How to Watch Soccer Like a Genius: What Architects, Stuntwomen, Paleoanthropologists, and Computer Scientists Reveal About the World’s Game

by Nick Greene

A brilliant and entertaining deconstruction of the most popular sport in the world, just in time for the 2026 World Cup in North America, from the bestselling author of How to Watch Basketball Like a Genius After reading this fun book, you’ll never look at soccer the same way again.In How to Watch Soccer Like a Genius, Nick Greene calls on a turf manager, an expert on color theory, and a landscape historian to understand the field itself, a paleoanthropologist to talk kicking, and an Anglican priest to explain schisms—how American football, soccer, and rugby could all develop from the field games of rowdy 19th-century British schoolboys.Greene delves deep into what defines the game, how it developed, and what happens during a match’s 90 minutes (and then some). His expert commentators include a domino toppler, a developmental neuroscientist, an art historian, a civil engineer, and more.On the surface, soccer seems like the simplest of one ball, two teams, two goals, and (preferably) some grass. There’s a reason it’s the first team sport little kids learn to play. But the closer you look, the more you dig into the game’s history, the more infinitely complex and complex the picture becomes.

Genres: Sports, Nonfiction, Soccer

272 pages, Hardcover

Published May 12, 2026

Reviews

[szreads · Rating 4 out of 5]

HEAR ME OUT…when I like books I either write a few sentences for a review… or a long review. This is a long review…you've been warned. I did really like the idea of this book. But maybe not the execution..

“It transcends language.” Maybe.

I recently learnt how to dribble properly ok, and what a kit is. My long term partner owns 60+ kits, plays soccer a minimum 3x a week, has watched Barcelona since Messi’s debut and soccer in general even longer, he is a member of not 1 but 3 fan clubs, and is going to the World Cup. You could say my life is very… soccer adjacent. So I was so excited to read this book! I too want to be a soccer genius. So, thank you to Abrams Books for the advanced copy!!

Bear with me as I take a somewhat critical academic focused analysis of this book. The librarian and historian in me can’t help it. In fact, this book DESERVES an actual academic review for a journal. HMU if you want one.

To start I need to recognize that Nick Green is an accomplished writer. He has previously written a similar book on Basketball, and published articles in VICE, and Mental Floss. However, I had difficulty finding his educational and research credentials. This isn't necessary but It would have been nice to know.

I struggled at first to understand WHO this book was for. I’ve come to the consensus tho after reading that it’s for EVERYONE.
-Want to sound like you know your shit during the World Cup?
-Love fun facts?
-Already love soccer? There’s going to be something you don’t know and can learn from this book! Trust me.

You might not understand PKs or offside after this but you can recognize a Cruyff turn and discuss the evolution of headers and diving like a pro. Plus where else could you discover the connection between colour theory and soccer?

However if this book is indeed for everyone and I’m being nitpicky… a quick page of definitions would be useful for terms like pitch and relegation for non avid soccer fans who pick this book up.

The book is divided into 3 sections with a timeline at the start of each section. I understand that he probably wanted to include many things in the book and couldn't but it would've been a cleaner read to only include what he actually mentioned. It felt like more often than not the timeline includes irrelevant information that is never mentioned. Like Ariana Grande being hit by a puck and the Colorado River carving into plateau. He’s stretching connections no..? Supposed to draw you in.. how are they linked to soccer. But some never being mentioned disrupted the flow of the book.


The title may seem misleading but I think that depends on what meaning you attribute to the word genius. Take it with a grain of salt. The tone however could be taken down a notch. Greene writes as if HE is a soccer genius. He is merely a researcher and writer. There are lots of personal anecdotes and attempts at comedy. The first two chapters were a tad pretentious….it very much gave off “I'm a genius and I am writing this the best way.” Starting a book that way sets the tone for the rest of the book. He is often attempting to inject humour into sometimes minute connections of his own making. For example..when discussing the heat in Qatar was it really necessary to say “the event was moved to November and December to protect fans and the world's most famous athletes from various health issues including but not limited to spontaneous combustion.” combustion…really?? Or when discussing that soccer is the only sport played entirely with our feet he adds “as a rule, researching feet online can be a harrowing experience.” Maybe he thought it was funny.

I really appreciated the emphasis on how soccer is so big in Europe and South America and the differences in North America. Especially the jab that its one of the few sports “as a generalization’ that with or without Americans will always be vital, and outside of their sphere of influence.” The majority of the book rightfully focuses on European soccer nations and South America to a lesser extent. Despite soccer spreading as described in the book, it's still hard to find soccer cards in Canada, and even harder sometimes to stream games without subscribing to 5 different services. Recognizing this was great.

Women are mentioned twice. And that's when it's maybe more than a few sentences. I know I'm just being critical since you can write anything in a book and there's only so many pages, but I think its worth mentioning that women are only majorly included when discussing their mistakes or issues. The longest paragraph on women mentions the 2012 USA vs Canada women's olympic goalie controversy. Women being banned is mentioned for two sentences then we move on. A bit more background could have been interesting. Otherwise, I found the information on stoppage time, playing style of different nations, spread of watching it on TV with technology, and perceptions of diving equally fascinating. The book moves from one topic to the other and you never know what crazy thing he'll talk about next.

This book leaves room too for researchers to further analyze soccer culture from different perspectives which I love. Future research could include soccer chants, uniforms, riots, and more on women and non European or South American nations. It’s not a bad thing that it’s not all encompassing since that would be nearly impossible to accomplish. This is a sign of a great book and research.

On a personal note as a stylistic choice in order to better evaluate sources I would have preferred they have been organized not just alphabetically but also source type like books, articles, interviews, and webpages. BUT, it is evident this book is VERY well researched spamming sources from the 1800s to present day.

Overall, I’d recommend this book. You might be thinking.. “but Szreads you just were so critical.” No book is perfect. Whether you like soccer or are just excited for the World Cup there’s something for everyone in it.

I plan to purchase this book for myself and friends.

Notes:
-Exploring how scores are so low
-What do the Beatles have in common with soccer
-What do dominoes and football have in common?
-Place vs space theories
- it could’ve been so much better if above issues weren’t present

[FaithfulReviewer (Jacqueline) · Rating 4 out of 5]

Thank you to Abrams Press, the author and NetGalley for a DRC in return for an honest review.

Nick Greene is an acclaimed writer known for his inventive, interdisciplinary approach to sport and culture and in How to Watch Soccer Like a Genius he applies an imaginative lens to the world’s most popular game, drawing on architects, stuntwomen, paleoanthropologists and computer scientists to uncover surprising truths about football.

First things first - I love the cover. It perfectly captures the playful, curious spirit of what’s inside.

Now, let’s address the biggest issue: the title is misleading. Once you get past that, you can fully appreciate what Greene is actually doing here - because this is emphatically NOT a guide to watching football. Instead, it’s a cultural and intellectual exploration of the game.

This is one of the clearest examples of 'title vs content' mismatch I’ve come across. I genuinely don’t understand what the author or publishers were aiming for, because it risks alienating readers who feel they’ve been promised something entirely different. If this book had been called 'The Hidden Worlds Inside Football', I suspect it would have received the stronger reception it deserves. What Greene offers is thoughtful, original and often fascinating - it’s just not what the title suggests. In that sense, it feels like an unfortunate own goal.

Strip away the marketing and the most accurate description would be: A collection of interdisciplinary essays about football’s hidden systems, told through history, science and culture. This is definitely not, a tactics guide, a match-reading manual or even a 'how to watch' book. In contrast, Injury Time by David Goldblatt offers a more structured, socio-political exploration of football. Both are insightful, but they operate in very different ways.

One thing I particularly enjoyed is that there is an underlying structure - even if it’s subtle. The book begins with turf, builds through the mechanics of the game and, fittingly, ends with penalties. There is a progression here, but it’s so lightly handled that readers may miss it entirely.

Greene frequently interrupts this framework with fascinating digressions, expert interviews and intellectual side paths. As a result, some readers may feel a lack of direction - less 'I’m being guided somewhere' and more 'I’m wandering through interesting rooms'. Now for me, that isn’t a flaw - it’s the entire appeal. To tighten this book would be to lose what makes it special. I’m far more drawn to books that feel like a really intelligent person taking you on a series of fascinating detours, rather than a perfectly organised lecture. I’m not looking for a textbook - I want something insightful, engaging and enjoyable to read. I didn’t pick this up because it’s about football; I picked it up because I love books that follow curiosity instead of forcing conclusions, connect unexpected fields, let meaning emerge gradually and trust the reader to keep up. Greene does this very well.

There are so many memorable and thought-provoking moments throughout: the evolution of rules, such as the changing role of the goalkeeper (and the shadow of horrific incidents like that involving Jimmy Thorpe in 1936), the explanation of why the US women’s team has historically outpaced much of the world due to fewer restrictions on female participation and Roberto Baggio’s wry observation on penalty shootouts: “Does it seem right that four years of sacrifices come to be decided by three minutes of penalty kicks?” (No, it really doesn’t.)

I also loved the discussion of the 1925 offside rule change, which didn’t just speed up play but created parallel currents across the pitch, and the evolution of officiating with the addition of a Referee in 1881. These moments capture exactly what Greene does best - revealing hidden layers beneath the familiar.

Ultimately, this is a fascinating, idea-rich book that suffers less from what it says than from what it claims to be. Which is a shame, because it is clearly well researched, engagingly written and full of rewarding insights.

I’m now very keen to read Greene's earlier book, How to Watch Basketball Like a Genius.

#HowToWatchSoccerLikeaGenius #NetGalley

[Cindy · Rating 5 out of 5]

This is a fun listen, just in time for the 2026 World Cup being played on US (and Canadian) soil. I hadn’t thought much about how soccer/football rules have evolved since the 1800s, but found it very interesting how the various football associations had to tweak rules and agree which set to play with when competing with other countries or clubs. Favorite bit of trivia: the black and white soccer ball we know today adopted its unique “color” scheme to be easier to see on black and white television screens. I also enjoyed the author’s musings about the green grass of the pitch and learning about the great lengths to which the Saudis and Americans went to prepare “regulation” soccer fields for World Cup play. After this book, I might even be able to spot an offsides! Well narrated and funny. 4.6 rounded up.
My thanks to the author, publisher, @TantorMedia, and #NetGalley for early access to the audiobook of #HowtoWatchSoccerLikeaGenius for review purposes. Publication date: 12 May 2026.

[Augusto Bernardi · Rating 3 out of 5]

This book is far more interesting than I thought. I am not a soccer watcher at all so this book seemed like a good opportunity for me ,as the world cup is currently unfolding. It'd either now or in four years time again.
The book doesn't necessarily give an indepth breakdown of the game itself but rather a philosophical one in a way and a perspective of the history. I was captivated right away.
One theme I can definitely see throughout many of the chapters is that soccer or football(he is an American author) evolved slowly in various places all at the same time and it took time to develop into the state it is now. Mostly in England though. He compares it later on to a butterfly going through all it's phases as a caterpillar and then a cocoon. The butterfly stage is that of not using hands. The simplicity of it is something that allows the game to be and continues to be so popular. This is something that has allowed various countries and various people of different social classes to participate in it. Having said that there is a real particular criteria for some things in modern day football. Especially on the big stage of the FIFA world cup. He talks about at length the absurdities that Qatar was willing to go through, or pay for, in order to get the right kind of grass and right kind of earth during their world cup. An insanely expensive and environmentally unfriendly project. Ot the first time either as the popularity of soccer is what makes people go to those lengths to make the game as it is today.
There are some fun chapters like the mechanics of kicking and how the human body was not naturally made to kick at all. Even in martial arts, too my fascination, was kicking introduced only recently.
In actuality, a more defining feauture of football as we know it was the not tackling or putting your hands on the opponent. That would split it away from the other big English sport, Rugby. Later on when it described the evolution of original soccer I was fascinated to hear that it was originally just dribbling or an individualistic team sport. Passing and tactics only developed or became a thing way later. This was largely a cultural thing of thinking that they needed to confront the opponent head-on. This is something that children or inexperienced soccer players often do when they have not really realized the use of The collective. Headers would also only develop later.
I liked the historical insight of how South American football originally developed. It was the Scottish that introduced it to Argentina and Uruguay. It was those two countries that actually dominated the sport in South America for the first half of the 20th century. In the first real international competition ever in Paris, it was Uruguay that demonstrated a new sort of evolution and style of playing, which was a game focused on close quarter passing.
The book unfortunately takes these really long detours as he tries to make a comparison or analogy. But they are way too long and detailed to the point that it barely relates back to the topic of the book itself. This isn't just a collection of random ideas. For example the book went waaaaaaay to deep into the history of the domino effect, the Beatles making it in America and Leonardo Da Vinci's obsession with water. It'd not that necessary to get too deep on these topics to understand football tactics.
A theme that has been repeated throughout the book is that what makes soccer great is it'd simplicity. This is kind of ruined and also preserves the quality of the game by the rule of off side. The off side rule is kind of a party pooper even to try to explain and the author explained that it is particularly difficult for the human eye to even pick up on it. But it is necessary or else there would only be a rush to kick the ball as far as possible towards the goal. Passing and teamwork would be at a minimum. World cups have been decided by this cursed rule and the use of cameras to judge this rule has only pissed more people off. There is a difficulty soccer fans have to acknowledge their own team being off side.
I was fascinated soccer became somehow popular on the radio and successful on the radio through the BBC in England. It's already quite difficult to describe it since it doesn't have a long history or specific geometry of the field and what's going on. But because of the tension of soccer of having those rare goals it became a success. Some people can say that rarity of goals and scoring is one of the things that makes soccer boring but on the other hand you could say that that's one of the main things of what makes it intense and gets people invested.
I really enjoy the parts of this book that have history in them about football. It gives you a perspective of how any sport really develops. For example how later football had some pushback to even come on TV and it wasn't an easy progression. Football owners worried that the attendance would go down by adding it to TV. And it wasn't easy to film because stadiums was weren't built for cameras or to be filmed and it was difficult to pick up the leather brown ball on camera. Which is why the black and white ball was eventually created for that specific reason. Earlier in the book he even goes even further saying that sucker was created for the players to enjoy themselves not for the spectators. Even the concept of winning and losing was secondary to the enjoyment of the current players. The business aspect of soccer which is so enormous nowadays is something that came far after.
On one hand this book has some very interesting scientific studies as well on the statistics and maths of soccer. For example how random it mathematically is and how the strongest team doesn't actually have a strong chance to win. This was largely based around the idea of what a strong chance mathematically or technically really is. On the other hand it's incredibly unfortunate how much this author goes into these huge rants that have nothing to do with soccer.q completely get sidetracked. Even goes on about how bad AI is just to me a pathetic argument. That's the type of argument that ages incredibly poorly quickly. You can't just give a couple of examples of the shortcomings of early AI as some sort of proof that it isn't as almighty powerful as it's proving to be in pretty much every other way.

I guess the bigger point he is trying to make in the second half of the book, which I think is the bigger message of the entire book is that despite technology making soccer an ever more precise game, it still is fundamentally a completely imprecise game. That had partly to do with the simplicity of the game, partly the complicated off side rule, and also some of the subjective parts of the game like theatric diving and also the time wasting on a clock that doesn't stop and the subjective extra time that The all powerful referee awards. Ultimately the technology may only change soccer in some ways but remains a point of contention in others.

[Karim · Rating 4 out of 5]

How to Watch Soccer Like a Genius isn’t the right title for this book; simultaneously, I don’t know what is. It’s an afternoon lounge-out with an interesting friend, the conversation chasing its whims. We're talking about the football, yes—but did you know the sport almost died in Britain because the upper classes found it threatening, then began privatising land? That it then found purchase in schools like Eton and Winchester because of the usual hand-wringing around masculinity, but also because the clergy worried boys spending too much time alone would be, well, buffing the bishop?

Let’s talk about passing, introduced by Nick Greene thusly:

Critique of Dialectical Reason represents Sartre’s attempts to expound on Marxism after he distanced himself from the Soviet interpretation and implementation of the philosophy. No one ever mistook the existentialist for a sports nut, so it is interesting that he would use soccer to explain an idea so central to his argument about, well, everything. But what’s really telling is when he made this comparison. Critique of Dialectical Reason was published in 1960, a notable period during the game’s evolution. […] Sartre would not have been so keen to make this analogy had he been around to witness the game’s earlier vintage. In fact, he already had the perfect words to describe it: “Hell is other people.”

The book's tangents are peculiar, but they're amusing, and if the similarities drawn between Leonardo da Vinci’s The Book of the Waters and the ebb and flow of a football match appear contrived, well, these links sometimes can be, but I can't deny they're entertaining. That undersells it, actually. A comparison between human-made dams (harmful to our planet) and beaver dams (fish can sail over them) is a descriptor for the evolution of offsides (Greene: “What soccer needed, then, was a beaver dam for its fish to solve”). Other links are more self-evident; my only qualm with how tickled stuntwoman Elisabeth Carpenter is with Luis Suárez's dives is that I wish I got to see her reactions.

It disassembles football conceptually and historically. Scotland thrashes England in their first few games because of class disparity; the upper crust English can't fathom "sharing" a ball instead of just running with it down the pitch and belting it, while Scotland's players working class players pass it. Uruguay gives Europe a lesson in humility at the 1924 Olympics in Paris: so disrespected their flag was hoisted upside down, a Brazilian march played in place of the national anthem, so destitute they were “sleeping on the wooden benches and playing game after game in exchange for room and board”, so ahead of the European competition they trounced that Greene describes the Uruguayan team as making cathedrals from the “toothpicks and glue” the British had exported. FA secretary and treasurer Charles Alcock sees football's potential as mass entertainment before the the concept has a name when he witnesses seeing 20,000 people filling the seats Crystal Palace...for a cat show.

But for all the laugh-out-loud vignettes and turns of phrase, my favourite bits are mathematical. It's interesting seeing how rule changes, like goal ratios becoming tie-breakers, affect the actual play via the scoreline; it's even more interesting that statistical modeling confirms that football's got a habit of producing misrepresentative results.

Still, the book's never quite more than a series of interviews with interesting people, with a funny host. These pieces never coalesce or develop a thesis or through-line. I suppose the book wants to be breezy, even when it could've been deeper; I recommend dipping into it on occasion, not going straight through it in two sittings as I did. While it's not the book the title told me I'd be reading, I had a good time.

[Evelin · Rating 1 out of 5]

Thank you to NetGalley and Tantor Audio for providing this ALC in exchange for an honest review.

Boring.

I powered through this audiobook, but it was haaaaaaaaaard.

I’ve watched a match or two in my life, but the author of this book doesn’t come across as someone who either loves or even really understands the game. Starting off with a long explanation of why he will call it “soccer” already felt unnecessary. I understand there’s a reason for it, but it wasn’t particularly appealing for a fan of football.

Based on the description, this is supposed to be a funny and entertaining book. It isn’t. I could tell there were moments the author intended to be humorous, but they simply didn’t land.

Scientific? Not really. It tries to introduce data and AI here and there, but it feels forced.

If you don’t know football, this won’t help you understand it. The whole book feels rushed and poorly structured—like someone wrote a dozen short essays over a few years, then sat down, arranged them, and tried to find something to loosely connect them.

The narration was robotic and inconsistent. The tone was flat and boring, and many times I genuinely thought it was AI-generated. I was positively surprised when, around 40%, the narrator pronounced Hungarian surnames almost perfectly. However, about 60 pages later, those same names were pronounced completely differently and almost unrecognizably wrong. What bothered me wasn’t that they were mispronounced, but the lack of consistency. Not to mention that there were barely any European (non-English) cities, people, or football club names pronounced correctly.

If you want to learn the rules of the sport and how it works, you’re better off checking Wikipedia. And if you’re looking for an entertaining and actually funny book that truly captures a love of football and the spirit of real fans, I recommend Fever Pitch.

[Caleb Deck · Rating 4 out of 5]

🚨🚨🚨THIS BOOK IS NOT A PRACTICAL GUIDE TO WATCHING SOCCER MATCHES! 🚨🚨🚨
Now that we’ve got that out of the way…

The title is a bit misleading, which I think results in a lot of people being dissatisfied with Greene’s books, though they are quite good. This happened with his basketball version as well, people expecting how to watch plays and coming away unhappy.

What the book really focuses on is the history, psychology, and other subtleties of the game and how it has evolved over time, with lots of interviews with experts in tangential fields. He even says in a lot of these that the person was confused when he asked them about soccer. The book starts with a chapter on the turf, type of grass, requirements for cutting, history of the uniformity, a story about importing grass for the Qatar World Cup, and discussions with color experts on the exact two-tone green and how it makes watchers feel.

Following chapters talk about the ball, the evolution of the sport from gentleman’s game to the masses, offsides rule, handballs, VAR, etc….

There’s a lot of history and facts throughout, Greene has clearly don a ton of research. My one gripe with the book regards its structure. The book tends to flit from one subject to another, often very loosely connected (VAR to seances and superstition, and on in just one chapter). It could have benefited from chapters being tightened or even having some sub-headings within chapters to help mark these abrupt shifts.

Overall I really enjoyed it, but would have liked it to be a bit more structured and the title will mislead a lot of readers on the purpose of the book. Dive in and enjoy!

[Justin · Rating 4 out of 5]

This one's a great read, even if the main title's a little misleading.

It works more like an adventurous history of the sport. There's little here that will help you watch more ... tactically, but you'll have plenty of trivia to work with as you watch.

Greene knows his audience: soccer fans, including but not especially diehards. There are fuller histories out there (Inverting the Pyramid is a must-read) and more tactical books. Greene's approach is to do a historical overview full of all sorts of fascinating side stories, sometimes getting lost in the weeds, but realizing that's a great place to be.

The book follows a sensible order, starting with turf and building up from there in a pattern that sort of follows history and sort of follows gameplay itself (the final chapter is on PK shootouts). His experts don't always help you watch the game more like a genius, but they do provide compelling insight into odd elements, as when a stuntwoman takes a look at diving, or a scholar considers how we process time. It's a multi-disciplinary look at various elements of the game. I didn't expect a chapter on providing turf to be fascinating, but it was.

Important note: Green's funny. As he travels through the past 150 years with his detours, he's frequently witty and conversational. He might or might not watch soccer like a genius, but he writes as if he'd be a fun person to end up next to in the stadium.

[Based on a NetGalley ARC]

[Maartje Paauw · Rating 2 out of 5]

Thank you to Abrams Press for this ARC!

I have mixed feelings. The book promises to change the way you watch soccer, but in my opinion, the title is somewhat misleading. The expert interviews often feel like side stories rather than essential insights into the viewing experience. They can be fun, but they rarely deepen your understanding of what happens during the 90 minutes on the pitch in a direct way.
Another issue I had was the tone. At times, the book comes across as somewhat self-congratulatory or self-indulgent. The author sometimes presents himself as if he possesses unique, superior insight into soccer, which made parts of the book feel less objective and more about showcasing his cleverness.

That said, the book is well-researched and clearly written, and readers who enjoy cultural history and unusual perspectives on familiar topics may appreciate it more than I did. But for readers expecting a guide that truly transforms the way they watch and understand a football (I will not be calling it soccer) match, this may not fully meet those expectations. It’s an interesting concept with creative ideas, but the execution does not quite match the promise.

[Jonnie M · Rating 2 out of 5]

Nick Greene takes a very different approach in How to Watch Soccer Like a Genius – and not just because he’s an American using the word “soccer”.

I’ve read my fair share of football books, whether focused on tactics, data, or the turbulent histories of certain clubs, but Greene sets out to examine the game through conversations with experts from a range of seemingly unrelated fields. In theory, that should make for a fresh and fascinating perspective.

Unfortunately, I struggled to stay engaged and found myself skimming more than once. There are plenty of interesting ideas scattered throughout, but not enough of a consistent thread to hold everything together.

There’s history, quotations from the likes of Jean-Paul Sartre and Leonardo da Vinci, and discussions spanning evolution, mathematics, neuroscience, and even the sleep cycle of fruit flies – but for all its range, the book never quite arrives at a cohesive point.

Ultimately, I was left unsure who this book is really for. It’s an intriguing concept, but one that never lives up to the promise of its title.

Thank you to NetGalley and Abrams Press for the digital review copy.

[Jackie McCarthy · Rating 4 out of 5]

Thank you to NetGalley for an Advance Reader Copy. I loved this wide-ranging and heartfelt ode to soccer's details and look forward to watching matches in a whole new way after reading this book. From the design of the pitch to the offside rule to flopping, Greene explores the origins and context of soccer's key attributes and rules with input from scientists, artists and writers. Greene describes the simplicity of the pitch as a broad canvas for the evolution of the game, and uses a mathematical explanation of "phase space" to explain soccer's cooperative nature. He uses DaVinci's drawings showing water flow around obstructions to explain the impact of the offside rule; hopefully I will be able to spot it when I watch a match! I particularly enjoyed the description of soccer's flexible nature of time as an example of how time reflects how we experience it in real life (i.e., time flies when you're having fun). Greene's passion for The Beautiful Game shines through.

[Philip · Rating 1 out of 5]

I picked up this book as the title intrigued me. Why did one have to be genius to watch the game I have loved for over 60 years!? Why does one have listen to what Architects, Stuntwomen, Paleoanthropologists and Computer Scientists have to enlighten me about FOOTBALL? Why does the bulk of America refer to this beautiful game as soccer? I do not know. I wonder if the author of this book has ever watched a game of football. If he has, he must have noticed the ball is conducted with the feet. I’m no genius, but I think I know how to watch and understand perfectly this wonderful, brilliant game. Hence my rating!!

[Siobhan · Rating 5 out of 5]

Want to watch the World Cup but clueless about soccer? Well, then How to Watch Soccer Like a Genius is the book for you. Sportswriter Nick Greene's fascinating account (of perhaps the world's favorite game) is filled with history, humor, and insights on how soccer evolved to become the global phenomenon it is today. I highly recommend to anyone eager for a history/rule book that's also a joy to read. World Cup, here we come!

Many thanks to NetGalley and Abrams for an ARC.

[John Schorg · Rating 2 out of 5]

If you've read the author's previous book on basketball, you know there will be a lot of wandering around as he explores various aspects of a sport that intrigue him. It worked well on basketball, but there is way too much wandering here. Every few pages, there are some interesting bits... some thoughts on growing grass, a look at diving, a diversion into set pieces... but all too often, I didn't know what the hell he was talking about. Lots of skimming here...

[Ky · Rating 4 out of 5]

It was super interesting to hear about more of the niche sides of soccer. Color analysis experts, statistics experts, agricultural experts, stunt people- there were a lot of people the author talked to about the sport that at first glance you wouldn't expect to be in a book about soccer. There are so many things I didn't really think about that go into the beautiful game. At some points it sort of slogged with history, but overall I really enjoyed the humor and unique perspectives. The history of rule change evolution was very interesting as well.

I rated it 3.5/5 rounded up to 4 stars.
Thank you to NetGalley and Abrams for the e-arc!

[Elsa · Rating 4 out of 5]

Quite narrative, and at times meandering, this is an engaging, story-driven retelling of some of the history and inner workings of modern soccer. Surprisingly technical, thoroughly engaging for those who want to learn more about the game in a broader sense.

[Sam · Rating 5 out of 5]

Charming history of the sport. Very engaging read, fun to get into soccer right before the World Cup. Makes a great gift. A whole chapter on feet!

[e!!!! · Rating 5 out of 5]

A quirky voice, yet none of the information feels dumbed down. I don’t give a damn about basketball, but I’ll be reading his basketball one too.

[James Freeman · Rating 4 out of 5]

Fascinating read. I really enjoyed the unorthodox way the writer picked people to talk about soccer. It all fit together in a way you would not initially see like a grand puzzle.

[Ben G · Rating 5 out of 5]

Has a comforting, childish wonder about it.

[Kidlitter · Rating 4 out of 5]

A deep dive for soccer wonks - either you'll love or be bored silly, rather like the game itself.

[David · Rating 4 out of 5]

3.5 ⭐️

[Niki]

some very unique and interesting bits like the stuff on Borges and our perceptions of time, quite liked the exploration of these really random topics through sport, obvs this would all be much more enjoyable if he called it football