I came upon Marek Halter's Canaan Trilogy by pure happenstance. I also read it out of order (Zipporah, then Sarah, and Lilah), but it is not a necessity to read this series in order. I loved that the trilogy encompassed almost 1600 years, starting with Sarah (which was set in and around 21st-century B.C.E.) Zipporah (15th-century B.C.E. ) to Lilah (which was set in around 550 B.C.E.).
"Sarah" was an engrossing and beautiful tale, and "Zipporah" was an enriching treat. "Lilah" however, misses the mark completely. One of my major issues is that Lilah, however dynamic and interesting of a character Halter made her out to be, was just that. Unlike Sarah and Zipporah, Lilah was not based on any sister of Ezra, as she is not mentioned anywhere in the Old Testament of the Bible (Book of Ezra or Book of Nehemiah), but I digress. The first half of the novel is very engaging and wonderful.
In the Persian town of Susa, Lilah is an aristocratic young Jewish woman who is torn between the love of her childhood (non-Jewish) friend Antinoes and the loyalty she has for her older brother Ezra. While these three were practically raised as siblings, Ezra's dogmatic studying of the Torah and its rules make them both strangers to him now. While Lilah's aunt and uncle welcome a marriage to such a highly respected member of the royal court, Lilah refuses to unless Ezra gives his blessing to their union (which is not needed, but deeply desired by Lilah). She schemes a way for Ezra to leave the city of Susa with a band of conservative zealots...but it backfires and leaves Lilah forced to venture with her brother, without a husband or a place to call home. The second part of the novel, which I have the most problems with is written a long Epistolary style.
Lilah documents the long, arduous journey she, Ezra, and the Babylonian Jews undertake. They return to Jerusalem, facing exclusion and oppression from other ethnic groups around them who too inhabit the land. The temple and settlements are built for the community, unfortunately divisiveness within the community surfaces. The Zealots and other conservative members of the community called for the expulsion of the "foreign" (the Jebusite, Moabite, Ammonite to name a few) women who married Hebrew men and their progeny so that the Hebrew men would be forced to marry Jewish women. Lilah wholeheartedly objects to this idea and begs Ezra to reconsider this expulsion, but he follows the more archaic and hurtful Mosaic Laws without question or consideration of their validity within their modern situation. Lilah decides to leave with the Outcast Women and become their leader, in hopes of a better future for them all.
One of my major pet peeves in the novel is the fate of the Outcast Women; I found it ironic that Ezra would condone the expelling of these women when some of the most prominent Biblical Patriarchs (Abraham, Joseph, Moses, Boaz to name a few) married non-Jewish women! The big theme that I inferred from this trilogy was that women like Sarah and Zipporah proved that being Jewish is NOT about being born into the religion but making a conscious effort to be an active and constructive member of the community. The trilogy showed over and over how different groups of people joined Abraham and Moses and were welcomed with open arms. I kept hoping a consolation would occur, that Ezra would have the foreign women and their children fully convert to Judaism and abide by the Mosaic Law. But unfortunately, that was not the case. I did enjoy the ending; sanctimonious Ezra thought he would go to bury his sister, a fallen forgotten woman. Instead, he was shocked at the celebration in honor of her. Ezra saw her as just a pariah; others saw her as a leader for the downtrodden.
I also saw heavy parallels to the current sociopolitical situation in Israel, wherein the Conservative/Orthodox Israeli factions (Ezra and the Zealots) and the more secular progressive/moderate Jews and Arabs (Lilah and Outcasts) are in constant conflict as to who the land truly belongs to. Can there be true equity between these two very different groups and does religion matter so much in a national identity when you do not live in a Theocracy?