(Reviewed the audio version)
Woo, boy. First things first, I love Joe Hempel's narration. The man is talented, and has a silver tongue for sure. I would listen to him read the phone book. Bad news is that for the latter half of this book, I wish I had been. Spoilers, spoilers everywhere, though I'll try to keep them to a minimum.
It starts off fine, picking up where the last Shade book left off. Sharon, otherwise known as Charon the ferryman, appears to Jonathan with a friend of hers: Cronos. It seems a wizard by the name of Winslow has somehow split himself up into three pieces in an attempt to change history. Only someone "perfectly balanced" can stop him. Sharon says that Jonathan still owes her a favor even though she BETRAYED him which ended in his friends' deaths before and he went back in time through spirit travel to save them. Now, of course, the world is in danger from a time traveling wizard and Jonathan is tapped to go save it.
There is a long convoluted explanation of how to get magic to work with Jonathan which I don't need to go over here save that it requires his friends, so he can piggyback along with them. Amazingly, Esther, Rayna, Kelly, and Brand agree within two hours with minimal arguing to go.
Kelly and Jonathan go to ancient Egypt, Brand and Esther to 1877, and Rayna to the 1920's. It's set up in such a way that when Kelly & Jonathan kill the aspect of Winslow in ancient Egypt, they go forward to Brand in 1877, and when the aspect of Winslow there is dead, they all go forward to Rayna, pulling Jonathan along if he's in physical contact. Time passes normally for all no matter what time they are in. In other words, if Kelly and Jonathan take a week to kill Winslow, a week passes in 1877 and the 1920's as well. Yes, I have to explain this set up in order to explain why I'm so disappointed and upset in this book.
Yes, this is also incomplete. Instead of being one book, this is a trilogy within a series, which I think was a mistake. It's... it's very disappointing, and yeah, he does end this particular one on a cliffhanger.
The book is split into four narratives. As with Dragon Gate, those who are not Jonathan or Kelly are told in the third person POV. I have NO idea why it's split up that way. It's a little jarring until you get used to it. I am, however, very happy to see Brand and Rayna's POV so we know what's going on with them as the story progresses. The main focus is on Jonathan and Kelly though.
Initially, they arrived, passed themselves off as powerful visitors (and there was a whole thing about ancient Egyptian garb that took up a whole chapter and then it was just "Nah, we're going to go in our street clothes". Wat? Why waste our time like that?) and in general got along well with King Tut and his Queen. There's some sexual tension between them, which made my one eye twitch, but Jonathan kept reminding himself about his girlfriend Rayna. Good. Few days pass and Winslow arrives in the Egyptian court! Problem solved. Initially Kelly is all gung ho to kill him, but Jonathan wants to talk to him to get information. Not a bad idea! Winslow points out something to them that I had assumed was simply handwaving before because it was SO OBVIOUS. But evidently, something so vital such as returning to their own time warranted no questions from the gang to Cronos or Charon. Especially after Charon had already proved themselves unworthy.
Alright, fine, there's stuff happening in the other timelines that we see, so of course Kelly and Jonathan kill Winslow's aspect and get to Brand's time, right? To do the mission? No. Kelly convinces Jonathan to stay after King Tut dies to help out his Queen. She wants to help her find a new king not of the court in Egypt, but a foreign court in order to maintain power. Jonathan agrees. The time spent to do this? At least seventy days. Minimum. This is where I stopped listening for a while because it angered me so much. Brand and Rayna are in trouble. The audience knows this. No, the characters don't, but the audience does. So, staying for the thinnest of reasons for nothing that helps them on their mission and could change the timeline and perhaps cause trouble (maybe not, but maybe it could) while leaving their friends on their own for at least seventy days... was a terrible, selfish move. I read it as the author wanting Jonathan and Kelly a chance to be alone for that long so they could have a romance, but since it's through a character filter... to me it reads like Kelly is manipulating Jonathan, whether consciously or subconsciously, in order to meet her own agenda of getting together with Jonathan. Oh, his girlfriend? Who cares. Friends who are hunting down a dangerous wizard (his two aspects left) on their own? Who cares.
That was the gutpunch. Not only did it destroy one of the best portrayals of a platonic friendship between a man and a woman in ANY piece of fiction I've ever read (Kelly & Jonathan's friendship), but it completely destroyed Kelly's character for me, and I loved Kelly! This was a betrayal on the level of Anita Blake's ardeur (or arduer, however it's spelled this week--if you don't know what I'm referring to there, you're lucky). Destroyed her character? Simply because she loved Jonathan? No. Because she completely disregarded Rayna's feelings on the matter, Jonathan's relationship, and the mission! It was like she was replaced with someone else entirely. Yes, she'd been through changes. Yes, she was more uncertain because of injuries, but would she make the huge, HUGE mistake to leave Winslow behind in the Egyptian court while they left for two months?! Would Jonathan? Where's his hard edge and his, you know, common sense? The last part of the book had me headdesking during the ancient Egypt section. They left their friends hanging for Two. Months. It was implied that more time than that passed, too. And you know what for? Nothing. It was all for nothing.
Rayna's voice also had troubles. The way she was written... she sounded more like a female Jonathan than her voice from Dragon Gate. Brand's segments were the saving grace for me (and the beginning, which was fine). Brand made mistakes too, but at least we got to see a different side of him which was believable, and then that side played into him making his mistake. He was more serious in this book, which I both liked and didn't like. I kind of like his juvenile sense of humor.
Unfortunately, the book ended on a cliffhanger which deals with my favorite character, Brand. Because of that and Joe Hempel's fantastic narration, I'll have to pick up Sunset Spectres, reluctantly. Again, it's akin to picking up Cerulean Sins after Narcissus in Chains in the Anita Blake series. Maybe it'll fix itself in the next one. Maybe things will make more sense. Maybe it'll all be OK?
You can tell how much it upset me by the length of the review. I still feel like I was sucker punched.