Eric Selbin, hailing from Southwestern University, feels like a little-league player, his analysis reminiscent of an undergraduate's. He uses the intersection of institutionalization and consolidation (a definition which he changes) to determine the success of four revolutions in Latin America. The simplicity of these determinants distorts more than it enlightens, leading to the controversial conclusions that the Cuban Revolution has not yet proven itself to be successful since it has hinged on the personality of Fidel Castro and has not yet seen a successful regime change. For an analysis that claims to put the people back into the movement, it seems strange that the movement must go beyond the revolutionaries in order to be considered a success. He also declares Nicaragua a success despite economic difficulties brought on by United States interference and that the Sadinistas lost control of the government in the second election. The most interesting contribution is Selbin's analysis of Grenada, hardly mentioned in revolutionary literature because it was a failure. 46 people managed to take over the entire island in a matter of 12 hours. But infighting eroded the initial success of this uprising.