Twenty one years after the brutal murders of three eight year old Cub Scouts in West Memphis, Arkansas, there seem to still be more questions than there are answers. We have gone all the way back to the beginning and looked through years worth of evidence. What we have found may truly shock you. Sifting between truth and lies, rumors and reality, and taking quite an emotional roller coaster ride, we have put together a book that strives to present nothing but the cold hard facts of what truly took place on the night of May 5, 1993 in Robin Hood Hills to Steven Branch, Michael Moore and Christopher Byers.Everything you think you know about this case is about to be turned upside down. The time has come to find out who truly is “The West Memphis Boogeyman”.
I thought I had read the worst book on the West Memphis Three murder case, but I was wrong. Well I don't know. I have read a lot of really bad books concerning this case. This one doesn't deserve a single star either but that one star looks defining so I am leaving it. I think this is the last book on the case that I haven't read, so at least I can be thankful. There were some tidbits, but nothing I didn't already know. BAD BOOK. BAD WRITING. If I am correct, plagiarism too.
Very good read .at the end i belive them boys didnt do it i dont believe kids that age could do them thing to small children but i couldnt understand why the three boys were so cool about being accused of the crime and why did one of them admit to it when quite clearly had nothing to do with it i was frustrated with the ending mainly because nobody still has been caught for a terrible crime .im sure if it was in england they would have those guilty locked up by now it makes me think there is something underlying in this case look forward to a follow up on this book
This book is literally copy and paste from online articles. And still it's lousy with spelling errors, such as "satin worshipers". They actually copy/paste the same several paragraphs more than once in a couple instances, and have the same pictures printed three or four times.
I like to read different accounts from different perspectives, and this had some interesting points in it, but it also included a lot of repetition and seemed to be written in the dialogue of Arkansas. With random formatting changes and jumbled sentence structure, it could have benefitted from proof reading.