Before the actual review a note on a pet peeve of mine around reviews and that's holding back a five star rating for 'perfection'. Given that you only have five stars to cover the entire spectrum between 'My god, that was awful! I don't understand how this even made it into print... Why?!' and a literally perfect literary effort, I really don't agree with the 'I never give five stars!' brigade.
So what's my criteria for star ratings? Broadly speaking: one is 'Oh god, no!' two is 'Well, it's not awful...', three is probably a range from a 'Well it wasn't my cup of tea but...' to 'OK', four is good and five is I really enjoyed it and would recommend it to others. For me, Bloodbound fell into that last category. There were several times as I read through it that I thought of friends and family that would really enjoy reading this too. I can see my copy getting tattered and dog-eared as I try and convince others to give it go.
I'm not going to recount any of the story here, it's easy enough to read a synopsis online rather than my ham-fisted attempt at one, but it is a book based in the world of a fantasy role-playing game, Pathfinder. Pathfinder is essentially an off-shoot of Dungeons and Dragons but don't let that put you off! Firstly, some game fiction is fantastic; I'd recommend the Dragonlance books by Margaret Weis and Tracy Hickmanm to anyone in a heartbeat. Secondly it's not your traditional 'swords and sorcery' book that you might expect would come from that, this has a very European gothic feel to it. It’s a book about vampires and vampire hunters with a good dash of religious fanatics and inquisitors that see heresy everywhere.
I will say it took me a while to get into this. Now I’ll give the author the benefit or the doubt here because I really don’t find much time to read any more. In the past the daily commute would be my opportunity to read, captive and away from the day to day distractions, but currently that’s only 10 minutes. It’s really not enough time to really get my teeth into anything so I can’t say whether it’s me or the author so I’ll give him the benefit of the doubt. The format of the book is that there are two protagonists, Larsa and Jadain, who take it in turns to give their point of view. Perhaps that’s not giving enough time for the first to grab you before moving to the second and this split attention slows down how long it takes for the book to get it’s teeth into you but, like I say, I really don’t find the time to read so I’ll give the author the benefit of the doubt here. I imagine it’s more me than him.
Once I got properly started, though, I couldn't put it down! Now I do play Pathfinder, and I am currently GMing the first part of Carrion Crown, set in the same area and it's an excellent game resource as well as an enjoyable book. Anyone playing or consider playing that campaign, this is a must read! The background detail it gives to the area is fantastic. Similarly, anyone playing a follower of Pharasma, read this! Not only is half the book about Jadain, a Pharasmin priestess, but a key part of the conflict for the character is multiple interpretations of worshipping the goddess of death. This aside, it's still a really great story in it's own right that I think non-RPG types will still enjoy. And I learned a new word. Bivouacked. Not once, but twice!
Now, I don't see this story as a must-read cornerstone of vampire fiction (the main antagonist, Rivascis, isn't the new Dracula or Lestat, for example) and there were a few errors that really should have been picked up in editing that jarred the reading experience but, minor issues aside, I'd really recommend giving this a try. I'm sure you'll enjoy it!