan asks a thought-provoking question:
“Amelia’s closest relatives endured the unresolved nature of her death and their grief for the rest of their days. Why can’t we?”
I was gifted this copy and was under no obligation to provide a review.
February 19, 2026
ADVANCE REVIEW COPY – RELEASE DATE: MARCH 3, 2026
When you think Amelia Earhart, what do you think? You should think about her accomplishments in aviation, her dedication to social justice, and her role in the early women’s rights movements. But chances are, the first thing you conjure is, of course, her mysterious disappearance. Or maybe Amy Adams’ over-the-top portrayal of her in the “Night at the Museum” movies. Hey, I’m guilty of it, too.
But if you’re as curious as I was about the woman behind the puzzle, this is your book.
Hartigan uses a simple but effective method: she alternates chapters. One will discuss an aspect of her disappearance, the next will cover her biography. Usually, I prefer the more linear method, but this structure just worked perfectly. It’s almost as if she wanted to convey that Earhart’s interesting and impactful life was just as important as her disappearance.
Hartigan lays out all the theories and investigations from 1937 until today, with some still ongoing. The term from the title, “Three Mysterious Deaths,” indicates the three main theories of what happened to Earhart and Noonan (her navigator):
1. They ran out of fuel and crashed in the ocean
2. They landed somewhere, somehow, and died as castaways on a deserted island
3. They were captured by the Japanese (and either executed or recruited as spies)
Thus, this part is quasi-linear. It gets a little jargon-y, so I went into “scan mode”: I just kind of got the gist of it and looked for the conclusions. But you’ll have to read it with – spoiler alert – the fact that none of the investigations have been successful. (So far.) Hartigan presents them with National Geographic-like curiosity and precision, not frenzied sensationalism.
However, what I appreciated most about this was the rich and meaningful description of an American heroine. The tragedy of her death seems to overshadow the triumph of her life, and Hartigan changed my focus. Earhart did things women just didn’t do at that time in history, and flying was just one part of it. From growing up playing sports and exploring nature, to making speeches to rapt audiences, to teaching aviation and business at the university level, to working for the betterment of her community in settlement houses, her life was one of service and discovery.
What’s more, she had her share of challenges, and not just battling sexism. She wasn’t dirt poor, but she also didn’t have unlimited resources. Society also expected her to settle down in the traditional American family style, but that just wasn’t her. She’s the kind of person I’d like to have met, and it’d be easy to call her a role model in any generation. Hartigan doesn’t canonize her, but opens our eyes to what’s been overlooked: a tremendous life that should overshadow her death.
It’s my hope this biography hits the big time, since it’s a subject worth noting and is written in a precise but emotional style. Go get it!
Thanks to NetGalley and none other than National Geographic for an advance copy in exchange for an honest review. Lost: Amelia Earhart's Three Mysterious Deaths and One Extraordinary Life will be released March 3, 2026.
When you think Amelia Earhart, what do you think? You should think about her accomplishments in aviation, her dedication to social justice, and her role in the early women’s rights movements. But chances are, the first thing you conjure is, of course, her mysterious disappearance. Or maybe Amy Adams’ over-the-top portrayal of her in the “Night at the Museum” movies. Hey, I’m guilty of it, too.
But if you’re as curious as I was about the woman behind the puzzle, this is your book.
Hartigan uses a simple but effective method: she alternates chapters. One will discuss an aspect of her disappearance, the next will cover her biography. Usually, I prefer the more linear method, but this structure just worked perfectly. It’s almost as if she wanted to convey that Earhart’s interesting and impactful life was just as important as her disappearance.
Hartigan lays out all the theories and investigations from 1937 until today, with some still ongoing. The term from the title, “Three Mysterious Deaths,” indicates the three main theories of what happened to Earhart and Noonan (her navigator):
1. They ran out of fuel and crashed in the ocean
2. They landed somewhere, somehow, and died as castaways on a deserted island
3. They were captured by the Japanese (and either executed or recruited as spies)
Thus, this part is quasi-linear. It gets a little jargon-y, so I went into “scan mode”: I just kind of got the gist of it and looked for the conclusions. But you’ll have to read it with – spoiler alert – the fact that none of the investigations have been successful. (So far.) Hartigan presents them with National Geographic-like curiosity and precision, not frenzied sensationalism.
However, what I appreciated most about this was the rich and meaningful description of an American heroine. The tragedy of her death seems to overshadow the triumph of her life, and Hartigan changed my focus. Earhart did things women just didn’t do at that time in history, and flying was just one part of it. From growing up playing sports and exploring nature, to making speeches to rapt audiences, to teaching aviation and business at the university level, to working for the betterment of her community in settlement houses, her life was one of service and discovery.
What’s more, she had her share of challenges, and not just battling sexism. She wasn’t dirt poor, but she also didn’t have unlimited resources. Society also expected her to settle down in the traditional American family style, but that just wasn’t her. She’s the kind of person I’d like to have met, and it’d be easy to call her a role model in any generation. Hartigan doesn’t canonize her, but opens our eyes to what’s been overlooked: a tremendous life that should overshadow her death.
It’s my hope this biography hits the big time, since it’s a subject worth noting and is written in a precise but emotional style. Go get it!
Thanks to NetGalley and none other than National Geographic for an advance copy in exchange for an honest review. Lost: Amelia Earhart's Three Mysterious Deaths and One Extraordinary Life will be released March 3, 2026.
September 8, 2025
Thanks to NetGalley and National Geographic [the publisher] for an eARC of Lost: Amelia Earhart’s Three Mysterious Deaths and One Extraordinary Life by Rachel Hartigan, with an expected publication date in March of 2026, in return for an honest review.
I have never been obsessed with the mystery of Earhart’s disappearance, but have been intrigued over the years at the periodic articles about the latest theory/discovery concerning her disappearance. She has become a figure of adulation and the center of a number of conspiracy theories. Was she a spy for the US in the years leading up to the war against Japan in WWII. Was she a Japanese spy, whose disappearance allowed her to go to Japan and become Tokyo Rose during the war? These are just two of the conspiracies covered in Hartigan’s fascinating book. While not a predominant theme, the author explores the role of conspiracy thought in American history.
The author was a journalist working for National Geographic, and participated in a couple expeditions to the Pacific in attempts to locate the remains of Earhart’s plane or even her remains. The book alternates between Earhart’s biography and an exploration of what went wrong on her last flight. Hartigan does a good job of laying out the various theories behind many of the attempts to locate her. [Some my find too much detail, but the detail is necessary to explain why the explorers searched where they did.] Despite her own role in the search, the author remains in the background, giving the reader enough to understand her experience and interest in the topic. I have not read any other biographies of Earhart, but Lost provides an excellent exposition of her life.
Reading Lost you get a sense of the adulation that continues around Earhart, in part as a feminist icon. Last time that I looked, Goodreads lists almost 1,000 entries with her as a subject, many of them for children. I recommend this book, especially for those interested in biographies, history [the history of the early days of aviation], or an exploration of conspiracy thinking.
I have never been obsessed with the mystery of Earhart’s disappearance, but have been intrigued over the years at the periodic articles about the latest theory/discovery concerning her disappearance. She has become a figure of adulation and the center of a number of conspiracy theories. Was she a spy for the US in the years leading up to the war against Japan in WWII. Was she a Japanese spy, whose disappearance allowed her to go to Japan and become Tokyo Rose during the war? These are just two of the conspiracies covered in Hartigan’s fascinating book. While not a predominant theme, the author explores the role of conspiracy thought in American history.
The author was a journalist working for National Geographic, and participated in a couple expeditions to the Pacific in attempts to locate the remains of Earhart’s plane or even her remains. The book alternates between Earhart’s biography and an exploration of what went wrong on her last flight. Hartigan does a good job of laying out the various theories behind many of the attempts to locate her. [Some my find too much detail, but the detail is necessary to explain why the explorers searched where they did.] Despite her own role in the search, the author remains in the background, giving the reader enough to understand her experience and interest in the topic. I have not read any other biographies of Earhart, but Lost provides an excellent exposition of her life.
Reading Lost you get a sense of the adulation that continues around Earhart, in part as a feminist icon. Last time that I looked, Goodreads lists almost 1,000 entries with her as a subject, many of them for children. I recommend this book, especially for those interested in biographies, history [the history of the early days of aviation], or an exploration of conspiracy thinking.
December 29, 2025
The story of Amelia Earhart has been told by countless authors. It is a well-researched subject. But this book does something few others do - it describes in detail Amelia’s life before her disappearance. In Lost, Rachel Hartigan dives deep, detailing this biographical information with suspenseful narration. She speaks about Amelia’s home life and the influences her mother and father had on her childhood. It speaks about her adoring sister, and the influence the World Fair had on her – cultivating a love for aviation that eventually led her to become a pilot. And, about Fred Noonan, to whom she leaned on for aviation advice and guidance.
Interwoven with the biographical information is the story of her last flight and theories of her disappearance. And, while many believe to know what happened to Amelia, spending tens of millions of dollars to search islands and seas, Rachel highlights an important point – we may never discover what became of the famed pilot. The sea is wide and deep, and resources are limited. But nearly 90 years later, interest continues to rise. With luck, we may stumble upon the wreck one day and be able to close this chapter of history.
Overall, Rachel’s writing was enjoyable. The story flowed well, navigating well the distribution of information with a dialogue-like narrative. I would recommend this to anyone interested in Amelia Earhart, aviation mysteries, or strange or mysterious stories.
Many thanks to NetGalley, National Geographic, and Rachel Hartigan for this book in advance of an honest review.
Interwoven with the biographical information is the story of her last flight and theories of her disappearance. And, while many believe to know what happened to Amelia, spending tens of millions of dollars to search islands and seas, Rachel highlights an important point – we may never discover what became of the famed pilot. The sea is wide and deep, and resources are limited. But nearly 90 years later, interest continues to rise. With luck, we may stumble upon the wreck one day and be able to close this chapter of history.
Overall, Rachel’s writing was enjoyable. The story flowed well, navigating well the distribution of information with a dialogue-like narrative. I would recommend this to anyone interested in Amelia Earhart, aviation mysteries, or strange or mysterious stories.
Many thanks to NetGalley, National Geographic, and Rachel Hartigan for this book in advance of an honest review.
April 3, 2026
Amelia Earhart is such an intriguing historical figure. Her disappearance has fascinated us all for generations. What really happened to her on that fateful journey across the globe? LOST is a wonderful exploration of Earhart’s life, giving us a taste of her daredevil spirit that led her to be one of the pioneers of female aviation. What I found most interesting is her life leading up to her disappearance. Amelia seemed like one of those take no shit from anyone types of pioneer spirit I admire.
Rachel Hartigan, a journalist from National Geographic, gives us an in-depth look at Earhart and the adventures that led up to her final journey, leading her to disappear in the South Pacific. Was she captured by the Japanese? Did she die a lonely death on a deserted island? The world may never know. Truth be told, she pushed the limitations of technological advancement, dodging the inevitable many times, until she couldn’t dodge it anymore. Explorers like Earhart roll the dice. Eventually, you number comes up. A fascinating read which I recommend to anyone interested in learning about her life or early air exploration.
4 Deserted Islands out of 5
Rachel Hartigan, a journalist from National Geographic, gives us an in-depth look at Earhart and the adventures that led up to her final journey, leading her to disappear in the South Pacific. Was she captured by the Japanese? Did she die a lonely death on a deserted island? The world may never know. Truth be told, she pushed the limitations of technological advancement, dodging the inevitable many times, until she couldn’t dodge it anymore. Explorers like Earhart roll the dice. Eventually, you number comes up. A fascinating read which I recommend to anyone interested in learning about her life or early air exploration.
4 Deserted Islands out of 5
March 17, 2026
A concise collection of every endeavor to recover Amelia Earhart and her navigator-- from the moment she disappeared to present day-- mixed with everything we know about Earhart's life. While occasionally I would get confused because of the timeline jumping around, I found myself completely convinced each time a new theory of the famed pilot's disappearance was introduced. Probably not much new information for someone well versed in Earhart's life and mystery, but for someone whose knowledge of her was limited, this was a really good summary.
Thank you to NetGalley for providing me access to the advanced copy
Thank you to NetGalley for providing me access to the advanced copy
February 26, 2026
Thank you Net Galley, Rachel Hartigan and National Geographic for allowing me to read this book in advance.
I have always been curious and interested to know what really happened to Amelia Earhart so when I saw this book offered I knew I had to read it.
I will keep my review brief and spoiler free as I don’t plan to ruin the book for anyone who aims to read it.
There is more to Amelia than most people realize. She has been involved in clothing lines, women’s movements and rights.
I myself being a huge fan of aircraft and female are probably why her life and story has always interested me over the decades.
Thank you for this very interesting story and all the hard work and efforts to try and decipher what really happened to Amelia.
I have always been curious and interested to know what really happened to Amelia Earhart so when I saw this book offered I knew I had to read it.
I will keep my review brief and spoiler free as I don’t plan to ruin the book for anyone who aims to read it.
There is more to Amelia than most people realize. She has been involved in clothing lines, women’s movements and rights.
I myself being a huge fan of aircraft and female are probably why her life and story has always interested me over the decades.
Thank you for this very interesting story and all the hard work and efforts to try and decipher what really happened to Amelia.
August 11, 2025
read if you like:
📖 non-fiction
✈️ Amelia Earhart
🤷🏻♀️ missing people
summary:
I’ve always been fascinated by Amelia Earhart since I was little. I mean really — how does someone just disappear? This combined with my love of female heroines made this the perfect book to preview. This story follows National Geographic reporter Rachel Hartigan on her search around the world for the true story behind Amelia Earhart, as she explores three of the most common theories of her disappearance. Alternating between the story of her life and the details behind these theories, the reader learns more about who Amelia was, what led her to her record-breaking trip, and the mystique behind her legacy.
As someone who hasn’t read a lot about these theories, Hartigan does an excellent job of digging into the details behind them. It’s hard to believe how far fetched some of them were and still are, but she investigates each of them, along with the evidence and research that followed to refute them. The depth of her investigation is impressive, and sadly proves that many of these theories are honestly, unprovable. While the author might go into a little too much detail for the average reader, it would be perfect for any Amelia Earhart fan who wants the complete story.
Thanks to National Geographic and NetGalley for the advanced copy. If you too are fascinated by this mystery, check this out book out when it releases on March 3, 2026.
📖 non-fiction
✈️ Amelia Earhart
🤷🏻♀️ missing people
summary:
I’ve always been fascinated by Amelia Earhart since I was little. I mean really — how does someone just disappear? This combined with my love of female heroines made this the perfect book to preview. This story follows National Geographic reporter Rachel Hartigan on her search around the world for the true story behind Amelia Earhart, as she explores three of the most common theories of her disappearance. Alternating between the story of her life and the details behind these theories, the reader learns more about who Amelia was, what led her to her record-breaking trip, and the mystique behind her legacy.
As someone who hasn’t read a lot about these theories, Hartigan does an excellent job of digging into the details behind them. It’s hard to believe how far fetched some of them were and still are, but she investigates each of them, along with the evidence and research that followed to refute them. The depth of her investigation is impressive, and sadly proves that many of these theories are honestly, unprovable. While the author might go into a little too much detail for the average reader, it would be perfect for any Amelia Earhart fan who wants the complete story.
Thanks to National Geographic and NetGalley for the advanced copy. If you too are fascinated by this mystery, check this out book out when it releases on March 3, 2026.
April 4, 2026
I'm grading up because it was much better than I expected. This popped up on Netgalley while I was prepping a presentation on Amelia's Settlement worker career (which also ended up being much more interesting than I thought, even though creepy how close it is to today's Settlement work). I hit "request" and then when it came through, I was like "why did I ask for that? I hate the Amelia conspiracy nuts?" But they gave it to me so I read it.
In the beginning, the author says there are two types of Amelia fans-- those who focus on her life and accomplishments and those who focus on the mystery of her death. I am firmly in camp 1- this book has put me more firmly in the camp that hopes she crashed at sea and died quickly, some of the theories presented here sound horrid! But if I am asked about her death, I will always say it is because she pushed too far too fast and this book gave me more solid information to that theory (I also never thought she was that great of a pilot- whenever she went head to head with other pilots she did not do well). Why didn't she learn more about navigation first? And now I add to that why did she only spend a couple hours training on the radio? She should have spent more time preparing.
This book did make me feel a little bad for GP. I have always seen him as the villain in the story, pushing Amelia so they can be more and more famous. This book puts the fault much more on her feet.
Oh, back to the book than my gripes about AE (as a Jacquie Cochran fan I have many). I really liked how she chopped up the book going between the biography and the nuts. And she was very diplomatic in talking about them but I liked where she brought out the quote from Amelia's family about how much money is wasted on the search. I did get confused with who was who and who was working with who, but overall, it was more interesting than I thought that part would be.
I also liked the biography part. She spent time on the Settlement phase of Amelia's life, which I think in many ways made her the most happy. I'm happy I read this after my presentation as she said much of the same things I had said and I would have felt I was plagiarizing (we clearly used the same sources). And she spent a couple paragraphs on Helen Richey's story, which has been forgotten and should be told much more often. Having read many many AE biographies, I feel she told the important stories.
I also liked her voice and writing style. I felt like I was along for the ride with her.
OK, maybe this deserves 4 stars cause it is that good.
ATY Prompt: A book involving survival (even if she didn't)
In the beginning, the author says there are two types of Amelia fans-- those who focus on her life and accomplishments and those who focus on the mystery of her death. I am firmly in camp 1- this book has put me more firmly in the camp that hopes she crashed at sea and died quickly, some of the theories presented here sound horrid! But if I am asked about her death, I will always say it is because she pushed too far too fast and this book gave me more solid information to that theory (I also never thought she was that great of a pilot- whenever she went head to head with other pilots she did not do well). Why didn't she learn more about navigation first? And now I add to that why did she only spend a couple hours training on the radio? She should have spent more time preparing.
This book did make me feel a little bad for GP. I have always seen him as the villain in the story, pushing Amelia so they can be more and more famous. This book puts the fault much more on her feet.
Oh, back to the book than my gripes about AE (as a Jacquie Cochran fan I have many). I really liked how she chopped up the book going between the biography and the nuts. And she was very diplomatic in talking about them but I liked where she brought out the quote from Amelia's family about how much money is wasted on the search. I did get confused with who was who and who was working with who, but overall, it was more interesting than I thought that part would be.
I also liked the biography part. She spent time on the Settlement phase of Amelia's life, which I think in many ways made her the most happy. I'm happy I read this after my presentation as she said much of the same things I had said and I would have felt I was plagiarizing (we clearly used the same sources). And she spent a couple paragraphs on Helen Richey's story, which has been forgotten and should be told much more often. Having read many many AE biographies, I feel she told the important stories.
I also liked her voice and writing style. I felt like I was along for the ride with her.
OK, maybe this deserves 4 stars cause it is that good.
ATY Prompt: A book involving survival (even if she didn't)
Read
March 20, 2026In 2017, Rachel Hartigan found herself on the island of Nikumaroro, an uninhabited coral atoll in the western Pacific Ocean. She was there on an assignment for National Geographic Magazine, trailing The International Group for Historic Aircraft Recovery (TIGHAR).
Their mission: to find Amelia Earhart.
The first woman to fly across the Atlantic. The aviator who vanished in 1937 somewhere in the Pacific during an around-the-world adventure. The superstar whose disappearance (along with that of her plane and her navigator, Fred Noonan) has befuddled and beguiled researchers for nearly 90 years.
Other so-called “Earhart hounds” have different theories. That she was captured by the Japanese, or drowned or even survived and moved back to the US under a different name.
Hartigan tries to make sense of them all in her new book “Lost: Amelia Earhart’s Three Mysterious Deaths and One Extraordinary Life” (National Geographic).
As the author unspools each of the main theories, “Lost” uncovers an obsessive subculture of amateur sleuths and conspiracy theorists — as well as legit scientists and historians — who have dedicated their lives to solving the mystery.
“I think people are drawn into theories around Earhart because they want an ending to the story,” Hartigan told The Post. “She was a super famous person. How could such a super famous person disappear? And how can we not know the ending? We need to know the ending to the story.”
Read the rest of my piece for the NY Post here: https://nypost.com/2026/03/08/world-n...
Their mission: to find Amelia Earhart.
The first woman to fly across the Atlantic. The aviator who vanished in 1937 somewhere in the Pacific during an around-the-world adventure. The superstar whose disappearance (along with that of her plane and her navigator, Fred Noonan) has befuddled and beguiled researchers for nearly 90 years.
Other so-called “Earhart hounds” have different theories. That she was captured by the Japanese, or drowned or even survived and moved back to the US under a different name.
Hartigan tries to make sense of them all in her new book “Lost: Amelia Earhart’s Three Mysterious Deaths and One Extraordinary Life” (National Geographic).
As the author unspools each of the main theories, “Lost” uncovers an obsessive subculture of amateur sleuths and conspiracy theorists — as well as legit scientists and historians — who have dedicated their lives to solving the mystery.
“I think people are drawn into theories around Earhart because they want an ending to the story,” Hartigan told The Post. “She was a super famous person. How could such a super famous person disappear? And how can we not know the ending? We need to know the ending to the story.”
Read the rest of my piece for the NY Post here: https://nypost.com/2026/03/08/world-n...
March 5, 2026
This book offers an interesting look not only at the story of Amelia Earhart, but also at the many attempts to locate her and her airplane in the Pacific Ocean. I especially liked the way the chapters alternated between Earhart’s life and background and the details of the various search expeditions. That structure helped the story flow well and kept the narrative engaging.
It’s clear that the book is thoroughly researched, and I appreciated that the author had firsthand experience with some of the search efforts. That perspective added an extra layer of credibility and interest to the story. I did find myself wishing there had been a bit more discussion about the aftermath of Earhart’s disappearance and its longer-term impact, but overall this was an intriguing and informative nonfiction look at the enduring mystery surrounding Amelia Earhart.
Thank you to NetGalley and the publisher for providing an advance copy in exchange for an honest review.
It’s clear that the book is thoroughly researched, and I appreciated that the author had firsthand experience with some of the search efforts. That perspective added an extra layer of credibility and interest to the story. I did find myself wishing there had been a bit more discussion about the aftermath of Earhart’s disappearance and its longer-term impact, but overall this was an intriguing and informative nonfiction look at the enduring mystery surrounding Amelia Earhart.
Thank you to NetGalley and the publisher for providing an advance copy in exchange for an honest review.
March 20, 2026
Thank you to NetGalley and National Geographic for an ARC of this book in exchange for an honest review.
Overall this was a combination biography and story of theories and searches for what happened to Amelia.
The style the author used flowed very well, mixing stories about searches along with biography. I found it overall interesting although parts seemed longer than necessary to establish the point.
For someone interested in the topic, they would probably find this interesting but for the diehards I’m not sure it would add much more than. Wasn’t previously known. Being neither, I still found the book overall enjoyable.
Overall this was a combination biography and story of theories and searches for what happened to Amelia.
The style the author used flowed very well, mixing stories about searches along with biography. I found it overall interesting although parts seemed longer than necessary to establish the point.
For someone interested in the topic, they would probably find this interesting but for the diehards I’m not sure it would add much more than. Wasn’t previously known. Being neither, I still found the book overall enjoyable.
March 14, 2026
Spoiler alert: this is a book about the events leading up to Amelia's disapperance AND simultaneously different rescue and recovery projects (most recent was 2025). This is NOT the story about finding Earhart, but about the long long efforts and questions people have asked and wondered about her life and disapperance.
Overall I loved how well research this was- but I also felt the story jumped around TOO many times for me to really keep track. I wished it was organized a little bit differently. Overall, highly recommend!
A special thank you to NetGalley and to National Geographic (SQUEAL!?!?!) for alloting me an ebook copy of this book.
Overall I loved how well research this was- but I also felt the story jumped around TOO many times for me to really keep track. I wished it was organized a little bit differently. Overall, highly recommend!
A special thank you to NetGalley and to National Geographic (SQUEAL!?!?!) for alloting me an ebook copy of this book.
April 2, 2026
The book would have worked better as a straight forward biography of Amelia Earhart. The biographical sections are riveting and inspiring. She was so much more than her mysterious disappearance. The book suffers from the rotating chapters on the efforts to solve the disappearance. These sections are interesting for a brief period but get more annoying and intrusive as the book goes on.
April 4, 2026
I rounded up from 3.5. I got sucked into the mystery as the different theories unfolded while also being astounded by level of dedication so many people have put into trying to solve this mystery. I knew very little about Amelia’s story and enjoyed learning more about her but there were plenty of terms and details that flew (pun intended) right over my head.
May 4, 2026
An easy, quick read about a continuing mystery.
March 5, 2026
Sure, I would love to know what really happened to Earhart, but this earnest and thorough overview of all main theories and their lives by an involved investigator is the next best thing. Most intriguing to me was the chase after bones
The chase to locate those bones reads like a drama movie.
What is real is Amelia the person that comes through here, and I really don't like to think of her dying slowly without stimulation....
When she was with society we learn there was a feminist push to clear the way for women in aviation and that was a driving impulse for Earhart.
In all this, it seems she was sloppy in not learning More code sufficiently, or some of her (then) modern equipment. This and multiple small errors are a constellation of those most convincing arguments of a rather banal final end.
Also an exciting part here is the large effort to re-create the conditions and see what may have happened.
King hypothesized that after Earhart died, the crabs consumed her flesh and dragged her bones into their burrows— except, of course, the 13 bones Gallagher’s team discovered.
The chase to locate those bones reads like a drama movie.
What is real is Amelia the person that comes through here, and I really don't like to think of her dying slowly without stimulation....
“Oh, if only we can get away soon. It is hard indeed to remains sans books, sans contact with one’s interests and withal on a terrific strain,” Amelia observed.
When she was with society we learn there was a feminist push to clear the way for women in aviation and that was a driving impulse for Earhart.
Amelia had nearly finalized a deal to be the aviation editor for McCall’s magazine, where she’d have a platform from which to extoll on her favorite subject— the wonders, convenience, and practicality of flying as well as the sheer opportunities it offered to women. She was thrilled, though apprehensive, at this new role. But McCall’s wouldn’t permit any member of its staff— especially a high-profile one— to be sullied by a whiff of cigarette smoke. After all, this magazine went into good, middle-class homes across the country. The offer was rescinded before she could begin.
...
For Amelia, talk of opportunities and a satisfying life naturally segued into talk of aviation. “There is need for every kind of talent to advance the business of flying,” a business that would only increase, even with the troubled economy, she argued. “What opportunities lie here for clear thinking, energy, and vision!” But those opportunities must include women, whose progress she said was being blocked by two capital T’s: “One is Training— or lack of it. The other, Tradition. It is a fact that women, because they are women, are denied certain types of training in a number of institutions of learning.” She pointed out that New York University, then the largest university in the country, prevented women from taking aeronautical engineering courses.
...
Amelia had been pushing for women’s rights in other arenas. She refused to give money to Denison House unless she could be certain her donation would be used “for girls in some way.” She’d begun researching how menstruation affected women’s abilities in other physically taxing fields. Men seemed to feel it was exceedingly dangerous for all women to fly during menses. Women themselves knew better: A few women were truly laid low by menstruation, but most women weren’t.
In all this, it seems she was sloppy in not learning More code sufficiently, or some of her (then) modern equipment. This and multiple small errors are a constellation of those most convincing arguments of a rather banal final end.
It took the Longs more than 25 years to publish their conclusion: After a cascade of errors, the Lockheed Electra 10-E ran out of fuel and crashed into the ocean near Howland. In their accounting, nearly everyone involved in the flight made mistakes or had the wrong information. None of these errors were insurmountable individually. Compounded, the Longs argued, they almost inevitably doomed Amelia Earhart and Fred Noonan. Earhart and Noonan never knew about their first mistake. Indeed, it wasn’t a mistake, just a matter of bad timing. When Earhart radioed the Itasca at 7: 42 a.m. on July 2, 1937, to say, “We must be on you but cannot see you,” she was going by what their charts and Noonan’s dead reckoning was telling her. And she was right to rely on Noonan, who had pioneered Pan American’s commercial routes across the Pacific; few navigators were more experienced than he was in that region of the world. Yet the island wasn’t where he thought it would be. The Itasca had been traveling down to the Line Islands— Howland, Baker 42 miles south, and Jarvis more than 1,000 miles to the east— since 1935, as part of the bid to establish them as U.S. territories. On one trip south from Hawaii, the ship’s navigator surveyed the islands and discovered existing maps put Howland nearly six miles east of where it actually was. (The island had last been charted by the U.S.S. Narragansett in 1872.) The Itasca sent the updated coordinates to Coast Guard headquarters, but an updated chart wasn’t published until June 1937— too late for Noonan to be apprised of the island’s real location. Compounding the error, Noonan made what Long considered a baffling mistake: He assumed his compass presented the actual magnetic heading, without any deviation. Long examined the charts Noonan sent home, which included his calculations. “Whenever it came to deviation, he wrote zero,” said Long. But most compasses on most planes deviate, reacting magnetically to metal objects and electrical currents on board. “There’s no such thing in my navigational experience (and I’ve had a lifetime of it) in those days as a perfect compass,” he explained. He estimated Noonan’s compass was actually off the mark by nearly four degrees— not a big deal for short flights (the Federal Aviation Administration now allows for deviations of up to 10 degrees) but potentially catastrophic in a long flight like theirs. This error may have put the Electra short by another six miles. Add that to the six miles from the incorrect map and Earhart’s “must be on you” was actually 12 miles west of Howland. Meanwhile, a wind blowing at exactly the wrong speed put them even farther off course: The Itasca had reported an easterly wind at four to eight miles an hour. Too weak to create whitecaps on the waves, thought Long, such a breeze would have been invisible to Earhart and Noonan. Noonan would have had no other way to measure wind speed as he had left his drift bomb behind in Lae. This light little wind pushed the Electra another six or so miles west. Now they were some 18 miles west of Howland, beyond visual range in the early morning sunlight. But all wasn’t lost. Unpredictable conditions are a predictable element of any long journey, and Earhart had prepared for them. She knew finding Howland would be one of the trickiest parts of the world flight, and that the smallest error could put them off their course to the island. That’s why she’d established a radio communication plan with the Coast Guard— through their cutter, the Itasca— so they could talk her in if need be. That’s why she’d had a cutting-edge radio direction finder installed on her plane, and why the Itasca was waiting at Howland with its own pair of radio direction finders: a powerful low-frequency model on the ship and a portable high-frequency counterpart on the island. With these backup systems in place, she and Noonan would be able to make a slight course correction and within minutes see the rough runways on Howland Island. Unfortunately, according to the Longs, every one of those backup systems failed. The trouble began early on. Earhart had informed the Itasca she would transmit 15 minutes before and after the hour and listen for their messages on the hour and half hour. The radiomen misunderstood; they were used to keeping to schedules, which to them meant making an appointment with another radio operator to be on the same frequency at a set time. They thought that’s what Earhart would be doing, and assumed they’d be able to communicate back and forth. But Earhart meant what she said. She’d flip on her transmitter to transmit messages at set times and turn on her receiver to listen for messages at others. She didn’t have time to hang out on a frequency waiting to chat. The Itasca had four radio operators whose sole responsibility was managing communications for the ship. The Electra only had Earhart. The discrepancy didn’t register with O’Hare, Bellarts, and their colleagues. When O’Hare demanded why she didn’t keep monitoring her receiver, Long responded with uncharacteristic heat: “She’s flying an airplane. She’s got to keep track of her fuel. She’s marking the engines. She’s navigating. She’s watching her autopilot. She’s doing everything.” “Has she got the cans on her ears?” asked O’Hare. The headphones, he meant. “For 20 hours?” Long replied, his voice rising. “Her ears would fall off, for Christ’s sake.” To Long, who’d flown solo around the world, it was clear: Earhart had to keep to the schedule she described so she could take care of everything else. And there was another big problem with the communication plan— one the Longs called “the simplest of booby traps”: the time zones. Earhart was operating on Greenwich Mean Time (now Coordinated Universal Time or UTC) while the Itasca crew was on Greenwich time plus 11: 30 (one hour behind Hawaiian Standard Time). In other words, the Longs wrote, “Earhart’s ‘on the hour’ was their ‘on the half hour.’” They weren’t transmitting when she was listening for them, and they were when she wasn’t. She never heard them, except once right toward the end. “The half-hour difference? Never gave it a thought,” said O’Hare. In Long’s recording of their interview, the former radio operator’s breath sounds short, as if the wind had been knocked out of him. The one time Earhart did hear them, the Itasca was sending a message on 7,500 kilocycles in Morse code. And therein lies another big error, according to Long: Neither Noonan nor Earhart knew code, but the radiomen on board the ship assumed they did. In their world, everyone who operated a radio knew code. But because she didn’t, she would have turned the switch to off on her receiver for CW— continuous wave Morse code signals. When they transmitted code, all she would have heard was an undecipherable whoosh. But despite the misunderstandings between the Electra and the Itasca, Earhart and Noonan might have landed safely on Howland Island if the cutting-edge technology they were all relying on as the ultimate backup had worked. And in this case, according to the Longs, the failure was not that of the Coast Guard crew— at least not completely— but of Earhart herself. Earhart had originally planned on having a dedicated radio operator on board for the first few legs. But Henry Manning, a ship’s captain as well as an accomplished pilot, navigator, and radio operator who knew Morse code, backed out after Earhart crashed on her first attempt around the world. When the radio direction finder was installed on the plane, Manning had been the one to learn how it worked. When Manning returned to his ship, Earhart received a brief tutorial. But she was too busy to practice using the device, which was so new that it didn’t even come with a manual. Not realizing that low frequencies were crucial to direction finding, she removed the trailing wire that would have made receiving them possible. She never figured out why she couldn’t get the direction finder to work throughout the world flight. The problems with direction finding didn’t end there. If the Electra couldn’t receive signals on 500 kilocycles, it also couldn’t transmit them. The Itasca direction finder was powerful, but only worked at low frequencies; it would not be able to guide the plane in. There was still the high-frequency direction finder loaned to the Itasca for this mission. None of the crew members knew how to operate it. A young radio operator was temporarily transferred from another ship. But he didn’t know how to operate it either. Later, he would claim the batteries had run out, and that’s why he never homed in on Earhart. But when he finally returned to the ship with the direction finder, the wires were “twisted up like a bunch of rats’ tails,” as if the loop had been turned too hard. It was inoperable. And there was one last miscalculation, according to the Longs— one that didn’t prevent Earhart and Noonan from finding the island, but did stop them from searching a little longer. The Electra had less fuel than Earhart realized. The tanks had been filled the day before they left Lae; tropical heat had affected the fuel’s density, effectively reducing the gallons on board from 1,100 to 1,092. “She was in the middle of her last radio message when they went in,” said Long. “I can tie that down pretty good.” Long also thought he had a pretty good idea where the plane went down. Or at least where it didn’t. He calculated that the Electra couldn’t have crashed anywhere within visual range of Howland Island— so nowhere within 20 nautical miles to the north, south, or east. To the west, the visual range shrank to 15 nautical miles because the aviators were flying toward the sun’s glare, which reduced visibility. Knowing what Noonan didn’t know about the charts, his compass, and the wind, and making the standard assumption that dead reckoning is 90 percent accurate, Long calculated that at 8: 43 in the morning on July 2, the plane crashed somewhere within a rectangle 62 miles north and south of Howland, 29 miles to the east, and 41 miles to the west. “If this approximately 2,000-square-nautical-mile area is searched, there is a 90 percent probability that the Electra will be found within it,” he wrote.
...
Why did she opt to use 7,500 as the frequency in the first place? “It’s just not optimal for doing that kind of work,” says Vinson. “You’re supposed to be down around 500 to 1,500 kHz.” He wonders if she misread instructions from her former radio operator Harry Manning, whose handwriting used a Europeanized “1” that could easily be mistaken for a 7.
....
it was a relatively short hop to Darwin, on the northern edge of Australia. When they arrived, a communications officer named Stanley Rose asked why Amelia hadn’t contacted the Darwin direction finding unit, as was mandatory in the country. She admitted she hadn’t been able to use the direction finder since leaving the United States— and apparently hadn’t missed it. Rose got it to work by replacing a fuse. But Amelia’s familiarity with the device she’d be relying on to cross the Pacific hadn’t improved since her brief training with Joe Gurr more than a month earlier in California.
Also an exciting part here is the large effort to re-create the conditions and see what may have happened.
...the vessel would play the role of the Itasca, the Coast Guard cutter that awaited Amelia Earhart and Fred Noonan at Howland Island. Some 30 miles to the north at Accomack County Airport, a restored Beechcraft Model 18 plane was being prepared for takeoff in a few hours. It would serve as a stand-in for Earhart’s Lockheed Electra 10-E.
April 3, 2026
Not a character study of AE but an insightful overview of her life and accomplishments, as well as several high profile attempts to explain her disappearance and locate remains. It’s amazing that we’re still captivated by her story nearly 100 years later.
April 30, 2026
The book unfolds less like a linear narrative and more like a shifting field of perception, where meaning is never fully secured but constantly deferred, echoing a distinctly postmodern sensibility. What initially appears to be a story about loss gradually destabilises itself, revealing that “loss” is not an event but a condition—one that seeps into language, memory, and identity.
The narrative resists closure at every turn, refusing to offer the reader the comfort of a resolved arc. Instead, it lingers in the liminal, where absence becomes as tangible as presence. This refusal to stabilise meaning situates the work within a broader postmodern tradition, where fragmentation, ambiguity, and multiplicity are not merely stylistic choices but philosophical commitments.
The text’s engagement with memory is particularly striking. Memory does not function as a reliable archive but as a site of distortion and reconstruction.
The narrator’s recollections feel less like recoveries of the past and more like inventions shaped by present desire and anxiety.
At one point, the suggestion that “what is remembered is never what happened, only what remains” encapsulates the text’s central tension.
This aligns with postmodern scepticism toward objective truth, emphasising instead the subjective and constructed nature of experience. Memory becomes a narrative device that exposes its own unreliability, thereby implicating the reader in the act of interpretation.
Comparatively, the work resonates with other postmodern explorations of loss and identity, yet it distinguishes itself through its intimate scale.
Where some narratives externalise fragmentation through sprawling structures or overt metafictional gestures, this text internalises fragmentation, embedding it within the psyche of the narrator. The result is a quieter but no less disorienting experience. The fragmentation is not merely structural but emotional, as the narrator struggles to articulate a coherent sense of self.
The line “I am made of what I cannot hold onto” underscores this condition, suggesting that identity is constituted by absence rather than presence.
Language itself becomes a site of tension. The prose oscillates between clarity and opacity, often within the same passage. Sentences begin with a sense of direction only to unravel into ambiguity, reflecting the instability of the narrator’s thoughts.
This stylistic choice reinforces the thematic concern with uncertainty.
Words are not reliable conveyors of meaning but slippery signifiers that point beyond themselves.
The text seems acutely aware of this limitation, as evidenced by moments where the narrator questions the adequacy of language: “How do you name what has already disappeared?” Such moments foreground the gap between experience and expression, a hallmark of postmodern writing.
The absence at the centre of the narrative—whether understood as a person, a relationship, or a sense of self—functions as a kind of gravitational force, pulling everything into its orbit. Yet this absence is never fully defined. The text resists the urge to specify, instead allowing the void to remain open and indeterminate.
This indeterminacy invites multiple readings, encouraging you to project your own interpretations onto the narrative. In this way, the text becomes a collaborative space, where meaning is co-created rather than imposed.
In comparison to more traditional narratives of loss, which often move toward acceptance or resolution, this work deliberately avoids such trajectories.
There is no catharsis, no moment of clarity that resolves the tension. Instead, the narrative dwells in the ongoing process of grappling with absence.
This is evident in the recurring motif of repetition, where certain phrases and images reappear with slight variations. These repetitions do not lead to greater understanding but rather emphasise the persistence of uncertainty.
The line “I return to the same place, and it is never the same” encapsulates this dynamic, suggesting that repetition is not a path to mastery but a reminder of difference.
The text’s temporal structure further complicates the notion of narrative progression. Time is not linear but recursive, looping back on itself in ways that blur the distinction between past and present. Moments from the past intrude upon the present without warning, creating a sense of temporal dislocation.
This nonlinearity mirrors the workings of memory, where events are not experienced in chronological order but according to their emotional resonance.
The narrative thus becomes a temporal collage, where different moments coexist and interact.
The interplay between presence and absence is also evident in the text’s use of space. Physical settings are described in ways that emphasise their emptiness or transience.
Rooms are “too quiet", streets are "half-remembered", and objects seem to exist only as traces of what they once were. These descriptions create an atmosphere of estrangement, where the familiar becomes uncanny.
The world of the text feels simultaneously real and unreal, grounded in concrete details yet permeated by a sense of unreality.
From a comparative perspective, the text can be seen as part of a broader movement that interrogates the boundaries between reality and representation. Like other postmodern works, it challenges the assumption that narratives can faithfully capture experience. Instead, it foregrounds the processes of construction and interpretation that underlie all storytelling.
The narrator’s frequent self-questioning—“Did it happen this way, or have I made it so?”—serves as a reminder that the narrative is always already mediated.
The emotional tone of the text is one of quiet intensity. Rather than dramatic outbursts, the narrative is characterised by a subdued, almost restrained expression of feeling.
This restraint amplifies the impact of the emotions, making them feel more immediate and authentic. The absence of overt sentimentality allows the reader to engage with the text on a deeper level, filling in the emotional gaps with their own responses.
The text’s engagement with identity is particularly nuanced. Identity is not presented as a stable or coherent entity but as something that is constantly in flux.
The narrator’s sense of self is shaped by their relationships, memories, and losses, all of which are unstable. This fluidity challenges traditional notions of identity as fixed and unified.
Instead, identity emerges as a process, an ongoing negotiation between different aspects of the self. The line “I am not who I was and not yet who I will be” captures this sense of in-betweenness.
In its exploration of loss, the text also touches on the limits of understanding. There are moments where the narrator seems to approach a realisation, only to have it slip away.
These moments of near-understanding highlight the gap between knowledge and experience. The text suggests that some aspects of loss cannot be fully comprehended, only felt.
This emphasis on the ineffable aligns with postmodern scepticism toward grand narratives and totalising explanations.
The narrative’s openness is both its strength and its challenge. For readers accustomed to more conventional storytelling, the lack of resolution may feel frustrating.
However, this openness is essential to the text’s exploration of uncertainty and ambiguity.
By refusing to provide clear answers, the text invites the reader to engage more actively with its themes. The meaning of the narrative is not given but must be constructed through the act of reading.
The text also engages with the idea of absence as a form of presence. The things that are missing—whether people, memories, or meanings—exert a powerful influence on what remains.
This paradox is captured in the line “What is gone shapes what is left behind.” The absence becomes a defining feature of the narrative, shaping its structure and tone.
In comparison to other works that explore similar themes, this text stands out for its subtlety and restraint. It does not rely on overt experimentation or radical formal innovation.
Instead, it achieves its effects through careful attention to language and structure.
The result is a work that feels both intimate and expansive, grounded in personal experience yet resonant with broader philosophical questions.
The postmodern elements of the text are not merely decorative but integral to its meaning.
The fragmentation, ambiguity, and self-reflexivity all serve to reinforce the central themes of loss and uncertainty. The text does not simply depict these themes but enacts them, creating a reading experience that mirrors the narrator’s own disorientation.
Ultimately, the narrative can be seen as an exploration of what it means to live with absence. It does not offer solutions or resolutions but instead dwells in the complexity of the experience.
The closing sense that “nothing is finished, only paused” encapsulates the text’s refusal of closure.
The story does not end so much as it continues beyond the final page, lingering in the reader’s mind.
In this way, the text exemplifies a postmodern approach to storytelling, where meaning is always provisional and open to revision. It challenges the reader to reconsider their assumptions about narrative, memory, and identity, offering instead a vision of these concepts as fluid and unstable.
The result is a work that is both intellectually engaging and emotionally resonant, inviting repeated readings and ongoing interpretation.
Give it a go. You’ll love it.
The narrative resists closure at every turn, refusing to offer the reader the comfort of a resolved arc. Instead, it lingers in the liminal, where absence becomes as tangible as presence. This refusal to stabilise meaning situates the work within a broader postmodern tradition, where fragmentation, ambiguity, and multiplicity are not merely stylistic choices but philosophical commitments.
The text’s engagement with memory is particularly striking. Memory does not function as a reliable archive but as a site of distortion and reconstruction.
The narrator’s recollections feel less like recoveries of the past and more like inventions shaped by present desire and anxiety.
At one point, the suggestion that “what is remembered is never what happened, only what remains” encapsulates the text’s central tension.
This aligns with postmodern scepticism toward objective truth, emphasising instead the subjective and constructed nature of experience. Memory becomes a narrative device that exposes its own unreliability, thereby implicating the reader in the act of interpretation.
Comparatively, the work resonates with other postmodern explorations of loss and identity, yet it distinguishes itself through its intimate scale.
Where some narratives externalise fragmentation through sprawling structures or overt metafictional gestures, this text internalises fragmentation, embedding it within the psyche of the narrator. The result is a quieter but no less disorienting experience. The fragmentation is not merely structural but emotional, as the narrator struggles to articulate a coherent sense of self.
The line “I am made of what I cannot hold onto” underscores this condition, suggesting that identity is constituted by absence rather than presence.
Language itself becomes a site of tension. The prose oscillates between clarity and opacity, often within the same passage. Sentences begin with a sense of direction only to unravel into ambiguity, reflecting the instability of the narrator’s thoughts.
This stylistic choice reinforces the thematic concern with uncertainty.
Words are not reliable conveyors of meaning but slippery signifiers that point beyond themselves.
The text seems acutely aware of this limitation, as evidenced by moments where the narrator questions the adequacy of language: “How do you name what has already disappeared?” Such moments foreground the gap between experience and expression, a hallmark of postmodern writing.
The absence at the centre of the narrative—whether understood as a person, a relationship, or a sense of self—functions as a kind of gravitational force, pulling everything into its orbit. Yet this absence is never fully defined. The text resists the urge to specify, instead allowing the void to remain open and indeterminate.
This indeterminacy invites multiple readings, encouraging you to project your own interpretations onto the narrative. In this way, the text becomes a collaborative space, where meaning is co-created rather than imposed.
In comparison to more traditional narratives of loss, which often move toward acceptance or resolution, this work deliberately avoids such trajectories.
There is no catharsis, no moment of clarity that resolves the tension. Instead, the narrative dwells in the ongoing process of grappling with absence.
This is evident in the recurring motif of repetition, where certain phrases and images reappear with slight variations. These repetitions do not lead to greater understanding but rather emphasise the persistence of uncertainty.
The line “I return to the same place, and it is never the same” encapsulates this dynamic, suggesting that repetition is not a path to mastery but a reminder of difference.
The text’s temporal structure further complicates the notion of narrative progression. Time is not linear but recursive, looping back on itself in ways that blur the distinction between past and present. Moments from the past intrude upon the present without warning, creating a sense of temporal dislocation.
This nonlinearity mirrors the workings of memory, where events are not experienced in chronological order but according to their emotional resonance.
The narrative thus becomes a temporal collage, where different moments coexist and interact.
The interplay between presence and absence is also evident in the text’s use of space. Physical settings are described in ways that emphasise their emptiness or transience.
Rooms are “too quiet", streets are "half-remembered", and objects seem to exist only as traces of what they once were. These descriptions create an atmosphere of estrangement, where the familiar becomes uncanny.
The world of the text feels simultaneously real and unreal, grounded in concrete details yet permeated by a sense of unreality.
From a comparative perspective, the text can be seen as part of a broader movement that interrogates the boundaries between reality and representation. Like other postmodern works, it challenges the assumption that narratives can faithfully capture experience. Instead, it foregrounds the processes of construction and interpretation that underlie all storytelling.
The narrator’s frequent self-questioning—“Did it happen this way, or have I made it so?”—serves as a reminder that the narrative is always already mediated.
The emotional tone of the text is one of quiet intensity. Rather than dramatic outbursts, the narrative is characterised by a subdued, almost restrained expression of feeling.
This restraint amplifies the impact of the emotions, making them feel more immediate and authentic. The absence of overt sentimentality allows the reader to engage with the text on a deeper level, filling in the emotional gaps with their own responses.
The text’s engagement with identity is particularly nuanced. Identity is not presented as a stable or coherent entity but as something that is constantly in flux.
The narrator’s sense of self is shaped by their relationships, memories, and losses, all of which are unstable. This fluidity challenges traditional notions of identity as fixed and unified.
Instead, identity emerges as a process, an ongoing negotiation between different aspects of the self. The line “I am not who I was and not yet who I will be” captures this sense of in-betweenness.
In its exploration of loss, the text also touches on the limits of understanding. There are moments where the narrator seems to approach a realisation, only to have it slip away.
These moments of near-understanding highlight the gap between knowledge and experience. The text suggests that some aspects of loss cannot be fully comprehended, only felt.
This emphasis on the ineffable aligns with postmodern scepticism toward grand narratives and totalising explanations.
The narrative’s openness is both its strength and its challenge. For readers accustomed to more conventional storytelling, the lack of resolution may feel frustrating.
However, this openness is essential to the text’s exploration of uncertainty and ambiguity.
By refusing to provide clear answers, the text invites the reader to engage more actively with its themes. The meaning of the narrative is not given but must be constructed through the act of reading.
The text also engages with the idea of absence as a form of presence. The things that are missing—whether people, memories, or meanings—exert a powerful influence on what remains.
This paradox is captured in the line “What is gone shapes what is left behind.” The absence becomes a defining feature of the narrative, shaping its structure and tone.
In comparison to other works that explore similar themes, this text stands out for its subtlety and restraint. It does not rely on overt experimentation or radical formal innovation.
Instead, it achieves its effects through careful attention to language and structure.
The result is a work that feels both intimate and expansive, grounded in personal experience yet resonant with broader philosophical questions.
The postmodern elements of the text are not merely decorative but integral to its meaning.
The fragmentation, ambiguity, and self-reflexivity all serve to reinforce the central themes of loss and uncertainty. The text does not simply depict these themes but enacts them, creating a reading experience that mirrors the narrator’s own disorientation.
Ultimately, the narrative can be seen as an exploration of what it means to live with absence. It does not offer solutions or resolutions but instead dwells in the complexity of the experience.
The closing sense that “nothing is finished, only paused” encapsulates the text’s refusal of closure.
The story does not end so much as it continues beyond the final page, lingering in the reader’s mind.
In this way, the text exemplifies a postmodern approach to storytelling, where meaning is always provisional and open to revision. It challenges the reader to reconsider their assumptions about narrative, memory, and identity, offering instead a vision of these concepts as fluid and unstable.
The result is a work that is both intellectually engaging and emotionally resonant, inviting repeated readings and ongoing interpretation.
Give it a go. You’ll love it.
August 15, 2025
Lost: Amelia Earhart's Three Mysterious Deaths and One Extraordinary Life by Rachel Hartigan doesn't solve the mystery of what happened to the acclaimed pilot who went missing during the Pacific leg of a transcontinental flight in 1937, but it does provide the reader with two different narratives to tell the story.
The first narrative is a semi-biography of Earhart, which is quite interesting. She grew up with an alcoholic father who could never seem to get his life together, a mother she ended up supporting as she became an adult, and a younger sister who by all accounts worshiped Amelia. Chapters discuss how she became interested in flying and aeronautics, and her many attempts to set various records as the world's leading female pilot. There are a lot of interesting aspects to her life that I had never heard of before, so this part of the book was very interesting to me.
The second narrative deconstructs the three main theories of Earhart's disappearance. These theories will not be recounted here, as they are quire detailed and involve many different time periods, people, and findings that still don't explain the mystery of what happened to Amelia Earhart and her navigator, Fred Noonan. The author was involved as part of the investigation of one of these theories funded in part by National Geographic. This section is particularly interesting as the author relates her experience on searching for the plane that carried the pilot or the remains (bones) of the two lost souls.
I learned a lot about Earhart and her family, and the many people who have searched to try and understand what happened. We will probably never know exactly where the plane crashed. Earhart remains a tragic heroine in aviation history, and the mystery of her death will likely continue to spawn new initiatives to find answers.
In terms of rating I give the book 5 stars.
My thanks to the author, publisher, and NetGalley for the opportunity to review an ARC in exchange for an objective review.
The first narrative is a semi-biography of Earhart, which is quite interesting. She grew up with an alcoholic father who could never seem to get his life together, a mother she ended up supporting as she became an adult, and a younger sister who by all accounts worshiped Amelia. Chapters discuss how she became interested in flying and aeronautics, and her many attempts to set various records as the world's leading female pilot. There are a lot of interesting aspects to her life that I had never heard of before, so this part of the book was very interesting to me.
The second narrative deconstructs the three main theories of Earhart's disappearance. These theories will not be recounted here, as they are quire detailed and involve many different time periods, people, and findings that still don't explain the mystery of what happened to Amelia Earhart and her navigator, Fred Noonan. The author was involved as part of the investigation of one of these theories funded in part by National Geographic. This section is particularly interesting as the author relates her experience on searching for the plane that carried the pilot or the remains (bones) of the two lost souls.
I learned a lot about Earhart and her family, and the many people who have searched to try and understand what happened. We will probably never know exactly where the plane crashed. Earhart remains a tragic heroine in aviation history, and the mystery of her death will likely continue to spawn new initiatives to find answers.
In terms of rating I give the book 5 stars.
My thanks to the author, publisher, and NetGalley for the opportunity to review an ARC in exchange for an objective review.
August 9, 2025
I received an ARC of this book from NetGalley in exchange for an honest review of Lost. Many thanks to Netgalley and the publisher, National Geographic, for this opportunity.
In Lost, the life and legend of Amelia Earhart are brought vividly to the page in a narrative that balances meticulous historical biography with the suspense and intrigue of one of the world’s most enduring aviation mysteries. Author Rachel Hartigan, a former National Geographic reporter, creates a novel that is both tribute to Earhart’s trailblazing legacy and a deep dive into the decades-long search for her final resting place. In doing so, she is able to expertly craft a book that is both informative and captivating.
Lost paints a rich and nuanced portrait of Earhart as not just as the leather-jacketed aviatrix of popular imagination but as a determined, intelligent, and groundbreaking figure in both aviation and women’s history. From her early days growing up in Kansas to her record-setting flights across oceans and continents, Lost traces Earhart’s journey with detail and clarity. Hartigan avoids hagiography, offering instead a balanced portrayal that highlights both her remarkable achievements and the challenges she faced, personally and professionally.
But Lost doesn’t end with her last takeoff. Instead, it uses that moment—her disappearance over the Pacific in 1937—as a pivot into a gripping exploration of the many missions, theories, and obsessions that have followed. The book chronicles early U.S. Navy search efforts, the rise of the crash-and-sink theory, and more recent technological expeditions involving underwater sonar, satellite analysis, and even bone fragment testing on remote islands like Nikumaroro. It captures the passion (and sometimes the controversy) behind those who have dedicated years or even decades to solving the mystery.
Crucially, Lost neither promises resolution nor falls into sensationalism. It respects the evidence, the limitations of what we know, and the motivations of those still searching. The mystery remains open-ended, but the book gives readers the tools to understand why that mystery has persisted—and why it continues to matter.
In the end, Lost is more than a biography or an investigation; it’s a meditation on legacy, obsession, and the human need to seek closure. Whether you come for the story of Amelia Earhart’s life or stay for the unraveling of her disappearance, you’ll find this book deeply satisfying.
A must-read for history lovers, aviation enthusiasts, and anyone fascinated by real-world mysteries.
In Lost, the life and legend of Amelia Earhart are brought vividly to the page in a narrative that balances meticulous historical biography with the suspense and intrigue of one of the world’s most enduring aviation mysteries. Author Rachel Hartigan, a former National Geographic reporter, creates a novel that is both tribute to Earhart’s trailblazing legacy and a deep dive into the decades-long search for her final resting place. In doing so, she is able to expertly craft a book that is both informative and captivating.
Lost paints a rich and nuanced portrait of Earhart as not just as the leather-jacketed aviatrix of popular imagination but as a determined, intelligent, and groundbreaking figure in both aviation and women’s history. From her early days growing up in Kansas to her record-setting flights across oceans and continents, Lost traces Earhart’s journey with detail and clarity. Hartigan avoids hagiography, offering instead a balanced portrayal that highlights both her remarkable achievements and the challenges she faced, personally and professionally.
But Lost doesn’t end with her last takeoff. Instead, it uses that moment—her disappearance over the Pacific in 1937—as a pivot into a gripping exploration of the many missions, theories, and obsessions that have followed. The book chronicles early U.S. Navy search efforts, the rise of the crash-and-sink theory, and more recent technological expeditions involving underwater sonar, satellite analysis, and even bone fragment testing on remote islands like Nikumaroro. It captures the passion (and sometimes the controversy) behind those who have dedicated years or even decades to solving the mystery.
Crucially, Lost neither promises resolution nor falls into sensationalism. It respects the evidence, the limitations of what we know, and the motivations of those still searching. The mystery remains open-ended, but the book gives readers the tools to understand why that mystery has persisted—and why it continues to matter.
In the end, Lost is more than a biography or an investigation; it’s a meditation on legacy, obsession, and the human need to seek closure. Whether you come for the story of Amelia Earhart’s life or stay for the unraveling of her disappearance, you’ll find this book deeply satisfying.
A must-read for history lovers, aviation enthusiasts, and anyone fascinated by real-world mysteries.
September 17, 2025
88/89 years after Amelia Earhart & her navigator went missing in The Electra, we still have more questions than answers. This trailblazer in aviation & the search for her remains is something known around the world.
The author who represented National Geographic on this 2023 expedition explores any & all possibilities from the past through current times The pages detail not only the gripping flight plan that Earhart took in 1937, but also how much expense & time has been expended trying to solve this mystery.
Amelia Earhart’s name is known around this globe no matter where it takes you & this book will have you referring to your atlas or map apps searching the many countries, islands & bodies of water mentioned.
My Father was a pilot so I grew up hearing about Amelia Earhart, but this particular book discusses the extent that was put into searching from July of 1937 until recently. Amelia Earhart flew to faraway destinations so getting there even now is extremely expensive. If successful in financing a search, once there the terrain or waters prohibit vs assist.
What I did not know & enjoyed learning was more about how Amelia was well-educated and a supporter of the early women’s rights movement in the US. It included her upbringing in Kansas, her marriage/relationships with men & the enormous profit that the flight around the world in 1937 was supposed to net. She went missing, but the financial debt of this endeavor remained with her Husband, George Putnam.
I’ll let the reader find out more, but I live not far from St. Petersburg, Florida. I forgot the very believable girl, Betty Klenck, there (15 years old) who lived a long life & was convinced she had shortwave radio contact with Amelia shortly after she went missing in 1937. I went on a deep dive on the SS Norwich City after that chapter!
The author is currently with National Geographic, but has been an editor with The Washington Post and US News & World Report. Hers is a book that will entertain & educate not only on aviation in its earliest years, but also on how much expense goes into these search party expeditions. While the public may yearn to know, I never weighed how much grief the Families felt when Amelia’s soul is never left at peace.
I thank NetGalley for the opportunity to read this book in exchange for a fair and honest review.
The author who represented National Geographic on this 2023 expedition explores any & all possibilities from the past through current times The pages detail not only the gripping flight plan that Earhart took in 1937, but also how much expense & time has been expended trying to solve this mystery.
Amelia Earhart’s name is known around this globe no matter where it takes you & this book will have you referring to your atlas or map apps searching the many countries, islands & bodies of water mentioned.
My Father was a pilot so I grew up hearing about Amelia Earhart, but this particular book discusses the extent that was put into searching from July of 1937 until recently. Amelia Earhart flew to faraway destinations so getting there even now is extremely expensive. If successful in financing a search, once there the terrain or waters prohibit vs assist.
What I did not know & enjoyed learning was more about how Amelia was well-educated and a supporter of the early women’s rights movement in the US. It included her upbringing in Kansas, her marriage/relationships with men & the enormous profit that the flight around the world in 1937 was supposed to net. She went missing, but the financial debt of this endeavor remained with her Husband, George Putnam.
I’ll let the reader find out more, but I live not far from St. Petersburg, Florida. I forgot the very believable girl, Betty Klenck, there (15 years old) who lived a long life & was convinced she had shortwave radio contact with Amelia shortly after she went missing in 1937. I went on a deep dive on the SS Norwich City after that chapter!
The author is currently with National Geographic, but has been an editor with The Washington Post and US News & World Report. Hers is a book that will entertain & educate not only on aviation in its earliest years, but also on how much expense goes into these search party expeditions. While the public may yearn to know, I never weighed how much grief the Families felt when Amelia’s soul is never left at peace.
I thank NetGalley for the opportunity to read this book in exchange for a fair and honest review.
Review of advance copy received from Netgalley
Rachel Hartigan’s "Lost: Amelia Earhart’s Three Mysterious Deaths and One Extraordinary Life" is an engaging read with a smooth, conversational narrative that blends Earhart’s remarkable life story with the investigation of her 1937 disappearance.
Hartigan, a former National Geographic reporter, joined two expeditions to the uninhabited island of Nikumaroro with forensic dogs to search for Earhart’s remains. Although she was not an adventurous and bold person, she wanted to discover Earhart’s amazing life with the extraordinary efforts made to uncover how her quest ended and to understand why one woman continues to inspire such determined exploration.
The book traces Earhart’s unstable childhood with an alcoholic father, her early years moving frequently, and her rise to aviation fame shaped in part by the publicity efforts of her husband, publisher George Putnam. It moves between these biographical chapters and detailed accounts of the ongoing efforts to solve her disappearance. Hartigan centers the investigation around three major theories: that Earhart and navigator Fred Noonan ran out of fuel and crashed near Howland Island; that they landed on the remote Nikumaroro Island and survived briefly before dying from injury, dehydration, starvation, or exposure—an idea supported by radio distress calls, scattered artifacts, and later skeletal analysis; and finally, that they reached the Marshall Islands, were captured by Japanese soldiers, and died in custody on Saipan or elsewhere. This theory draws on eyewitness accounts from islanders, alleged intelligence reports, and claims of Earhart’s imprisonment.
"Lost" is an engaging blend of historical biography and scientific exploration that illustrates how Earhart lived and how she may have died. The narrative weaves her incredible life story with the obsessive pursuit of divers, archaeologists, historians, and amateur researchers who continue to investigate her disappearance, often at a great personal cost. Because of incomplete evidence, the mystery continues to captivate the public. Earhart’s story will appeal to readers interested in aviation history, feminism, scientific exploration, and historical mysteries.
Thank you to NetGalley for an advanced copy and to Rachel Hartigan for her incredible reporting.
Hartigan, a former National Geographic reporter, joined two expeditions to the uninhabited island of Nikumaroro with forensic dogs to search for Earhart’s remains. Although she was not an adventurous and bold person, she wanted to discover Earhart’s amazing life with the extraordinary efforts made to uncover how her quest ended and to understand why one woman continues to inspire such determined exploration.
The book traces Earhart’s unstable childhood with an alcoholic father, her early years moving frequently, and her rise to aviation fame shaped in part by the publicity efforts of her husband, publisher George Putnam. It moves between these biographical chapters and detailed accounts of the ongoing efforts to solve her disappearance. Hartigan centers the investigation around three major theories: that Earhart and navigator Fred Noonan ran out of fuel and crashed near Howland Island; that they landed on the remote Nikumaroro Island and survived briefly before dying from injury, dehydration, starvation, or exposure—an idea supported by radio distress calls, scattered artifacts, and later skeletal analysis; and finally, that they reached the Marshall Islands, were captured by Japanese soldiers, and died in custody on Saipan or elsewhere. This theory draws on eyewitness accounts from islanders, alleged intelligence reports, and claims of Earhart’s imprisonment.
"Lost" is an engaging blend of historical biography and scientific exploration that illustrates how Earhart lived and how she may have died. The narrative weaves her incredible life story with the obsessive pursuit of divers, archaeologists, historians, and amateur researchers who continue to investigate her disappearance, often at a great personal cost. Because of incomplete evidence, the mystery continues to captivate the public. Earhart’s story will appeal to readers interested in aviation history, feminism, scientific exploration, and historical mysteries.
Thank you to NetGalley for an advanced copy and to Rachel Hartigan for her incredible reporting.
Review of advance copy received from Goodreads Giveaways
First, a disclaimer: I won this book in a #GoodreadsGiveaway. I want to thank National Geographic Books for the Advance Readers’ Edition (“ARE”). I really enjoyed the book (it was hard to put down) and I recommend reading it.
The book is roughly half biography of Amelia Earhart and half the story of the many attempts to solve the mystery of her disappearance. The chapters alternate between the attempts to solve the mystery and the biography. The biographical part has the essentials, framing Earhart’s life within the context of the time. Within the structure of the book the biography balances well with the stories of the searches for Earhart. I don’t feel like anything is missing in the biography but I am sure a standard biography would flesh it out more. So if you are only interested in a biography, a different book may be for you.
The chapters on the many searches are interesting. They are in three groups: searches related to stories about Amelia Earhart being captured by the Japanese; the possibility of her landing on an island or atoll and living briefly as a castaway; and searches in the ocean on the possibility she went down in the water and had no chance to survive. These are all fascinating. I was not aware of the wide range of purported evidence and theories there are as to what happened to Earhart. The author was on a few of the expeditions giving her first-hand knowledge not available to the lay person. She is not one of the many people fixated on finding the answer preferring to report the facts she finds. This gives her a less biased viewpoint from which to communicate to the lay person. This part of the book feels comprehensive and I am especially glad to have read it to understand range of possibilities and the prospects each avenue of research has found. This information completes the biography in a way that a standard biography couldn’t.
Note – on non-fiction I would usually include comments on the quality of pictures, maps and maybe even note the index but since this is an ARE, the color insert is not included and the index is a place holder. But on the strength of NatGeo’s reputation, I believe the quality will be consistent.
I won this book in a #GoodreadsGiveaway. This is a voluntary and honest review.
The book is roughly half biography of Amelia Earhart and half the story of the many attempts to solve the mystery of her disappearance. The chapters alternate between the attempts to solve the mystery and the biography. The biographical part has the essentials, framing Earhart’s life within the context of the time. Within the structure of the book the biography balances well with the stories of the searches for Earhart. I don’t feel like anything is missing in the biography but I am sure a standard biography would flesh it out more. So if you are only interested in a biography, a different book may be for you.
The chapters on the many searches are interesting. They are in three groups: searches related to stories about Amelia Earhart being captured by the Japanese; the possibility of her landing on an island or atoll and living briefly as a castaway; and searches in the ocean on the possibility she went down in the water and had no chance to survive. These are all fascinating. I was not aware of the wide range of purported evidence and theories there are as to what happened to Earhart. The author was on a few of the expeditions giving her first-hand knowledge not available to the lay person. She is not one of the many people fixated on finding the answer preferring to report the facts she finds. This gives her a less biased viewpoint from which to communicate to the lay person. This part of the book feels comprehensive and I am especially glad to have read it to understand range of possibilities and the prospects each avenue of research has found. This information completes the biography in a way that a standard biography couldn’t.
Note – on non-fiction I would usually include comments on the quality of pictures, maps and maybe even note the index but since this is an ARE, the color insert is not included and the index is a place holder. But on the strength of NatGeo’s reputation, I believe the quality will be consistent.
I won this book in a #GoodreadsGiveaway. This is a voluntary and honest review.
March 2, 2026
I remember being obsessed with the disappearance of Amelia Earhart when I was younger. She was the first woman to fly across the Atlantic alone and the first pilot to fly alone from Hawaii to California. Then suddenly in 1937, she and navigator, Fred Noonan, went missing while flying around the world. They’d already completed 22k miles and only had 7k left. They were on their way to Howland Island from Papua, New Guinea but they were never seen again and neither was Earhart’s Lockheed Electra plane.
The book opens in 2017 with the author,
Rachel Hartigan, heading to the island of Nikumaroro just shy of the Equator in the central Pacific Ocean. She’s part of an expedition that includes two archaeologists, and four border collies and their handlers in the hopes of finding Amelia Earhart’s remains. Hartigan writes an incredibly detailed book alternating chapters describing Amelia’s life and the three biggest theories of what happened to her.
It’s fascinating how Hartigan breaks down each theory and if it holds any weight. She begins with the idea that Earhart was captured by the Japanese delving into eyewitness accounts and issues with credibility. Next, is the theory that she became stranded on Nikumaroro and the exhaustive search to find her bones. Lastly, the most obvious, that the plane crashed in the Pacific and the search for the Electra on the bottom of the ocean.
But it’s the biographical part of Amelia’s life that is truly special. Hartigan humanizes her. Interviews and excerpts from family members puts all the conspiracy theories into perspective. As much as explorers want answers to one of the world’s most famous disappearances, what cost is that to the families and descendants of Earhart and Noonan? It’s a wound continuously reopened by outlandish conspiracies and thoughtful theories. At almost 90 years, they may never be found but it certainly isn’t for lack of trying.
Thank you to National Geographic for this ARC via NetGalley in exchange for an honest review.
The book opens in 2017 with the author,
Rachel Hartigan, heading to the island of Nikumaroro just shy of the Equator in the central Pacific Ocean. She’s part of an expedition that includes two archaeologists, and four border collies and their handlers in the hopes of finding Amelia Earhart’s remains. Hartigan writes an incredibly detailed book alternating chapters describing Amelia’s life and the three biggest theories of what happened to her.
It’s fascinating how Hartigan breaks down each theory and if it holds any weight. She begins with the idea that Earhart was captured by the Japanese delving into eyewitness accounts and issues with credibility. Next, is the theory that she became stranded on Nikumaroro and the exhaustive search to find her bones. Lastly, the most obvious, that the plane crashed in the Pacific and the search for the Electra on the bottom of the ocean.
But it’s the biographical part of Amelia’s life that is truly special. Hartigan humanizes her. Interviews and excerpts from family members puts all the conspiracy theories into perspective. As much as explorers want answers to one of the world’s most famous disappearances, what cost is that to the families and descendants of Earhart and Noonan? It’s a wound continuously reopened by outlandish conspiracies and thoughtful theories. At almost 90 years, they may never be found but it certainly isn’t for lack of trying.
Thank you to National Geographic for this ARC via NetGalley in exchange for an honest review.
March 9, 2026
Highly recommended!
I’m an Amelia Earhart devotee. So much so that I visited her birthplace and hangar museums in Kansas and plan to visit her archives at Purdue University this summer. What I am not, is a conspiracy theorist. In fact, the most effort I’ve put into thinking about her end of life is to simply assume she and navigator Fred Noonan ran out of fuel and plunged into the ocean.
But along comes acclaimed journalist Rachel Hartigan with Lost: Amelia Earhart’s Three Mysterious Deaths and One Extraordinary Life, and a deep dive into her life and the three most popular theories of her disappearance. I raced to my local B&N and picked up a copy.
Chapters alternate between AE’s biography and the three theories: were they captured by the Japanese, did they land on an uninhabited island, or did they simply run out of fuel and crash into the ocean? The result is a brilliant, up-to-date analysis, which provides the reader with enough facts and logic to dispel some of the outlandish claims made over the years. If you are also an AE devotee, be forewarned, because some of the details will break your heart.
Another feature of Hartigan’s creative non-fiction that I appreciate is reminding us that science has much to say about the trickiness of memory and the “‘psychological motives’ that draw people to conspiracy theories.” Can you imagine how many more theories if AE had disappeared in 2026 instead of 1937?
If you are interested in reading a page-turning, mystery-“solving”, historical account of one of the world’s most amazing women, get a copy of Hartigan’s Lost from your public library or an independent bookstore.
By the way, did I mention that I am confident this will be my best read of 2026??
I’m an Amelia Earhart devotee. So much so that I visited her birthplace and hangar museums in Kansas and plan to visit her archives at Purdue University this summer. What I am not, is a conspiracy theorist. In fact, the most effort I’ve put into thinking about her end of life is to simply assume she and navigator Fred Noonan ran out of fuel and plunged into the ocean.
But along comes acclaimed journalist Rachel Hartigan with Lost: Amelia Earhart’s Three Mysterious Deaths and One Extraordinary Life, and a deep dive into her life and the three most popular theories of her disappearance. I raced to my local B&N and picked up a copy.
Chapters alternate between AE’s biography and the three theories: were they captured by the Japanese, did they land on an uninhabited island, or did they simply run out of fuel and crash into the ocean? The result is a brilliant, up-to-date analysis, which provides the reader with enough facts and logic to dispel some of the outlandish claims made over the years. If you are also an AE devotee, be forewarned, because some of the details will break your heart.
Another feature of Hartigan’s creative non-fiction that I appreciate is reminding us that science has much to say about the trickiness of memory and the “‘psychological motives’ that draw people to conspiracy theories.” Can you imagine how many more theories if AE had disappeared in 2026 instead of 1937?
If you are interested in reading a page-turning, mystery-“solving”, historical account of one of the world’s most amazing women, get a copy of Hartigan’s Lost from your public library or an independent bookstore.
By the way, did I mention that I am confident this will be my best read of 2026??
April 3, 2026
While I was vaguely familiar with the story of Amelia Earhart's disappearance, I did not realize there were so many theories and how much research has been done to determine what happened. This book covers all of that (and more!).
Rachel Hartigan weaves multiple story lines together: She shares details of Earhart's last flight, tells Earhart's life story, and reviews the theories of her disappearance. The 3 theories are: 1) capture by the Japanese army while spying on them near the Marshall Islands, 2) flying off course and crashing on Gardner Island (now Nikumaroro), or 3) simply running out of fuel short of her destination (Howland Island). She includes details from multiple research groups on each of the theories. It's a lot to take in!
The book is well written and was a pleasure to read. I was intrigued by the theories. The entwined story lines were not too hard to follow. (However, sometimes Haritgan would jump to another story line just I when something was getting interesting.) My only "challenge" was mentally tracking all of the South Pacific locations: Howland Island, Nikumaroro (Gardner Island) and related Kribati islands, and the various Marshall islands. I wish the publisher included a map of the South Pacific showing her planned route and the alternate destinations. It would also be nice to have maps of each island (especially Nikumaroro/Gardner Island).
This review is based on an advanced proof copy of the book from National Geographic Books I received in a Goodreads giveaway. Thanks NatGeo!
Rachel Hartigan weaves multiple story lines together: She shares details of Earhart's last flight, tells Earhart's life story, and reviews the theories of her disappearance. The 3 theories are: 1) capture by the Japanese army while spying on them near the Marshall Islands, 2) flying off course and crashing on Gardner Island (now Nikumaroro), or 3) simply running out of fuel short of her destination (Howland Island). She includes details from multiple research groups on each of the theories. It's a lot to take in!
The book is well written and was a pleasure to read. I was intrigued by the theories. The entwined story lines were not too hard to follow. (However, sometimes Haritgan would jump to another story line just I when something was getting interesting.) My only "challenge" was mentally tracking all of the South Pacific locations: Howland Island, Nikumaroro (Gardner Island) and related Kribati islands, and the various Marshall islands. I wish the publisher included a map of the South Pacific showing her planned route and the alternate destinations. It would also be nice to have maps of each island (especially Nikumaroro/Gardner Island).
This review is based on an advanced proof copy of the book from National Geographic Books I received in a Goodreads giveaway. Thanks NatGeo!
April 26, 2026
"Lost" is simultaneously a biography of Amelia Earhart and a portrait of the various ways people today have come to speculate on her loss.
What's good: The book is a very readable biography and offers important context for Earhart's life and work. (For example: Her adventuring literally paid the bills for her lifestyle. By becoming famous in these stunts, she was able to sell her name for brand deals, and in turn pay for her needs, including plane access. Without these kinds of stunts, she would not have been able to maintain the life and career she had. For that reason, there's an ominous sense in the text that she could easily have lost her life in another mission if not the infamous one--because she had to keep going out.) It also gives us some fascinating insight into the various theories proposed to explain her disappearance, including the science behind some experiments related to her loss. Last but not least, it also makes a very important point--we let her loss, her death, overshadow her life, and we'd be all better off for focusing on the causes she championed in life rather than pursuing her plane's wreckage.
What's iffier: I wanted to know more about Earhart's relationship with her husband, as it's very clear from what is in the text that theirs was a unique one. (There's a famous letter essentially offering non-monogamy as an option, for example.)
With gratitude to the publisher and Netgalley for access to the ARC of this book in exchange for an honest review.
What's good: The book is a very readable biography and offers important context for Earhart's life and work. (For example: Her adventuring literally paid the bills for her lifestyle. By becoming famous in these stunts, she was able to sell her name for brand deals, and in turn pay for her needs, including plane access. Without these kinds of stunts, she would not have been able to maintain the life and career she had. For that reason, there's an ominous sense in the text that she could easily have lost her life in another mission if not the infamous one--because she had to keep going out.) It also gives us some fascinating insight into the various theories proposed to explain her disappearance, including the science behind some experiments related to her loss. Last but not least, it also makes a very important point--we let her loss, her death, overshadow her life, and we'd be all better off for focusing on the causes she championed in life rather than pursuing her plane's wreckage.
What's iffier: I wanted to know more about Earhart's relationship with her husband, as it's very clear from what is in the text that theirs was a unique one. (There's a famous letter essentially offering non-monogamy as an option, for example.)
With gratitude to the publisher and Netgalley for access to the ARC of this book in exchange for an honest review.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 133 reviews