The revolutionary new book from the international bestselling author of Hunt, Gather, Parent.
Why do video games include missions?
Why does junk food give us cravings?
Because they tap into dopamine, the neurotransmitter that motivates us to want more.
Companies and developers use knowledge of how dopamine affects our children’s brains to sell them screens, games and ultra-processed foods. In Dopamine Kids, Michaeleen Doucleff, bestselling author of Hunt, Gather, Parent, empowers parents with this same knowledge, but instead shows how to utilize it to reinforce positive habits, activities and lifestyle choices.
Through five simple and science-backed steps, she demonstrates how to identify unhealthy hobbies and re-direct your child’s motivation to build positive ones. Swap binge-watching with reading. Replace the excitement of screens with the thrill of outdoor activities. Substitute ultra-processed foods for the joy of baking.
By understanding and harnessing the power of dopamine, we can help our children build independence, concentration, strong mental health and, above all, thrive in an ever-changing world.
Michaeleen Doucleff is a correspondent for NPR's Science Desk. She reports for the radio and the Web for NPR's global health and development blog, Goats and Soda. She focuses on disease outbreaks, drug development, and trends in global health.
I’m going to come back and update this review once I’ve finished the book, but so far I feel that this book somewhat misses the mark.
The research on dopamine, how phones tap into that circuit amazing 5 stars it’s definitely worth reading the book for that. The details about ultraprocessed foods while plausible feel more like a stretch and a bit of a personal vendetta on the part of the author. The advice on how to get your kids off of screens is sometimes good and sometimes maybe not grounded in great science either. I don’t doubt that it works, but I genuinely wonder if it’s what’s best for kids.
I would recommend reading the book just to see how phones are using us more than we’re using them, but I would also recommend reading the parenting advice with a skeptical eye.
I cannot overstate how helpful Michaeleen’s books have been for my parenting. Her first impacted our home in so many ways, and I can definitely tell you that this one will, too.
I learned SO MUCH about technology and food and how they affect us easily-affected humans. We’re suckers! I nerded out on all of her research, and I love how easily it is presented for those of us who aren’t totally science-minded.
I took ten pages of notes and will be purchasing when the paperback comes out.
There are too many ideas to quote, but I’ll add a few—
“If I examined my daily routine closely, I could see I rarely felt a sense of satisfaction… when that feeling did arrive, it fluttered away in seconds.”
“Neuroscientists and psychologists have found that before you can cut back, or cut out, an activity or food in your life, you first need to identify alternative activities and foods to replace the unwanted ones.”
“I learned to differentiate between wanting and liking.”
I can’t recommend this enough. It’s so insightful and practical. She ends with a 4-week plan for how to limit screens and processed foods and “take back our homes” from the tech companies and food companies. If I sound loony, pick up a copy and see for yourself. 👏
Really interesting and immensely readable. Doucleff explains the science behind how devices and UPF hook us in by hijacking our dopamine system. She offers practical advice for how to break the cycle for you and your kids.
One gripe - I’m kind of sick of reading parenting advice by people with only one kid. Multiple kids changes dynamics a lot. So while the general info is applicable to all families, advice like “talk to your kid in the car” and “teach your kid to ride a bike independently” is much easier done when you have one child getting all of your parenting attention.
Doucleff also falls prey to seduction of stuff. To incentivize time away from screens she suggests buying your kids things (new books or craft kits). So if you’re goal for going screen-free is also anti-consumerist, the advice may grate. Again though, the general ideas are still helpful.
And just an FYI, Doucleff treats schooling as a given. Not helpful for families with young kids at home or those of us who homeschool. (Being screen-free for 2 hours after school is one of the goals, which… is not a thing for many kids, and even more during the summer break!)
Easter Egg: she refers to a book (which seems to only be available in Swedish right now) called “Smarter Than Your Phone” by Siri Helle. 👌
She seems like a nice person, but two things were very clear to me at the end of this book:
1. She only has one child. 2. She has a VERY flexible job.
Look, there are some great points here and even some decent ideas for how to loosen the grip of habit-forming technologies and foods in family life. But there is also a bit of a holier-than-thou attitude that makes it more challenging to swallow, as well as an almost complete lack of recognition of the potential character-building merits of selected screen-based activities.
There is a difference between binging the soapy drama of the week on Netflix and choosing to spend some evenings watching movies by Capra, Coppola, Kubrick, and so on (and introducing children to great movies!).
There is a difference between playing a first person shooter until 2am every night and working your way through a Legend of Zelda adventure over several weeks.
These things are not the same. And shoe-horning our families into extremes of cauliflower snacking, forced family conversation on every commute, and drawing our favorite TV characters instead of ever watching them seems like a recipe that is still lacking a few key ingredients.
But what do I know. Maybe the dopamine made me write this.
I read this for my Hot Moms Bookclub (shoutout to the Hot Moms) and I'm really glad I did (shoutout to hot mom Cas Bertone for recommending it). Admittedly, my first thoughts when picking this up were: 1. This might feel a bit like homework because non-fiction doesn't normally draw me in the same way fiction does, and 2. I'm not going to learn too much from this, I already know the negatve affects of screen time and ultraprocessed foods and I already plan on parenting in a way that avoids them both as much as possible. But guess what, you'll never believe this, I was wrong. Firstly, this book was super readable. I actually found myself feeling drawn to pick it up more than the fiction book I was reading at the same time. I also want to credit the author for taking a scientific topic and making it very accessible to the layman - I think it takes a really smart person to do that. Secondly, while, yes, I already generally understood prior to reading this book that "dopamine magnets" as the author calls them (screens and ultraprocessed foods) are not condusive to good mental health, confidence, or genuine fulfillment, reading this made me realize just how much they inhibit those things. It also forced me to face that, despite priding myself in being a person (and parent) who spends a lot of time outside, values social connection, and has old-timey hobbies like reading and knitting, I spend a LOT of time on my phone. It's the first thing I look at in the morning, last thing I look at night, I carry it around with me everywhere I go and I check it constantly, whether I'm out on a walk, at the beach, at the grocery store, cooking dinner, or even nursing my baby. I also reflected on how doing this pretty rarely brings me actual joy. I'm glad I read this while my child is still so young so I can be really mindful moving forward of how my husband and I are raising her, and for her sake but, also my own, I'm definitely going to put some of the author's suggestions in place to reduce my own use of "dopamine magnets".
I skipped the authors book Hunt, Gather, Parent after hearing concerns about her parenting tactics of scaring your children into obedience by telling them there are monster going to get them (?!) and other weird things. But I went into Dopamine Kids open-minded. I do agree with the core idea that many kids today are overstimulated and dopamine dependent from screens, sugar, and constant input. But the book fell short for me. The terminology (“dismounting,” “magnets”) felt overcomplicated and simple direct parenting like saying no and explaining why often seemed replaced with indirect strategies.
There was also no real acknowledgment of low-tech or screen-free families. And when she highlighted using video games “correctly” for educational gain, she completely lost me 😅
The food chapters were the most interesting to me , but still felt lacking. I just kept thinking why not just… not buy processed junk and be honest with your kids about why? Why not just… not let your children watch Lego girls or other “magnetic” shows and just tell them why? And better yet, just raise children who for the most part don’t know what any of these things are and do not care about them at all 😅😂
My children play outside, read books, eat Whole Foods and from scratch treats, no tricks or gymnastic moves required. 🤸
Big takeaways: - Human dopamine circuitry drives us to want things with strong cues even if the activity itself is not strongly rewarding - Humans are especially driven by quick turnarounds, low near-term costs, and approaching (but not quite meeting) fundamental needs. Essentially this explains why short form video is so addictive. - Children have fundamental developmental needs that screens are preventing them from achieving.
I’m less convinced by the science on ultraprocessed food (UPF). Not that I wish to defend UPF, I think besides infant formula and other food for specific dietary needs (e.g., PKU, liquid diets), we’d all be better off if it entirely disappeared. But the exact scientific explanation for how it grips us felt unconvincing to me. Nonetheless, I liked Michaeleen’s anecdotal takeaway that removing UPFs reduces food noise and allows for intuitive eating.
I liked this book way more than Anxious Generation. Doucleff gives way more credit to what scientists and doctors already know. (For example, it’s been appreciated for years and years that risky outdoor play reduces anxiety in children.) There is no correlation = causation BS. I wish Doucleff used a bit more technical language instead of dumbing everything down, but she did do a very nice job of making it all understandable and relatable.
This book confirmed a lot of my biases as a parent who -doesn’t keep sugary food in the house - who lives next to a giant courtyard that my kids play in all the time independently - doesn’t allow individual screens for my kids - doesn’t have social media accounts herself
Despite my kids already living all the habits the book teachers, this book was an inditement of MY technology usage and made me want to stop checking my phone in the car, around my kids, and around bedtime. I realized that I’ve fallen out of the habit of journaling not because I’m too tired at night (which is what I told myself for a long time) but because the cues for my phone are so much stronger at night. I’m now haunted by the phrase “There’s always a reason to check your phone just like there’s always a reason for an alcoholic to have a drink” (or something like that). It’s actually so true, we make up our reasons post deciding what we want.
I am very interested that the media coverage of Doucleff reveals she got rid of her smart phone and homeschools her daughter. Those elements did not come out in the book and I wonder what other elements of her parenting decisions went totally unmentioned. Definitely a woman I would pay a lot of money to talk with over dinner.
Why do I keep underestimating Michaeleen Doucleff?
The first time I picked up Hunt, Gather, Parent I was skeptical. I suspected that it would be gimmicky and overly idealistic. I was incorrect; though I maintain that it takes a while to get to the really helpful stuff, that book is full of very practical - and it seems to me - very good parenting advice; so much so that I’ve now read it twice and would not be surprised if I find myself consulting it again in the future.
When I heard about Dopamine Kids, I was similarly skeptical. I suspected that Doucleff was trying to capitalize on the popularity of books like The Anxious Generation (which, for the record, I read and highly appreciated) and that this would mostly be rehashed material from Haidt and others in that space, with some questionably relevant commentary on ultra processed foods thrown in to make it seem more original. I was once again incorrect. Ultimately, this book is less about the dangers of too much screen use or social media or processed foods, and more about instilling in our kids (and ourselves!) the importance and value of intentionally pursuing and cultivating real pleasure and engaging with real things and real people. Like Hunt, Gather, Parent it takes a little while to really get going, but it is ultimately remarkably practical and well-researched. Doucleff’s optimism is also highly refreshing and a through-line I’ve appreciated in her work. Next time she puts out a new book I will try to give her the credit she’s earned from the start.
This one really made me think as a parent. It dives into how kids are constantly overstimulated and how that affects their behavior, attention, and overall happiness. It wasn’t preachy, which I appreciated, but it definitely made me reflect on how I want to raise my kids and what I expose them to. A really eye opening read with some practical takeaways
I’m giving this five stars because it was very impactful for me, not because it was a perfect book. It offers real, practical advice for changing kids’ routines and habits to get them off of screens and junk food. I read it more to make changes with my husband in my own life to set up the norms we want for our kids, and it made me feel motivated and empowered to do that. (Shout out to my parents for raising me away from screens and ultraprocessed food.)
The advice was certainly tailored for people in the author’s situation though, for example: • How do you create routines and positive habits from birth? This was my main question and it wasn’t addressed. In reality though, advice on this issue wouldn’t be as helpful as what was provided, and isn’t too hard to extrapolate. • Lots of advice was centered on middle-class suburbia, ie make different rooms in your house zones for different things, just buy more stuff for new habits and hobbies to replace negative ones, let your kids roam the neighborhood free… Again, a truly committed parent could find workarounds and invest in these changes regardless of family situation, but this aspect isn’t really addressed. • Go outside… yes, great, what if it rains/snows/is freezing for a third of the year? Probably the answer is “dress for the weather and do it anyway,” but that doesn’t come up. It would be nice to have some alternative non-screen activity ideas specifically to sub in for the “outside after school routine” for the situation of a truly awful weather day as well.
Other questions: • What about ebooks? Genuinely curious to know the author’s thoughts (especially since I read this on my phone), but it never came up. • “More on this on my website” - why? Was the book too long? Did you not come up with it in time? Especially considering it’s not all on the website yet (the book came out like a month ago). • Tips for aligning priorities and making changes with a spouse/partner? She certainly had to do that but doesn’t discuss it. • What about the anxiety of not having a phone with you at all times for communication? This is more something I need to hash out with myself. It’s probably enough that the book makes it clear that for the average person, this is very possible.
This presents great motivation for making changes with the research it discusses, as well as helpful implementation ideas. It honestly fills in a lot of the gaps that Hunt, Gather, Parent left me with, while… leaving some more gaps. It definitely is motivating me to answer the questions I now have with other books and my own consideration though - and I can’t blame one little book for not addressing EVERYTHING.
2.5 ⭐️ I liked the part about the screens and how dopamine works in the brain. For the ultra processed food part (or “pood” as she puts it) - it was a miss for me. It was very much an All-or-nothing approach which I have a hard time with, especially having worked with people who have eating disorders. Also, the author talks a lot about her daughter. It reminded me of Leonard’s mom in the BigBang Therory (iykyk)
Her first (hunt, gather, parent) changed my parenting forever. There’s systems and philosophies from that book I still use 5 years later, this book is no different. I’m so passionate about her work. It’s well researched but never dry. It’s easily digestible and applicable. 5 stars just like her first.
The most helpful and practical book I’ve read in the past few years. Our family will forever be changed by the plan we are creating for our family around dopamine magnets as outlined in this book. This book is FULL of practical step by step instructions on how to move our worlds away from phones and screens and into real life relationships, fun activities, and joy!!
Kind of hated the author at first (you let your daughter watch iPad every night even though she throws tantrums because you think it’s her hobby?) but in the end a pretty solid book it wouldn’t hurt pay parents to read, the food portion at the end feels a little tacked on but could have been its own book
Though we are a no/low-tech family, I appreciate the authors thorough research on the effects of media of all forms and what it does to a child’s brain. A must-read for anyone struggling with the question of: “is this tech okay for my child?”
Great and contemporary book that explains the science behind the addiction to technology and how to connect its intentional use to values in your life and with your family. Living by your values is not a novel concept, but integrating technology to them is.
Dopamine Kids: A Science-Based Plan to Rewire Your Child's Brain and Take Back Your Family in the Age of Screens and Ultraprocessed Foods by Michaeleen Doucleff (2026) V+374-page Kindle Ebook 1-341
Featuring: Graphics, Dopamine Magnets, Emotions in Children, Smartphones, Digital Media, Internet and Children, Processed Foods, How to Use This Book, Television Shows, Devices, Footnotes, Deep Brain Stimulation, Habits, Templates, Dream Lists, Values and Goals, Steps, Fundamental Needs, Beavers or Bowerbirds, Task Rabbits, Sign Tracking, Motivation, Boredom, Eudaimonia, Recipe For Addiction, Three P's, Autonomy, Phone Noises, Bright-Line Rules, Curate the Cues, Willpower, How to Build a Sanctuary, FOUR-WEEK TRANSFORMATION - Sanctuary for Conversation, Distraction, Escape, and Goldilocks Challenges, Sanctuary for Focus, Sanctuary for Sleep, Sanctuary for Adventure, Acknowledgments, Discussion Questions, Activities, Bibliography for Michaeleen Doucleff, Author's Links, Notes, Index, Publisher Links
My rating: 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟📱🎮💻📺🧠🍿
My thoughts: 🔖Page 93 of 374 CHAPTER 3 The Most Addictive Screen on Earth - This is very good. I see why it's so popular. 🔖135 CHAPTER 4 The App Builder’s Recipe for Addiction - I'm going to bed, for real this time.
This book is the type of resource I wish I'd had encountered a decade ago, though it was not available then. I thoroughly appreciate this story; however, implementing much of its guidance will be challenging for me, given that my son is 17. Nevertheless, there remains a degree of optimism. I even contemplated suggesting he reads it.
Recommend to others: I wholeheartedly recommend this book, regardless of whether you have children. Michaeleen offers guidance not only for children regarding electronics and fast food, but also reflects on her own experiences, making it relevant for adults as well.
Books and Authors mentioned: Succession by Jesse Armstrong, Hunt, Gather, Parent: What Ancient Cultures Can Teach Us About the Lost Art of Raising Happy, Helpful Little Humans by Michaeleen Doucleff; Digital Minimalism: Choosing a Focused Life in a Noisy World by Cal Newport; Lifting Depression: A Neuroscientist's Hands-On Approach to Activating Your Brain's Healing Power by Kelly G. Lambert, Ph.D., Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience by Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi; Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do by B.J. Fogg, The Art of Roughhousing: Good Old-Fashioned Horseplay and Why Every Kid Needs It by Anthony T. DeBenedet and Lawrence J. Cohen, The Joy of Cooking by Irma S. Rombauer, Mattering as a Core Need in Children and Adolescents: Theoretical, Clinical, and Research Perspectives by Gordon Flett, Goldilocks and the Three Bears by Robert Southey, Addiction by Design: Machine Gambling in Las Vegas by Natasha D. Schull, Psychological Care of Infant and Child by John B. Watson, BoyMom: Reimagining Boyhood in the Age of Impossible Masculinity by Ruth Whippman, Wings of Fire series by Tui T. Sutherland, Tiny Habits: The Small Changes That Change Everything by BJ Fogg, PhD, Good Habits, Bad Habits: The Science of Making Positive Changes That Stick by Wendy Wood; Guts by Raina Telgemeier, The Wandering Mind: What Medieval Monks Tell Us about Distraction by Jamie Kreiner, 10 Rules for Raising Kids in a High-Tech World: How Parents Can Stop Smartphones, Social Media, and Gaming from Taking Over Their Children's Lives by Jean M. Twenge, PhD; The Land of Stories series by Chris Colfer, Smarter than Your Phone by Siri Helle
Memorable Quotes: Low as this background hum may have been, I knew it was affecting my parenting. I had a hard time just being with Rosy as we went through our day. We would go for a ten-minute bike ride to the park, and I would check my phone every time we stopped at a traffic light. At night, I couldn’t wait for Rosy to go to sleep so I could watch HBO. Sometimes I’d even become short with her because she wouldn’t fall asleep quickly enough. Please, please go to sleep, Rosy. Mommy needs to watch Succession. One time, I was typing furiously on my phone, trying to respond to an angry comment on Twitter. When I looked up, I saw Rosy watching me, intensely. I felt a tinge of guilt. A tiny worry cropped up in my mind: Oh gosh, am I re-creating my phone habits inside her? As the months went by, another question slowly arose in my thoughts: Had I always been like this? I didn’t think so. It seemed like my brain had changed somehow. I began to notice a similar change in my relationship with food. I wasn’t overweight, but I often ate past what felt good. And between meals, I experienced what some people called food noise. I couldn’t stop thinking, even obsessing over what we would eat next—the next trip to a restaurant, the next glass of wine, the next stop at Starbucks.
As cigarette sales plummeted in the late 1980s, tobacco companies purchased food manufacturers, such as Kraft, General Foods, and Nabisco. By the late 1990s, the availability of ultraprocessed foods had skyrocketed, and that growth continued into the twenty-first century. Today 60 to 70 percent of children’s calories come from these foods, which often contain high concentrations of fat, sugar, salt, or all three. In many ways, these foods carry just as much power and influence on our lives as apps and devices.
This list will help you align your family’s time and diet with your deepest values and what’s important to you. We’re going to create an initial list here, but we’ll build and refine it throughout this book. So don’t skip this step. This list is such an important jumping-off point for remodeling your relationship with dopamine magnets that I’ve created a template for you to fill out right here in the book. Cut out this page, use it as a bookmark, and as you read through the book, continue to add more ideas to the list. (You can find exact copies of the template on the Dopamine Kids website and print out as many as you need.)
You can ask them straightforwardly, “If you could do anything in the world, what would it be?” I’ve asked many kids this question, and oftentimes the answers aren’t so useful. Many times children list off activities that involve iPads, game consoles, and their parents’ phones. “I want to watch YouTube all day,” one child told me. Or, alternately, they tell me activities that involve an enormous amount of time or participation from their parents. For example, I’ve heard “I want to go to Six Flags,” “trampoline parks,” and “ice skating.” Because here’s what I didn’t appreciate until recently: To desire a specific activity or food, you first need to experience it. Oftentimes, you need to experience it frequently. As we’ll learn, children can’t really want something they haven’t experienced or enjoyed. They need to build a neurological pathway of wanting inside their motivation circuitry pointed toward a hobby or food before they can begin to desire it. And on the flip side, they can develop a love of high-value hobbies and foods once they’ve experienced and enjoyed them repeatedly. Exposure builds Interest And so if a child hasn’t been exposed to many activities that don’t involve a screen or their parents, they don’t have any motivation for these activities. They don’t know how much they would enjoy them. Think of it this way: If a child says they’re “bored” without a screen, then they haven’t learned yet how to love and crave activities off the screen.
I’m telling you, these kids. They’ll stare at you for an hour if you ask them to do a fraction. [But] if they could get access to YouTube, they’re… like, “Good news. I have a 128-qubit quantum processor I hacked together in the playground and was able to break the public key encryption that was keeping us out of Mark Rober videos.” They become hackers. —Cal Newport, computer scientist and productivity guru
Now that I understood how Rosy’s motivation circuitry works, I knew that the mere sight of the cookies would trigger a surge of dopamine in her motivation center and a burst of hope and desire in her mind, as one single thought raced through it: Oh, cookies are possible. I want some cookies. As she stood with her head tilted back, taking in the aisle, a mental image might have flashed through her mind of grabbing the box of cookies from the shelf and putting it into the cart. Or she might have anticipated the pleasure of opening the box and eating her first few cookies. (Just like what my brain does at 5:30 p.m. when I believe that a glass of Chardonnay is possible.) Now Rosy had one, largely subconscious, goal: Get the cookies! If we diagrammed out how the process worked in Rosy’s brain, it would have looked a bit like: Here the “work” equaled doing whatever she believed was necessary to convince me to buy those cookies, which likely included begging and negotiating. It wasn’t her fault. She wasn’t trying to make my life hard and instigate conflict. It’s how her brain evolved to work. When high-calorie foods appear, you go after them with vigor. You work hard for them. And so, right on cue, with her cute seven-year-old voice, Rosy said, “Mama, you know, I’m just craving a Pinwheel. Just one or two.” “Hmm,” I said, trying to downplay it. “Not today. We had desserts all last week.” But her motivation circuitry made her persist and push to get the cookies into the cart. “Come on, Mama. I feel like we never have cookies. And Laura gets them all the time.” Not true. And not true, I thought to myself. But instead of initiating a conflict, I saw an opportunity. At that moment, Rosy was super-motivated and quite eager for cookies. So instead of becoming frustrated by her begging, or simply dismissing her request with “no” and walking away (which would have been a totally reasonable response in this situation), I tried an experiment. “OK, Rosy. You can have cookies,” I said, emphasizing that I wasn’t saying no. “But… you’re going to have to bake them yourself. You have to go pick out the ingredients, go home, and bake them.” This experiment offered Rosy the chance to practice a whole bunch of useful skills, such as reading a recipe, identifying what ingredients we needed to buy, and then taking the instructions from the recipe and converting them into an edible treat. She might even have the chance to use fractions. Sophisticated! Through the process of baking, Rosy had the opportunity to use, sharpen, and refine skills that she needed to become a competent, contributing adult. And, as it happens, these were skills that would also make her feel confident, proud, and, perhaps most important, purposeful in our home. “Let’s go to the baking aisle and find a recipe on the back of a bag of chocolate chips. Then we can pick out the ingredients and go home and bake the cookies,” I said. “And you’re going to have to do most of this by yourself, because I’m tired.” She looked at me suspiciously. Paused for a beat. And then her eyes widened, as she realized what I had just said—and that she would have a cool new activity for the afternoon. “I can bake them myself?” she asked, with a hint of excitement. “All by myself?” “Yes. I’ll help get you started. But then you’re on your own.” That’s when I began to wield one of my most potent superpowers as a parent, one that the tech and food industries have been using for decades: By tapping into Rosy’s fundamental needs, I was harnessing her willingness to work hard and to learn. I was harnessing her motivation.
By shifting from cookie buying to cookie baking, Rosy now starts to fulfill six fundamental needs in her life. Kids need to learn. They especially need to learn skills that keep them alive (hello, cooking). They need to explore their environment (hello, searching through the spice cabinet for cinnamon and vanilla or searching through the grocery store for cornstarch), they need to try out new tasks and experiment (hello, preheating the oven and trying to grease the pan), they need to take risks (hello, putting the tray of cookies into the hot oven), and they need to feel purposeful and help others (hello, making them and their family food).
But as her daughter grew up, Schüll began to observe firsthand how much apps and games gripped children’s attention and interfered with their lives. “Just this week, at my daughter’s school, we had to have a meeting about the boys and these apps,” she told me. “These poor eleven- and twelve-year-old boys can’t stop themselves with both games and porn apps. Some of them are coming to school without any sleep. It’s freaking them out.”
A study from 2020 found that nearly 60 percent of the top video games on the iPhone contained so-called loot boxes, which are essentially slot machines hidden inside the game. More than 90 percent of these games were targeted to children ages twelve and above. But even games marketed to younger children often involve gambling elements. For example, on the gaming platform Roblox, children spend a large amount of their time opening loot boxes and spinning kiddie roulette wheels, New York magazine reported in 2025.
In her research, Schüll uncovered a recipe that game and app designers use to hold children on their products as long as possible. The recipe contains four key ingredients. As Schüll said, these ingredients produce “the opposite of human flourishing.” They drain us of energy and time. They strip away satisfaction and pleasure. When mixed together these features can short-circuit a child’s (or adult’s) motivation circuitry, so their wanting for the activity can rise above the reward or pleasure they’re gaining from it. These ingredients can put children (and adults) into a trancelike state in which they lose track of time and the consequences of actions. And it can be difficult for anyone to pull out of the state, including myself.
One night, when I felt extra confident as a mom, I made the swap. Before dinner, I downloaded a book that I knew Rosy would love. When she came to me begging for cartoons after dinner, I introduced her to the wonderful world of audiobooks. Talk about more value! Audiobooks fulfilled Rosy’s need for escape. But she also really learned while listening to them. After she had listened to several books in the Land of Stories series, I could hear her vocabulary and narrative skills improving. For Rosy, listening to audiobooks required way more work than staring at a cartoon. She had to concentrate and create the story in her mind. And this extra bit of work slowed down the cycle of wanting, so stopping the books was much easier. No tears and little whining. Listening to audiobooks seemed like a high-value habit I wanted to cultivate—one that would serve her well for the rest of her life, instead of preventing her from accomplishing meaningful and purposeful work. So I added it to my dream chart and to my growing list of screen-replacement activities that Rosy loves.
Cues can be anything around us that predicts a reward or the fulfillment of a fundamental need, he explained. It’s the Instagram logo on your phone, prompting you to check your account. It’s the black cursive T at the top of your browser, causing you to stop working and check the New York Times. It’s the Starbucks sign, triggering a desire for a latte. Even normal, innocuous household items can transform into potent, behavior-changing cues, Robinson explained. For example, when I thought carefully about my habit of drinking Chardonnay each night, I could see that I didn’t need a beep to trigger my desire for wine. My dopamine neurons spontaneously found a cue in my kitchen: onions. For nearly twenty-five years, I sipped a glass of wine (or two) while preparing dinner. Almost every night, I would go into our kitchen, grab an onion from the refrigerator, and start slicing it. As soon as the vegetable’s sulfurous scent wafted into the air, an image arose in my mind. It showed me pouring a glass of Chardonnay into a wineglass. Then I would feel this visceral urge to execute this action. I would not just want wine. I would need wine. I expected wine, thanks to that onion and its pungent scent.III As the years went by, chopping onions turned into a potent cue for me—one that I can still sometimes feel even two years after I stopped drinking in my kitchen.
So when Rosy eats foods that contain both speedy fat and speedy carbohydrates, such as the Veggie Straws, the two dopamine surges combine together to create an even bigger release in dopamine. And her dopamine circuitry screams, Holy mackerel! These straws have superhigh calorie density and calorie speed. This food will keep us alive better than the other food around! Remember these straws. Remember the signals and cues for these straws. And when you see these straws again, eat them. Eat all of them. Forget other foods and eat this!
Notice how I’m not saying “we can’t have pood in the car.” Instead, it’s “we don’t have pood in the car.” Studies have found that when children (and adults) feel like they “can’t” do an activity, they feel like they’re missing out or being punished. But when a family chooses not to do an activity because it doesn’t fit their identity or values, they don’t feel deprived. They feel empowered.
As Anna Lembke, a psychiatrist at Stanford University, once told me: “There’s always a reason to use your phone just like there’s always a reason to have a drink.”
Interesting, but overall regurgitated a lot of information about screen time best practices that's been going around the parenting and smart-phone free space for years. (Think Stolen Focus or Anxious Generation.)
It offered decent worksheets and practical advice for starting from scratch to build an intentional home that targets less distractions and high quality pass times (and food, although those sections felt more like an afterthought).
I'm not sure I was the target audience for this book, so I'd recommend it to readers who are just starting out on their journey to move away from screens and replace online time with analogue hobbies.
This book isn’t just for parents pertaining to their children. It was enlightening as it related to me as an adult & my relationship with screens. The research behind it all and the work Doucleff did to bring it all together was really incredible.
I did not enjoy this book. I was icked out when she was having her child write a paper on the last movie she watched before she was allowed to watch another. It seemed like everything was a song and dance as opposed to just saying no. I can say no to my children and hold a boundary without needing to make a sanctuary zone around it and without putting such hard limits that all the joy seems to be sucked out. This just wasn't the book for me and I didn't really learn anything new or helpful.
I went into Dopamine Kids expecting something thoughtful and nuanced, especially after really appreciating parts of Hunt, Gather, Parent. Instead, I walked away feeling… talked down to.
The biggest issue for me is that the book feels like it starts with a conclusion and then works backwards to justify it. There’s a heavy “this is the problem, and here is the solution” tone, but very little actual curiosity about kids as whole humans. It leans hard into this idea that overstimulation and dopamine are the issue, and while there’s some truth there, it gets stretched into a catch-all explanation for basically everything.
Kids are complex. Behavior is communication. There are so many layers to what’s going on for them…sensory needs, nervous system regulation, neurodivergence, family dynamics, culture, environment. This book kind of flattens all of that into “too much stimulation = problem,” which feels…convenient, but not accurate.
It also reads like a checklist disguised as insight. In the same way Vitamin N sometimes feels like a long list of prescriptions, this ends up being very “here’s what to do” instead of “here’s how to think.” Parenting isn’t a protocol. Kids aren’t something you optimize with the right formula!
And honestly, the confidence of it all bothered me. The claims are strong, the tone is very certain, but the nuance isn’t there to back it up. It feels like the answer was decided first, and then everything else was shaped to fit that narrative.
What’s frustrating is that there is something real underneath it. Yes, kids today are exposed to a lot of fast, high-reward stimulation. Yes, environment matters. Yes, boredom and slower rhythms are important. But instead of holding that as one piece of a much bigger picture, the book treats it like the main story…and it just isn’t.
After reading Hunt, Gather, Parent (which, to be fair, also has its own issues… including that very real “white person gets credit for BIPOC wisdom” dynamic), this one felt even flatter. At least that book invited reflection.
Overall, I didn’t find it helpful so much as frustrating. It’s a compelling argument built on a partial truth. but it overreaches in a way that ends up feeling reductive and, at times, kind of judgmental.
If you’re looking for depth, flexibility, or something that actually respects how complex kids are this probably isn’t it.