One of the New Yorker's "Best Books of 2026 So Far" How the rise of Wall Street in the 1980s lured a generation of young upstarts to New York, unleashing a political and cultural transformation whose national repercussions are still felt today.
Yuppies may have been a classic 1980s stereotype, but they were also a very real a wave of hundreds of thousands of highly educated young professionals that washed over New York during that decade. As Wall Street moved to the center of American life, it drew a generation of young people into its vortex. For the first time, banks recruited roughly one-third of graduating classes from top universities.
America’s economy had a new main character. Young bankers extracted profits from waning industries, shattering the foundations on which stable middle-class employment had long rested. Yuppie lawyers devised deals and tax strategies that eroded workers’ power and wages. As consumers, yuppies created new cultures of fitness and of excess, popularizing marathon running and fine dining as status markers. As city-dwellers, they were pioneers of gentrification. And as voters and political donors, yuppies engineered a takeover of local and national government, using their wealth to back candidates who would remake the country in their image.
Yuppies reminds us that we still live in the shadow of the greed-is-good 1980 Our cities are playgrounds for the wealthy, and Wall Street and Washington remain locked in a tight embrace. Dylan Gottlieb’s exquisite recounting leaves no doubt that the yuppie takeover of New York began a more unequal chapter in American life―one we continue writing today.
I was excited to read this after I picked it up after reading the author’s NYT opinion article. The piece in NYT is very good, and for anyone considering reading the book I would strongly encourage them to skip it and read the article instead. I say that because there is not much more content to the book than the short article.
I will say the book has a lot of interesting insights into the yuppies and the cultural and political milieu they came up in. But these come so infrequently through the slog of repeated points, high school essay droning paragraph structure, and quotes and examples that stand in the place of any useful analysis or insight.
A bit boring, too long, but overall a good book. Could have been an article (it was).
I am the proto consumer, as described by a dear friend. Whether as a result of my parents love manifesting itself in material goods or my exposure to American Pyscho at an impressionnable age is still TBD. As I prepare to make the same journey as many before me (transplanting myself in NYC), I figured it was only fitting to read Yuppies.
Through the discourse of the pipelines into Law and Finance, the change in restaurant culture and taste, and even real estate shifts - I saw much of myself. I thought the book was incredibly well researched, with great references and anecdotes throughout. I appreciated the seperation of chapter by category rather than purely chronological, as it better contextualized how each element built on eachother: starting from career shifts, to real estate, to consumer demand, to politics.
At times, I do believe the book could’ve accomplished it’s goal by being a bit more concise. Midway through, I felt that the book just kept mentioning anecdotes that did not do much to move the needle in terms of information or narrative.
Overall, really interesting to understand how NYC has changed since, and how much of that change has spilt over to other sides of the U.S.
Learned a lot about how this city became what it is today, the events leading up to financialization, and why I feel icky sometimes about my own self/neighborhood.
I found this book useful in several regards: first the discussion in chapter 1 about the relationship between Wall Street firms and college career services offices in channeling student labor into finance capital. This undercurrent of the relationship between universities and the creation of the yuppie class continues in the second chapter on law firms. The chapter on arson and gentrification in Hoboken, the Upper West Side, and Park Slope builds on the work of scholars like Bench Ansfield but also tells a different story than the arson wave in the Bronx, where landlord arson was motivated by the gap between rental income and insurance payouts. Here the impetus for landlords to burn down their buildings is to redevelop the property into Yuppie condos. I grew up on the Upper West Side. My family has lived there since the late 1950s/early 1960s. I found Gottlieb’s history of the violent class struggles over gentrification there fascinating. The chapter on the politics of yuppie taste, spanning Sushi, Eli Zabar’s E.A.T., and Zagat, inter alia, is insightful and useful, as is the chapter on jogging, fitness, the NYC marathon, and the Central Park Jogger case. The final chapter, on Gary Hart as the harbinger of the yuppie ascendancy in the Democratic Party, treads on more well-worn paths, but does so insightfully and comprehensively. A very useful history of the recent past.
Interesting anthropological study, very bad causal reasoning. Anthropology is probably more interesting than the author intended because the described phenomena are probably much more universal - seeking status via dining, of physical activities that bond, pressures on career choices, the mixture of pragmatic and ideological incentivizes that prompt political involvement...however, there is an incredible amount of confusing moralistic judgement / causal claims. For ex, discussion of inequality and blue vs white without discussing globalization and de-industrialization? Do you think M&As just happen because banks and law firms wanted them to happen? Do you think you can take global desire for US federal debt for granted forever? What are you even hoping for? I feel like the anthropology was interesting but I feel like mind-poisoned by the interspersed logic here
"After graduation, Flom was repeatedly rejected by New York's WASP firms. So he tried his luck at Skadden, which like almost all Jewish and mixed firms, was still quite small. Founded in 1948, the firm had only 10 lawyers in the early 1960s. But as the market for legal services grew geometrically, those firms, with their willingness to hire any talented associate, were able to scale up rapidly. In the 1970s, Jewish firms grew at double or triple the rate of New York's WASP firms. By 1980, they would account for four of the ten biggest firms in the city. This was the irony of hiring discrimination: It created a huge and diverse pool of untapped labor that enterprising firms could exploit when conditions permitted." (64)
"In the 1980s, yuppies wielded taste like a weapon, using it to cut themselves free from the dead weight of the singing middle and working classes. Good taste, in every sense, came to reflect and reinforce the inequalities that marked life in later-twentieth century America." (138)
Such a fascinating read on the financialization of the US and the cultural implications of that, which have shaped so much of culture today. The first two chapters are very tedious as they spell out the deregulation of the markets and the changes in the workforce/workplace that came out of those policy changes, but if you can make it through those it’s such an amazing summary and analysis of New York City’s rebirth in the 80s. Specifically loved the chapter about taste as a form of currency and about running the marathon as a status symbol/the way running as a hobby just turns leisure into a field for work and achievement. Fuck run clubs fr and I’ve always said that!
This book tied the threads of so many parts of my life together — feeling a bit like an outsider moving from the Midwest to the coasts, getting exposed to finance / VC / private equity / management consulting as a “king maker” career (despite producing minimal value itself), and being smack in the middle of all of it raising funds in a biotech startup environment. This book resonated with me and helped describe how we got to such an empty and dystopian place in society. 4 stars because it was a bit repetitive, but nevertheless super interesting.
I think this book does a good job tackling a somewhat porous social, economic, and political group: yuppies. Very thought provoking, the chapters on yuppies' consumption habits were the most compelling. I would read an entire book just on the NYC Marathon!
4 stars. History of Yuppies from 1970s to 2000, with Ivy League educated White young people came into Wall Street, law firms. How it change social landscape of Manhattan. their culture from Marathon, dining and entertaiment to their downfall due to Financial Crisises.
I personally felt @ by this book. At some points, the author has a vengeful spirit because he either didn’t get into law school or an investment bank. Overall, I found that the modern yuppie strives and one ups the old yuppies image but now with social media added for the modern day
Reads like a textbook, felt like I was in the classroom. The structure was wonky, going from micro and macro economics to a whole slog on marathon running.
For this topic I preferred “Triumph of the Yuppies” by Tom McGrath. Much more of a pleasant and digestible understanding of this fascinating culture.
Disappointing, mainly because of the ideologically-biased tone, blaming the Yuppie phenomenon for all shortcomings of American society. Not what you would expect from an academic scholar, neither the often contradictory arguments and frequent repetitions.
The ideas and statistics are interesting but the editing is horrible. The logic was scattered and circular which was very distracting. The repetition was the worst part. With each chapter I counted the number of pages I had left.
Enjoyable, engaging for my first trip to New York soon! Since I didn’t live through this era it’s interesting to see the roots of the current financial/business landscape and how we’ve prioritized finance. Although with AI and the decline of white collar work, maybe we’re in the era of healthcare and skilled trades rather than yuppies?
“Whatever their income level, yuppies' status always felt tenuous, since it relied on diligence and hard-won credentials rather than inherited wealth or family connections. They were haunted, in Barbara Ehrenreich's memorable phrase, by a "fear of falling." To maintain their upward momentum and ensure their privileges were transmitted to the next generation, yuppies engaged in relentless self-improvement. On the job, they continually retrained themselves, mastering emerging technologies and esoteric financial products in a shifting regulatory environment. They toiled seventy or eighty hours a week in the slim hope of making partner or managing director.” 11
A history of the Wall Street financiers, brokers, and attorneys who remade New York City, and the nation, into their own image.
Yuppies came from elite colleges (usually MBA's or law school grads, but sometimes liberal arts majors) who were drawn to New York City by elite firms, usually with the help of college career centers, earned large sums of money. New York City and landlords catered to this growing group of wealthy people; but it came at a cost.
Many Yuppies worked themselves to severe burn out and while they made big money, it cost others who lived in NYC and the surrounding areas to lose their apartments, whether through exorbitant rents, arson, or strong arm tactics.
This was a good book and I highly recommend it if you want to learn more about Yuppies.
Terribly written with poor editing, circular logic, and repetitive points, as if it were a hastily compiled senior thesis paper. The reader learns close to nothing about the people the author proclaims to write about, and instead dedicates the pages to demonizing them as generalizations, and the malaise they intentionally or unintentionally inflicted upon the marginalized members of society. The only problem with such a broad generalization of the demographic that it becomes impossible to understand who marginalizes or harms what... Complete with statistics that only an academic grading committee would value, for anyone curious to learn about the people who made up this demographic group, I would suggest looking elsewhere.
gatsby...radical chic...yuppies...if it's about rich ppl in nyc i will always read it. but this was truly fantastic. such a comprehensive view of yuppie culture: its social and economic causes as well as its effects on the economy, the housing market, politics, and american culture. the idea of yuppies as a group driven by the "liberalizing" idea of meritocracy following the civil rights era and feminist movements that ended up actually harming the majority of working class and non-white americans and brought neoliberalism into the mainstream i thought was very compelling. the eighties are such an interesting period socially and i really enjoyed this glimpse into a little part of it. read this!!
1975-1990 surface history of NYC yuppies. An easy read of a social movement that led to so much. Nothing groundbreaking.
The financialization of the economy explodes demand for yuppies in NYC.
“White-shoe” law firms had been based on connections and “character” which favored the WASP class. Skadden is willing to do dirty M&A work and hire from a diverse pool. Once hired the hours are brutal and mentorship slim.
Food, cars and entire industries targeted the wealthy urban sophisticated consumer with increasing disposable income.
Running was the perfect hobby for yuppies. Running established a meritocratic ranking of winners and losers as well as a method for self improvement,”self-discipline, delayed gratification, time management, self-analysis”
Well-researched and entertaining; however, the book is betrayed by a thesis that wasn’t clearly supported by the evidence provided. I have not yet come across such a wealth of information about a group of people that has essentially defined the last ~50 years of American life. But while, yes, there certainly are ethical tensions associated with the yuppie ascendancy, the weakly-supported arson allegations and reduction in violent crime positioned as a problematic outcome seriously missed the mark among otherwise well reasoned points.
The book offers an interesting and compelling perspective that the rise of the Yuppies in the 1980s was a consequence of the financial liberalization and the stagflation of the 1970s, both of which facilitated meritocracy replacing born-and-bred elitism.
It’s often repetitive, however, and is lighter than I would’ve liked on economic and social transition, and relatively heavier on urban transition.
Loved it. Explains the world around us if you live in most coastal cities. Trying to understand, why do friends love running marathons? Szechuan cuisine? Working 100+ hour weeks? This book has the answers, and explains the textures surrounding those desires in a compelling way. The chapter on arson most harrowing and worth reckoning with, but my favorite was probably the food chapter. Just a well-written, well-researched book.
Highly readable nonfiction account of how yuppies and the finance industry that employed them, changed New York City in the late 1970s and 1980s. I especially enjoyed the chapters that focused on the Yuppie lifestyle - gourmet foods and jogging specifically.
Read the relevant to me sections, ie Big law and running, because I was curious. Interesting insight into the big law section. Sections felt a little drawn out and repetitive.