What do you think?
Rate this book
So You Want to Own Greenland?: Lessons from the Vikings to Trump
"An engaging blend of history and modern-day political analysis ... with a hard line of Realpolitik and a surprising dash of humor." — Ron Charles, The Washington Post
Why have foreigners over the centuries kept wanting to own Greenland? The fascinating, calamitous story of the many who’ve tried . . . and uniformly failed . . .
An indispensable guide to Greenland—why it matters, and how it could become the next global flashpoint.
Ever since its discovery Greenland has been a frontier for human exploration, empire and geostrategic competition. This book delves into that rich history and complex politics, revealing how a country of just 56,000 inhabitants, 80% of which is above the Arctic Circle, has shaped—and been shaped by—the world.
Elizabeth Buchanan’s short history begins with Erik the Red and the Vikings, Greenland’s first colonizers—whose settlement of over 2,000 people mysteriously disappeared. She explores the island’s evolution from a Danish possession into an autonomous territory, and its role in the World War II, when soldiers from the U.S. helped Greenland’s 15-man army, operating on dogsleds, capture Nazis trying to set up secret, remote surveillance outposts. She details how Greenland became a strategic hot spot in the Cold War arms race between the U.S. and Russia — when the U.S. built a nuclear-powered base under the Greenland icesheet, and President Kennedy devised Project Iceworm, a plan to deploy 600 ballistic ice-hidden missiles there.
Finally, she dissects Greenland’s position today at the center of a new “great game,” featuring Cold War belligerents the U.S. and Russia and now China, and the mounting domestic pressures for independence—not to mention President Trump’s agenda to acquire the landmass.
Buchanan poses provocative yet compelling scenarios for Greenland’s future, providing an essential read for anyone curious about this frozen frontier and its place on the world stage.
Why have foreigners over the centuries kept wanting to own Greenland? The fascinating, calamitous story of the many who’ve tried . . . and uniformly failed . . .
An indispensable guide to Greenland—why it matters, and how it could become the next global flashpoint.
Ever since its discovery Greenland has been a frontier for human exploration, empire and geostrategic competition. This book delves into that rich history and complex politics, revealing how a country of just 56,000 inhabitants, 80% of which is above the Arctic Circle, has shaped—and been shaped by—the world.
Elizabeth Buchanan’s short history begins with Erik the Red and the Vikings, Greenland’s first colonizers—whose settlement of over 2,000 people mysteriously disappeared. She explores the island’s evolution from a Danish possession into an autonomous territory, and its role in the World War II, when soldiers from the U.S. helped Greenland’s 15-man army, operating on dogsleds, capture Nazis trying to set up secret, remote surveillance outposts. She details how Greenland became a strategic hot spot in the Cold War arms race between the U.S. and Russia — when the U.S. built a nuclear-powered base under the Greenland icesheet, and President Kennedy devised Project Iceworm, a plan to deploy 600 ballistic ice-hidden missiles there.
Finally, she dissects Greenland’s position today at the center of a new “great game,” featuring Cold War belligerents the U.S. and Russia and now China, and the mounting domestic pressures for independence—not to mention President Trump’s agenda to acquire the landmass.
Buchanan poses provocative yet compelling scenarios for Greenland’s future, providing an essential read for anyone curious about this frozen frontier and its place on the world stage.
196 pages, Kindle Edition
Published September 16, 2025
58 people are currently reading
463 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 53 reviews
January 11, 2026
My wife’s school district contains about three times the population of Greenland. At the moment, only one of them is being openly threatened by Donald Trump.
How the fate of a remote community of 57,000 people could spark fears of NATO’s collapse is one of the strangest developments in this already awful year.
World leaders were still sputtering over the recent U.S. errand in Venezuela when Stephen Miller, the White House adviser in charge of 1930s nostalgia, told CNN’s Jake Tapper, “Nobody’s going to fight the United States militarily over the future of Greenland.”
“We live in a world, in the real world, Jake, that is governed by strength, that is governed by force, that is governed by power.”
Or, as Orwell puts it in “1984,” “If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face — forever.”
This week, a flock of op-eds has descended on Greenland like Arctic puffins reclaiming their cliffs. But Elizabeth Buchanan was there long before them. Last fall she published an engaging blend of history and modern-day political analysis with the cheeky title: “So You Want to Own Greenland?”
“The change under way in the Arctic is going to be century-defining,” she writes. “Beyond the redrawing of global trade corridors, or the carving up of resources for humanity’s next millennium, the Arctic is hosting an extinction-level event in respect of the post-war global order.”
The co-founder of a polar security program at West Point, Buchanan doesn’t sound like an academic. Determined to explain complex issues to lay readers — she notes that her parents didn’t go to college — she approaches the Greenland question with a hard line of Realpolitik and a surprising dash of humor.
Her book offers a survey of the giant island’s geography and its native peoples: No, it’s not empty, nor is it the grotesquely distorted mass our Mercator maps show. Her concise history runs through attempts to own Greenland, starting with the Vikings, whose mysterious disappearance may be a modern-day warning.
In a chapter slick with James Bond intrigue, she reminds us that during the Cold War, the U.S. built Camp Century, a nuclear-powered city beneath the ice with miles of tunnels, a hospital, a chapel and hot showers. Project Iceworm, meanwhile, involved an audacious scheme to hide hundreds of nuclear missiles without telling....
To read the rest of this review, go to the free Book Club newsletter from The Washington Post:
https://s2.washingtonpost.com/camp-rw...
How the fate of a remote community of 57,000 people could spark fears of NATO’s collapse is one of the strangest developments in this already awful year.
World leaders were still sputtering over the recent U.S. errand in Venezuela when Stephen Miller, the White House adviser in charge of 1930s nostalgia, told CNN’s Jake Tapper, “Nobody’s going to fight the United States militarily over the future of Greenland.”
“We live in a world, in the real world, Jake, that is governed by strength, that is governed by force, that is governed by power.”
Or, as Orwell puts it in “1984,” “If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face — forever.”
This week, a flock of op-eds has descended on Greenland like Arctic puffins reclaiming their cliffs. But Elizabeth Buchanan was there long before them. Last fall she published an engaging blend of history and modern-day political analysis with the cheeky title: “So You Want to Own Greenland?”
“The change under way in the Arctic is going to be century-defining,” she writes. “Beyond the redrawing of global trade corridors, or the carving up of resources for humanity’s next millennium, the Arctic is hosting an extinction-level event in respect of the post-war global order.”
The co-founder of a polar security program at West Point, Buchanan doesn’t sound like an academic. Determined to explain complex issues to lay readers — she notes that her parents didn’t go to college — she approaches the Greenland question with a hard line of Realpolitik and a surprising dash of humor.
Her book offers a survey of the giant island’s geography and its native peoples: No, it’s not empty, nor is it the grotesquely distorted mass our Mercator maps show. Her concise history runs through attempts to own Greenland, starting with the Vikings, whose mysterious disappearance may be a modern-day warning.
In a chapter slick with James Bond intrigue, she reminds us that during the Cold War, the U.S. built Camp Century, a nuclear-powered city beneath the ice with miles of tunnels, a hospital, a chapel and hot showers. Project Iceworm, meanwhile, involved an audacious scheme to hide hundreds of nuclear missiles without telling....
To read the rest of this review, go to the free Book Club newsletter from The Washington Post:
https://s2.washingtonpost.com/camp-rw...
October 16, 2025
Australian polar geopolitics expert Elizabeth Buchanan with her September 2025 So You Want to Own Greenland?: Lessons from the Vikings to Trump provides a generally insightful and educational examination of what has made and continues to make Greenland (which of course is the world's largest island and is at least for now still around eighty percent permanent ice sheet) such a desirable but also such a difficult to keep and to maintain landmass, that situated right between Eurasia and North America and with massive still unexploited stores of natural resources (and in particular so-called rare earth minerals), this, as well as Greenland's mentioned above strategic location have often been and are even now a major source of global political strife and conflict.
And in So You Want to Own Greenland?: Lessons from the Vikings to Trump, from the arrival of Erik the Red (and the Vikings) in Greenland in AD 985 through the often horrid and harrowingly exploitative colonial relationship with the Kingdom of Denmark (and especially regarding the native Inuit population of Greenland and which Buchanan depicts in So You Want to Own Greenland?: Lessons from the Vikings to Trump unflinchingly and without making any annoying and frustrating Euro-centric excuses) to US President Donald Trump’s recent and ever more covetous, ever more categorically demanding desire to own and to exploit mineral-rich (and important for Trump's expansionist dreams in the Arctic) Greenland, Elizabeth Buchanan enlighteningly and readably (as well as occasionally quite wittily) analyses and explains in and with So You Want to Own Greenland?: Lessons from the Vikings to Trump why Greenland has always been such an important and enticing lure to those who believed they could tame and also exploit this gigantic frozen island with its vast underground riches.
Now albeit I have generally enjoyed reading So You Want to Own Greenland?: Lessons from the Vikings to Trump (and have also learned quite a lot from and through Elizabeth Buchanan's featured text), I must admit that I do not really believe it when she, when Buchanan claims in So You Want to Own Greenland?: Lessons from the Vikings to Trump that she is not really involved here, that she has no personal stakes, desires and even no investments here (in Greenland). For as the co-founder of the polar warfare program at West Point's Modern War Institute, Dr. Buchanan's professional reputation would (for me, from where I am standing) certainly be seriously augmented and equally be hugely glorified if in the event of conflict, those very plans were to be picked up and used by the Pentagon.
Furthermore, Elizabeth Buchanan's views in So You Want to Own Greenland?: Lessons from the Vikings to Trump are also decidedly pro war and also pretty much sympathetic to Donald Trump’s designs on the icy landmass. But no, no, no, with Trump's recent and continuous annexation threats against Canada, I do find what Donald Trump (and the USA) are saying about and wanting with Greenland pretty intolerable and inexcusable and that Buchanan in So You Want to Own Greenland?: Lessons from the Vikings to Trump seemingly accepts, welcomes and condones this (even if not quite as gratingly vociferously and all as all-encompassingly as Trump and his spokespersons), this is rather a bit personally infuriating (because in my own and not so humble opinion, Greenland should either be totally independent or it should with its shared Inuit culture and languages be linked and allied with Arctic Canada and NOT with the United States, however, just to make it clear, I also and certainly do not at all think that Greenland should be absorbed into and become part of Canada).
Yes, Elizabeth Buchanan's the American way is seemingly always better attitude in So You Want to Own Greenland?: Lessons from the Vikings to Trump is or at least can get more than a trifle grating. I mean why are the seal oil lamps that were traditionally used by the Inuit in Greenland automatically inferior to kerosene and why is everything "American" far too often kind of depicted as being the greatest thing since sliced bread so to speak in So You Want to Own Greenland?: Lessons from the Vikings to Trump? And considering that material progress is often a familiar justification deployed by occupying, by colonising powers, how accommodative Buchanan is to Donald Trump and to the USA regarding their clearly exploitative economic and mostly military designs on Greenland leaves me shaking my head somewhat angrily and frustratingly, even if I also hugely agree with Elizabeth Buchanan's critical eye in So You Want to Own Greenland?: Lessons from the Vikings to Trump regarding the Vikings' and the Kingdom of Denmark's presence in Greenland (and that Denmark's hypocrisy of on the one hand promoting the right of Greenland to be independent while at the same times often deliberately stalling is hugely problematic). But indeed and for me, Buchanan asserting in So You Want to Own Greenland?: Lessons from the Vikings to Trump that if Greenland became independent, followed by the Faroe Islands, the Kingdom of Denmark would actually simply cease to exist is wrong, is just totally silly, and well, that her totally anti Denmark and even rather majorly anti Europe attitude and stance are pretty one-sidedly horrible and equally also makes Elizabeth Buchanan sound (at least for me and in my opinion) far too much, far too often like a decidedly Donald Trump style American Republicanism and expansionist apologist and tool.
Moreover and just to point out that considering how Denmark and as such also Greenland have some of the most liberal, most supportive and most tolerant LGBTQ and transgender legislation and rights on earth, that in Greenland all healthcare is free, sorry, but after what has been happening in the USA with the current administration in 2025 totally trouncing human rights, diversity and sexual and gender freedom, with Republican politicians and in particular Donald Trump, J.D. Vance, Pete Hesgeth, top military honchos, industrialists etc. obviously hugely hugely intent on owning and perhaps even annexing Greenland, well, if this actually occurred, it could also likely mean that these rights along with the right to protest against Trump and company might very rapidly disappear or at least seriously and severely be lessened in Greenland and for ALL citizens and residents (which I think is something that Buchanan should be at least be considering and acknowledging in So You Want to Own Greenland?: Lessons from the Vikings to Trump but sadly totally ignores, since for Elizabeth Buchanan in my opinion, the USA under Trump becoming increasingly dictatorial, somehow totally seems to be a non-issue and that Greenland becoming increasingly American or even wholly American would automatically somehow mean protection and safeguarding human rights abuses etc. from China and from Russia, that for Buchanan they are the main and total villains and the USA is somehow shiningly positive and democratic, which in 2025 is simply for and to me absolutely no longer the case by any stretch of the, of my imagination).
Thus while much of Elizabeth Buchanan’s narrative for So You Want to Own Greenland?: Lessons from the Vikings to Trump is interesting, has certainly been educational and also performs a genuine and essential service drawing the reader's attention to the fact that many non-Arctic states, among them China and members of the European Union are jostling for a bigger stake in the future of the circumpolar zone and where not that many of their citizens actually live, I have to admit and point out that I equally and certainly do NOT consider the United States really an Arctic nation anyhow, as for me, Alaska does not really count all that much and is certainly much closer ethnically and linguistically to Northern Canada, Siberia and the northern reaches of Scandinavia than to the continental United States and vice versa. And not to mention that I also find it rather academically frustrating and supplemental research and reading unfriendly how Buchanan provides no index for So You Want to Own Greenland?: Lessons from the Vikings to Trump and while there are endnotes, there are no lists of websites and books for further reading, that for me, So You Want to Own Greenland?: Lessons from the Vikings to Trump should not only provide the appreciated notes I have mentioned but also have a separate and user friendly bibliography (so yes, that my three star rating for So You Want to Own Greenland?: Lessons from the Vikings to Trump is probably a wee bit generous on my part, but that what I have enjoyed and appreciated regarding Elizabeth Buchanan's text for So You Want to Own Greenland?: Lessons from the Vikings to Trump does mildly but surely and strongly, decently enough outweigh what I have found problematic, what has textually made me groan).
And in So You Want to Own Greenland?: Lessons from the Vikings to Trump, from the arrival of Erik the Red (and the Vikings) in Greenland in AD 985 through the often horrid and harrowingly exploitative colonial relationship with the Kingdom of Denmark (and especially regarding the native Inuit population of Greenland and which Buchanan depicts in So You Want to Own Greenland?: Lessons from the Vikings to Trump unflinchingly and without making any annoying and frustrating Euro-centric excuses) to US President Donald Trump’s recent and ever more covetous, ever more categorically demanding desire to own and to exploit mineral-rich (and important for Trump's expansionist dreams in the Arctic) Greenland, Elizabeth Buchanan enlighteningly and readably (as well as occasionally quite wittily) analyses and explains in and with So You Want to Own Greenland?: Lessons from the Vikings to Trump why Greenland has always been such an important and enticing lure to those who believed they could tame and also exploit this gigantic frozen island with its vast underground riches.
Now albeit I have generally enjoyed reading So You Want to Own Greenland?: Lessons from the Vikings to Trump (and have also learned quite a lot from and through Elizabeth Buchanan's featured text), I must admit that I do not really believe it when she, when Buchanan claims in So You Want to Own Greenland?: Lessons from the Vikings to Trump that she is not really involved here, that she has no personal stakes, desires and even no investments here (in Greenland). For as the co-founder of the polar warfare program at West Point's Modern War Institute, Dr. Buchanan's professional reputation would (for me, from where I am standing) certainly be seriously augmented and equally be hugely glorified if in the event of conflict, those very plans were to be picked up and used by the Pentagon.
Furthermore, Elizabeth Buchanan's views in So You Want to Own Greenland?: Lessons from the Vikings to Trump are also decidedly pro war and also pretty much sympathetic to Donald Trump’s designs on the icy landmass. But no, no, no, with Trump's recent and continuous annexation threats against Canada, I do find what Donald Trump (and the USA) are saying about and wanting with Greenland pretty intolerable and inexcusable and that Buchanan in So You Want to Own Greenland?: Lessons from the Vikings to Trump seemingly accepts, welcomes and condones this (even if not quite as gratingly vociferously and all as all-encompassingly as Trump and his spokespersons), this is rather a bit personally infuriating (because in my own and not so humble opinion, Greenland should either be totally independent or it should with its shared Inuit culture and languages be linked and allied with Arctic Canada and NOT with the United States, however, just to make it clear, I also and certainly do not at all think that Greenland should be absorbed into and become part of Canada).
Yes, Elizabeth Buchanan's the American way is seemingly always better attitude in So You Want to Own Greenland?: Lessons from the Vikings to Trump is or at least can get more than a trifle grating. I mean why are the seal oil lamps that were traditionally used by the Inuit in Greenland automatically inferior to kerosene and why is everything "American" far too often kind of depicted as being the greatest thing since sliced bread so to speak in So You Want to Own Greenland?: Lessons from the Vikings to Trump? And considering that material progress is often a familiar justification deployed by occupying, by colonising powers, how accommodative Buchanan is to Donald Trump and to the USA regarding their clearly exploitative economic and mostly military designs on Greenland leaves me shaking my head somewhat angrily and frustratingly, even if I also hugely agree with Elizabeth Buchanan's critical eye in So You Want to Own Greenland?: Lessons from the Vikings to Trump regarding the Vikings' and the Kingdom of Denmark's presence in Greenland (and that Denmark's hypocrisy of on the one hand promoting the right of Greenland to be independent while at the same times often deliberately stalling is hugely problematic). But indeed and for me, Buchanan asserting in So You Want to Own Greenland?: Lessons from the Vikings to Trump that if Greenland became independent, followed by the Faroe Islands, the Kingdom of Denmark would actually simply cease to exist is wrong, is just totally silly, and well, that her totally anti Denmark and even rather majorly anti Europe attitude and stance are pretty one-sidedly horrible and equally also makes Elizabeth Buchanan sound (at least for me and in my opinion) far too much, far too often like a decidedly Donald Trump style American Republicanism and expansionist apologist and tool.
Moreover and just to point out that considering how Denmark and as such also Greenland have some of the most liberal, most supportive and most tolerant LGBTQ and transgender legislation and rights on earth, that in Greenland all healthcare is free, sorry, but after what has been happening in the USA with the current administration in 2025 totally trouncing human rights, diversity and sexual and gender freedom, with Republican politicians and in particular Donald Trump, J.D. Vance, Pete Hesgeth, top military honchos, industrialists etc. obviously hugely hugely intent on owning and perhaps even annexing Greenland, well, if this actually occurred, it could also likely mean that these rights along with the right to protest against Trump and company might very rapidly disappear or at least seriously and severely be lessened in Greenland and for ALL citizens and residents (which I think is something that Buchanan should be at least be considering and acknowledging in So You Want to Own Greenland?: Lessons from the Vikings to Trump but sadly totally ignores, since for Elizabeth Buchanan in my opinion, the USA under Trump becoming increasingly dictatorial, somehow totally seems to be a non-issue and that Greenland becoming increasingly American or even wholly American would automatically somehow mean protection and safeguarding human rights abuses etc. from China and from Russia, that for Buchanan they are the main and total villains and the USA is somehow shiningly positive and democratic, which in 2025 is simply for and to me absolutely no longer the case by any stretch of the, of my imagination).
Thus while much of Elizabeth Buchanan’s narrative for So You Want to Own Greenland?: Lessons from the Vikings to Trump is interesting, has certainly been educational and also performs a genuine and essential service drawing the reader's attention to the fact that many non-Arctic states, among them China and members of the European Union are jostling for a bigger stake in the future of the circumpolar zone and where not that many of their citizens actually live, I have to admit and point out that I equally and certainly do NOT consider the United States really an Arctic nation anyhow, as for me, Alaska does not really count all that much and is certainly much closer ethnically and linguistically to Northern Canada, Siberia and the northern reaches of Scandinavia than to the continental United States and vice versa. And not to mention that I also find it rather academically frustrating and supplemental research and reading unfriendly how Buchanan provides no index for So You Want to Own Greenland?: Lessons from the Vikings to Trump and while there are endnotes, there are no lists of websites and books for further reading, that for me, So You Want to Own Greenland?: Lessons from the Vikings to Trump should not only provide the appreciated notes I have mentioned but also have a separate and user friendly bibliography (so yes, that my three star rating for So You Want to Own Greenland?: Lessons from the Vikings to Trump is probably a wee bit generous on my part, but that what I have enjoyed and appreciated regarding Elizabeth Buchanan's text for So You Want to Own Greenland?: Lessons from the Vikings to Trump does mildly but surely and strongly, decently enough outweigh what I have found problematic, what has textually made me groan).
September 25, 2025
I know very, very little about Greenland, and I still probably know more than 99 percent of Americans. (Hey, at least I’ve read Smilla's Sense of Snow and watched the Q’s Greenland YouTube channel!) This traces the various — invasions is too strong a word, so let’s go with encounters — in Greenland, dating back to Erik the Red’s arrival in Greenland in A.D. 984 after fleeing a murder charge. The island’s population remains tiny, 57,000, most of whom live on the southern edge, but its natural resources might be very big, attracting unwanted attention. Author Elizabeth Buchanan relates the history and the political intrigue with the right amount of snark to make it fun.
In the interest of full disclosure, I received this book from NetGalley and Melville House Publishing in exchange for an honest review.
In the interest of full disclosure, I received this book from NetGalley and Melville House Publishing in exchange for an honest review.
October 19, 2025
Just because you’re an expert doesn’t mean you can write a popular political science book…. That, unfortunately, is the lesson I take away from So You Want to Own Greenland?: Lessons from the Vikings to Trump. Elizabeth Buchanan is nominally an expert in polar geopolitics. However, her book about the contentious history of Greenland’s settlement and sovereignty is anything but interesting. I received an eARC from NetGalley and publisher Melville House in exchange for a review.
Reader, this book is boring. It shouldn’t be; Buchanan makes a concerted effort to write in a conversational style with a tone that is outright sarcastic at times. She takes potshots at everyone from the Americans (she really wants you to know she isn’t one) to the Danes to the Vikings. I admit to finding her description of Erik the Red as “Ed Sheeran’s head, with a lush siren-red full beard, atop André the Giant’s body” somewhat humorous. However, this sense of humour is detrimental at times to a serious analysis of Greenland’s history and politics. For example, not a few pages later, Buchanan handwaves away Erik the Red’s death:
Wikipedia gives me a better summary than this. For a book from someone with a PhD, I’d expect slightly more in-depth research.
Now, maybe I’m being too harsh—Buchanan’s PhD is in Russian Arctic strategy, so maybe Norse history is a bit too much of a stretch. Cool, cool. But even once we get closer to the modern era, this book is sorely lacking rigour. Buchanan passes off a lot of personal opinion as if it’s a foregone conclusion—and while I am willing to grant she knows more about this area than me, I’d like to see more actual analysis instead of just “take me word for it.” There are endnotes, but most of them point to government documents and news reports, not academic articles about these topics.
In short, despite its author’s pedigree, this book doesn’t seem soundly researched or presented to me. And yet, when Buchanan digs in and actually tries to do analysis, that conversational tone runs up against her penchant for detail and jargon. For example, she breaks down the report of a commission about Greenlandic independence section by section in stultifying detail that is at odds with the summarizing, wise-cracking approach at the start of the book.
Indeed, one wonders what the original publication schedule of this book was and whether it might not have been pushed up to capitalize on Trump’s “buying Greenland” malarkey from March of this year. Obviously this book was in the works prior to that, with its subtitle getting a glow-up. I won’t lie—Trump’s comments were why the title of this book caught my eye when I was browsing NetGalley. At the same time, Buchanan has a point: Trump or not, Greenland is clearly an important place in the next fifty years of Arctic interactions.
Alas, if like me you came looking for something that would fill you in on Greenlandic history and politics, you might be disappointed. I mean, this book kind of does that. But I derived zero enjoyment from reading it and found it pretty boring—if you were looking for a book to convince you that reading about geopolitics can be fun, this isn’t it.
Originally posted on Kara.Reviews.
Reader, this book is boring. It shouldn’t be; Buchanan makes a concerted effort to write in a conversational style with a tone that is outright sarcastic at times. She takes potshots at everyone from the Americans (she really wants you to know she isn’t one) to the Danes to the Vikings. I admit to finding her description of Erik the Red as “Ed Sheeran’s head, with a lush siren-red full beard, atop André the Giant’s body” somewhat humorous. However, this sense of humour is detrimental at times to a serious analysis of Greenland’s history and politics. For example, not a few pages later, Buchanan handwaves away Erik the Red’s death:
Not so much for Erik. Erik the Red died in about AD 1003, from something unbefitting a man of his stature or reputation—he simply fell off a horse. Or caught a virus from new Viking settlers. Both stories feature in the history books.
Wikipedia gives me a better summary than this. For a book from someone with a PhD, I’d expect slightly more in-depth research.
Now, maybe I’m being too harsh—Buchanan’s PhD is in Russian Arctic strategy, so maybe Norse history is a bit too much of a stretch. Cool, cool. But even once we get closer to the modern era, this book is sorely lacking rigour. Buchanan passes off a lot of personal opinion as if it’s a foregone conclusion—and while I am willing to grant she knows more about this area than me, I’d like to see more actual analysis instead of just “take me word for it.” There are endnotes, but most of them point to government documents and news reports, not academic articles about these topics.
In short, despite its author’s pedigree, this book doesn’t seem soundly researched or presented to me. And yet, when Buchanan digs in and actually tries to do analysis, that conversational tone runs up against her penchant for detail and jargon. For example, she breaks down the report of a commission about Greenlandic independence section by section in stultifying detail that is at odds with the summarizing, wise-cracking approach at the start of the book.
Indeed, one wonders what the original publication schedule of this book was and whether it might not have been pushed up to capitalize on Trump’s “buying Greenland” malarkey from March of this year. Obviously this book was in the works prior to that, with its subtitle getting a glow-up. I won’t lie—Trump’s comments were why the title of this book caught my eye when I was browsing NetGalley. At the same time, Buchanan has a point: Trump or not, Greenland is clearly an important place in the next fifty years of Arctic interactions.
Alas, if like me you came looking for something that would fill you in on Greenlandic history and politics, you might be disappointed. I mean, this book kind of does that. But I derived zero enjoyment from reading it and found it pretty boring—if you were looking for a book to convince you that reading about geopolitics can be fun, this isn’t it.
Originally posted on Kara.Reviews.
February 12, 2026
Óf de geopolitieke situatie rond Groenland is erg gecompliceerd, óf het boek is een chaotisch geheel van grappig bedoelde populair-wetenschappelijke informatie over de geschiedenis van Groenland vermengd met saaie analyses van ingewikkelde, bijna onbegrijpelijke internationale verdragen óf mijn beheersing van de Engelse taal schiet tekort. Óf een combinatie daarvan.
January 25, 2026
A much-needed basic historical and political context for this weird moment in time we live in.
January 31, 2026
A dash of the pen.
November 15, 2025
This is the most I’ve ever thought about Greenland
February 12, 2026
The publisher no doubt saw a sales opportunity in Trump's lunatic ravings on Greenland, but the credibility of the information and analysis was undermined by the author's ever-present snarky, smart-aleckey tone.
December 6, 2025
It was interesting and written in a very accessible way.
September 22, 2025
I don’t know what I expected out of this book, but I enjoyed that the author discussed some historical context of Greenland, as well as the large part it plays in certain global affairs due to it’s geographic position. Some points were a bit repetitive, but it didn’t detract much from the book overall. Thanks to the publisher and NetGalley for sending me an advanced reader copy! It is now available for everyone to read.
January 20, 2026
Un excelente libro que muestra las características únicas de esta enorme isla y que informa en forma efectiva y precisa su historia, su desarrollo y por que actualmente es objeto de disputas con los Estados Unidos. tiene información valiosa para entender lo que sucede actualmente en ese lugar y por que la quiere adquirir ese país. Una lectura valiosa en estos momentos.
January 20, 2026
I ate this up. Was a perfect blend of actual case law, various constitutions, Buchanan’s wit, and breaking down everything into digestible terms. If you’re at all interested in the Arctic strategy I would fs recommend this
January 17, 2026
A quick read, great little history of Greenland!
Read
February 16, 2026I knew nothing about Greenland, and now I know a teensy bit about Greenland.
January 19, 2026
I definitely know more about Greenland than I did 24 hours ago!! I picked this up out of the want to know more about this island that has been populating recent headlines. Admittedly, I knew very little, so I approached this book almost as a blank slate. If you are like me, you will learn a lot.
I found the book to be very matter-of-fact. I felt like I was reading someone’s thesis except with some moments of comedic relief with pop culture references.
I found the book to be very matter-of-fact. I felt like I was reading someone’s thesis except with some moments of comedic relief with pop culture references.
July 25, 2025
As we are about to head to Greenland for the first time, I wanted to find a book where I could learn more about the people and culture.
This is not that book.
But it sure is interesting.
‘So You Want To Own Greenland’ is a history of the changing international status of Greenland - why it matters, why so many nations covet it, how a land of only 56,000 people can be such a priority, its complicated relationship with Denmark, and the very slow march towards full independence (maybe).
Greenland is important for its strategic location for defence, as well as trade, oil, fishing and minerals. It has survived Vikings, Nazis, nuclear weapons, and world wars. Now a warming icecap, resource scarcity, and new political security tensions are challenging it like never before.
Greenland is especially impacted by climate change; 80% of it is covered by ice, so ice melt is a major issue, as is the warming of waters around Greenland which impacts fisheries and marine mammals.
As the book goes through history and politics, there is lots of cloak and dagger intrigue with WW2 espionage, secret research stations, illegal nuclear weapons, and yes it goes right into Trump world, wrapping up with four potential scenarios for Greenland’s future.
A fast and fascinating read. 4.5 stars out of 5.
Thanks to the publisher and Netgalley for an advance reading copy of this book, It will be published on September 4th.
This is not that book.
But it sure is interesting.
‘So You Want To Own Greenland’ is a history of the changing international status of Greenland - why it matters, why so many nations covet it, how a land of only 56,000 people can be such a priority, its complicated relationship with Denmark, and the very slow march towards full independence (maybe).
Greenland is important for its strategic location for defence, as well as trade, oil, fishing and minerals. It has survived Vikings, Nazis, nuclear weapons, and world wars. Now a warming icecap, resource scarcity, and new political security tensions are challenging it like never before.
Greenland is especially impacted by climate change; 80% of it is covered by ice, so ice melt is a major issue, as is the warming of waters around Greenland which impacts fisheries and marine mammals.
As the book goes through history and politics, there is lots of cloak and dagger intrigue with WW2 espionage, secret research stations, illegal nuclear weapons, and yes it goes right into Trump world, wrapping up with four potential scenarios for Greenland’s future.
A fast and fascinating read. 4.5 stars out of 5.
Thanks to the publisher and Netgalley for an advance reading copy of this book, It will be published on September 4th.
January 2, 2026
My thanks to Melville House (distributed by PRH) for an eARC of this timely book. It could have also been titled, "A Very Short History of Greenland", or "Greenland: An Introduction". Dr. Buchanan covers the history of Greenland from the Vikings to May 2025 (the book was then published in September 2025). An Aussie, she is a senior fellow at the Australian Strategic Policy Institute and a polar geopolitics expert, as well as the co-director and co-founder of polar warfare studies at the Modern War Institute of the West Point Military Academy.
Given the stated desire by the Current Resident of the WH to "own" Greenland, the history of the the huge island, and its relationship and importance to the US, is quite helpful.
She makes quite the case that with global warming the newly opened ship routes are of international significance. Not just to the US, but to Russia and China as well. China's claim is rather slim, and it is surprising that she never brings up their global New Silk Road policy, of which this is a prime example.
Buchanan perhaps overstates the importance of Greenland, but then its importance is what the book is all about. I also could have done with out her snarky little jokes thrown in here and there. Maybe this was done to make this a more "popular reading" title than you would expect from someone with her scholarly and policy wonk background.
The chapter on Greenland and the US in WWII (actually, even before the US was officially in WWII) is a very helpful background to the relationship between the the US and Greenland.
Greenland's official standing as part of The Kingdom of Denmark is quite complex. I wish she had explained it further in terms of the relationship between Canada and Great Britain (something we in the US are more familar with) than GB and Australia (something she is more familar with, being from there). And given us numbers and an explanation of how, and how much, Denmark is paying towards Greenland's social services.
Also, while she quotes polls, we never are given a sense of the lives and make up of the populace of Greenland, or the land itself. This is a study based on the actions of men (and a few women) in the higher echelons of power.
With a population of less than 60,000, many of whom are Inuit, there would be a problem extracting the rare minerals under the ice and ground in the land. Luckily the population does value its environment, and something like the "man camps" and super-heavy equipment that decimate American fossil fuel sites is unlikely to happen.
Overall, a very useful read on the subject. As are the four (in actuality, five) scenarios of how things could pan out for the island that can lay claim to so many natural resources, food supplies (seafood), and a defensive and offensive global location.
3.5 out of 5.
Given the stated desire by the Current Resident of the WH to "own" Greenland, the history of the the huge island, and its relationship and importance to the US, is quite helpful.
She makes quite the case that with global warming the newly opened ship routes are of international significance. Not just to the US, but to Russia and China as well. China's claim is rather slim, and it is surprising that she never brings up their global New Silk Road policy, of which this is a prime example.
Buchanan perhaps overstates the importance of Greenland, but then its importance is what the book is all about. I also could have done with out her snarky little jokes thrown in here and there. Maybe this was done to make this a more "popular reading" title than you would expect from someone with her scholarly and policy wonk background.
The chapter on Greenland and the US in WWII (actually, even before the US was officially in WWII) is a very helpful background to the relationship between the the US and Greenland.
Greenland's official standing as part of The Kingdom of Denmark is quite complex. I wish she had explained it further in terms of the relationship between Canada and Great Britain (something we in the US are more familar with) than GB and Australia (something she is more familar with, being from there). And given us numbers and an explanation of how, and how much, Denmark is paying towards Greenland's social services.
Also, while she quotes polls, we never are given a sense of the lives and make up of the populace of Greenland, or the land itself. This is a study based on the actions of men (and a few women) in the higher echelons of power.
With a population of less than 60,000, many of whom are Inuit, there would be a problem extracting the rare minerals under the ice and ground in the land. Luckily the population does value its environment, and something like the "man camps" and super-heavy equipment that decimate American fossil fuel sites is unlikely to happen.
Overall, a very useful read on the subject. As are the four (in actuality, five) scenarios of how things could pan out for the island that can lay claim to so many natural resources, food supplies (seafood), and a defensive and offensive global location.
3.5 out of 5.
February 24, 2026
Sellest lühikesest esseistlikust teadusliku taustaga kirjutisest saab väga selge, adekvaatse ja faktipõhise pildi Gröönimaast. Jah! Gröönimaast!
Eesti teab Taanit - ja Taani teab meid! Lipp ja värki! Aga Gröönimaa on nende suur "võitlustanner maa". Fääri saared on nii igaks juhuks ka, aga Gröönimaata Taani Kuningriik ei saa. Hamletiga või Hamnetiga, aga ei saa!
Autor vestab meile loo sellest, kuidas viikingid ehku peale saare avastasid ja siis ära kadusid. Lännu, nagu "Patune Pool" muusikaajalukku, või Taavi Rõivas tagasi panomeheks. Neid otsima läinud preester pani käima uue ajastu Gröönimaa arengus - religioon ja kombed. Siis tuli ühtlasi ka Taani Kuningriigile meelde, et Gröönima ja selle rahvas on päriselt ikka veel nende oma. Maailmasõjad ja eriti natside salalpaanid muutsid saare nii atraktiivseks, et maailma esimese "breksiti" orgunnijad otsustasid, et Gröönima USAta ei saa. Või õigemini USA ilma Gröönimaata.
Selle seikluse käigus selgus muuhulgas, et Gröönimaad üritas algselt USAle sokutada Taani suursaadik ja alles siis aktiviseerus USA huvi. Tulemuseks oli salajase jääaluse linna ehitamine, tuumarelvade paigutamine saarele (kuigi öeldi, et ei tehta nii ju!) ja palju potentsiaalseid hetki, kus oleks läinud lahti Jääkülm Sõda. Aga siis pakkis USA oma kodinad kokku ja läks tuldud teed tagasi, sest kallis on see jäätunud saare elu.
Nüüd aga on pukis el patron oranže ja mees on sama kindel, kui lubrikant orgial, et saar peab olema tema, tfui USA, oma. Eelmine Taani poolt USAle müüdud saar on hetkel ka väga populaarne - seda tuntakse "Epsteini saarena".
Raamatu lõpus esitab autor 4 väga selget stsenaariumi selle kohta, kuidas asjad edasi võiksid kulgeda. Ja need on tõesti silmi avavad lood. Eriti hästi on lahti seletatud Arktika roll globaalses julgeolekupoliitikas ning Gröönima peamine mure - tahaks iseseisvust, aga mis raha eest?
Korraks jooksid mul judinad üle kere ka, sest Ed Sheerani nimi tuli mängu, aga ma sain hakkama ja elasin selle hetke üle. Vaatasin tantsivaid teletupse ja lubasin endale ühe eriti suure küpsise.
Eesti teab Taanit - ja Taani teab meid! Lipp ja värki! Aga Gröönimaa on nende suur "võitlustanner maa". Fääri saared on nii igaks juhuks ka, aga Gröönimaata Taani Kuningriik ei saa. Hamletiga või Hamnetiga, aga ei saa!
Autor vestab meile loo sellest, kuidas viikingid ehku peale saare avastasid ja siis ära kadusid. Lännu, nagu "Patune Pool" muusikaajalukku, või Taavi Rõivas tagasi panomeheks. Neid otsima läinud preester pani käima uue ajastu Gröönimaa arengus - religioon ja kombed. Siis tuli ühtlasi ka Taani Kuningriigile meelde, et Gröönima ja selle rahvas on päriselt ikka veel nende oma. Maailmasõjad ja eriti natside salalpaanid muutsid saare nii atraktiivseks, et maailma esimese "breksiti" orgunnijad otsustasid, et Gröönima USAta ei saa. Või õigemini USA ilma Gröönimaata.
Selle seikluse käigus selgus muuhulgas, et Gröönimaad üritas algselt USAle sokutada Taani suursaadik ja alles siis aktiviseerus USA huvi. Tulemuseks oli salajase jääaluse linna ehitamine, tuumarelvade paigutamine saarele (kuigi öeldi, et ei tehta nii ju!) ja palju potentsiaalseid hetki, kus oleks läinud lahti Jääkülm Sõda. Aga siis pakkis USA oma kodinad kokku ja läks tuldud teed tagasi, sest kallis on see jäätunud saare elu.
Nüüd aga on pukis el patron oranže ja mees on sama kindel, kui lubrikant orgial, et saar peab olema tema, tfui USA, oma. Eelmine Taani poolt USAle müüdud saar on hetkel ka väga populaarne - seda tuntakse "Epsteini saarena".
Raamatu lõpus esitab autor 4 väga selget stsenaariumi selle kohta, kuidas asjad edasi võiksid kulgeda. Ja need on tõesti silmi avavad lood. Eriti hästi on lahti seletatud Arktika roll globaalses julgeolekupoliitikas ning Gröönima peamine mure - tahaks iseseisvust, aga mis raha eest?
Korraks jooksid mul judinad üle kere ka, sest Ed Sheerani nimi tuli mängu, aga ma sain hakkama ja elasin selle hetke üle. Vaatasin tantsivaid teletupse ja lubasin endale ühe eriti suure küpsise.
July 25, 2025
Elizabeth Buchanan’s So You Want to Own Greenland? is a compact and engaging overview of Greenland’s geopolitical significance across history. As a nonfiction work, it’s strongest in its ability to highlight just how often this sparsely populated, icy territory has attracted the ambitions of global powers—from Viking settlers to modern-day superpowers.
The book covers a wide arc: the mysterious disappearance of Viking colonizers, Greenland’s evolution under Danish rule, its peculiar role in World War II, and its status as a Cold War asset for the United States, including the construction of a nuclear-powered base (Camp Century) under the ice. Buchanan also outlines Greenland’s modern relevance, from domestic independence movements to President Trump’s attempt to purchase it.
Buchanan writes with precision and clarity, although truly exploring the Greenlandic viewpoint in more depth would have elevated this book. Most of the narrative is shaped through the lens of external powers, and while that’s essential to the book’s theme, a deeper engagement with local voices would have added welcome texture.
In all, this is a useful and concise guide for readers interested in Arctic politics, environmental history, or international strategy. It doesn’t overreach, but it does effectively explain why Greenland—despite its isolation—has remained a central focus of global ambitions.
Thank you to Melville House Publishing for providing this book for review consideration via NetGalley. All opinions are my own.
The book covers a wide arc: the mysterious disappearance of Viking colonizers, Greenland’s evolution under Danish rule, its peculiar role in World War II, and its status as a Cold War asset for the United States, including the construction of a nuclear-powered base (Camp Century) under the ice. Buchanan also outlines Greenland’s modern relevance, from domestic independence movements to President Trump’s attempt to purchase it.
Buchanan writes with precision and clarity, although truly exploring the Greenlandic viewpoint in more depth would have elevated this book. Most of the narrative is shaped through the lens of external powers, and while that’s essential to the book’s theme, a deeper engagement with local voices would have added welcome texture.
In all, this is a useful and concise guide for readers interested in Arctic politics, environmental history, or international strategy. It doesn’t overreach, but it does effectively explain why Greenland—despite its isolation—has remained a central focus of global ambitions.
Thank you to Melville House Publishing for providing this book for review consideration via NetGalley. All opinions are my own.
March 26, 2026
This book’s title piqued my curiosity. With Greenland being in the news thanks to our ambitious President, I was interested to learn more about the island that most of us can find on a map but less of us can expound upon.
Elizabeth Buchanan takes the reader from the Viking age (briefly) to the present, back to the early 20th century and the World Wars, and back again to the present. It’s a bit of a jumbled ride, but there is a lot of geopolitical information to unpack along the journey. I was hoping to learn more about the culture and peoples of the island.
While I believe that Buchanan researched her topic thoroughly, her ability to convey the information falls flat. There are grammatical errors like introductory clauses with no commas and odd sentence structure that forced me to pause and reread entire passages in an effort to better understand. I counted no less than five uses of the phrase “more on [insert topic] later” before I stopped counting. Buchanan references pop culture a bit too much for such a serious topic: Ed Sheeran and Carrie Bradshaw both make an appearance in the book, and Greenland is referred to as “being in her independent woman era.” Frankly, these references distract from the subject matter and remove the credibility of the author’s input and intent—so much so that I was surprised to see on the back cover that the author had a PhD. But, to quote my intelligent daughter, “Having a PhD doesn’t make you good at conveying information.”
Elizabeth Buchanan takes the reader from the Viking age (briefly) to the present, back to the early 20th century and the World Wars, and back again to the present. It’s a bit of a jumbled ride, but there is a lot of geopolitical information to unpack along the journey. I was hoping to learn more about the culture and peoples of the island.
While I believe that Buchanan researched her topic thoroughly, her ability to convey the information falls flat. There are grammatical errors like introductory clauses with no commas and odd sentence structure that forced me to pause and reread entire passages in an effort to better understand. I counted no less than five uses of the phrase “more on [insert topic] later” before I stopped counting. Buchanan references pop culture a bit too much for such a serious topic: Ed Sheeran and Carrie Bradshaw both make an appearance in the book, and Greenland is referred to as “being in her independent woman era.” Frankly, these references distract from the subject matter and remove the credibility of the author’s input and intent—so much so that I was surprised to see on the back cover that the author had a PhD. But, to quote my intelligent daughter, “Having a PhD doesn’t make you good at conveying information.”
January 17, 2026
I can honestly say that going into this book I knew absolutely nothing about Greenland other than what it looks like and where it is located on a map.
With that in mind, I learned quite a bit about Greenland’s history, politics, geopolitics, and a bit of its culture from this book. I count that as a win. I also enjoyed the author’s sarcasm.
Now, some things that bothered me about this text…a lot of the information was repeated throughout the chapters. I found myself skimming through many paragraphs that had literally explained the same details from previous chapters and I would STILL come across it again in the later chapters. It just felt like a lot more research and information could have gone into this book rather than having to read the same stuff over and over again.
Overall, this is a great starting point for those who, like I, have absolutely no knowledge on Greenland and would like to better understand current political affairs involving the island. But be prepared to have that information drilled into you multiple times before finishing the book. And if you already have a basic understanding of Greenland, then I would say skip this and do your own research.
Thank you NetGalley for the opportunity to read this ARC. All thoughts and comments are my own.
With that in mind, I learned quite a bit about Greenland’s history, politics, geopolitics, and a bit of its culture from this book. I count that as a win. I also enjoyed the author’s sarcasm.
Now, some things that bothered me about this text…a lot of the information was repeated throughout the chapters. I found myself skimming through many paragraphs that had literally explained the same details from previous chapters and I would STILL come across it again in the later chapters. It just felt like a lot more research and information could have gone into this book rather than having to read the same stuff over and over again.
Overall, this is a great starting point for those who, like I, have absolutely no knowledge on Greenland and would like to better understand current political affairs involving the island. But be prepared to have that information drilled into you multiple times before finishing the book. And if you already have a basic understanding of Greenland, then I would say skip this and do your own research.
Thank you NetGalley for the opportunity to read this ARC. All thoughts and comments are my own.
September 2, 2025
The author tells the reader right up from that Greenland's probable future is boring. But, this book is anything but boring! Like your history with a side of cold sarcasm? Then this is the book for you! Like to impress your friends with random otherwise probably useless facts? Then this is the book for you! What to know what it takes for run the world's largest island? Then this is the book for you! According to the author, and correct, this is basically a buyer's guide to Greenland. Owning Greenland is and would be an expensive, delicate endeavor, easily messed up. I am honestly not sure the US is up to the task! I really enjoyed reading the history of Greenland's path and the part the US has continued to play in it. I have saved a bunch of interesting, odd, humorous, and Jeopardy level facts about Greenland from reading the book.
Thanks to NetGalley and Melville House for a copy of the book. This review is my own opinion.
Thanks to NetGalley and Melville House for a copy of the book. This review is my own opinion.
September 17, 2025
At first glance Greenland doesn't seem to warrant any desire for ownership. It's a large island, although not nearly as large as portrayed on most maps, and 80% of it's landmass is covered with ice. From a geopolitical viewpoint, however, it has location, location, location. Buchanan addresses the twists and turns of historic attempts to possess the island and the reasons for them. The Greenland/Denmark relationship is addressed in depth and, yes, it's complicated. The relationship with the U.S. is too, having begun attempts to secure control in 1867. Buchanan is a senior fellow at the Austrailian Strategic Policy Institute. Her writing is straightforward, although with a bit of repetition, and I found her clearly stated viewpoints refreshing, especially regarding the near future.
I received a digital advanced copy compliments of Melville House and NetGalley.
I received a digital advanced copy compliments of Melville House and NetGalley.
February 14, 2026
Written by an Australian woman who is a polar geopolitics expert and whose credentials include work at West Point and NATOs Defense College, the book relates the history of Greenland from the time of Lief Erickson to the present. She concentrates on the politics surrounding Greenland, especially the murky dealings with Denmark and the United States. At the conclusion, she lists several scenarios that she sees could be coming in the future. The problems inherent in maintaining a hold over the polar region are defined as well as all the players who wish to be involved and the treaties that underlie their positions. I had no idea how complicated the background was and how the US became involved to begin with and what is at stake. Written in a style that is understandable and as clear as can be, it helped me as I try to follow the actions of the various constituents.
January 12, 2026
From Vikings to Trump: Greenland in Play
Elizabeth Buchanan’s So You Want to Own Greenland? traces the island’s improbable journey from Viking settlement to Trump-era headlines, situating it as both a geopolitical flashpoint and a cultural curiosity. She threads together history, sovereignty disputes, and Arctic strategy to show why Greenland matters far beyond its icy borders.
Greenland’s icy expanse could have been a slog of treaties and troop movements, but Buchanan salts the snow with wit. Her command of polar geopolitics is undeniable, and while not every joke lands cleanly, the humor itself is a welcome companion. The levity rescues sovereignty disputes from dryness, proof that even Arctic policy can sparkle. A brisk, clever guide to a frozen flashpoint.
Elizabeth Buchanan’s So You Want to Own Greenland? traces the island’s improbable journey from Viking settlement to Trump-era headlines, situating it as both a geopolitical flashpoint and a cultural curiosity. She threads together history, sovereignty disputes, and Arctic strategy to show why Greenland matters far beyond its icy borders.
Greenland’s icy expanse could have been a slog of treaties and troop movements, but Buchanan salts the snow with wit. Her command of polar geopolitics is undeniable, and while not every joke lands cleanly, the humor itself is a welcome companion. The levity rescues sovereignty disputes from dryness, proof that even Arctic policy can sparkle. A brisk, clever guide to a frozen flashpoint.
March 7, 2026
Elizabeth Buchanan, a polar geopolitics expert, was quick in writing this book, timely because of Donald Trump’s clamoring to get his hands on Greenland. The book is short, a quick and easy read, but it packs a lot of knowledge about Greenland’s geopolitical history and present. Much of it focuses on various treaties, the Greenlandic constitution, its relations with Denmark, etc.. As important as these topics are, they don’t easily add up to an exciting or absorbing storyline. Consequently, Dr. Buchanan makes an effort to be — funny. It’s of course a matter of taste, but I found her flippant style somewhat annoying and most of her quips less than hilarious. Nevertheless, I learned a lot about the big northern island currently frequently in the news.
August 11, 2025
Thank you to NetGalley, the author, and the publisher for this complementary ARC in exchange for my honest review!
This book takes the reader through the history of Greenland from Erik the Red to Donald Trump. I went into this book not knowing much about Greenland and learned a lot - the author provides a really informative, unbiased take on the politics of potential change. I would have liked to learn more about the geography and people of Greenland, but I'm sure there are other sources that cover that.
I would recommend this to anyone looking to learn more about the history, politics and intricacies of Greenland.
This book takes the reader through the history of Greenland from Erik the Red to Donald Trump. I went into this book not knowing much about Greenland and learned a lot - the author provides a really informative, unbiased take on the politics of potential change. I would have liked to learn more about the geography and people of Greenland, but I'm sure there are other sources that cover that.
I would recommend this to anyone looking to learn more about the history, politics and intricacies of Greenland.
September 7, 2025
A very timely book, although I suppose that’s both its greatest strength and its greatest weakness, as it feels rushed. It answers many questions about Greenland's recently inflated geopolitical status and offers interesting insights, but it is repetitive in places and mostly ignores the story of Indigenous peoples and their point of view. I would love to learn more about that. The style is strange too, mixing a very laid-back tone with an academic one.
It is still worth reading, as there are few publications on this topic. However, be aware that it is a mixed bag.
Thanks to the publisher, Melville House, and NetGalley for an advanced copy of this book.
It is still worth reading, as there are few publications on this topic. However, be aware that it is a mixed bag.
Thanks to the publisher, Melville House, and NetGalley for an advanced copy of this book.
February 21, 2026
Many reviews criticise the formal in-depth analysing and deep dive on Greenlandic history and policy. As a newbie to Greenland and her politics and policy; I found the over simplified, and easy to follow story written to be quite informative without boring the reader. I found the opinion piece of prediction at the book end to be unwarranted and not needed, but felt as though the author wanted to express her own taste on the book. An interesting enough read, simple, modern (very modern) and informative - and made me aware of the strategy and desire to own an island in a far away land.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 53 reviews