There are memoirs that speak, and then there are those that bleed. "Nautch Boy" belongs to the later category. It isn’t just a story, it’s a wound dressed in words. Manish Gaekwad’s autobiographical account of being born to a courtesan and growing up in the shadow of both stigma and stardust is an act of remembering what the world prefers to forget. It’s not just the story of a boy who escaped the kotha; it’s the story of what it means to carry the kotha inside you, its rhythm, its music, its loneliness, even when you’ve left it far behind.
At its heart, this book is a haunting meditation on identity, the kind that’s not chosen but inherited, and the lifelong struggle to make peace with it. The book oscillates between two worlds, the glittering yet decaying kothas of Bowbazar, and the rigid, ‘civilized’ world of boarding schools in the hills. These contrasting spaces are not just geographical; they are moral and emotional divides.
The author's s mother, Rekhabai, embodies the resilience of women trapped between desire and duty. Her kotha is both her stage and her prison. Her son, meanwhile, becomes the site of her redemption, the proof that she can break the cycle of shame. But what happens when that very shame becomes a part of the boy’s marrow? The author's writing navigates that silent inheritance of trauma, the unspoken guilt of being born from a body society refuses to sanctify.
Rekhabai is not a conventional mother; she is both the nurturer and the performer, both fiercely protective and emotionally absent at times. Her love isn’t expressed in lullabies but in sacrifices, in the quiet determination to send her son away even if it means loneliness for herself. There’s a raw tenderness in how Gaekwad recalls her, not saintly, not flawless, but real.
In one sense, the book is her elegy. Every page throbs with her unspoken pain, a woman fighting to preserve her child’s future while the world around her rots. The emotional power of the book lies not in grand confessions, but in the silences between them.
The author's confession of his queer inclinations is handled with remarkable honesty, not as a bold declaration, but as an aching truth. His queerness is not presented as rebellion but as confusion, loneliness, and an extension of his alienation. Growing up amidst sensuality and performance, he learns early that gender and desire are fluid. Yet, the world demands labels.
The author's writing is clean, cinematic, and unapologetically honest. He doesn’t romanticize the filth of the kotha, nor does he drown it in pity. There’s restraint in his storytelling, a refusal to exaggerate. He writes as if he’s walking barefoot over shards of his past, bleeding quietly with every memory. His alternating tone, lyrical when he writes about his mother, detached when he writes about his schooling, mirrors his emotional dislocation. The transitions between these worlds are often abrupt, yet they serve the book’s truth: life doesn’t offer neat transitions.
✍️ Strengths :
🔸There’s no pretension in his voice. Every emotion, shame, longing, defiance, feels lived rather than written.
🔸The book humanizes courtesans without romanticizing them, peeling away the cinematic gloss to reveal their humanity.
🔸The interplay between Rekhabai’s fading world and Manish’s evolving one captures generational conflict with striking sensitivity.
🔸Few writers allow themselves to be this exposed. The author's candour about his sexuality, fear, and guilt is what makes the book linger.
✒️ Areas for improvement :
▪️The book occasionally drifts in chronology. The shifts between childhood memories, reflections, and adult observations feel uneven, sometimes diluting emotional momentum.
▪️While its open-endedness feels true to life, it may frustrate readers seeking narrative resolution. The memoir ends where understanding begins, abruptly, almost mid-breath.
▪️His queerness, though mentioned, feels like a thread left hanging. One wishes he delved deeper into that part of his identity and how it intersected with his upbringing.
▪️For readers unfamiliar with tawaif culture, certain details of Bowbazar and its socio-historical texture remain underexplained.
In conclusion, it is not an easy book to read, nor should it be. It drags you through the narrow, suffocating lanes of Bowbazar, through classrooms filled with prejudice, and into the quiet ache of a son who has lived too many lives in one lifetime. It is tender without being sentimental, brutal without being cynical. In the end, it is not just a story about escaping the kotha, it is about never truly escaping. About how love, shame, and resilience can coexist within the same heart. About how some dances never end; they just shift stages. In short, this is not merely a memoir, it is a confession, a cultural document, and above all, a son’s love letter to a mother who refused to let society define her worth. It deserves to be read, not for the glamour of its setting, but for the grace of its truth.