How did a remote desert people change the course of world history?In the seventh century AD, the Eastern Roman Empire collapsed—defeated by the rising power of Arabia. How did this happen? And why then? In this gripping new history, Nick Holmes offers a fresh view of the end of the Ancient World and the rise of Islam—it wasn’t just religion and war that shaped history, but a hidden force also played a vital role—climate change. A mysterious climatic shift—the Late Antique Little Ice Age—devastated the Roman and Persian empires while Arabia thrived. The End of Antiquity brings together history, science, and religion to uncover the truth behind one of the most enigmatic centuries in history. It's the fifth book in Holmes’ acclaimed series on the fall of the Roman Empire—and the most surprising yet.
Praise for Nick Holmes’ Books'A talent for storytelling' Kirkus Reviews ‘Clear, succinct and compelling’ AudioFile Magazine ‘Perhaps the best historical story-teller alive’ Amazon Reviewer
Hello, I'm a British author, podcaster, and historian, and welcome to my series of books on the Fall Of The Roman Empire. My passion is Roman history. I've wandered among the ruins of the Roman Forum and wondered what happened to this great civilisation? I've stared into the dome of Hagia Sophia in Istanbul, and reflected on how the Roman Empire lasted for centuries after Rome itself was sacked, even when its capital moved to Constantinople. So, I've embarked on writing the full account of this momentous time.
Immerse yourself in this incredible story. It may surprise you to find that those events so long ago are strangely relevant to our modern times, from the changing climate to religion, and from war to peace. Let us listen to the voices from the past.
And if you like podcasts, try mine "The Fall of the Roman Empire", which accompanies my books, and please check out my website which offers a free book and much more at www.nickholmesauthor.com
Very good 5th installment in the author series - energetic, reads like a novel. Presents two interesting takes on the (fairly well known and documented events of the book) - one that the Muslim conquest of the Levant, Egypt and Persia was due not only to the great weakness of both the Roman and Persian empires after a decades long brutal war between them, as well as recurrence of devastating plague, all during the period of climate cooling (3 degrees in a very short time) due to powerful volcanic eruptions in the 530's, but also to the fact that Arabia united by the Prophet Muhammad actually prospered during this period (untouched by the plague due to sparseness of population centers, climate cooling helping increase agricultural production and population) so could field large armies that overwhelmed the remaining armies of the Persian and Roman empires - for the Romans, another issue was the age and illness of emperor Heraclius the victor over Persia who was probably suffering of prostate cancer and lacked energy to muster a more vigurous response - in the Persian case, actually their army defeated comprehensively the caliphate army in the first battle, but the Arabs returned with a larger and more powerful army within a few years which argues for the author thesis.
Second and more of a matter of interpretation, the author argues that Heraclius was the last Roman emperor and his succesors were the first Byzantine ones as until the Arab conquests, what we call the Byzantine empire was actually the continuing Roman empire - Justinian's conquests for example, were never seen in their time as "conquests" but retaking Roman territory - so a large multiethnic and multi religious state (the division between the Catholic/Orthodox religion - what the author calls Chalcedonian - and the monophysite religion of Egypt and Syria especially severe during the Persian wars and their aftermath). After the Arab conquests, what remained was a much more unitary "modern" state, ethnically and religiously, properly called Byzantium, and which survived for another 800 years or so.
This has been an exceptional series following the spectacular story of Rome from the crisis of the 3rd century up until the Arab siege of Constantinople in 718.
this last part focuses on the key period from 590 to 642. it asks the key question how did the arab armies come from seemingly no where to win a series of huge victories which in the space of a generation transformed the middle east for ever.
Holmes places emphasis on 2 developments that few others have.
firstly the religious split within the eastern empire which maybe helped the arabs. the monophysites of Egypt seemed to have liked the 11 years of Persian rule from 617 and probably saw the arabs in a similar light. The jews of palestine had plenty of reasons to not like the Romans as well.
secondly he makes a big play for climate change. As he notes from about 530 onwards global average temperatures fell by maybe 3C. This produces huge changes everywhere. But a big winner may have been Arabia which became cooler, wetter and greener than before, probably supporting a population boom. Add in the unequal effects of plague (devastating in Rome and Persia, not so much in Arabia), and for perhaps the 1st time in history the demographic scales tipped to the Arabs. Mohammad's great success was to unite the arabs into 1 coherent state behind a shared ideology. This gave the arabs the means to exploit their demographic position.
Argues that Climate Change (little ice age) was responsible for weakening the Sassanid and Byzantine Empire to allow for an opening for a new force coming out of Arabia, Islam. Things like the Nike Riots and the Plague of Justinian certainly didn't help the Byzantines, and similar evidence for the Sasanids. I wonder if such dice rolls with climate are in the works today.
The author takes a very complex time in human history and distils out the essentials, clearly explaining what (in his opinion) brought about the most drastic and improbable change that distinguishes antiquity from the modern era.