Snowstorms & Schnapps by Sydney Marsh is a contemporary forced-proximity novella told in first-person single POV. The story follows Caroline Mitchell, a Denver businesswoman, who rents a cabin in the mountains for some R&R and gets snowed-in with the owner’s nephew.
When I accepted this ARC, I wanted to be supportive; that’s why I read ARCs. I wanted to love it, and I went in expecting that I would, but the final product was disappointing. My issue isn’t that AI was used (I knew that from the start and support authors using any tool at their disposal) but that the result wasn’t up to par. Knowing the experience of the authors behind this pen name, I expected more, at the very least a thorough edit to ensure the prose made sense.
Instead, the text felt largely untouched, filled with meaningless metaphors and similes—word salad that added nothing to the story. As an avid romance reader, I was hoping for something comparable to other titles in the genre, but this fell short. If an AI-written or AI-cowritten book can’t match the quality of human-written work, what’s the point?
These were the main issues:
- Nonsensical metaphors/similes throughout that were grammatically correct but meaningless.
- Punctuation problems, specifically awkwardly placed em dashes and excessive, misplaced ellipses.
- Inconsistent text formatting. Italics for internal thoughts was used sporadically, creating verb tense issues when not used, and there was occasional bold text with no clear purpose.
- Incorrect story arc formatting. The “epilogue” was actually the final chapter of the romance arc, not a true epilogue. It should have simply been called “Chapter 12.”
- A lot of awkward phrasing, and a few consistency errors.
All these things kept me from truly connecting with the characters and investing in their story. I had high hopes for it, but I wasn’t expecting a masterpiece. It’s a snowed-in mountain-man novella, after all. So all I was expecting was something light, fluffy, and fun that I could lose myself in for a couple hours.
While the premise had potential, the execution just didn’t match the quality of comparable romances on the market. A stronger human edit could have made all the difference. The authors are not novices, so I’m baffled these basics weren’t addressed. I don’t enjoy leaving critical reviews, but my support doesn't come at the expense of my honesty. I really hope future books receive stronger editing and meet a higher standard.
*** I voluntarily read and reviewed an ARC. ***