Seeing anything less than a four star on an indie author's novel (especially an author whose works I tend to adore) breaks my heart. But I pride myself on honesty. This had its moments, most of which involved the character Sorrow (her struggles deserved more than being the tail end of a series), while Envy and his motivations were more akin to pride; his jealousy was mostly surface/aesthetic level, rather than embodying a true envious nature. As with most of my three stars, here are the lists:
-Pros/Interesting
*Pointing out all the couples are walking romance novel cliches: Forbidden love= Love/Andrew, Unrequited love=Anger/Merry, Second chance=Malice/Wonder, and last but not least, Hate to love=Sorrow/Envy
*Sorrow's internal conflict: she cuts herself after causing humans (and Wonder) sorrow or sadness, signifying her guilt for what she is; Sorrow really drew the short stick, imagine watching your friends bask in the joys of love and happiness, while you're stuck lamenting on suffering
*The phrase "What's your pleasure?" Have they summoned Pinhead?
*Mention of their love being a consensual team up of pleasure and pain (Envy and Sorrow) brought to mind the personification of BDSM. And, don't laugh, whoever you are who stumbles upon this review, but also a Power Rangers battle.... I apologize... I'll show myself out.
*"Call me a selfish myth" Roll credits!
*The writing style changes, depending on the characteristics of the love interests; this is very rough/action packed, and not just because of the battle of outcast deities vs. fate court
*Questioning whether the characters falling in love is hypocritical: they're fighting for free will, while letting a predestined prophecy define their infatuation
*The word "carved" describing Sorrow's cutting brings to mind a butcher to a meat block. Strangely powerful
*Sorrow selling them to the Court to lessen the pain she knows they'll make her inflict upon her friends broke my heart; either way she can't win, and she's got the most to lose
Cons/Huh?
*Lots of retreading from the last two books and their love stories. Hopefully this isn't your first go round in a four book series
*Envy and Sorrow were the least fleshed out in the last three novels, only gaining a snarky line or two towards the end of Tempt. Not to mention, they're emotions aren't the easiest to digest.
*Repetition of the phrase pleasure and pain. We got it and enjoyed it the first time, five times is (two of which were two pages apart) is hammy
*Tons of the same PHI 101 rhetoric
* Hold your tomatoes, but... Envy and Sorrow's bickering and sexual tension got a bit old. The cringe hurt so much (even the back blurb), I began to think this was actually a parody of urban fantasy cliches. I was ready to DNF at 150 pages because that's all we'd gotten so far: rehashing PHI arguments and just plain arguing. This may have cured me of my "hate to love" adoration
*Elements of this novel felt uncomfortably familiar... the two main love interests end up adrift from their goal/comrades, sequestered away in a water land/lagoon one of them practically grew up in. And through this time, they grow closer, opening up/learning to love. Umm... Dare, is that you? Also, the main cynical love interest wandering past the rooms of the other lovers, describing what they're engaging in is definitely copy/paste Dream. Last but not least, Sorrow (to me anyway), was a morose Aire, while Envy is a less inhibited/raunchy Aspen from Lie, which might be my least favorite Natalia Jaster book. So, was she ripping off her own works?
*I was more invested in the side characters (AKA, the MC's of the previous books), because they were fleshed out through tidbits before their novels were published. But all we got for Envy and Sorrow before this was they'd slept together and bickered a lot. And while we did eventually find out their backstories, it was info dumped more than halfway through. The impact of their love wasn't as great. At least for me.
Judging by the overall rating, I'm aware I'm in the minority. If you enjoyed this book, go you. Don't spit on someone's opinion either way. But now I'm not sure I want to go through another quartet by this author...