This is one of those times I regret taking on an advance review copy. As an ARC reader, I take seriously the commitment to give an honest assessment for future readers, for the author, and for my own integrity.
But this one simply didn’t work for me.
The characters had seeds of interesting backstories, and the central idea *could* have been compelling. But the book handwaves the genesis of its core technology, asking readers to focus only on its use. And the story that arises from that use frustrated me with its simplistic and unrealistic solutions to inherently paradoxical problems. Other authors in my recent reviews have handled similarly outlandish inventions with stronger foundations and more convincing stories.
Worse, the consequences and downstream story built around the technology felt implausible and too neatly resolved. The premise is the sort of thing that demands a bolder, stranger, more committed direction; something closer to the way Philip K. Dick’s followed an idea into uncomfortable, unpredictable and even unhappy territory. Instead, this narrative pulls back toward a tidy ending, and the result is unsatisfying.
I don’t enjoy leaving a two-star review, especially for an ARC. But honesty is the whole point of early reviews, and this one falls into my 2-star rule: “Two stars when it’s so bad that it makes you laugh, or sigh, and want to write a review, but you dislike it so much that you feel bad bout doing so.”
I received an advance review copy for free, and I am leaving this review voluntarily.