What do you think?
Rate this book
The Invisible Coup: How American Elites and Foreign Powers Use Immigration as a Weapon
Every day, ICE is arresting hundreds of illegal immigrants with a criminal record. They didn’t just come here. They were sent here.
Our debates about immigration revolve around what happens with immigrants once they arrive.
We need to start talking about who is sending them and why. For decades, establishment elites
sold us the story of immigration as a compassionate renewal of the American Dream within a harmonious melting pot.
But beneath that narrative lies a different Mass migration has morphed into the most powerful political weapon ever aimed at the United States—one engineered by elites at home and aided by adversaries abroad. Now Peter Schweizer, the bestselling investigative journalist of our time, is blowing the lid off this whole series of schemes,
• Mexico’s Election How Mexico’s 50+ consulates are running a shadow campaign to sway U.S. elections.
• CCP Spy $$$ The U.S. visa program designed by a Chinese spy that lets Beijing pour tens of millions into our elections.
• POTUS Foreign Voter How three American presidents minted unvetted “instant citizens”—including criminals—to stack the voter rolls.
• The Mexican president admits that mass migration is a tool to reclaim and conquer America’s Southwest.
• “Manchurian Generation” Ballot More than one million Chinese with U.S. citizenship who grew up on the Communist mainland will soon start voting in American elections.
Backed by years of forensic fieldwork and a trove of confidential documents and intercepted communications—linking political leaders, global NGOs, and even drug cartels—Schweizer detonates a political shock wave eclipsing his past bombshells, revelations that have sparked FBI probes and bipartisan reforms.
Urgent, shocking, and overflowing with national security implications, The Invisible Coup makes
America’s greatest political threat visible for all to see—and solve.
Our debates about immigration revolve around what happens with immigrants once they arrive.
We need to start talking about who is sending them and why. For decades, establishment elites
sold us the story of immigration as a compassionate renewal of the American Dream within a harmonious melting pot.
But beneath that narrative lies a different Mass migration has morphed into the most powerful political weapon ever aimed at the United States—one engineered by elites at home and aided by adversaries abroad. Now Peter Schweizer, the bestselling investigative journalist of our time, is blowing the lid off this whole series of schemes,
• Mexico’s Election How Mexico’s 50+ consulates are running a shadow campaign to sway U.S. elections.
• CCP Spy $$$ The U.S. visa program designed by a Chinese spy that lets Beijing pour tens of millions into our elections.
• POTUS Foreign Voter How three American presidents minted unvetted “instant citizens”—including criminals—to stack the voter rolls.
• The Mexican president admits that mass migration is a tool to reclaim and conquer America’s Southwest.
• “Manchurian Generation” Ballot More than one million Chinese with U.S. citizenship who grew up on the Communist mainland will soon start voting in American elections.
Backed by years of forensic fieldwork and a trove of confidential documents and intercepted communications—linking political leaders, global NGOs, and even drug cartels—Schweizer detonates a political shock wave eclipsing his past bombshells, revelations that have sparked FBI probes and bipartisan reforms.
Urgent, shocking, and overflowing with national security implications, The Invisible Coup makes
America’s greatest political threat visible for all to see—and solve.
288 pages, Hardcover
Published January 20, 2026
883 people are currently reading
4226 people want to read
About the author
Peter Schweizer
47 books425 followersPeter Schweizer is a research fellow at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University. From 2008-'09 he served as a consultant to the White House Office of Presidential Speechwriting and he is a former consultant to NBC News. He has written for the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Los Angeles Times, USA Today, National Review, Foreign Affairs, and elsewhere. His books include The Bushes, Reagan's War, and Do as I Say, Not as I Do.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 10 of 10 reviews
January 25, 2026
Peter Schweizer’s The Invisible Coup presents immigration as a deliberate assault on American sovereignty orchestrated by foreign powers, domestic “elites,” and assorted shadow actors. The book frames these claims as investigative revelations, yet the overall structure resembles an accusation delivered to an already sympathetic jury.
Schweizer’s background is relevant. His previous books, including Clinton Cash and Secret Empires, and his editorial role at Breitbart, have placed him firmly within a combative partisan ecosystem. Past criticisms over selective sourcing and factual errors recur here in the form of sweeping inferences and a tendency to assume intent rather than demonstrate it.
The prose signals its stance from the outset. When the first page depicts:
“a haze of smoke drifted across the street where masses of protesters inciting violence waved foreign flags in the breeze… On the surface, these scenes painted a jarring picture of the consequences of an open border policy”
the reader is not being invited to consider competing explanations or viewpoints. Instead, they are being told what to fear and whom to blame. That rhetorical approach substitutes intensity for balance and assertion for evidence.
As a result, The Invisible Coup functions less as analysis than as a political brief. It may satisfy readers who share its premises, but those seeking rigorous argument or empirical nuance will find it thin, tendentious, and more interested in stoking alarm than in clarifying a complex policy debate.
Schweizer’s background is relevant. His previous books, including Clinton Cash and Secret Empires, and his editorial role at Breitbart, have placed him firmly within a combative partisan ecosystem. Past criticisms over selective sourcing and factual errors recur here in the form of sweeping inferences and a tendency to assume intent rather than demonstrate it.
The prose signals its stance from the outset. When the first page depicts:
“a haze of smoke drifted across the street where masses of protesters inciting violence waved foreign flags in the breeze… On the surface, these scenes painted a jarring picture of the consequences of an open border policy”
the reader is not being invited to consider competing explanations or viewpoints. Instead, they are being told what to fear and whom to blame. That rhetorical approach substitutes intensity for balance and assertion for evidence.
As a result, The Invisible Coup functions less as analysis than as a political brief. It may satisfy readers who share its premises, but those seeking rigorous argument or empirical nuance will find it thin, tendentious, and more interested in stoking alarm than in clarifying a complex policy debate.
January 27, 2026
Fundamental!
If you believe in the principles of the Declaration of Independence, please read this book. Meticulously researched and documented, it outlines our future if Democrats regain power.
If you believe in the principles of the Declaration of Independence, please read this book. Meticulously researched and documented, it outlines our future if Democrats regain power.
February 1, 2026
The Invisible Coup
By Peter Schweizer
It is almost your civic duty to read or listen to this book. It will enlighten you as to “what is going on” with all of the protests and violence in our country.
Have you wondered why the left opened the flood gates as if we had no borders during the last administration? Why the social justice warriors wreaking havoc in the streets are mostly white liberals? Why do they take up the “cause” of everyone who is against the interest of the United States?
Mr. Schweizer lays it out pretty well. While some of it is shadowy and clandestine, most of it is not. The details can be found in headlines here and around the world. Apparently you simply need to know where to look, and more importantly know how to connect the dots. This book does that.
Most of it comes down to a couple of old adages which remain true.
The enemy of my enemy is my friend.
If someone tells you who they are, believe them.
Mr. Schweizer does not call for some major police action against the coordinated insurgency which has been active in our country for decades. He simply lays out facts so perhaps we will see what is right in front of us.
By Peter Schweizer
It is almost your civic duty to read or listen to this book. It will enlighten you as to “what is going on” with all of the protests and violence in our country.
Have you wondered why the left opened the flood gates as if we had no borders during the last administration? Why the social justice warriors wreaking havoc in the streets are mostly white liberals? Why do they take up the “cause” of everyone who is against the interest of the United States?
Mr. Schweizer lays it out pretty well. While some of it is shadowy and clandestine, most of it is not. The details can be found in headlines here and around the world. Apparently you simply need to know where to look, and more importantly know how to connect the dots. This book does that.
Most of it comes down to a couple of old adages which remain true.
The enemy of my enemy is my friend.
If someone tells you who they are, believe them.
Mr. Schweizer does not call for some major police action against the coordinated insurgency which has been active in our country for decades. He simply lays out facts so perhaps we will see what is right in front of us.
February 1, 2026
The book title tells it all!
Shocking, but true, finally a roadmap to where we are today and if nothing is immediately done by our split leadership, where it may lead to is very upsetting to me as a Vet and retired American dream survivor.
Shocking, but true, finally a roadmap to where we are today and if nothing is immediately done by our split leadership, where it may lead to is very upsetting to me as a Vet and retired American dream survivor.
January 30, 2026
Must Read
I loved the book but it is so scary what is going on in our country. So glad I am a born again believer!
I loved the book but it is so scary what is going on in our country. So glad I am a born again believer!
January 31, 2026
The book appeals directly to conservative readers who believe that "establishment elites" and foreign powers (such as Mexico) are deliberately using mass migration to reshape the U.S.. Many positive reviewers likely feel their existing concerns are being validated and exposed by the author.
The book has been heavily promoted in conservative media circles, including a nod from Donald Trump, which helps drive up sales and positive engagement from supporters. Not shocking but disappointing.
Criticized as propaganda by some, for easily discernible reasons, the book is framed as a "deeply researched" investigative work based on "confidential documents and intercepted communications.” This gives it a veneer of credibility that resonates with readers looking for validation of conspiracy-focused narratives rather than mainstream media accounts.
The book's thesis—that immigration is a "weapon" rather than a policy challenge—is designed to be emotionally compelling and to spark "political shockwaves". This creates a high, passionate engagement among readers who agree with the premise, resulting in 5-star reviews.
The book has been heavily promoted in conservative media circles, including a nod from Donald Trump, which helps drive up sales and positive engagement from supporters. Not shocking but disappointing.
Criticized as propaganda by some, for easily discernible reasons, the book is framed as a "deeply researched" investigative work based on "confidential documents and intercepted communications.” This gives it a veneer of credibility that resonates with readers looking for validation of conspiracy-focused narratives rather than mainstream media accounts.
The book's thesis—that immigration is a "weapon" rather than a policy challenge—is designed to be emotionally compelling and to spark "political shockwaves". This creates a high, passionate engagement among readers who agree with the premise, resulting in 5-star reviews.
February 3, 2026
The Invisible Coup advances a deeply unsettling argument: that mass immigration in the modern West is not merely a humanitarian phenomenon or economic inevitability, but increasingly a tool deliberately used by foreign governments, domestic political actors, NGOs, multinational corporations, activist networks, foundations, and churches, especially the Catholic Church, to reshape electorates, overwhelm institutions, and neutralize democratic resistance.
Schweizer’s claim is not that immigrants themselves are the problem. On the contrary, the book repeatedly emphasizes that immigrants are often the pawns, the instruments, rather than the authors of the strategy he describes. What is at issue is not migration per se, but the political exploitation of migration at scale.
Chapter 1: Proof of Concept
Schweizer opens with a historical case study that serves as proof of concept. When Fidel Castro released thousands of criminals, intelligence assets, and mentally ill individuals into Florida during the 1980 Mariel boatlift, the episode demonstrated that migration could be weaponized as an instrument of state policy. While many Marielitos were ordinary Cubans seeking freedom, Castro’s deliberate inclusion of destabilizing elements showed that mass migration could function as more than a humanitarian release valve—it could be used to impose costs and chaos on a rival society.
[Aside: Obama deported 3M illegal aliens during his regime because he knew the research that the Marielitos decreased Black high school dropouts income by as much as 30%
Chapters 2–5: Contemporary Mechanisms
Schweizer then turns to the mechanisms through which migration is leveraged today.
At the state and quasi-state level, he examines how Mexico facilitates northbound flows as a form of political leverage and a form of Reconquista, reconquering its former territory. This may sound bizarre, but several Mexican presidents have explicitly stated that as their objective.
China exploits Western citizenship and family-law systems through birth tourism operations, industrial-scale surrogacy and IVF pipelines, and so-called “maternity hotels” clustered near U.S. hospitals. These practices, Schweizer argues, are not random or marginal, but organized, financed, and tolerated by U.S. officials.
He also describes the role of transnational NGOs (including churches), which function as logistical infrastructure, coordinating transport, legal assistance, housing, and political advocacy, often shielded from scrutiny by humanitarian language and moral prestige.
Domestically, Schweizer is unsparing. He argues that Western political elites have not merely failed to enforce immigration law; in some cases, they have deliberately violated it, creating demographic facts on the ground that cannot easily be reversed. Voter-registration loopholes, sanctuary jurisdictions that openly defy federal law, and administrative amnesty through non-enforcement all serve, in his account, to convert migration into durable political power.
I’ll distill the opening quote for the book from Cicero’s wisdom thousands of years ago
Cicero’s famous warning about treason from within is reminder that states most often fall not by invasion, but by elite betrayal, the consequences of a society growing too weary to defend the norms it once considered non-negotiable, and the slow burning corrosion of law.
Chapter 6: Importing the Revolution
In one of the book’s most controversial sections, Schweizer examines ideological movements that explicitly frame migration as a civilizational strategy. One that features prominently is the Mexican FMLN. The other is factions associated with the Muslim Brotherhood, whose literature describes migration not as neutral movement, but as a form of long-term political struggle. As Abu Basir wrote, “Immigration and jihad go together. One is the consequence of the other and dependent on it.”
Schweizer’s point is not that migrants uniformly share such views, but that ideological actors openly articulate goals that Western elites refuse even to acknowledge.
Chapter 7: Progressives and Drug Cartels
Here Schweizer is careful to draw a crucial distinction. He does not argue that immigrants are inherently disloyal, criminal, or conspiratorial. Rather, he shows how systems can be exploited even when individuals act in good faith. Progressive political movements, organized crime, and cartel networks all benefit, often simultaneously, from weakened borders, and overwhelmed enforcement.
Chapter 8: The Catholic Church
One of the most fraught chapters examines the Catholic Church’s role. Schweizer argues that the Church has become an outsized institutional actor in migration advocacy, creating a vast infrastructure of charity, service, and political pressure under Catholic auspices.
He contrasts Karol Wojtyła (Pope St. John Paul II), whose anti-communism was forged under totalitarian rule, with Jorge Mario Bergoglio (Pope Francis), whose Latin American context shaped a theology deeply influenced by liberation theology, extreme inequality, violence, drug wars, ecological degradation, and massive internal and cross-border migrations. The question is not motive, but consequence. Drawing on Gustavo Gutiérrez’s definition of liberation theology as a movement aimed at “a profound transformation of the private property system, access to power of the exploited class, and a social revolution,” Schweizer situates Bergoglio’s pastoral priorities within a broader ideological tradition. [As a student at Fairfield U, a Jesuit institution, I was steeped in Gutiérrez, Boff, Segundo, Sobrino and other liberation theologians; this stuff I know; it's transformative...right into socialism.]
Bishop Daniel Flores of Brownsville, Texas, exemplifies this alignment when he argues that supporting the return of migrants to collapsed societies constitutes formal cooperation with intrinsic evil, comparable to abortion. Such statements, Schweizer argues, effectively sacralize one policy position while foreclosing democratic debate.
Pope Francis’s condemnation of barriers to migration as a grave moral evil, along with the Vatican’s 20 Pastoral Action Points [well worth reading!], envisions a borderless world (a dream shared by George Soros as well) in which migrants benefit from any pension plan available to natives. This from the walled city of the Vatican, which admits no refugees or migrants at all.
Clergy and religious often live like children, willfully ignoring the pragmatic consequences of their idealism.
Not so the rebuked Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò, who went so far as to accuse the Pope of “destroying civil society” through what he called an indiscriminate invasion of Europe. Within the same moral tradition, radically distinct judgments about migration coexist, but institutional power has increasingly aligned with one side of that divide.
I cannot resist juxtaposing the perspective of the Catholic Church under Bergoglio with that of the Dalai Lama: “There are too many refugees in Europe,” and this “makes it difficult in practice….Europe, and for example Germany, cannot become an Arab country….And morally speaking, I think that refugees can only be taken in on a temporary basis. The goal should be to return them and help them to rebuild their own countries.”
The book opens our eyes, which then imposes responsibility.
Chapter 10: Fighting Back
Schweizer concludes with concrete proposals:
1. Ban dual citizenship. Foreign governments pay for their citizens to become US citizens
2. Improve vetting of immigrants and refugees. Do not reduce English language or civil knowledge requirements
3. Ban political donations from non-citizens. “Tens of millions of dollars flow into our elections every campaign cycle from foreign nationals and…cannot even be identified as such.”
4. Ban birth tourism and surrogacy as a means of citizenship. The authors of the 14th Amendment did not envision foreign nationals sending gametes to the US to “have a child born in an American womb…as a US citizen” (an organized effort of the Chinese elite class)
5. Expel foreign diplomats and close the consulates of foreign nations that are engaged in political activities inside the US, which interfere in domestic political affairs
6. Enforce the laws that restrict the participation of foreign nationals and foreign political organizations in American politics
7. Review student visas vigorously for radical foreign political affiliations and fields of study with military applications
8. Increase Congressional oversight of the US citizenship process (retain background checks, do not use immigration to fabricate new voters)
Whether one agrees with every recommendation or not, The Invisible Coup forces a reckoning with a question Western societies have tried to avoid: who controls the future of democratic nations—their citizens, or the systems that quietly reshape them?
Schweizer’s claim is not that immigrants themselves are the problem. On the contrary, the book repeatedly emphasizes that immigrants are often the pawns, the instruments, rather than the authors of the strategy he describes. What is at issue is not migration per se, but the political exploitation of migration at scale.
Chapter 1: Proof of Concept
Schweizer opens with a historical case study that serves as proof of concept. When Fidel Castro released thousands of criminals, intelligence assets, and mentally ill individuals into Florida during the 1980 Mariel boatlift, the episode demonstrated that migration could be weaponized as an instrument of state policy. While many Marielitos were ordinary Cubans seeking freedom, Castro’s deliberate inclusion of destabilizing elements showed that mass migration could function as more than a humanitarian release valve—it could be used to impose costs and chaos on a rival society.
[Aside: Obama deported 3M illegal aliens during his regime because he knew the research that the Marielitos decreased Black high school dropouts income by as much as 30%
Chapters 2–5: Contemporary Mechanisms
Schweizer then turns to the mechanisms through which migration is leveraged today.
At the state and quasi-state level, he examines how Mexico facilitates northbound flows as a form of political leverage and a form of Reconquista, reconquering its former territory. This may sound bizarre, but several Mexican presidents have explicitly stated that as their objective.
China exploits Western citizenship and family-law systems through birth tourism operations, industrial-scale surrogacy and IVF pipelines, and so-called “maternity hotels” clustered near U.S. hospitals. These practices, Schweizer argues, are not random or marginal, but organized, financed, and tolerated by U.S. officials.
He also describes the role of transnational NGOs (including churches), which function as logistical infrastructure, coordinating transport, legal assistance, housing, and political advocacy, often shielded from scrutiny by humanitarian language and moral prestige.
Domestically, Schweizer is unsparing. He argues that Western political elites have not merely failed to enforce immigration law; in some cases, they have deliberately violated it, creating demographic facts on the ground that cannot easily be reversed. Voter-registration loopholes, sanctuary jurisdictions that openly defy federal law, and administrative amnesty through non-enforcement all serve, in his account, to convert migration into durable political power.
I’ll distill the opening quote for the book from Cicero’s wisdom thousands of years ago
“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.”
Cicero’s famous warning about treason from within is reminder that states most often fall not by invasion, but by elite betrayal, the consequences of a society growing too weary to defend the norms it once considered non-negotiable, and the slow burning corrosion of law.
Chapter 6: Importing the Revolution
In one of the book’s most controversial sections, Schweizer examines ideological movements that explicitly frame migration as a civilizational strategy. One that features prominently is the Mexican FMLN. The other is factions associated with the Muslim Brotherhood, whose literature describes migration not as neutral movement, but as a form of long-term political struggle. As Abu Basir wrote, “Immigration and jihad go together. One is the consequence of the other and dependent on it.”
Schweizer’s point is not that migrants uniformly share such views, but that ideological actors openly articulate goals that Western elites refuse even to acknowledge.
Chapter 7: Progressives and Drug Cartels
Here Schweizer is careful to draw a crucial distinction. He does not argue that immigrants are inherently disloyal, criminal, or conspiratorial. Rather, he shows how systems can be exploited even when individuals act in good faith. Progressive political movements, organized crime, and cartel networks all benefit, often simultaneously, from weakened borders, and overwhelmed enforcement.
Chapter 8: The Catholic Church
One of the most fraught chapters examines the Catholic Church’s role. Schweizer argues that the Church has become an outsized institutional actor in migration advocacy, creating a vast infrastructure of charity, service, and political pressure under Catholic auspices.
He contrasts Karol Wojtyła (Pope St. John Paul II), whose anti-communism was forged under totalitarian rule, with Jorge Mario Bergoglio (Pope Francis), whose Latin American context shaped a theology deeply influenced by liberation theology, extreme inequality, violence, drug wars, ecological degradation, and massive internal and cross-border migrations. The question is not motive, but consequence. Drawing on Gustavo Gutiérrez’s definition of liberation theology as a movement aimed at “a profound transformation of the private property system, access to power of the exploited class, and a social revolution,” Schweizer situates Bergoglio’s pastoral priorities within a broader ideological tradition. [As a student at Fairfield U, a Jesuit institution, I was steeped in Gutiérrez, Boff, Segundo, Sobrino and other liberation theologians; this stuff I know; it's transformative...right into socialism.]
Bishop Daniel Flores of Brownsville, Texas, exemplifies this alignment when he argues that supporting the return of migrants to collapsed societies constitutes formal cooperation with intrinsic evil, comparable to abortion. Such statements, Schweizer argues, effectively sacralize one policy position while foreclosing democratic debate.
Pope Francis’s condemnation of barriers to migration as a grave moral evil, along with the Vatican’s 20 Pastoral Action Points [well worth reading!], envisions a borderless world (a dream shared by George Soros as well) in which migrants benefit from any pension plan available to natives. This from the walled city of the Vatican, which admits no refugees or migrants at all.
Clergy and religious often live like children, willfully ignoring the pragmatic consequences of their idealism.
This is compassion without discernment: a moral posture activated by political identity rather than by consistent principle, indifferent to the long-term costs imposed on the nation. What presents as mercy is, in practice, an incapacity to weigh costs, enforce norms, or apply standards consistently.
Not so the rebuked Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò, who went so far as to accuse the Pope of “destroying civil society” through what he called an indiscriminate invasion of Europe. Within the same moral tradition, radically distinct judgments about migration coexist, but institutional power has increasingly aligned with one side of that divide.
I cannot resist juxtaposing the perspective of the Catholic Church under Bergoglio with that of the Dalai Lama: “There are too many refugees in Europe,” and this “makes it difficult in practice….Europe, and for example Germany, cannot become an Arab country….And morally speaking, I think that refugees can only be taken in on a temporary basis. The goal should be to return them and help them to rebuild their own countries.”
The Invisible Coup is unsettling not because it invents a grand conspiracy, but because it documents how ordinary bureaucratic incentives, ideological blind spots, and cynical political calculations can produce revolutionary outcomes without a single shot being fired.
The book opens our eyes, which then imposes responsibility.
Chapter 10: Fighting Back
Schweizer concludes with concrete proposals:
1. Ban dual citizenship. Foreign governments pay for their citizens to become US citizens
2. Improve vetting of immigrants and refugees. Do not reduce English language or civil knowledge requirements
3. Ban political donations from non-citizens. “Tens of millions of dollars flow into our elections every campaign cycle from foreign nationals and…cannot even be identified as such.”
4. Ban birth tourism and surrogacy as a means of citizenship. The authors of the 14th Amendment did not envision foreign nationals sending gametes to the US to “have a child born in an American womb…as a US citizen” (an organized effort of the Chinese elite class)
5. Expel foreign diplomats and close the consulates of foreign nations that are engaged in political activities inside the US, which interfere in domestic political affairs
6. Enforce the laws that restrict the participation of foreign nationals and foreign political organizations in American politics
7. Review student visas vigorously for radical foreign political affiliations and fields of study with military applications
8. Increase Congressional oversight of the US citizenship process (retain background checks, do not use immigration to fabricate new voters)
Whether one agrees with every recommendation or not, The Invisible Coup forces a reckoning with a question Western societies have tried to avoid: who controls the future of democratic nations—their citizens, or the systems that quietly reshape them?
January 24, 2026
Very sobering.
February 3, 2026
This book illustrates how an abundance of citations can mask, but not compensate for, fundamentally poor research. Despite a bibliography of 61 pages, the work is characterized by superficial analysis, selective sourcing, and a persistent effort to bend evidence to fit the author’s preconceived theories.
The prose is immature and imprecise, marked by conjecture and recurring misquotations that undermine any claim to scholarly seriousness. The result is not a contribution to the field, but a cautionary example of how quantity can be mistaken for rigor.
The book offers little value and does not merit further critical attention.
The prose is immature and imprecise, marked by conjecture and recurring misquotations that undermine any claim to scholarly seriousness. The result is not a contribution to the field, but a cautionary example of how quantity can be mistaken for rigor.
The book offers little value and does not merit further critical attention.
February 1, 2026
Kind of boring. Book focuses on Mexican, Chinese, and Arabic immigrants. Personally, I don’t like Canadians or Texans either. The only immigrants I find tolerable are from Kazakhstan & Laos.
Displaying 1 - 10 of 10 reviews