Is "too short" a valid criticism? What about, "It did not explore topics to the depth I would have liked"? To be fair, Ryan Kemp did not write this book exclusively for me (darn), and I don't think the thirst this book leaves in my tongue is necessarily a negative quality. I believe that this book achieves what it sets out to do, and in that regard is a 5-star book. My 4 stars reflect the goodness and beauty that still reside within, even if I wanted a book that goes deeper
These essays are brief, beautiful vignettes that explore life, God, beauty, and attention in ways that I find much more approachable that what these ideas look like in the world of philosophy. In other words, Kemp makes these big and important ideas relatable and understandable. In fact, I think my "too short" criticism directly stems from my having explored these ideas with Kemp in college. I know we can go deeper, and I want that desperately. Essays like "Quitting the Internet," and "AI and the Struggle to Think Humanly" stand out in particular as times I wish Kemp went deeper, especially since I'm passionate about these topics. But maybe that's for another book.
Other essays were too short because what was there was already so good and I want to spend more time meditating with my guide. "Julian's Terrible Request" and "From the Whirlwind" I believe exemplify the best that this book has to offer: raw emotions in the face of beauty and God. The image of God suffering alongside us is so powerful in the "Julian" essay, but it takes on new life in light of "Whirlwind" and another essay that speaks to Dostoevsky's problem of evil. This leads me to another thing I liked/disliked about they essays: the synergy. Sometimes the answer to one essay is found in another; other times a later essay has ramifications for one that came before. I can't tell if I like or dislike this. The synergy is at times amazing, leading to really profound AHA! moments when you connect what you're reading to something said earlier. I was also frustrated at times when a later essay fixed issues with a former essay, and instead of shouting, "AHA!", I said to myself, "I wish you had said that earlier." But I recognize this as personal; your mileage may vary.
Anyway, back to the praise! In addition to Julian of Norwich, Kemp does a great job in his rendering of The Brothers Karamazov and Moby Dick and makes the issues explored in each book approachable and inspiring, even awakening my personal struggle with Ivan's rebellion. Kemp is also good at making uncited authors accessible. Martin Buber, Simone Weil, and David Foster Wallace come to mind when Kemp addresses attention, presence, and the lack thereof in the present technological age. He even turned me onto Camus in this book! I guess what I'm trying to say is that, far from summarizing, Kemp brings us into the emotions of the book to get a good look at the conflicts within before bringing us back to the real world to see the far-reaching implications.
I have a soft spot for the more vulnerable and personal essays that bookend the collection (and, ironically for this review, are the shortest). I do believe that grounding the philosophical and emotional struggles in real life are the best way to show the significance of the issues at hand. Kemp's struggle with attention and how that affects his daughter Violet is a particularly touching moment.
The only true "negative," if you will, is that I'm not fully on-board with the arguments on display in "Measuring God," but a book (or in this case, essay) that you disagree with is not necessarily a bad book. While Kemp hints at a new way of "understanding" God, I wonder if there can't be a balance of subjective and objective ways of relating to God. And I know full well that balancing opposing realities is a struggle for me, so perhaps I'm projecting my own fears and struggles onto this essay.
My biggest nitpick with the book is the lack of citations for brief references, which is humorous. Kemp wants us to ditch the internet, but then he quotes Whitman and Camus without citation, and I am instantly tempted to google the quotes to find their origins. If you want me to quit, you'll have to give this dog a bone, but I also can't help but wonder if Kemp wanted me to feel that impulse and realize, "Oh, I AM addicted to the internet." Another nitpick is that 2 of the 3 essays that didn't land for me end up being some of the longest in the book (which is ironic because I want the essays to be longer, yet I'm complaining about the longest essays). My star rating is an attempt to quantify that, but it's just a star rating. My lasting impression of this book is that it's a perfect point of first contact for the topics of God, beauty, and attention from a contemporary existentialist perspective, but thanks to having Dr. Kemp as a professor, I'm well past the point of first contact, and what I'm left with is a collection of beautiful essays that remind me of key ideas and leave me thirsty for more. In other words, I can't wait for the next book!