Ce ar mai putea fi spus despre fanatismul catolic şi excesele sale din veacurile de mijloc, acum, în ultimele zile ale unui mileniu în care sentimentul religios a fost pre-textul a felurite atrocităţi, crime, războaie, abjurări? Eyvind Johnson (1900-1976) adaugă scriiturii sale, atentă la detaliile reconstituirii istorice cât mai exacte, ironia necesară unei priviri detaşate deopotrivă de absolutismul mistic şi tendinţele revansarde ce constituie pandantul ca-şi-obligatoriu al victimizărilor produse în numele său.
Deşi scris în 1949, când termenul postmodernism nu începuse să aibă acoperire decât cel mult în arhitectură, eşafodajul narativ al acestui scriitor (premiul Nobel, 1974) este unul cât se poate de rezonant în actualitate. Ceea ce justifică perfect, după 24 de ani, motivația juriului Nobel: Pentru o artă narativă vizând peste țări şi epoci şi pusă în slujba libertăţii...
Eyvind Johnson was a proletarian writer who was influenced by the contemporary literary currents of his time. He is regarded as the modern novel art's foremost pioneer in Sweden. He made his debut in 1924 and had his breakthrough in 1930 with the semi-autobiographical novel about Olof . His most prominent works include Krilontrilogin , Strändernas Svall and Hans Nådes Tid . He became a member of the Swedish Academy (Chair 11) in 1957. He was awarded the 1974 Nobel Prize in Literature "for a narrative art, farseeing in lands and ages, in the service of freedom." (Award shared with Harry Martinson.)
This book has lingered in my mind long after reading it more than many others have done. Whether the deceptively tedious diary entries of Daniel Drouin, a man full of hidden complexity, or the agonising accounts of church conflict or tortured romance, the many voices of this unresolvable novel are credible and compelling. Johnson's Nobel prize has been questioned because he was on the committee the year he won and because other seemingly more deserving writers missed out to him that year. But I don't know many more virtuosic or powerful books of the past century than this one.
Very well written but ultimately not as engaging a read as you might hope. I feel this was predominantly due to the structure, which jumped around from various different people's viewpoints, narratives and time points and as such the novel felt stilted.
I have yet to read The Devils of Loudon, but would be interested to see how that compares to this rendering of the story.
A historical novel about the burning of a rebellious priest after he was framed for demons haunting nuns. The book changes POV from the accused to his accusers to nuns and other characters, and can change styles based on the POV character as well. The novel's multiple voices and perspectives are very interesting and the descriptions can be very poetic and atmospheric. You get to understand the psychology and thinking of multiple characters despite being diametrically opposed and the tension is very high. Some scenes are very erotic. I would say that this is a very competent and successful novel, but I wouldn’t consider it a masterpiece or something that I have never encountered in a historical novel before, I would be glad to rage it 4/5.
En verklighetsbaserad historisk berättelse pm en ståndaktig präst i 1600-talets Frankrike. Psykologisk skildring av vad som händer när avund och makthunger vänds mot en omtyckt/älskad person som blivit för viktig för staden och som vägrar att inte tänka själv och stå upp för sin sak och övertygelse. Otäcka scener av tortyr och otäcka beskrivningar av hur vissa bara följer makten, eller fegt intar en ”neutral hållning”. Säger mycket om människans psykologi. Fantastiskt och varierande språk beroende på vilken person som ”talar” och uttrycker sina tankar. Slås av hur mycket ett sådant här författarskap erbjuder jämfört med merparten av dagens författare. Läsupplevelse. Mycket vackra och sensuella avsnitt om kärleken mellan Urbain och Madelene.
Nobel Prize in Literature 1974. Eyvind Johnson shared the 1974 Noble Prize with his compatriot and colleague Nobel Committee member Harry Martinson. This led to some controversy and nowadays both laureates seem to be mostly forgotten. It was somewhat difficult to find anything still available by Johnson and quite surprising tat the only book I could find by him was a Dutch translation. Anyhow, the author can write well (even though the translation doesn't do him justice) and uses a great many perspectives on the 17th century Loudun witch-hunt to come to this novel. Many perspectives also means regular repetition, though. His writing style is quite factual, often bordering on non-fiction. I'd call this novel informative rather than engrossing. 2.5 stars.