The book is packed with extensive and deep knowledge, but seen as a book "product", it's far from excellence. There's an agglomerate of concepts, ideas, theories from several areas of knowledge, all quite interesting to read, but sometimes seemingly redundant. Going too deep into a certain concept, intended to be supportive, often sidetracks from the main line of thought. So using a secondary concept, however interesting, turns out counterproductive, as it didn't in fact help to convey the thought, but only turned me, a reader, away from it. An example of a detour is a several pages foray into the abilities obtained by humans thanks to writing.
There is clearly an attempt to provide a clear visible structure for the book (physical, semantic and digital information and then five "pace layers of information"), but I don't think that it works that well.
Because of this lack of prioritizing of ideas, some red threads that are essential for the book (e.g. nesting) might get lost among the multitude of secondary, supplementary concepts and ideas. This pattern of coming up with associations and connecting everything to everything is a fantastic way of creative thinking. In this case, however, it makes for a worse book.
An abundance of other people's ideas makes it difficult to hear the author's voice.
The last chapter is really good. That's where it shines through that the book is not a compilation; Hinton speaks from own experiences and writes about them well. Too bad this kind of writing only shows up in chapter number 22.