If you're not ready for the dense brilliance of The Phenomenology of Perception, this would be a good entry into Merleau-Ponty if you're familiar with and enjoy the essays of his bros Camus and Sartre. These essays are far chattier, and I'd hate to call them philosophy – they largely deal with art and culture, and the issues of the day (those are damn near useless nowadays, though, rehashing old feuds that are of minimal interest to the modern reader, maybe even in France). It was all enjoyable enough, even if it didn't captivate me the way his hardcore philosophy did.
140711: more m-p is always welcome, this selection of three main topics captures thought of the times and breadth of application of his type of phenomenology. Cezanne ‘s doubt, makes me wonder what he thought of non-realistic art, as attempts to fix the non visual, the abstract. Metaphysics in man, A scandalous author, catch the era, then The war has taken place, is a sense of how one must live in the Occupation, while the essays on Marxism, theory and communist practice versus philosophy were also of the times when leftism was being co-opted by communism...
Het Cézanne-essay is echt een hoogtepunt. Merleau-Ponty neemt daarin de schilder zelf als vertrekpunt; zijn ervaring staat centraal, niet het kunstwerk achteraf. Helemaal in lijn met de fenomenologie. Cézanne oriënteerde zich immers ook op die manier; hij probeerde de ervaring als ‘zodanig’ te vangen - nog vóór Husserls zu den Sachen selbst - als fenomenoloog avant la lettre, niet conceptueel, maar in verf en kleur. Wat echt bijzonder is. Merleau-Ponty brengt dit alles buitengewoon subtiel; hij verhoudt zich tot Cézanne zoals Cézanne zich tot de ervaring zelf; van binnenuit. Héel mooi
it was an awful experience. This is a terribly written MP; unlike most of the other work, this one is a selection of early essays among which most are non-academic as well as poorly-researched.
A pretty good collection of essays from Merleau-Ponty: they really benefit from having a background in the thinkers that are discussed, like Hegel, Marx, Heidegger, etc, but I still think there's a good nugget of wisdom to be extracted even if one is unaware. It's broken into 3 sections:
1. Aesthetics, in which he uses phenomenological philosophy as a lens in which to view art like paintings and film. This one was actually probably my favorite part, it's interesting to meditate on his thoughts as I feel like they're quite insightful.
2. Ideas, in which he discusses pretty much contemporary (for 1945) political movements, drama brewing between local essayists and their basis in Marxist theory. A little boring since it's most relevant to the French intellectuals half a century ago, but it has some tidbits to take away.
3. Politics, in which Merleau-Ponty gives his thoughts on the immediate conclusion of WW2, and this is actually a really insightful thing to read. His thoughts on the origin and future after these conflicts is fantastic, and gives some great modern quotes, such as,
"It is up to us to observe the world during these years when it begins to breathe again, once the bottom has fallen out of fascism. If the class struggle once again becomes the motivating force if history and, definitely, if the alternative of socialism or chaos becomes clearer, it is up to us to choose a proletarian socialism."
I first encountered Merleau-Ponty's thought in Sarah Bakewell's excellent primer At the Existentialist Cafe. I really liked a lot of what she highlighted and starting with this one seemed far less daunting than taking on Phenomenology of Perception. I had mixed feelings. There are some essays in here I thought were amazing ("A Scandalous Author" and especially "The War Has Taken Place") but most felt too dated or specified for me. They dealt with timely situations in a very timely way, which is no fault of Merleau-Ponty's, but it still robs the content of the timelessness that, for instance, "The War Has Taken Place" has. It's still interesting to see what people were thinking and the major debates about Marxism and existentialism in immediate post-war France, but I just found myself skimming more often than not. I'm interested in exploring some of his more explicitly philosophical work and every essay had at least a few glimmers of eternal insight I was very thankful to take in.
My exposure to Merleau-Ponty has mostly been through his most classic philosophical/phenomenological works, which are fascinating but dense. This book was an extremely fun read, then, containing some of that kind of writing/thinking and then also other examples of his political and cultural criticism, a side of him and his work that I just hadn't been exposed to. I don't know a ton about French politics, of course, but it was still incredibly interesting to read the way that his critical mind worked, and how his political thought emerged very naturally and consistently from his philosophical outlook. I can't say that I got everything I was supposed to out of some of the essays, lacking appropriate context and historical background, but I enjoyed thinking through them nonetheless.
Here we find ourselves in history, seemingly so far removed from the horrors of World War II and that terrible rise of fascism. Yet, these essays seem to resonate, somewhat eerily, with the modern age. The essays don't necessarily try to portray a unified view but rather they provide vignettes of important perspectives. Everything from the human condition to Catholicism to history to politics to faith is brought into the dialogue.
Highlights were Cezanne's Doubt, Metaphysics and the Novel, A Scandalous Author, The Battle Over Existentialism and The War Has Taken Place. Found many of the other essays in this collection to drag. Overall though Merleau-Ponty presents many of the key aspects of his philosophy in these essays that are generally about other things so it makes for an interesting read.