You might have noticed that this book has some pretty wildly diverging reviews. You'll move from glowing 5 star ones to pitiless 1 star ratings. I've read plenty of both, to try to make my mind around this novel. And I've realised I'm not sure I agree with any. Oh, don't get me wrong, this has been a 1 star experience for me, out of sheer bordom, mostly.
But let's clear the field first. This is erotica, plain and simple. I didn't know that, so my fault. Still, I read the genre, and while I admit freely that most is trash or porn (= meaning it's awfully written or completely missing the point), I still read it, and enjoy some books.
This is actually the erotica that's most disappointing: stories with a wonderful potential in plot and world building that get destroyed by totally lack of focus on anything that's not sex.
Anyway, going back on the reviews. This is not my idea of a good book (the 5 stars): it lacks character coherence and depth, a tight plot. It does have a core of a good story, but it would come out only if you cut at least 20 of those 40 chapters. And then rebuild the story. As it is you get an almost non stop sex scene. And that's it. Again, yes, erotica, but god how mind numbing boring. And coarse and offensive, but I'll get back on this.
(By the way, I have no idea of other people's opinion, but to me eroticism has to be engaging, it's never the mechanics.)
It's quite difficult to get engaged in a plot if it drowns in thousands useless details (here sex), and if characters are unbelievable or unpalatable, or flat. And here you had all of this, and not one rounded, believable one. Let's take the heroine, she's presented as a real tough, competent, military pilot, able to resist all her captains, even physically. This is the background offered and hinted. What did we get? A sopping, dripping, useless masochistic slave out of the blue. She's raped repeatedly, violated in many ways, humiliated, and forced into every situations, including being a slave; and she enjoys it so much she falls in love. There's not a single real reaction. Oh, yes. She's has temper (as an excuse for punishment and sex), but not one single ounce of steel. She's fake and unbelievable in all her reactions. A kind of Mary Sue, unreal. So why do you give her that background simply to ignore it?
So many things had no sense, except as the author's way to have it happen. Yes, she's the pilot who saves ship rather than crew. But I need one hell of a strong, valid motive to justify the choices she makes, like forfeiting her life for a ship. I don't see it here at all. Self preservation is one hell of a feeling...
As to the male leads, I can only say they are unpleasant and unpalatable. I couldn't find one saving grace. They are not even evil, or real bad guys. They aren't that interesting. They are spoilt, selfish jerks. Unfeeling, and uncaring, words notwithstanding. At the end of the book, one of them says their love is unromantic. Nope, that simply isn't love. She's a toy, maybe a breeder, but surely she's not loved.
As for the 1 star rating. What can I say? Right, but not because this book is dark or gritty. It definitely isn't. It isn't good enough to be, it doesn't know how to be gritty. It's too shallow, there's no despair, no depth of feeling. How can it be? It's just a yawn-inducing sex fest. Boring, at time a bit revolting, but not even maddening enough to rant.
Now, to the other hot topic. The non con. Those who know me know I don't run from rapes, as long it's acknowledged as such. Wanderlust is such a book. It's a love story between a rapist and his victim. It's not sugar coated, it's not dressed. She may orgasm, but it's still a rape.
Here I found it really irritating (and therefore offensive), not because it's a rape, but because it's unacknowledged. It's negated, there's no reaction. "it's not really rape, you wanted us, no matter what came out of your mouth". No is no is no, even if I tease you and then I say no. No is no is no. Rinse an repeat. If it's real, it has consequences. Otherwise you are just using to titillation, and that's offensive too. (I'm talking to the author, not to the characters.)
Plus, this isn't an historic romance, some things have no sense. She's not the belle of the ball. (Not that they had in HR....) Different genre, different expectations.
Any way I found the sex and the sexual situation overall coarse, excessive and over the top (and not in a good way), again lacking in subtlety and depth (sorry the pun is unintentional). Rape and slavery as a joke.
Bleah, bash it as a waste of time and money, but don't give it more merit than it deserves.