Imagine you were given a chance to fix something that went wrong. Only imagine it was your avatar? Or was it?
The book has one or two things right: We are a collection of our fears, given the chance we probably would make decisions based on survival, and the world may be a simulation.
The world appears to be destroyed in this text. Thought you might want to know that the simulation is holding together at 2042. There is always the rule that the present dimension is being written by one. Turtles, all the way down.
I enjoyed the gaming aspect of the book. The game is buggy and forgetful. So, it reminds me of Red Dwarf meets The Twilight zone.
Give it a read. I’d like to discuss this with anyone.
From Wikipedia
In 2003, philosopher Nick Bostrom proposed the simulation argument, which suggested that if a civilization became capable of creating conscious simulations, it could generate so many simulated beings that a randomly chosen conscious entity would almost certainly be in a simulation. This argument presents a trilemma: either such simulations are not created because of technological limitations or self-destruction; or advanced civilizations choose not to create them; or if advanced civilizations do create them, the number of simulations would far exceed base reality and we would therefore almost certainly be living in one. This assumes that consciousness is not uniquely tied to biological brains but can arise from any system that implements the right computational structures and processes.
THAT explains this book. 50/50 we are in a simulation