„Valéry nu e un autor care «devine», ci care «este», alternanţa şi schimbările de accent în cadrul operei sale ajung să fie percepute abia prin raportarea la tendinţele diverse şi momentele succesive de cultură la care a participat. În încercarea timpurie închinată lui Leonardo, Valéry tratează nu un portret, ci o metodă, şi nu o metodă personală, ci una generală, o cale de acces către acel «loc central din care întreprinderile ştiinţei şi ale artei să fie la fel de posibile». Exegeza lui e teoretizantă, tipizantă, nu individualizantă.“ (Mircea Martin)
Ambroise-Paul-Toussaint-Jules Valéry was a French poet, essayist, and philosopher. His interests were sufficiently broad that he can be classified as a polymath. In addition to his fiction (poetry, drama and dialogues), he also wrote many essays and aphorisms on art, history, letters, music, and current events.
Valéry is best known as a poet, and is sometimes considered to be the last of the French Symbolists. But he published fewer than a hundred poems, and none that drew much attention. On the night of 4 October 1892, during a heavy storm, Paul Valéry entered an existential crisis, which made a big impact on his writing career. Around 1898, his writing activity even came to a near-standstill, due partly to the death of his mentor Stéphane Mallarmé and for nearly twenty years from that time on, Valery did not publish a single word until 1917, when he finally broke this 'Great Silence' with the publication of La Jeune Parque at forty-six years of age. This obscure but superbly musical masterpiece, of 512 alexandrine lines in rhyming pairs, had taken him four years to complete, and immediately secured his fame. It is esteemed by many in France as the greatest French poem of the 20th century.
I made the proofing of this book for Free Literature and it will be published by Project Gutenberg.
Page 85: ...je crois cependant que la méthode la plus sûre pour juger une peinture, c'est de n'y rien reconnaître d'abord et de faire pas à pas la série d'inductions que nécessite une présence simultanée de taches colorées sur un champ limité, pour s'élever de métaphores en métaphores, de suppositions en suppositions à l'intelligence du sujet—parfois à la simple conscience du plaisir—qu'on n'a pas toujours eu d'avance.
"From this point of view all displacement of elements made to be perceived and judged depends on certain general laws and a particular application defined in advance for the category of known minds specially addressed; and the work of art becomes a machine designed to awaken and to combine the individual formations in these minds."
In his essay Paul Valéry attempts to define Leonardo Da Vinci's method in different spheres. He explores the genius's way of thinking as as a model of universal inquiry—a blend of art, science, and philosophy united by disciplined observation and imagination. Leonardo seeks to understand the principles behind natural phenomena rather than merely imitate appearances. His mind, Valéry says, moves between intuition and analysis, always connecting art with scientific curiosity.
'He never separated the painter from the physicist, nor the anatomist from the poet.' -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 'His eyes questioned all things, and all things answered.' -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 'He dreams as a man of science and observes as a poet.' -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 'He never finished anything because he saw too much to be satisfied with any one form.' -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 'This symbolic mind held an immense collection of forms, an ever lucid treasury of the dispositions of nature, a potentiality always ready to be translated into action and growing with the extension of its domain.' -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 'He makes a Christ, an angel, a monster, by taking what is known, what exists everywhere, and arranging it in a new order.' -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 'No example I could give of the general attitude toward painting would be more amusing than the celebrated "smile of Mona Lisa," to which the epithet "mysterious" seems irrevocably fixed. That dimpled face has evoked the sort of phraseology justified in all literatures, under the title of "Sensations" or "Impressions" of art. It is buried beneath a mass of words and disappears among the many paragraphs that start by calling it disturbing and end with a generally vague description of a state of soul. It might deserve less intoxicating studies. Leonardo had no use for inexact observations or arbitrary symbols, or Mona Lisa would never have been painted. He was guided by a perpetual sagacity.
Dans ce regroupement de trois textes sur Léonard de Vinci, Valéry parle peu de Vinci, et beaucoup - même indirectement - de Valéry. Parmi quelques lentes réflexions on peut tout de même trouver quelques pages très éclairantes sur ce qu'est une analyse picturale ou poétique, ou sur l'histoire de la philosophie.
This Valery guy was all over the place, with very little actual Leonardo analysis. Essaying, self reflection, reviewing his own essay 30 years later, getting scared of postmodernism. Not an actual book discussing Leonardo's works and thoughts. Clickbait title.
...or the benefits of amazon.com of buying a book only because of its title... As an introduction to Valery's work, I thought I was buying a book that would analyze some of Leonardo's major works, their historical context, the methods used to build them, the way they inter-connected, and got instead of this a rather dense essay about the structure of thoughts, the universal man, the differences and similitudes between artists and philosophers, the accidental vs the "constructed" characteristics of works of art, and so on. The kind of book that needs to be discussed, analyzed, and put in a place where it's easy to go back to once in while for further meditation as every page contains multitude. Multitude of topics too conceptual for my own criterias and center(s) of interest but probably relevant if this is your field as it addresses a lot of fundamental (unanswered) questions about each one of topics mentioned hereabove. A book I'll get back to, with a (humble) raised eyebrow.