Honestly, I’m surprised at how highly this book is rated, because up there with the greats of the Expanded Universe it is not. After reading a friend’s review, I have to wonder if the book garners praise because people are comparing it against the animated film which it is the novelisation of, and finding Karen Traviss’ retelling to improve what seems to have been a very widely panned film.
As someone who has never seen any of the Clone Wars animated material (didn’t have access to it when it aired, and just never felt compelled later to seek it out), I may be coming at this from a different angle. I will admit that I can see how Traviss has upgraded the source material, and I can tell this because the dialogue is often execrable, but the inner thoughts and motivations of the characters are much more plausible and interesting – obviously the dialogue is what Traviss was saddled with, while the inner monologues are what she brings to the table. So even without viewing the film, I strongly suspect that this book is indeed a better version.
Unfortunately, that is not enough. The source material shines through in the extremely episodic feel of the book. It starts by telling us that Jabba’s son has been kidnapped and Jedi will be sent to track him down, but then we dawdle around for a third of the book on some planet that we haven’t been given a reason to care about, instead of pursuing what is supposed to be the main plot. The fact that the film is cobbled together from a few episodes of a series sticks out like a sore thumb, and a coherent story would never do this.
Another major problem is that it doesn’t make sense within the universe, contradicting previously established lore. The Expanded Universe developed a detailed timeline of the Clone Wars through a whole range of books set between Episode II and Episode III, in which Anakin Skywalker was Knighted shortly before Episode III. But since he can’t have a Padawan unless he’s a Knight, and the animated series wanted them to go on lots of adventures together, it put his Knighting right at the start of the war. This then prompted a massive rejigging of the order in which fans were told to read the books – an order which still didn’t make sense because books that we were now told should come early on referred to events in books which we were now told came after them. Essentially the entire narrative coherency of this slice of time in the story was completely messed up, and honestly it would have been better to keep the book order as it was and market the animated series as a kind of spin-off. I’ve never really understood why, even now, the animated series is deemed to take precedence, as I would have thought that adult targeted books would be higher in the order of canon than a cartoon series for children.
But it’s not just this – other aspects of this story mess with the lore too. It doesn’t make sense to me why the Republic needs access to Hutt space’s hyperspace lanes. In the Star Wars universe, hyperspace is a different space – you can pass through hundreds of star systems; you’ll just emerge on the other side. The only consideration is the necessity to plot routes to avoid large gravity wells such as stars and planets, and there are some starships which serve as interdictors but they can’t target ships individually, they just set up along a well-known route and see what they can catch by casting an unexpected gravity well. So why does the Republic need access to hyperspace lanes through Hutt space when they can just go through it anyway? The thing is, this could have easily been explained away as their maps on the region being poor and outdated and only the Hutts having access to detailed current information for safe routes… but this is never done.
I was also baffled as to why Jabba was in male form despite having just had a baby – his parents’ sibling, Jiliac, remained in female form for some time after the birth of her Hutt infant, suggesting that when Hutts transition to female in order to reproduce they remain female for some time in order to sustain the infant. This is well documented in A. C. Crispin’s The Hutt Gambit, where we learn that Hutt babies spend most of their time in their mother’s pouch (which seems to exist only in female form). Anakin refers to Ahsoka being too young to be a Padawan, at age 14, but Jude Watson’s series following a young Obi-Wan Kenobi firmly established that if a child hadn’t been chosen as a Padawan before turning 13, they were washed out and turned their Force talents elsewhere, such as the AgriCorps.
There was also a fair bit of just plain silliness. I seriously doubt Palpatine would speak one on one with Jabba. That seems like a job for teams of ambassadors and diplomats, or at least the equivalent of a Foreign Minister.
Ahsoka Tano is so very annoying – she has some of the most cringe-worthy dialogue in the whole story – and verging on Mary Sueism. Warps canon to fit her in? Check. Develops a close relationship with one of the major existing characters? Check. It’s borderline. I find it pretty unbelievable that Anakin would be Knighted at the start of the war in any case, let alone given a Padawan straight away.
Even if you find all this totally credible, having to read through Ahsoka calling Anakin “Skyguy”, and the utterly inexplicable decision to name an antagonist “Whorm Loathsom” is enough to make me want to toss this book on the fire. Yes, I know it’s been done before – Elan Sleazebaggano and General Grievous come to mind. That is no excuse to saddle the Star Wars universe with yet another atrocious example of utterly lazy naming practice. Seriously, the lack of effort makes me angry. Most authors in the Expanded Universe at least tried to make non-silly sci fi names, but it seems when it came to the prequel era and a visual medium, everyone just phoned it in.
2 out of 10