Marriage is scary, because what if they turn out like Beth?
I can’t say I loved this, but I also can’t say I hated it.
I originally started this because it’s currently receiving praise and reviews left and right, with it becoming a trendy book at the moment on this app. Broken Country will come off as emotional, tear jerking and heartbreaking to some, but to me it came off as selfishly indulging. I can see how and why people love it, but for me it falls under those “unsure how to feel” books.
The story had a lot of potential for me. It may seem repetitive and unoriginal for some, but I was drawn to the idea of flawed characters making dumb and messy decisions and having a complex relationship with each other. There’s a love triangle that adds drama, reminding me of the telenovelas I grew up watching. I knew this beforehand, and I think it’s important for anyone who wants to read this to know because it’s a big part of the story. I personally don’t like love triangles and stories with them, but I knew this had it going on so I was ready. There’s a side mystery that doesn’t take over the story but adds more relevance to it, adding a very bit of suspension even if it can be obvious who did what and what exactly happened. Was I shocked at the turn of events? Yup! What can I say? I never claimed to be a good detective.
It’s realistic, it’s flawed, it’s complex, it’s messy, it’s humane. I praise the author for the realistic emotions it brings out from the reader. I hated the protagonist, Beth, for what she did, but I don’t think we’re expected to fully sympathize with her anyway. The way I see it, I think it speaks highly of the author for making me hate Beth. Kind of like when you’re watching a movie and you hate the villain. Like, in my opinion, you’re supposed to, and if you do, I personally see it as the actor doing a fantastic job. And I know Beth is the type of character that, if she were real, she would know people would hate her. I was even telling my mom about it and she said “You know this even happens in real life.” And when it’s like that, I’m a big fan of what the author is trying to incorporate. The drama is fulfilling and entertaining. The love triangle adds messy confusion, bringing in media entertainment to the storyline. It’s not toxic, but it’s contradicting, adding a sense of realism to the story, showing the reality of uncertainty, confusion, and hypocrisy. It goes to shows how we as humans are selfish, greedy, and needy.
But at the same time, I think that’s where the author’s spark kind of dies. Despite how relatable or realistic it can come off as, the characters themselves are never really that memorable. I especially felt like Beth is a mix of contradicting and pure selfishness. Her actions were predictable yet emotionless. She claims to have loved both men at the same time, but never once did I feel like the author showed her love for Frank, her husband. Instead I felt like the author herself had a bias with Gabriel, as if we as the readers should also prefer Gabriel. While both men are good men and there’s no toxicity here, I never thought the author was fair with her comparisons. Beth’s decision to have an affair with Gabriel is never drawn out. We never see her struggle, we never see her be confused, we never see her regret what she did. She goes along saying she knows she’s hurting Frank but we never really see those emotions play out. The story itself isn’t that long, but I would have preferred more on the emotions aspect here. It’s as if the author was missing that connection between the reader and main character, like we never really get into Beth’s mind enough. In other words, lots of telling and hardly any showing.
I also thought that because of that, the love triangle is hardly a love triangle. I was expecting more drama, more tension, more severity, but again, the author’s decision to write more about Gabriel as a boyfriend and then secret lover felt biased. Frank is a good man too, but we hardly learned about him. We don’t really know anything about his history with Beth besides the fact that he had liked her since they were 13 and a little bit of his family history, yet nothing relevant or enough. As we make progress in the story, even when we learn about the affair and whatnot, Frank always felt like a second choice. He never felt like he was someone Beth chose and wanted to be with. I felt like Beth chose him because she knew she needed a man in her life and Frank just happened to me there.
I was not a fan of this.
It’s confusing and not in a good way. If you’re gonna give me a love triangle and secret love affair, give me more tension. If you’re going to say your character feels bad and knows what she’s doing is wrong, show that. Prove to me that your character feels this, that your character is experiencing these confusing emotions and doesn’t know what to do. But that never happened. Beth never really felt bad. And in my opinion, once Gabriel came back into the picture, Beth never really loved Frank. It’s not to say she couldn’t love both men at the same time, but in that case, she would be polyamorous. Sorry to say it, but there was no way she loved Frank while doing what she did with Gabriel.
I can’t even feel too bad for Frank, though, because he decided to get back with her. In the end, the drama and love triangle was messy and worthless. It added drama for a moment only, and it wasn’t something that lasted. Hence, that’s why I wanted more drama and tension. It’s as if her affair was meant to last a bit only and then poof! Gone. All that for nothing. Sorry to the author, but it’s a weak decision to write this way.
While Broken Country will continue receiving positive feedback from many others, I’m going to be on the minority here. Maybe if the book had been longer; maybe if it felt like the author wasn’t biased; maybe if the author let us dig into Beth’s brain more; maybe if the author let us get to know the other important characters more, then maybe I would’ve enjoyed this more.