What do you think?
Rate this book


231 pages
First published January 1, 2006
This is a thoroughly conservative, even reactionary book. It is in a way a fundamentalist tract. Here is what the author had to say in the preface:
"Shinto is the consciousness underlying the Japanese mentality, the foundation for Japanese culture and values. Japanese society is still in a state of confusion, one of the symptoms of which has been the proliferation of bizarre cults and sects. It is important, therefore, for the Japanese people to rediscover their spiritual essence and their cultural roots, and to make these a force for the good of humanity as a whole."
Already off to a bad start. The author's motive becomes clear. Not only does he wish to reform "Japanese culture and values", but the whole of humanity. He may be the "79th Grand Master of Yamakage Shinto", an assertion he makes with much frequency (a Shinto Pope?), and may as a result have some clout over those of his faith, maybe even within the larger Japanese society, but to presume a mandate over the rest of the world is hubristic in the extreme. I have no patience for anyone claiming to know what is best for humanity.
I was surprised to find a touch of original sin. "I am unclean" therefore "I beg forgiveness." (pg. 75) And when the author describes how a "lower spirit" acquired from an "unclean" shrine produced physical maladies in himself and others around him, even when far removed from the shrine (pg. 83), that was for me the final inanity. If he really is suffering severe pain in his legs, he really should see a physician. The Shinto that Yamakage describes seems to have more in common with Western theology than with Eastern mysticism.
And then there is this from chapter two:
"We can say that the great influx of atheism and materialism into Japan had a serious influence on the Japanese mind, where the notion of Kami and the spirit-soul are increasingly disappearing. Human beings are seen as simply material things, and there is no concept of an afterlife or a sense of continuity in the dominant culture of modern Japan. This view of the world has steadily undermined rather than enhanced the humanist conceptions of freedom, responsibility, and dignity. When human beings become conscious of an afterlife, of a higher being or beings, or of the possibility of rebirth, they are more likely to think beyond their immediate material interests. But when assuming everything is finished with death, people might conclude that they can do anything as long as they are not violating man-made laws—or as long as they are managing to escape punishment. Then their absolute goals are satisfying their short-term desires and the prolongation of life at all costs. Ultimately, such questions as "what does it really mean to be human?" or "what values should human beings pursue?" begin to disappear."
Well there you have it. Atheists are selfish, materialistic, and devoid of any moral purpose. The author obviously does not understand the concepts of freedom, responsibility, and dignity. My beautiful sister who studies such things tells me that the true essence of Shinto is one of balance and harmony with the universe. Yamakage's portrayal of Shinto proclaims just the opposite. Apart from the author's glaring bigotry, I think what I may be seeing is the same sort of dichotomy between conservative fundamentalism and liberal relativism that is such a problem in Christianity and Islam. Maybe it occurs to some extent in all religious cultures. Japan has embraced and has greatly contributed to the modernity that has so changed our world and that so troubles Motohisa Yamakage. It would be a shame if the Japanese people found themselves being held back by the same sort of regressive ideology that plagues American culture.