What do you think?
Rate this book
Ugly: A Letter to My Daughter
A tender, moving, and insightful account of queer motherhood and an interrogation of life on the margins of American culture as a self-described “ugly” woman
Ugly is a word with fangs that can kill a woman’s self-esteem in one bite. Edicts about how women should look, behave, and think are the brutal forge through which they are made — not born. And to defy the pretty imperative is to become invisible. It can be a hard thing to admit to yourself, let alone to your child— to say the words, “I am ugly,” or “I am seen as ugly.” But early on in her motherhood journey, watching her young daughter begin to wrestle with beauty standards, Stephanie Fairyington felt compelled to face her own demons, to unpack her own ugly self-perception, one that she could trace to her own childhood, in order to conquer this seemingly immoveable frontier, far too taboo even among women to broach—the ways in which women’s lives are unfairly contoured by the nature of their looks.
The multiple iterations of ugliness that Fairyington saw in her young self—her physical appearance, her unavoidably obvious queerness, and her dissonant gender expression—are not present in her beautiful and traditionally feminine daughter. But Fairyington’s old feelings of inadequacy take on new meaning as she confronts fresh insecurities around her role as the non-biological mother in her relationship, exacerbating wounds from a lifetime of being treated from the poverty of her genetic inheritance to questions about her parentage to doubts about the legitimacy of her family.
Interlacing cultural history and analysis with memoir, Ugly is a probing investigation into cultural norms and the formation of our aesthetic sense of self. Fairyington contrasts her so-called ugliness with her daughter’s attraction and adherence to beauty ideals, a tender and tenuous condition that by age seven she was already walking a tightrope to maintain. By sharing the history of her troubled self-image, Fairyington invites us to go rogue, to invent a new language and logic to overthrow all the ways that women have been cultivated to hate themselves.
Ugly is a word with fangs that can kill a woman’s self-esteem in one bite. Edicts about how women should look, behave, and think are the brutal forge through which they are made — not born. And to defy the pretty imperative is to become invisible. It can be a hard thing to admit to yourself, let alone to your child— to say the words, “I am ugly,” or “I am seen as ugly.” But early on in her motherhood journey, watching her young daughter begin to wrestle with beauty standards, Stephanie Fairyington felt compelled to face her own demons, to unpack her own ugly self-perception, one that she could trace to her own childhood, in order to conquer this seemingly immoveable frontier, far too taboo even among women to broach—the ways in which women’s lives are unfairly contoured by the nature of their looks.
The multiple iterations of ugliness that Fairyington saw in her young self—her physical appearance, her unavoidably obvious queerness, and her dissonant gender expression—are not present in her beautiful and traditionally feminine daughter. But Fairyington’s old feelings of inadequacy take on new meaning as she confronts fresh insecurities around her role as the non-biological mother in her relationship, exacerbating wounds from a lifetime of being treated from the poverty of her genetic inheritance to questions about her parentage to doubts about the legitimacy of her family.
Interlacing cultural history and analysis with memoir, Ugly is a probing investigation into cultural norms and the formation of our aesthetic sense of self. Fairyington contrasts her so-called ugliness with her daughter’s attraction and adherence to beauty ideals, a tender and tenuous condition that by age seven she was already walking a tightrope to maintain. By sharing the history of her troubled self-image, Fairyington invites us to go rogue, to invent a new language and logic to overthrow all the ways that women have been cultivated to hate themselves.
288 pages, Hardcover
Published May 5, 2026
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 9 of 9 reviews
May 8, 2026
At the Customs Desk of Beauty
Stephanie Fairyington’s “Ugly: A Letter to My Daughter” turns the mirror into a border, and asks what women and queer families must prove to be waved through.
By Demetris Papadimitropoulos | May 5th, 2026
Beauty, in “Ugly: A Letter to My Daughter”, is less a mirror than a customs desk. It asks for papers. Face, clothes, bloodline, claim to motherhood: all must be presented for inspection. Smile here. Soften there. Explain this family. Account for that body. Prove that you are the kind of woman, mother, daughter, or child the world knows how to wave through.
Stephanie Fairyington starts at the mirror and refuses to stay there. She is after the question prettiness was built to hide: who passes without explanation, and who must keep producing face, dress, lineage, and gender as paperwork? The title gestures toward the mirror; the book keeps leading us to the border.
Fairyington writes to her daughter from inside a private sentence she has served for decades: “I am an ugly woman.” The bluntness matters. This is not a book about reaching the last page and finding beauty waiting there with a sash. It refuses the kind of uplift that arrives already laminated. Fairyington is not asking to be entered retroactively into the ledger where prettiness becomes credit. She is asking why the ledger has such power, why women are trained to consult it so early, and why her daughter, still young, is already learning to sidestep “ugly” as if it were a crack in the sidewalk.
A bookseller could misfile the premise in three seconds: queer mother writes so daughter will not inherit her shame. But “Ugly: A Letter to My Daughter” is thornier, more exposed, and less willing to behave like a recovery script than that. Fairyington treats ugliness as a verdict issued in the body’s name. It marks faces, yes, but also genders, families, desires, clothes, kinship claims, and the authority to call oneself a mother. Her self-disgust is tangled with visible queerness, gender nonconformity, a lack of resemblance to her glamorous mother, and later, the exposed flank of being the non-biological mother in a two-mom family. This is not a mirror-book with a queer annex. It is a queer-family memoir in which the pretty economy becomes one more checkpoint where belonging is stamped or delayed.
The daughter-addressed form gives the memoir its live wire. Fairyington is not writing from the clean authority of aftermath, saying: here is what happened to me, here is the lesson, laminated for your convenience. She is writing while the old machinery is still running. Her daughter wants certain clothes, worries about looking “big,” asks about fathers, cherishes donor information, reads queer graphic novels, loves witches, and notices who counts and who does not.
The child is not just evidence for the mother’s argument; she is the one person in the book who keeps making the argument misbehave. She is funny, literal, theatrical, inconvenient. Culture does not knock. It arrives as a classroom question, a mirror glance, a book on a shelf, a father-shaped silence, a dress requested of two mothers who do not wear dresses. Fairyington’s vigilance comes from love, but the daughter’s presence keeps disturbing the cleanliness of theory. Children have terrible manners that way. They keep living.
The early chapters bite hardest when blood stops being metaphor and starts behaving like paperwork. Fairyington and her spouse, Sabrina, first imagine asking Fairyington’s brother to be their donor, an arrangement that would seem to fuse family lines and give the child a known genetic father. The idea feels like mercy until it becomes a trapdoor. Fairyington knows, as a queer person, that family is not guaranteed by blood, that kinship can be made by care, ritual, proximity, daily labor, and choice. Yet she also knows how stubbornly the world treats resemblance as a stamped permission slip. When the prospect of her handsome brother’s contribution begins to arrange Sabrina, the brother, and the future child into a triangle of resemblance, Fairyington again finds herself at the edge of the picture. The fantasy of perfect family proof smuggles the old bruise straight into the nursery.
That scene is one of the book’s clearest achievements because it refuses the comfort of its own politics. Fairyington believes in chosen kinship, in queer kinship, in families made by the long work of showing up. But belief does not abolish the ache of exclusion. It does not stop a face from looking unlike the faces beside it. It does not stop the world from asking whether love has a receipt.
A later remark in “Perceptions” lands like a tossed-off cut. Someone suggests that Sabrina should carry the baby because she is prettier. The cruelty is casual, which is part of its efficiency; it strolls in wearing indoor shoes and leaves with the silver. The comment is not merely about appearance. It becomes about fitness, reproduction, desirability, maternal authority, and whose body is imagined as worthy of beginning a child’s life. The wound is not vanity. It is ontology in bad lighting.
Here the book slips the shelf prepared for it. Fairyington has clearly absorbed the tradition of feminist beauty critique represented by “Beauty Sick” by Renee Engeln and “The Beauty Myth” by Naomi Wolf, but her own subject is too jagged for packaged uplift. It nods toward the queer family-and-theory territory of “The Argonauts” by Maggie Nelson, though Fairyington writes hotter, messier, closer to the bruise. The comps orient the reader; they do not explain the book away.
The sentences arrive under pressure, carrying memory, argument, and self-rebuke in the same breath. Fairyington favors long, accumulating lines that gather childhood humiliation, queer legal history, gender performance, shame, disgust, desire, and love without always stopping to unpack. Her diction moves from maternal intimacy to profanity to scholarly vocabulary without changing clothes. In those passages, the braided voice produces a mind arguing with its own scar tissue. The kitchen table, the schoolyard, the archive, the seminar room, and the anxious parent’s bed at 3 a.m. share the same air.
Ugliness has fangs. Girls walk tightropes. Faces are examined like specimens. Witches become ancestors of women punished for refusing the available categories. Bloodlines certify and exclude. Soap becomes a plea to be harmless. Feet, strangely and beautifully, become an emblem of exposure: the body part Fairyington wants hidden, the part love eventually touches. By the final movement, breath, light, trees, sound, and the moon press against the harsher vocabulary of ranking and judgment. The images trace the book’s escape attempt: away from inspection, toward feeling before verdict.
But the sentences also reveal what maternal vigilance costs. Fairyington’s prose can be charged and exact, but some lines arrive with their own explanatory placards. The memoir is so determined to think through every injury that it occasionally thinks over the scene. A jacket, a doll, a dress, a body-size comment, a donor question, a dark outfit – all may matter, but they can become meaningful almost before they become themselves. That is emotionally understandable. A mother who knows the trap will see tripwires everywhere. Artistically, though, the watchfulness can flatten surprise. Childhood, under this gaze, sometimes enters wearing a subpoena.
The worry becomes the structure. The book is organized without named parts: a prologue, twelve thematic chapters, then acknowledgments and notes. The chapters move through blood, difference, the invention of beauty and ugly, visible queerness, fatherhood, perception, weirdness, cleanliness, fantasy, grief, affirmation, and transcendence. It is not plot-driven. It advances by circling. A scene opens at home or school; Fairyington remembers her own formation; the book widens into cultural history, queer politics, feminist theory, law, or aesthetics; then it returns to the daughter with new urgency.
That braid suits the subject. Fairyington is writing about transmission: how meanings reproduce themselves, how shame finds the route from mother to daughter, how culture enters the home with muddy shoes and somehow never apologizes. A strictly linear memoir would make this material too tidy. The circling matters because the same hurt keeps arriving in different clothes.
Still, by the middle third, the rhythm becomes familiar.
Scene, scar, archive, daughter.
The braid tightens and sometimes chafes. The historical materials – foot binding, corsetry, high heels, witches, body disgust, school-book controversies – often illuminate the memoir, but they can also become an evidentiary line, occasionally too orderly. The verdict sometimes arrives before the witnesses. Fairyington’s range is impressive, but the book would sometimes gain force by trusting fewer examples more deeply. Not every cultural artifact needs to be cross-examined until it gives up its accomplices.
“Clean” is where the braid grips. Fairyington narrows the lens from beauty to disgust, puberty, washing, bodily estrangement, and moral judgment. The historical material around Sabella Nitti, a masculine-looking immigrant woman whose appearance shaped public perception of her guilt, does not feel imported from a research file. It clarifies Fairyington’s own compulsion to scrub, bathe, rinse, and purify, and later her anxious attempts to manage her daughter’s body and cleanliness. The chapter makes visible that “clean” is never only clean. Clean means feminine, respectable, controllable, innocent, worthy of public handling. Soap becomes theology with bubbles.
The father material is just as piercing. The daughter holds the donor profile like both comfort object and missing-person poster. Fairyington treats the child’s longing for a father, or for knowledge of the donor, with a seriousness many books would dodge with a slogan. She knows that biology is not everything, and she refuses the easy comfort that it is nothing. The daughter’s invented stories, her attraction to father-centered narratives like “The Parent Trap”, and her curiosity about donor siblings all complicate the family’s cherished truths. Fairyington and Sabrina’s love is not in question. But the world has taught the child a family grammar in which a father’s absence still appears as a missing word. The courage is in letting that absence ache without letting it become the family’s final name.
The present enters through smaller doors: a school shelf, a graphic novel, a child asking whether her family is safe outside the apartment. “Ugly: A Letter to My Daughter” speaks directly to girls’ early self-surveillance, LGBTQ representation in children’s books and schools, and the fragile cultural standing of queer families. Fairyington does not need to wave a headline in the aisle. Politics does not sit behind the memoir; it gets into the room through the child’s bookshelf.
Fairyington’s sharpest recognition is that ugliness and legitimacy use the same grammar of admission and refusal. The same ranking impulse that polices beauty also polices gender presentation, biological family, motherhood, and whether a non-biological parent is treated as fully real. “Ugly” becomes the name for what fails the dominant test of coherence: the unruly woman, the unreadable body, the queer mother asked to clarify her relation to the child she is already raising, the girl entering the world’s sorting machine before she can fully argue with it.
Fairyington’s refusal of easy affirmation is one of the book’s bracing gifts. She does not soothe the reader with the refrigerator-magnet mercy that everyone is beautiful in her own way. She knows how often that line simply keeps beauty in power while changing the seating chart. Instead, she asks whether a woman might deserve fullness, love, authority, and joy without being translated into beauty first. It has no patience for empowerment that still asks whether the lighting is flattering.
Yet its suspicion of the pretty economy can harden too quickly. Fairyington is right to distrust the idea that every aesthetic choice becomes liberation because a woman made it. Still, the memoir is so alert to coercion that pleasure has trouble entering without a security screening. Style, adornment, dolls, makeup, girlhood performance, and pretty things can be instruments of discipline; they can also be play, theater, language, drag, experiment, delight, nonsense. Fairyington knows this in flashes. Her affection for weirdness, witches, music, and queer flamboyance proves it. But the argumentative current often pulls toward suspicion. The book is strongest when contradiction is allowed to stay in the room, muddy shoes and all.
In “Transcendence,” Fairyington goes looking for air after the house has filled with mirrors, verdicts, and paperwork. After so much dissection – beauty, law, gender, family, shame, cleanliness, representation – she reaches for a register beyond social meaning. Pandemic anxiety, depression, breath, light, trees, music, and spiritual attention enter the book not as a cure but as a loosening. The final pressure is no longer only how to survive ugliness, but how to survive the human reflex of making labels feel like fate.
The turn moves because it knows its limits: transcendence opens a window; it does not smuggle anyone out. It does not fully free the memoir from the categories it has spent so many pages anatomizing. Fairyington cannot hand her daughter a clean exit from culture. No parent can. The most she can offer is a more truthful map: the dangerous roads marked, the false exits crossed out.
I would rate “Ugly: A Letter to My Daughter” 84/100, which corresponds to 4/5 stars. It is a book with teeth, bruises, and a little too much evidence in its pockets. Its finest pages do not stop looking when the flinch arrives; its weaker ones explain, repeat, or make the child carry too much of the mother’s dread. But even that flaw belongs to the book’s deepest ache. This is a memoir about trying to stop harm from becoming hereditary, and anyone who has tried to protect a child from a world they themselves did not escape will recognize the impossible arithmetic.
Fairyington does not end by making ugliness disappear. She does something harder to sell and harder to shake. She leaves beauty standing there, overdressed and officious, still checking names at the door. Then she turns toward the daughter, the mother, the strange family, the hidden foot, the witch child, the breath, the moonlit room – and lets love walk past without showing papers.
Stephanie Fairyington’s “Ugly: A Letter to My Daughter” turns the mirror into a border, and asks what women and queer families must prove to be waved through.
By Demetris Papadimitropoulos | May 5th, 2026
Beauty, in “Ugly: A Letter to My Daughter”, is less a mirror than a customs desk. It asks for papers. Face, clothes, bloodline, claim to motherhood: all must be presented for inspection. Smile here. Soften there. Explain this family. Account for that body. Prove that you are the kind of woman, mother, daughter, or child the world knows how to wave through.
Stephanie Fairyington starts at the mirror and refuses to stay there. She is after the question prettiness was built to hide: who passes without explanation, and who must keep producing face, dress, lineage, and gender as paperwork? The title gestures toward the mirror; the book keeps leading us to the border.
Fairyington writes to her daughter from inside a private sentence she has served for decades: “I am an ugly woman.” The bluntness matters. This is not a book about reaching the last page and finding beauty waiting there with a sash. It refuses the kind of uplift that arrives already laminated. Fairyington is not asking to be entered retroactively into the ledger where prettiness becomes credit. She is asking why the ledger has such power, why women are trained to consult it so early, and why her daughter, still young, is already learning to sidestep “ugly” as if it were a crack in the sidewalk.
A bookseller could misfile the premise in three seconds: queer mother writes so daughter will not inherit her shame. But “Ugly: A Letter to My Daughter” is thornier, more exposed, and less willing to behave like a recovery script than that. Fairyington treats ugliness as a verdict issued in the body’s name. It marks faces, yes, but also genders, families, desires, clothes, kinship claims, and the authority to call oneself a mother. Her self-disgust is tangled with visible queerness, gender nonconformity, a lack of resemblance to her glamorous mother, and later, the exposed flank of being the non-biological mother in a two-mom family. This is not a mirror-book with a queer annex. It is a queer-family memoir in which the pretty economy becomes one more checkpoint where belonging is stamped or delayed.
The daughter-addressed form gives the memoir its live wire. Fairyington is not writing from the clean authority of aftermath, saying: here is what happened to me, here is the lesson, laminated for your convenience. She is writing while the old machinery is still running. Her daughter wants certain clothes, worries about looking “big,” asks about fathers, cherishes donor information, reads queer graphic novels, loves witches, and notices who counts and who does not.
The child is not just evidence for the mother’s argument; she is the one person in the book who keeps making the argument misbehave. She is funny, literal, theatrical, inconvenient. Culture does not knock. It arrives as a classroom question, a mirror glance, a book on a shelf, a father-shaped silence, a dress requested of two mothers who do not wear dresses. Fairyington’s vigilance comes from love, but the daughter’s presence keeps disturbing the cleanliness of theory. Children have terrible manners that way. They keep living.
The early chapters bite hardest when blood stops being metaphor and starts behaving like paperwork. Fairyington and her spouse, Sabrina, first imagine asking Fairyington’s brother to be their donor, an arrangement that would seem to fuse family lines and give the child a known genetic father. The idea feels like mercy until it becomes a trapdoor. Fairyington knows, as a queer person, that family is not guaranteed by blood, that kinship can be made by care, ritual, proximity, daily labor, and choice. Yet she also knows how stubbornly the world treats resemblance as a stamped permission slip. When the prospect of her handsome brother’s contribution begins to arrange Sabrina, the brother, and the future child into a triangle of resemblance, Fairyington again finds herself at the edge of the picture. The fantasy of perfect family proof smuggles the old bruise straight into the nursery.
That scene is one of the book’s clearest achievements because it refuses the comfort of its own politics. Fairyington believes in chosen kinship, in queer kinship, in families made by the long work of showing up. But belief does not abolish the ache of exclusion. It does not stop a face from looking unlike the faces beside it. It does not stop the world from asking whether love has a receipt.
A later remark in “Perceptions” lands like a tossed-off cut. Someone suggests that Sabrina should carry the baby because she is prettier. The cruelty is casual, which is part of its efficiency; it strolls in wearing indoor shoes and leaves with the silver. The comment is not merely about appearance. It becomes about fitness, reproduction, desirability, maternal authority, and whose body is imagined as worthy of beginning a child’s life. The wound is not vanity. It is ontology in bad lighting.
Here the book slips the shelf prepared for it. Fairyington has clearly absorbed the tradition of feminist beauty critique represented by “Beauty Sick” by Renee Engeln and “The Beauty Myth” by Naomi Wolf, but her own subject is too jagged for packaged uplift. It nods toward the queer family-and-theory territory of “The Argonauts” by Maggie Nelson, though Fairyington writes hotter, messier, closer to the bruise. The comps orient the reader; they do not explain the book away.
The sentences arrive under pressure, carrying memory, argument, and self-rebuke in the same breath. Fairyington favors long, accumulating lines that gather childhood humiliation, queer legal history, gender performance, shame, disgust, desire, and love without always stopping to unpack. Her diction moves from maternal intimacy to profanity to scholarly vocabulary without changing clothes. In those passages, the braided voice produces a mind arguing with its own scar tissue. The kitchen table, the schoolyard, the archive, the seminar room, and the anxious parent’s bed at 3 a.m. share the same air.
Ugliness has fangs. Girls walk tightropes. Faces are examined like specimens. Witches become ancestors of women punished for refusing the available categories. Bloodlines certify and exclude. Soap becomes a plea to be harmless. Feet, strangely and beautifully, become an emblem of exposure: the body part Fairyington wants hidden, the part love eventually touches. By the final movement, breath, light, trees, sound, and the moon press against the harsher vocabulary of ranking and judgment. The images trace the book’s escape attempt: away from inspection, toward feeling before verdict.
But the sentences also reveal what maternal vigilance costs. Fairyington’s prose can be charged and exact, but some lines arrive with their own explanatory placards. The memoir is so determined to think through every injury that it occasionally thinks over the scene. A jacket, a doll, a dress, a body-size comment, a donor question, a dark outfit – all may matter, but they can become meaningful almost before they become themselves. That is emotionally understandable. A mother who knows the trap will see tripwires everywhere. Artistically, though, the watchfulness can flatten surprise. Childhood, under this gaze, sometimes enters wearing a subpoena.
The worry becomes the structure. The book is organized without named parts: a prologue, twelve thematic chapters, then acknowledgments and notes. The chapters move through blood, difference, the invention of beauty and ugly, visible queerness, fatherhood, perception, weirdness, cleanliness, fantasy, grief, affirmation, and transcendence. It is not plot-driven. It advances by circling. A scene opens at home or school; Fairyington remembers her own formation; the book widens into cultural history, queer politics, feminist theory, law, or aesthetics; then it returns to the daughter with new urgency.
That braid suits the subject. Fairyington is writing about transmission: how meanings reproduce themselves, how shame finds the route from mother to daughter, how culture enters the home with muddy shoes and somehow never apologizes. A strictly linear memoir would make this material too tidy. The circling matters because the same hurt keeps arriving in different clothes.
Still, by the middle third, the rhythm becomes familiar.
Scene, scar, archive, daughter.
The braid tightens and sometimes chafes. The historical materials – foot binding, corsetry, high heels, witches, body disgust, school-book controversies – often illuminate the memoir, but they can also become an evidentiary line, occasionally too orderly. The verdict sometimes arrives before the witnesses. Fairyington’s range is impressive, but the book would sometimes gain force by trusting fewer examples more deeply. Not every cultural artifact needs to be cross-examined until it gives up its accomplices.
“Clean” is where the braid grips. Fairyington narrows the lens from beauty to disgust, puberty, washing, bodily estrangement, and moral judgment. The historical material around Sabella Nitti, a masculine-looking immigrant woman whose appearance shaped public perception of her guilt, does not feel imported from a research file. It clarifies Fairyington’s own compulsion to scrub, bathe, rinse, and purify, and later her anxious attempts to manage her daughter’s body and cleanliness. The chapter makes visible that “clean” is never only clean. Clean means feminine, respectable, controllable, innocent, worthy of public handling. Soap becomes theology with bubbles.
The father material is just as piercing. The daughter holds the donor profile like both comfort object and missing-person poster. Fairyington treats the child’s longing for a father, or for knowledge of the donor, with a seriousness many books would dodge with a slogan. She knows that biology is not everything, and she refuses the easy comfort that it is nothing. The daughter’s invented stories, her attraction to father-centered narratives like “The Parent Trap”, and her curiosity about donor siblings all complicate the family’s cherished truths. Fairyington and Sabrina’s love is not in question. But the world has taught the child a family grammar in which a father’s absence still appears as a missing word. The courage is in letting that absence ache without letting it become the family’s final name.
The present enters through smaller doors: a school shelf, a graphic novel, a child asking whether her family is safe outside the apartment. “Ugly: A Letter to My Daughter” speaks directly to girls’ early self-surveillance, LGBTQ representation in children’s books and schools, and the fragile cultural standing of queer families. Fairyington does not need to wave a headline in the aisle. Politics does not sit behind the memoir; it gets into the room through the child’s bookshelf.
Fairyington’s sharpest recognition is that ugliness and legitimacy use the same grammar of admission and refusal. The same ranking impulse that polices beauty also polices gender presentation, biological family, motherhood, and whether a non-biological parent is treated as fully real. “Ugly” becomes the name for what fails the dominant test of coherence: the unruly woman, the unreadable body, the queer mother asked to clarify her relation to the child she is already raising, the girl entering the world’s sorting machine before she can fully argue with it.
Fairyington’s refusal of easy affirmation is one of the book’s bracing gifts. She does not soothe the reader with the refrigerator-magnet mercy that everyone is beautiful in her own way. She knows how often that line simply keeps beauty in power while changing the seating chart. Instead, she asks whether a woman might deserve fullness, love, authority, and joy without being translated into beauty first. It has no patience for empowerment that still asks whether the lighting is flattering.
Yet its suspicion of the pretty economy can harden too quickly. Fairyington is right to distrust the idea that every aesthetic choice becomes liberation because a woman made it. Still, the memoir is so alert to coercion that pleasure has trouble entering without a security screening. Style, adornment, dolls, makeup, girlhood performance, and pretty things can be instruments of discipline; they can also be play, theater, language, drag, experiment, delight, nonsense. Fairyington knows this in flashes. Her affection for weirdness, witches, music, and queer flamboyance proves it. But the argumentative current often pulls toward suspicion. The book is strongest when contradiction is allowed to stay in the room, muddy shoes and all.
In “Transcendence,” Fairyington goes looking for air after the house has filled with mirrors, verdicts, and paperwork. After so much dissection – beauty, law, gender, family, shame, cleanliness, representation – she reaches for a register beyond social meaning. Pandemic anxiety, depression, breath, light, trees, music, and spiritual attention enter the book not as a cure but as a loosening. The final pressure is no longer only how to survive ugliness, but how to survive the human reflex of making labels feel like fate.
The turn moves because it knows its limits: transcendence opens a window; it does not smuggle anyone out. It does not fully free the memoir from the categories it has spent so many pages anatomizing. Fairyington cannot hand her daughter a clean exit from culture. No parent can. The most she can offer is a more truthful map: the dangerous roads marked, the false exits crossed out.
I would rate “Ugly: A Letter to My Daughter” 84/100, which corresponds to 4/5 stars. It is a book with teeth, bruises, and a little too much evidence in its pockets. Its finest pages do not stop looking when the flinch arrives; its weaker ones explain, repeat, or make the child carry too much of the mother’s dread. But even that flaw belongs to the book’s deepest ache. This is a memoir about trying to stop harm from becoming hereditary, and anyone who has tried to protect a child from a world they themselves did not escape will recognize the impossible arithmetic.
Fairyington does not end by making ugliness disappear. She does something harder to sell and harder to shake. She leaves beauty standing there, overdressed and officious, still checking names at the door. Then she turns toward the daughter, the mother, the strange family, the hidden foot, the witch child, the breath, the moonlit room – and lets love walk past without showing papers.
May 5, 2026
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Thank you to NetGalley and Pantheon for the eBook as well as the physical copy!
📝 Short Summary
This is a deeply honest and emotional memoir that explores identity, beauty standards, and motherhood through the lens of a woman who has lived on the margins. It blends personal experience with cultural reflection, creating a powerful conversation about how we see ourselves and how that shapes the next generation.
Review
This book really stayed with me. It’s one of those reads that feels personal from the very first page, and the honesty in it is what makes it so powerful. Stephanie Fairyington doesn’t hold back when talking about her experiences, her self-perception, and the way the world has shaped how she sees herself. That level of vulnerability made this feel incredibly real and important.
What I loved most is how this isn’t just a memoir, it’s also a conversation. It dives into beauty standards, identity, and what it means to grow up feeling different, but it also brings it into motherhood in such a meaningful way. Watching her reflect on her own experiences while raising her daughter added so much depth. It’s emotional without feeling overwhelming, and thoughtful without ever feeling distant.
There’s something about the way this is written that makes you stop and think about your own experiences, your own beliefs, and even the things you may not have questioned before. It’s not just about being labeled “ugly,” it’s about how those labels shape confidence, identity, and how we move through the world.
I also really appreciated how layered this felt. It wasn’t just one perspective or one moment in time. It explored different stages of her life, different insecurities, and how those feelings evolved. It made the entire story feel complete and grounded.
This is one of those books that feels important to pass on. I will absolutely be gifting this to my daughter because it opens up conversations that matter, especially around self-worth and how we define ourselves beyond what the world expects.
✅ Would I Recommend It?
Yes, I think everyone should read this. It’s honest, emotional, and incredibly important, especially for anyone navigating identity, self-worth, or motherhood.
Thank you to NetGalley and Pantheon for the eBook as well as the physical copy!
📝 Short Summary
This is a deeply honest and emotional memoir that explores identity, beauty standards, and motherhood through the lens of a woman who has lived on the margins. It blends personal experience with cultural reflection, creating a powerful conversation about how we see ourselves and how that shapes the next generation.
Review
This book really stayed with me. It’s one of those reads that feels personal from the very first page, and the honesty in it is what makes it so powerful. Stephanie Fairyington doesn’t hold back when talking about her experiences, her self-perception, and the way the world has shaped how she sees herself. That level of vulnerability made this feel incredibly real and important.
What I loved most is how this isn’t just a memoir, it’s also a conversation. It dives into beauty standards, identity, and what it means to grow up feeling different, but it also brings it into motherhood in such a meaningful way. Watching her reflect on her own experiences while raising her daughter added so much depth. It’s emotional without feeling overwhelming, and thoughtful without ever feeling distant.
There’s something about the way this is written that makes you stop and think about your own experiences, your own beliefs, and even the things you may not have questioned before. It’s not just about being labeled “ugly,” it’s about how those labels shape confidence, identity, and how we move through the world.
I also really appreciated how layered this felt. It wasn’t just one perspective or one moment in time. It explored different stages of her life, different insecurities, and how those feelings evolved. It made the entire story feel complete and grounded.
This is one of those books that feels important to pass on. I will absolutely be gifting this to my daughter because it opens up conversations that matter, especially around self-worth and how we define ourselves beyond what the world expects.
✅ Would I Recommend It?
Yes, I think everyone should read this. It’s honest, emotional, and incredibly important, especially for anyone navigating identity, self-worth, or motherhood.
May 18, 2026
ugh i just got into an argument with my mom bc she doesn’t want me espousing anti-nuclear family to my baby sister. god forbid i reflect on my thoughts about a book.
been feeling very gay. kind of had a devastating situationship. also been rethinking my gender presentation. i kind of just needed to contextualize my thoughts in terms of what an older and wiser queer mentor might say.
i was really struck by the analysis that connection is not just achieved through biological ties. i grew up with parents that emphasized our “pioneer blood,” how the people in our home would drop anything for you and you should drop everything for them. realizing i can build community outside of that world is an idea that i’ve been playing with for a while especially as i see tayae and lauren and jude graduate. seeing it so fully embodied was empowering.
also i love reading more about queer people building families! and the how. i thought the second person was so well done with the sprinkling of the anecdotes about the daughter really letting me create a picture of the family in my head.
i really liked understanding how the pursuit of gay marriage was resisted in some circles bc it conformed to existing practices of partnership, as well as how the modern-day lgbtq+ movement was built off of successful mobilizing from the civil rights movement.
i feel like i don’t understand queer history and theory as much as i would like. this book felt like a great place to start bc it weaved so many ideas together along with giving me so many song, film, and book recs!
i would love to be able to write like this author one day!
overall thoughts and messages that resonated strongly with me at this stage in my life. great writing. i will prize my (drenched) copy of this book!
been feeling very gay. kind of had a devastating situationship. also been rethinking my gender presentation. i kind of just needed to contextualize my thoughts in terms of what an older and wiser queer mentor might say.
i was really struck by the analysis that connection is not just achieved through biological ties. i grew up with parents that emphasized our “pioneer blood,” how the people in our home would drop anything for you and you should drop everything for them. realizing i can build community outside of that world is an idea that i’ve been playing with for a while especially as i see tayae and lauren and jude graduate. seeing it so fully embodied was empowering.
also i love reading more about queer people building families! and the how. i thought the second person was so well done with the sprinkling of the anecdotes about the daughter really letting me create a picture of the family in my head.
i really liked understanding how the pursuit of gay marriage was resisted in some circles bc it conformed to existing practices of partnership, as well as how the modern-day lgbtq+ movement was built off of successful mobilizing from the civil rights movement.
i feel like i don’t understand queer history and theory as much as i would like. this book felt like a great place to start bc it weaved so many ideas together along with giving me so many song, film, and book recs!
i would love to be able to write like this author one day!
overall thoughts and messages that resonated strongly with me at this stage in my life. great writing. i will prize my (drenched) copy of this book!
May 16, 2026
Thank you Pantheon Books for the #gifted copy in exchange for an honest review! #PantheonPartner
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️✨
There are few words more loaded than “ugly,” particularly for women, girls, and female-presenting people. Prettiness may be a social construct, but it’s a mandate placed upon us by beauty culture. And yet, ugliness isn’t just about physical appearance; it’s a term used to describe the sexual and gender deviance that queer people experience. For Stephanie Fairyington, who has come to identify as ugly, the term took on entirely new meaning as she became a mother and watched her daughter navigate the waters of beauty culture.
It’s part memoir, part epistle, part sociohistorical deconstruction; but 100% vulnerable and groundbreaking in its approach to demystify beauty standards and overthrow the acculturation that teaches women to hate themselves. It’s a book that makes you uncomfortable to read, in that you’ll identify parts of yourself in perpetuating a double standard of beauty or find yourself saying “I never knew that’s where that notion of beauty came from.” I promise it’s not all doom and gloom (and even the parts that are have been meticulously researched and presented logically); there are glimpses of hope for a future generation of girls defying the cultural confines of beauty. Stephanie Fairyington is leading the way.
Reviewed as part of an #ARC from the publisher.
Read this book if you:
📚 have The Second Sex by Simone de Beauvoir on your bookshelf
🏳️🌈 love the intersectionality of queer feminism
🧠 want an expand-your-mind read
Follow me on Instagram for more book reviews!
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️✨
There are few words more loaded than “ugly,” particularly for women, girls, and female-presenting people. Prettiness may be a social construct, but it’s a mandate placed upon us by beauty culture. And yet, ugliness isn’t just about physical appearance; it’s a term used to describe the sexual and gender deviance that queer people experience. For Stephanie Fairyington, who has come to identify as ugly, the term took on entirely new meaning as she became a mother and watched her daughter navigate the waters of beauty culture.
It’s part memoir, part epistle, part sociohistorical deconstruction; but 100% vulnerable and groundbreaking in its approach to demystify beauty standards and overthrow the acculturation that teaches women to hate themselves. It’s a book that makes you uncomfortable to read, in that you’ll identify parts of yourself in perpetuating a double standard of beauty or find yourself saying “I never knew that’s where that notion of beauty came from.” I promise it’s not all doom and gloom (and even the parts that are have been meticulously researched and presented logically); there are glimpses of hope for a future generation of girls defying the cultural confines of beauty. Stephanie Fairyington is leading the way.
Reviewed as part of an #ARC from the publisher.
Read this book if you:
📚 have The Second Sex by Simone de Beauvoir on your bookshelf
🏳️🌈 love the intersectionality of queer feminism
🧠 want an expand-your-mind read
Follow me on Instagram for more book reviews!
May 7, 2026
Ugly: A Letter to My Daughter is a courageous and deeply reflective memoir that examines beauty, queerness, motherhood, and the emotional architecture of self-perception.
Stephanie Fairyington blends personal narrative with cultural analysis to explore how women are shaped by beauty standards long before they understand the systems behind them. Through memories of childhood, questions of legitimacy and belonging, and the realities of queer motherhood, the memoir becomes both an intimate confession and a broader critique of how society defines value through appearance.
What makes the book especially compelling is its honesty. Fairyington does not soften the complexity of her experiences or the lingering effects of internalized ugliness. Instead, she traces how those feelings evolve across relationships, parenthood, and generational expectations, particularly as she watches her daughter navigate a world already teaching girls how to be seen.
The writing is thoughtful and emotionally layered, balancing tenderness with sharp cultural insight. The result is a memoir that feels both deeply personal and socially urgent.
Overall, it is a powerful and probing work that challenges inherited narratives about beauty, femininity, and worth while inviting readers to imagine a freer and more compassionate way of seeing themselves and others.
Stephanie Fairyington blends personal narrative with cultural analysis to explore how women are shaped by beauty standards long before they understand the systems behind them. Through memories of childhood, questions of legitimacy and belonging, and the realities of queer motherhood, the memoir becomes both an intimate confession and a broader critique of how society defines value through appearance.
What makes the book especially compelling is its honesty. Fairyington does not soften the complexity of her experiences or the lingering effects of internalized ugliness. Instead, she traces how those feelings evolve across relationships, parenthood, and generational expectations, particularly as she watches her daughter navigate a world already teaching girls how to be seen.
The writing is thoughtful and emotionally layered, balancing tenderness with sharp cultural insight. The result is a memoir that feels both deeply personal and socially urgent.
Overall, it is a powerful and probing work that challenges inherited narratives about beauty, femininity, and worth while inviting readers to imagine a freer and more compassionate way of seeing themselves and others.
Review of advance copy received from Publisher
Ugly: A Letter to My Daughter is a raw, intimate, and deeply thought-provoking memoir that challenges the way we think about beauty, identity, and worth. Stephanie Fairyington writes directly to her daughter while unpacking her own lifelong relationship with being labeled “ugly,” weaving together personal history, queer motherhood, and cultural critique. The result is both vulnerable and fiercely intelligent, shining a light on how deeply societal standards shape the way we see ourselves.
What makes this book so powerful is its honesty. Fairyington doesn’t offer easy answers, but instead creates space for reflection, questioning, and ultimately self-acceptance. Tender, bold, and quietly radical, Ugly is a moving exploration of what it means to exist outside of narrow definitions of beauty—and to redefine them for the next generation.
What makes this book so powerful is its honesty. Fairyington doesn’t offer easy answers, but instead creates space for reflection, questioning, and ultimately self-acceptance. Tender, bold, and quietly radical, Ugly is a moving exploration of what it means to exist outside of narrow definitions of beauty—and to redefine them for the next generation.
Review of advance copy received from Publisher
This is such an important book for everyone in the times we currently live in. We go into the author’s mind and see how one person has coped with being different their entire life - from feeling ugly and not feminine to deciding to have a child via sperm donor with her partner. There were some great historical references and I loved the inclusion of the very volatile culture in our country today. This book is beautiful and SO RELEVANT! I received an advance review copy for free, and I am leaving this review voluntarily.
Review of advance copy received from Netgalley
gorgeously lyrical memoir about body image, especially in terms of LGBTQ+ people, and works really well. 5 stars. tysm for the arc.
March 22, 2026
A combination of memoir, a letter to one's daughter, and essays about being queer, the concept of ugly, and what girls are held up to and expected to put up with. Gorgeously and angrily written.
Displaying 1 - 9 of 9 reviews