I bought this because it was inexpensive and I was curious about the author having read reviews of his 'Atom Heart John Beloved' which was a Rainbow Award winner. It is not a bad story, but it is an insubstantial story. There is sex, but not much else, maybe most young men now, or maybe always, communicated on the barely literate level of 'Dude you wanna fuck?' but it is not what I remember. I don't say the erotic rituals of my youth were more successful only that they were drawn out. I wouldn't say that we were any less obsessed with the physical only that one of the wonders of, not sex, but sexual desire, was that it didn't only involve wrestlers with flat tummies and toned bodies.
This story, and probably most? all? of Mr. Hartwell's oeuvre is aimed at a YA audience of which I am far from belonging. It is erotic and honest about desire and what young men (well any men but I suspect Mr. Hartwell's stories only involve the young) do with their bodies and what they think about when they are not doing it. But men, even teenagers, as much as they enjoy, and often as they enjoy, le petit mort do not think only of it or its liquid consequences. From the reviews and comments on other of Mr. Hartwell's works it appears the mention and description of 'emissions' (as they were so quaintly referred to in my youth) is a regular feature of his stories and novels. This appears to surprise, disgust and even enrage some reviewers. I am just amazed that anyone finds it worth commenting on. For goodness sakes Aleister Crowley published 'White Stains' in 1898, Jean Cocteau's 'White Paper' was available in English since the 1950s and since the 1990s there have been many Japanese Anime 'boy love' stories in English - spunk, ejeculate, cum, jizz, splooge, love juice or whatever non de plume is used is nothing new.
There is almost something charming in the idea that the young can be so fastidious about the mention of something so commonplace.
As for this story - Micheal is enjoyable but about as interesting as a bubble and has the depth of a puddle. Bubbles, and puddles, can be attractive, but they are neither substantial nor deep. Sex is only really interesting when it is about more then sex - I don't mean it has to a Romeo & Julio love story but even nameless, anonymous sex is about more then sex. I give this a very charitable three stars and have removed all of Mr. Hartwell's works from my TBR list.