This is a tough one to review. I loved the subject matter but the execution left me wanting. Given the other reviews, I think this might be a case of the author’s style being a mismatch for my personal taste rather than anything else.
What worked for me:
🐇 The premise of this book was intriguing and I was keen to hear about Dalton’s experience. I liked that she didn’t just scoop up the baby but gave the mother opportunity to return for her without going all ‘free bun’ about it but some of her other actions did frustrate me later on.
🐇 Illustrations in the book were absolutely stunning!
🐇 As an enthusiastic planetary stewardship advocate, I am thrilled that Dalton has become more in tune with nature and has used this story to highlight the perils of wildlife at the hands of humans. Anything that increases the reach of this message and drives awareness is worth doing.
What I wasn’t so keen on:
🐇 Structure and style: Info dumpy fact sections and focus on hares in literature felt like filler. The experience the author had raising the hare was, particularly at the beginning, overpowered by pages and pages of fiction and history excerpts. We’d spend half a page on what felt like a random tangent - like on the difference between hares and cats - you know, that classic mix-up - which just added to the feeling of padding. The overwrought descriptions, the info dumping, copy-pasted quotes from literature, and tangents interrupted flow of the author’s experience (the reason we’re reading the book!). The writing style felt stilted and, at times, pompous which I didn’t gel with as a reader. It didn’t have the warmth of many of my favourite nature books but felt clinical in execution. Another element that I found distracting was how present the author was in the story: Early on, it becomes evident that the author has an alarming preoccupation with their job that bleeds into this story excessively. It’s evident that the job is the main priority and, while there’s a bit of acknowledgement of this mid-way through the book, I think a lot of the job stuff should have been cut - it doesn’t add anything. Your readers are here for the hares!
🐇 Author’s naïvety: As a reader who grew up rurally in Canada, none of the author’s revelations were news to me (prey animals don’t like feeling penned in! keeping nature away from your garden is probably not going to work! animals can be creatures of habit! human urbanization threatens the habitats of wild beings!). For someone who claimed to have a pet rabbit when they were younger, the author is very naïve when it comes to lagomorph care: trying to feed them bread, picking them up, not knowing they’re crepuscular critters, being surprised that they go for the spicy hay (power cords) and chew pretty much anything. “I was always troubled by the possibility that proximity to humans might have taken the edge of its natural instincts” says human who rushes to the rescue at every perceived threat and constantly scoops the hare up. 🙃 Real talk: I wanted to scream “stop interfering!” so many times during this read.
🐇 Dalton spends a lot of time describing actions, appearances, and places in great detail. As a reader, I would have valued more illustrations or photos over paragraphs of flowery descriptions.
Obligatory PSA: Have you found a baby animal? An injured bird or animal? Call your local wildlife rehab clinic for advice. The critter might not need help but if they do, leave it to the pros. Don’t try to “save” them, keep them as a pet, or raise them yourself. They’re living, wild beings with complex needs that may need specialist care. Good intentions can cause deep harm - please always get the advice of a wildlife expert before intervening with a young or injured wild animal.
⚠️ Content Caution: For humans who love or steward the care of lagomorphs, some of the hunting, farming, and consumption history may be distressing. There are a lot of grisly descriptions of hare cruelty and deaths within these pages. Be kind to yourself.
If you’ve spent time with lagomorphs, or spent time observing the natural world, you may not get much out of this. For readers who enjoy Katherine Rundell’s style or those new to the joy of lagomorphs, I heartily encourage you to check this out!
I was privileged to have my request to read this book accepted through NetGalley. Thank you, Canongate.