I do love a good unsolved mystery and the mystery of Eilean Mor’s missing lightkeepers is one that captured my interest the moment I first heard about it. On the surface, it seems to be an open-and-shut case. The weather was bad on the day that the three keepers – James Ducat, Thomas Marshall and William MacArthur – disappeared, so obviously they were just washed away by a freak wave, right? It seems to be the most plausible theory, but, as Keith McCloskey explains in The Lighthouse, it’s a theory that isn’t without a plethora of unanswered questions.
The rule was that if two keepers were outside, the third keeper had to remain inside the lighthouse. What would drive all three of them – two of whom were seasoned keepers – to not only ignore this rule, but to put themselves in a position where they could be washed away by a wave? Furthermore, it was evident upon investigation that one of the keepers had ventured out into the wild weather without his oilskin coat. What was so pressing that he didn’t even have time to don his coat? They may well have been ripped off the island by a freak wave, but it’s apparent that there was a lot more to the circumstances leading up to this event than investigators at the time realised.
McCloskey not only discusses these possible circumstances, but also other theories as to how and why the keepers disappeared, never to be heard from again. These theories range from murder/suicide to the supernatural and McCloskey goes to great lengths to explore the plausibility of such theories. In the section on the murder/suicide theory, he provides readers with different case studies from around the world that look at the psychological effects life as a lightkeeper can have upon a person. Essentially, he gives readers the information needed for them to draw their own conclusions as to what happened to the Eilean Mor keepers and this is one thing that I liked about The Lighthouse. As opposed to telling readers what to believe, the book encourages them to decide for themselves.
Another thing that I liked about the book is the fact that McCloskey dispels the myths surrounding the case. Despite the fact that the book’s blurb references the fictionalised final entry in the logbook, this myth, as well as others, are laid to rest in The Lighthouse.
My only real criticisms are the numerous typos and the fact that it felt a little dry and unnecessarily long-winded in places. The book isn’t self-published and I feel as though editors at The History Press publishing house should have picked up on a majority of the typos, such as sentences beginning with lower case letters. Part of my job involves editing, so it could be argued that I only noticed a lot of the typos because looking for errors is part of what I do on a daily basis. With regards to me finding the book somewhat dry in places, I don’t read a lot of non-fiction, so this could simply be down to the fact that I’m more accustomed to the faster pace found in fiction.