BELLICOSE AND THUGGISH: The Roots of Chinese "Patriotism" at the Dawn of the Twenty-First Century (2002)
The "great rejection" idea is upside-down theory in the sense that it begins with a neat formula and then fills in facts to suit it. It says: in politics, reject Western "political hegemony" and oppose "peaceful evolution" in a pro-West direction. In military affairs, prepare for confrontation with American "military hegemony," an call for a multipolar international order. In economics, prevent "capital hegemony" from controlling China, and retain our people's economy as the indisputable top priority. In the cultural realm, prevent "Western discursive hegemony," which is also "cultural colonialism," and advocate the indigenization of scholarship. (81)
Western rules and standards are everywhere. In the view of the hegemony theorists, the "system hegemony" (81) of the West is unfair. It did not come about because Western culture and Western systems are superior to others or because they are intrinsically more "universal." It came about because the West has been economically, technologically, and militarily more powerful. Material differences, not value differences, put it where it is. (82)
In recent world history, the worship of violence has always found convenient pretexts: during the Second World War, the efficiency of Fascism was the rationale; during the Cold War, it was the Communist ideal of one-world harmony; and now, for China, it is ultra-nationalism. (83)
-
EPILOGUE TO Chinese Politics and China's Modern Intellectuals (1989)
I might point out that the West's overriding emphasis on rationality, science, and money has resulted in the loss of individuality and in a commercial[ization that overwhelms all resistance; I might also criticize the economic stratification that technological itnegration has brought about, and I can repudiate the ways in whichc onsumer culture has inured humanity to an unquestioning addiction to affluence and a cowardly fear of freedom. (122)
How can people who lack a sense of "original sin" ever hear the voice of God? From the early Middle Ages, when God was a being of reason, to the late Middle Ages, when God was a figure of power, to modern times, when God became even more profoundly subjected to reason, and finally to today's world, where God has gradually become secularized, human civilization has been in descent. By its own hand, humanity in the West has killed the sacred values of its heart. (123)
My wife [first wife, Tao Li] once wrote to me in a letter:
Xiaobo, on the surface you seem to be a rebel within this society, but in fact you have a deep identification with it. The system treats you as an opponent, and in so doing it accommodates you, tolerates you, even flatters and encourages you. In a sense you are an oppositional ornament of the system. But me? I'm an invisible person; I disdain eve nto demand anything of this society, and don't lose sleep over how I am going to denounce it. It is I, not you, who am fundamentally incompatible with it. Even you cannot comprehend my profound indifference. Not even you can accommodate me. (124)
-
THE EROTIC CARNIVAL IN RECENT CHINESE HISTORY (2004)
Especially stunning is the fact that cultured people--literary people--can view this kind of blatant "sex banquet" as a form of high culture. They quote the poetic line "With bodies warm and stomachs full, thoughts next turn to sex" and cite the Chinese sex craze as evidence that ths society is achieving middle-class prosperity. (165)
The roots of this cynicism and moral vacuity must be traced to the Mao era. It was then (an era that "leftist" nostalgia today presents as one of moral purity) that the nation's spirit suffered its worst devastation. During the Cultural revolution people "handed their reddest hearts to Chairman Mao." Why, after doing that, would one still need one's own spirit? (170)
-
FROM WANG SHUO'S WICKED SATIRE TO HU GE'S EGAO: Political Humor in a Post-Totalitarian Dictatorship (2006)
There is some truth in this. Egao in post-totalitarian Chian is a symptom of spiritual hunger and intellectual poverty at the same time. It can be seen as a kind of psychosomaticc drug, something that works hand-in-hand with the vacuous comedy shows that the official media present, except that it can be even more effective than those in its power to anesthetize. People can get drunk laughing at one political joke after another that tells about suffering, corruption, and unhappiness. Jokes on such topics can become mere commodities to enjoy--as in "That's a good one!" One could even say that the laughter egao induces is a heartless kind, soemthing that buries people's senses of justice and their normal human sympathies. (184)
When "carnival" comes along, according to Bakhtin, the people at the grassroots, accustomed to their place at the receiving end of scoldings, suddenly become "fearless." They produce a spontaneous logical inversion of the base and the noble, of up and down. They use parody, mockery, ridicule, and insolence--sarcasm of several forms--to vent their sentiments, but these are not (185) simply negative sentiments aimed at knocking something down. Satire of what is wrong implies that something else is right; it tears things down for the sake of rebirth. (186)
-
JUNE 2 HUNGER STRIKE DECLARATION (1989)
[Our Basic Watchwords]
1. We have no enemies. We must not let hatred or violence poison our thinking or the progress of democratization in China.
2. We must reflect on our ways. China's backwardness is everyone's responsibility.
3. We are citizens before we are anything else.
4. We are not seeking death. We are seeking to live true lives.
(282)
-
USING TRUTH TO UNDERMINE A SYSTEM BUILT ON LIES: Statement of Thanks in Accepting the Outstanding Democracy Activist Award (of SF, in 2003)
We can even say that what the autocrats at the top fear most is not violent uprisings, which they can put down (so long as these are not too large, and we should be wary of wishing for full-scale violent revolution, which might only bring a new dictatorship); their worst nightmare is a situation in which every person, beginning with intellectuals and the other notables who speak in public, is able to ignore material inducements and begins to refuse to utter lies. Even to say nothing, even just to remain silent, would be enough, so long as no lies are repeated and everyone agrees to stop living off the telling of lies. The system would choke. (296)