What do you think?
Rate this book
On Colonialism and Modernization
- GenresPolitics
493 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 1969
1 person is currently reading
48 people want to read
About the author
Karl Marx
3,245 books6,521 followersWith the help of Friedrich Engels, German philosopher and revolutionary Karl Marx wrote
The Communist Manifesto
(1848) and
Das Kapital
(1867-1894), works, which explain historical development in terms of the interaction of contradictory economic forces, form many regimes, and profoundly influenced the social sciences.
German social theorist Friedrich Engels collaborated with Karl Marx on The Communist Manifesto in 1848 and on numerous other works.
Mikhail Mikhailovich Bakhtin in London opposed Communism of Karl Marx with his antithetical anarchy.
Works of Jacques Martin Barzun include Darwin, Marx, Wagner (1941).
The Prussian kingdom introduced a prohibition on Jews, practicing law; in response, a man converted to Protestantism and shortly afterward fathered Karl Marx.
Marx began co-operating with Bruno Bauer on editing Philosophy of Religion of Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (see Democritus and Epicurus), doctoral thesis, also engaged Marx, who completed it in 1841. People described the controversial essay as "a daring and original piece... in which Marx set out to show that theology must yield to the superior wisdom." Marx decided to submit his thesis not to the particularly conservative professors at the University of Berlin but instead to the more liberal faculty of University of Jena, which for his contributed key theory awarded his Philosophiae Doctor in April 1841. Marx and Bauer, both atheists, in March 1841 began plans for a journal, entitled Archiv des Atheismus (Atheistic Archives), which never came to fruition.
Marx edited the newspaper Vorwärts! in 1844 in Paris. The urging of the Prussian government from France banished and expelled Marx in absentia; he then studied in Brussels. He joined the league in 1847 and published.
Marx participated the failure of 1848 and afterward eventually wound in London. Marx, a foreigner, corresponded for several publications of United States.
He came in three volumes. Marx organized the International and the social democratic party.
Marx in a letter to C. Schmidt once quipped, "All I know is that I am not a Marxist," as Warren Allen Smith related in Who's Who in Hell .
People describe Marx, who most figured among humans. They typically cite Marx with Émile Durkheim and Max Weber, the principal modern architects.
Bertrand Russell later remarked of non-religious Marx, "His belief that there is a cosmic ... called dialectical materialism, which governs ... independently of human volitions, is mere mythology" ( Portraits from Memory , 1956).
More: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Marx
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/marx/
http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/bi...
http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/...
http://www.historyguide.org/intellect...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/historic...
http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/...
http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/t...
German social theorist Friedrich Engels collaborated with Karl Marx on The Communist Manifesto in 1848 and on numerous other works.
Mikhail Mikhailovich Bakhtin in London opposed Communism of Karl Marx with his antithetical anarchy.
Works of Jacques Martin Barzun include Darwin, Marx, Wagner (1941).
The Prussian kingdom introduced a prohibition on Jews, practicing law; in response, a man converted to Protestantism and shortly afterward fathered Karl Marx.
Marx began co-operating with Bruno Bauer on editing Philosophy of Religion of Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (see Democritus and Epicurus), doctoral thesis, also engaged Marx, who completed it in 1841. People described the controversial essay as "a daring and original piece... in which Marx set out to show that theology must yield to the superior wisdom." Marx decided to submit his thesis not to the particularly conservative professors at the University of Berlin but instead to the more liberal faculty of University of Jena, which for his contributed key theory awarded his Philosophiae Doctor in April 1841. Marx and Bauer, both atheists, in March 1841 began plans for a journal, entitled Archiv des Atheismus (Atheistic Archives), which never came to fruition.
Marx edited the newspaper Vorwärts! in 1844 in Paris. The urging of the Prussian government from France banished and expelled Marx in absentia; he then studied in Brussels. He joined the league in 1847 and published.
Marx participated the failure of 1848 and afterward eventually wound in London. Marx, a foreigner, corresponded for several publications of United States.
He came in three volumes. Marx organized the International and the social democratic party.
Marx in a letter to C. Schmidt once quipped, "All I know is that I am not a Marxist," as Warren Allen Smith related in Who's Who in Hell .
People describe Marx, who most figured among humans. They typically cite Marx with Émile Durkheim and Max Weber, the principal modern architects.
Bertrand Russell later remarked of non-religious Marx, "His belief that there is a cosmic ... called dialectical materialism, which governs ... independently of human volitions, is mere mythology" ( Portraits from Memory , 1956).
More: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Marx
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/marx/
http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/bi...
http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/...
http://www.historyguide.org/intellect...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/historic...
http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/...
http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/t...
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews
May 26, 2022
Re-reading Marx
The Parisian Marx was not yet preoccupied rationally and politically with colonialism and slavery.
Both apologists and opponents of colonialism have argued that Marx had seen British colonialism as a progressive interference of history in a sluggish and diffident India.
There can perhaps be a no bigger misunderstanding and distortion of Marx’s views about India.
Marx was very lucid that capital did not function merely in the apparently officially regulated environment of capitalist countries. Marx was extremely aware of the reality of colonial plunder and violent accumulation of capital from across the world, which in fact had created the conditions for capitalism to emerge.
He was eagerly conscious that “If money comes into the world with a congenital blood-stain on one cheek, capital comes dripping from head to foot, from every pore, with blood and dirt”.
Although not necessarily pro-slavery and to different degrees, all prominent French socialists, from Proudhon to Louis Blanc to Pierre Leroux, supported the colonial cause in the early 1840s as a way to solve the so-called “social question” at home and export socialism abroad. Calling and fighting for the liberation of the oppressed in Algeria or Guadeloupe was therefore not a pressing concern to their politics.
And thus, it did not become a pressing concern to the “abstract” proletariat on whose shoulders Marx, in his Paris Manuscripts and later in the Communist Manifesto, had decided to devolve the task of overthrowing capitalism.
Things began to change when Marx moved to London. His immersion in a different working-class culture, and in particular his close association with the Chartist revolutionary and labour poet Ernest Jones, is key to the expansion of his viewpoint.
The Parisian Marx was not yet preoccupied rationally and politically with colonialism and slavery.
Both apologists and opponents of colonialism have argued that Marx had seen British colonialism as a progressive interference of history in a sluggish and diffident India.
There can perhaps be a no bigger misunderstanding and distortion of Marx’s views about India.
Marx was very lucid that capital did not function merely in the apparently officially regulated environment of capitalist countries. Marx was extremely aware of the reality of colonial plunder and violent accumulation of capital from across the world, which in fact had created the conditions for capitalism to emerge.
He was eagerly conscious that “If money comes into the world with a congenital blood-stain on one cheek, capital comes dripping from head to foot, from every pore, with blood and dirt”.
Although not necessarily pro-slavery and to different degrees, all prominent French socialists, from Proudhon to Louis Blanc to Pierre Leroux, supported the colonial cause in the early 1840s as a way to solve the so-called “social question” at home and export socialism abroad. Calling and fighting for the liberation of the oppressed in Algeria or Guadeloupe was therefore not a pressing concern to their politics.
And thus, it did not become a pressing concern to the “abstract” proletariat on whose shoulders Marx, in his Paris Manuscripts and later in the Communist Manifesto, had decided to devolve the task of overthrowing capitalism.
Things began to change when Marx moved to London. His immersion in a different working-class culture, and in particular his close association with the Chartist revolutionary and labour poet Ernest Jones, is key to the expansion of his viewpoint.
November 27, 2023
Happy 90 years Shlomo Avineri! Thanks for a lifetime of editing and commenting on Marx, Hegel, Herzl, and Trotsky. Perhaps there is some cosmic justice in the fact that the best and most thorough collection of Karl Marx's writings on what we moderns call the Third World should come from the desk of an Israeli scholar and former Foreign Ministry official. ON COLONIALISM AND MODERNIZATION, two terms that did not exist in their present meaning during Marx's lifetime, show that Marx did not have a fixed position on how Africa, Asia, and Latin America (and Ireland too) would evolve under the challenge of worldwide capitalist expansion. The early Marx assumed that advanced capitalist countries, primarily England, "hold up a mirror to the less advanced, showing them their future". In that regard, Marx welcomed the intrusion of capital into feudal lands, even by force. As Shlomo shows, Marx even took the side of the U.S. during the Mexican War! The more mature Marx, examining the Taiping Rebellion in China and the Sepoy Mutiny in India, became convinced that rebellion in the backlands of the empire might spark a revolution in the metropolis. Finally, Marx skimmed the phenomenon of imperialism without issuing any scientific declarations on the subject; which he left to Lenin, Luxemburg, and Trotsky. A fine, nuanced, and pertinent anthology of vital writings, courtesy of Shlomo.
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews