What comes first, is it sex and attraction (of course) or depression, or alcoholism, or is something unseen and even more hidden – generational family secrets? A compulsion to repeat the past? Can anything be done? How do you help someone when they don’t want your help, or at least not the help you’re offering? These are questions nibbled at in Kathryn Craft’s fictional account of a real event in her life, written, I suspect, as she still tries to understand and cope with what happened. Briefly: The story is about a violent suicide, in front of family and TV cameras, of a man trying desperately to coerce his wife –who is divorcing him – not to.
There is so much going on here : 1) Writing style and point of view. 2) Real life statistical evidence and events. 3) Recovery. 4) Alcoholism. 5) Generational family drama. 6) Love and marriage. 7) Interpersonal communication. 8)The Media. 9) Modern policing. 10) The Power of Intention, or (not named) The Law of Attraction; and that’s not getting into any real psychological analysis. 11) Children of suicidal parents. 12) And finally, guns. 1) Personally, I can’t stand MFA style writing. Here’s an example; “ … ever-burbling spring that bathed Janet’s heart with its only source of joy.” (pg. 105) This water metaphor thing ran throughout the novel. It’s an attempt to show writing prowess. My notes were “please”; “barf”; etc. and then I gave up even making notes. But, I liked the way Craft constructed the story – one day, with flashbacks, and different characters recollections’. 2) The statistical evidence about suicides and alcoholism are accurate and woven into the story well, mostly through dialogue. The event happened to the author, in 2000. It’s impossible to know what , w/r/t the story, actually happened and what is “artistic license” for the benefit of the story, and what is 3) part of the author’s recovery process. There is a lot of “recovery speak” in the story. So, I don’t know if this reflects the mind of the character during the event, or a retelling, a re-remembering of events from ten years hence, and the concurrent and subsequent therapy. But, the decision to divorce, which was the actual trigger to the suicide, seems to be real. The next four themes 4,5,6, & 7) are so closely intertwined that it’s impossible to separate them. Some statements stood out: “ … believed in the power of women.” “tight-fisted management of husband’s paycheck.” “We are not having this conversation.” “What he wants is you.” “I don’t know what more I could have done. He’s a big boy.”
The best of the book/story was a description/detail/dialogue of an epic female fight between the wife (the protagonist/author) and her mother and her mother’s best friend, who happened to be the wife’s mother-in-law and mother of the husband suicider. Here Craft reveals the toxic formula for interpersonal and generational muck that seems at the root of much human suffering: despair, drama, hurt, trauma, and horror. Simply stated, a failure to be honest and disclose, or, a failure of intimacy. Who’s at fault? Or is it simply fate? Unavoidable? Part of the human condition?
10) Craft, it’s obvious, is using the writing of the novel as a sort of rationalization. ‘See, I did everything a reasonable, loving wife could be expected to do – and he still killed himself. I’m a good person. … No doubt. But Craft didn’t answer the questions – she just exonerated herself. The Media’s 8) role is, to be kind, questionable, as it is still today. Donald Trump may have it right, most of them are “scum.” Who would ever want to go into TV news? Is a question worth asking. The police’s 9) role is also questionable. Did they help or hurt the situation? But, they had to respond and follow protocol, they have no choice, once called to the/any scene. Left alone, without the 911 call, the situation might have wound up as a murder suicide; but, if they hadn’t forced the issue as night approached, maybe the man just falls asleep? Which brings up the issue of professional intervention. All “Ronnie”’s attempts to get help with/for her husband failed. Would nothing have saved this man’s life? Was it doomed from the start, or at least from early childhood? 11) What about the children of suicides? There’s not a lot devoted to this, but their role in the family is always relevant – how they are used by the parents. Which sounds harsh, but it’s true. Suicide tends to run in families. And finally, there is the question of guns 12) and mental health. There is much talk today about not allowing the mentally ill to possess firearms. But this story shows how that is really just not ever going to be possible. This man was a gun enthusiast, collected them, and then – What? After his admission into a psych ward, where he was deemed a suicide risk and alcoholic, do you get a legal order to take away the guns? How’s that going to work out? It’s not going to happen.
Maybe … she wanted so much to be a WRITER [you’ll have to read the novel] (10) she did contribute to all of this in some weird Law of Attraction way that we humans aren’t close to understanding. On page 251 she offers a glimpse: “She swallowed her anger, unsure who she was in this scenario: someone who deserved to defend her principles or a class-A bitch?” To which something stuck out to me. Ronnie, throughout her self-defense of her behavior, laments that she tried everything, but couldn’t get Jeff to talk, to open up. But when he wanted to talk, about her possible affair with Kevin, she slammed the door. “We’re not having this conversation.” (pg. 255) “Please … I want to talk.” Jeff almost begged. So …
I give Kathryn Craft a lot of credit for trying to put into words how ugly life can be, how unforgiving. The title is good, excellent.
Lastly, in some ways the story is so typical. Most all marriages begin with infatuation, desire, love, sex … then children and work … and then economics and money rear up, and weighs in and overwhelms all the romantic fantasy … and then the couple begins to find out who they really are – under real life pressures’. Usually the story doesn’t end so violently and horrific, it just goes on and on, and on. I don’t know who I could recommend this to … by the time it might be understandable, it’s too late.
How do you help someone who doesn’t want the help you are offering?