What do you think?
Rate this book
Pár-harc - Így erősítik a konfliktusok a párkapcsolatot
Újra és újra ugyanazon vesztek össze a partnereddel? Az érzelmi viharban egyre nagyobb sebeket ejtetek egymáson, és teljesen elképzelhetetlennek tűnik, hogy valaha is véget tudtok vetni az összetűzéseknek? A jó hír az, hogy nem is kell erre törekednetek, mert a legboldogabb párok között sok a konfliktus. A veszekedések nemhogy természetesek, de elengedhetetlenek a valódi kapcsolódáshoz, a kérdés tehát nem az, hogy veszekedtek-e, hanem az, hogy hogyan veszekedtek: képesek vagytok-e látni és hallani egymást egy vita hevében is, és ezáltal közelebb kerülni a másikhoz.
A könyvből kiderül, mi az öt legnagyobb hiba, amit elkövetünk veszekedés közben, és hogyan küszöbölhetjük ki ezeket. Az elmélet és az esettanulmányok mellett kérdéssorok és gyakorlati feladatok segítenek, hogy felismerjük, miről is veszekszünk valójában; hogy tudatosítsuk, milyen a neveltetésünkből fakadó konfliktuskultúránk, és ez hogyan hat a reakcióinkra; hogyan beszéljünk az érzéseinkről a másik kritizálása nélkül; hogyan fejezzük ki a dühünket nem bántó módon; hogyan hallgassuk meg egymást együttérzően. Egyszóval hogyan tegyük alapvetéssé: a konfliktusok célja nem az, hogy eldöntsük, kinek van igaza, hanem hogy szorosabbra fűzzük a köztünk lévő köteléket.
"A párokkal végzett munkánk során mindketten azt fedeztük fel, hogy mindenki a haragot tartja a legszégyenletesebb dolognak – azt, amikor átveszik felette az uralmat az érzelmei. Pedig a haragban nincs semmi szégyellnivaló.
A harag – különösen a női harag, amit a történelem során nagyobb mértékben kellett elfojtani – nem olyasmi, amit kerülni kellene; sőt, a tudáshoz vezető utat is jelentheti. De sajnos az emberek félnek a haragtól. Ugyanakkor minél jobban rettegünk tőle, annál elszigeteltebbé válunk. A mi kultúránkban, ha nagy általánosságban nézzük, a férfiaknak szabad haragot érezniük, olyan érzelmeket azonban nem, amelyek sebezhetőnek mutatják őket. A nők több jogot kapnak a passzívabb érzelmekre – a szomorúságra, a félelemre, az aggodalomra –, de az olyan aktívabbakra, mint a düh, nem."
A könyvből kiderül, mi az öt legnagyobb hiba, amit elkövetünk veszekedés közben, és hogyan küszöbölhetjük ki ezeket. Az elmélet és az esettanulmányok mellett kérdéssorok és gyakorlati feladatok segítenek, hogy felismerjük, miről is veszekszünk valójában; hogy tudatosítsuk, milyen a neveltetésünkből fakadó konfliktuskultúránk, és ez hogyan hat a reakcióinkra; hogyan beszéljünk az érzéseinkről a másik kritizálása nélkül; hogyan fejezzük ki a dühünket nem bántó módon; hogyan hallgassuk meg egymást együttérzően. Egyszóval hogyan tegyük alapvetéssé: a konfliktusok célja nem az, hogy eldöntsük, kinek van igaza, hanem hogy szorosabbra fűzzük a köztünk lévő köteléket.
"A párokkal végzett munkánk során mindketten azt fedeztük fel, hogy mindenki a haragot tartja a legszégyenletesebb dolognak – azt, amikor átveszik felette az uralmat az érzelmei. Pedig a haragban nincs semmi szégyellnivaló.
A harag – különösen a női harag, amit a történelem során nagyobb mértékben kellett elfojtani – nem olyasmi, amit kerülni kellene; sőt, a tudáshoz vezető utat is jelentheti. De sajnos az emberek félnek a haragtól. Ugyanakkor minél jobban rettegünk tőle, annál elszigeteltebbé válunk. A mi kultúránkban, ha nagy általánosságban nézzük, a férfiaknak szabad haragot érezniük, olyan érzelmeket azonban nem, amelyek sebezhetőnek mutatják őket. A nők több jogot kapnak a passzívabb érzelmekre – a szomorúságra, a félelemre, az aggodalomra –, de az olyan aktívabbakra, mint a düh, nem."
432 pages, Paperback
First published January 30, 2024
2840 people are currently reading
20090 people want to read
About the author
Julie Schwartz Gottman
30 books210 followersJulie Schwartz Gottman is a clinical psychologist, co-founder and director of the Gottman Institute. She is co-initiator of the extremely popular weekend workshops for couples "The Art and Science of Love" and co-developed the national clinical training program for Gottman couples therapy in the USA. She is an author and co-author and lives with her husband in Seattle.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 545 reviews
December 7, 2025
HIGHLIGHTS:
1. CONFLICT:
- Conflicts breakdown what’s not working and create something better.
- Lack of conflict does not equate to peace.
- We can disagree and still be on each other’s side.
- Anger is a “frustrated goal.”
- Decision fatigue throughout the day. It is a constant drain of energy.
- Intentional positivity: 5 positive to 1 negative.
2. META-EMOTION:
- Meta-emotion mismatch: avoider (shut down when emotions increase), validator, volatile (fighting is enticing)
- Build agenda, persuade, comprise attempt
- “Intention” doesn’t match “impact” in a fight.
3. BIDS FOR CONNECTION:
- 3 minutes to turn the conflict around or it goes downhill.
4. STARTUPS:
- Harsh startups and the problems that evolve. Criticism. Describe other. Kitchen sink complaints.
- Don’t face up complaints
- Soft Startup: my feelings, my needs, behavior I want from you. I feel..I need.
5. EMOTIONAL FLOODING:
- Reduces the ability to have healthy conflict.
- Take a break if you’re feeling flooded.
- Come back in 20-60 minutes. The body needs time to “regulate”.
6. REPAIRS:
- Please say that more gently
- I feel … can you rephrase that?
- I need your support right now.
- Sorry, I need to try that again softer
- That’s a good point
- I appreciate that
7. GRIDLOCK:
- We try to fix the problem before we understand it.
- Gridlock conflicts have deeper unmet needs.
- Have I ever been in a similar fight like this before (personal history)?
- Identify dreams under the conflict.
8. JUST MOVE ON:
- People say sorry, but the hurt is not resolved because it is NOT UNDERSTOOD.
- Unfinished business sears into memory.
- Revisiting memory becomes inaccurate.
- Use “I saw” + “I felt” + “the story I told myself about your behavior is”.
9. OVERVIEW:
- Everyone wants to be understood. There may be a deeper layer of needs happening.
- The goal is not to win or persuade the other person.
- Make this conversation a positive one.
- Don’t fight flooded.
- Make small repairs.
- Yield to win. Identify where you can be flexible and where there is a non-negotiable.
- Share HOW you felt (description), not WHY (interpretation from own perception).
1. CONFLICT:
- Conflicts breakdown what’s not working and create something better.
- Lack of conflict does not equate to peace.
- We can disagree and still be on each other’s side.
- Anger is a “frustrated goal.”
- Decision fatigue throughout the day. It is a constant drain of energy.
- Intentional positivity: 5 positive to 1 negative.
2. META-EMOTION:
- Meta-emotion mismatch: avoider (shut down when emotions increase), validator, volatile (fighting is enticing)
- Build agenda, persuade, comprise attempt
- “Intention” doesn’t match “impact” in a fight.
3. BIDS FOR CONNECTION:
- 3 minutes to turn the conflict around or it goes downhill.
4. STARTUPS:
- Harsh startups and the problems that evolve. Criticism. Describe other. Kitchen sink complaints.
- Don’t face up complaints
- Soft Startup: my feelings, my needs, behavior I want from you. I feel..I need.
5. EMOTIONAL FLOODING:
- Reduces the ability to have healthy conflict.
- Take a break if you’re feeling flooded.
- Come back in 20-60 minutes. The body needs time to “regulate”.
6. REPAIRS:
- Please say that more gently
- I feel … can you rephrase that?
- I need your support right now.
- Sorry, I need to try that again softer
- That’s a good point
- I appreciate that
7. GRIDLOCK:
- We try to fix the problem before we understand it.
- Gridlock conflicts have deeper unmet needs.
- Have I ever been in a similar fight like this before (personal history)?
- Identify dreams under the conflict.
8. JUST MOVE ON:
- People say sorry, but the hurt is not resolved because it is NOT UNDERSTOOD.
- Unfinished business sears into memory.
- Revisiting memory becomes inaccurate.
- Use “I saw” + “I felt” + “the story I told myself about your behavior is”.
9. OVERVIEW:
- Everyone wants to be understood. There may be a deeper layer of needs happening.
- The goal is not to win or persuade the other person.
- Make this conversation a positive one.
- Don’t fight flooded.
- Make small repairs.
- Yield to win. Identify where you can be flexible and where there is a non-negotiable.
- Share HOW you felt (description), not WHY (interpretation from own perception).
April 20, 2024
3.5 Lots of mixed feelings about this one. Let me preface by saying I love the Gottman’s work. Their research is invaluable and the information in this book is extremely helpful.
I didn’t love the book itself. I found it very difficult to relate to most of the couples whose stories were used as examples. Much of what was presented as normal marital conflict sounded like verbal and emotional abuse to me, and the profane language of the fighting couples was often shocking and unsettling.
The relationship dynamics of one couple in particular really bothered me…she was 15 years younger than him and he was her cardiologist. They met while she was his patient and both were married to other people. There’s just a lot about that whole scenario that left me very uncomfortable, and didn’t seem appropriate to use as a prototype for couples to get healthy considering the power and abuse dynamics.
There was a disclaimer regarding abuse, which I appreciated, however the way they explained abusive relationships also made me uneasy. It kind of came across as if the majority of abusive relationships are mutually abusive with both partners engaging in violence, and that these relationships can be saved if the partners learn how to fight right instead of resorting to violence.
The Gottman’s expertise is not in abuse dynamics, so I wouldn’t expect this book to be a primer on such, however, I think the way it was presented could be very confusing for abuse victims who are reading this looking for help. They may think that their self-defense responses or natural reactions to being mistreated are “mutual abuse” when in reality, mutual abuse is largely a myth. Abuse involves one person in power and the other person being used, exploited, or controlled.
Along the same lines, there were examples of couples recovering from infidelity. I felt uneasy about this as well, because there was no mention that if the couple does want to work towards health and reconciliation, they need to first address individual healing of the victim and the individual beliefs/character/integrity of the betrayer—before couples therapy and before learning how to have healthy conflict. The book did lightly address betrayal trauma, but still seemed to suggest that the betrayed partner needed to learn how to fight right and empathize with her/his partner more than anything else.
I deeply appreciated the chapter in Part 2 about “standoffs.” A key element in the Gottman’s research is the fact that marriages centered around a hierarchy of power—where one person is in charge and makes the final decisions—are much more likely to fail. This chapter presented this point along with a description of the ways women throughout history have been used, abused, and subjugated because of power over dynamics. It was a very therapeutic chapter as well as a very practical one, offering strategies for overcoming this mindset which can lead to standoffs in conflict.
Overall, I think the actual material, the strategies, the data, and the guidelines, are all very helpful and will really help a lot of people. On the Gottman Institute website there is a free download available called A Better Way to Fight which is a simplified version of the main points in the book and looks incredibly helpful. They also have a couple of conflict courses you can take on their website which I would feel very comfortable recommending—but not to couples who have abuse dynamics in their relationship or to couples in which one partner is a recent victim of betrayal trauma.
I didn’t love the book itself. I found it very difficult to relate to most of the couples whose stories were used as examples. Much of what was presented as normal marital conflict sounded like verbal and emotional abuse to me, and the profane language of the fighting couples was often shocking and unsettling.
The relationship dynamics of one couple in particular really bothered me…she was 15 years younger than him and he was her cardiologist. They met while she was his patient and both were married to other people. There’s just a lot about that whole scenario that left me very uncomfortable, and didn’t seem appropriate to use as a prototype for couples to get healthy considering the power and abuse dynamics.
There was a disclaimer regarding abuse, which I appreciated, however the way they explained abusive relationships also made me uneasy. It kind of came across as if the majority of abusive relationships are mutually abusive with both partners engaging in violence, and that these relationships can be saved if the partners learn how to fight right instead of resorting to violence.
The Gottman’s expertise is not in abuse dynamics, so I wouldn’t expect this book to be a primer on such, however, I think the way it was presented could be very confusing for abuse victims who are reading this looking for help. They may think that their self-defense responses or natural reactions to being mistreated are “mutual abuse” when in reality, mutual abuse is largely a myth. Abuse involves one person in power and the other person being used, exploited, or controlled.
Along the same lines, there were examples of couples recovering from infidelity. I felt uneasy about this as well, because there was no mention that if the couple does want to work towards health and reconciliation, they need to first address individual healing of the victim and the individual beliefs/character/integrity of the betrayer—before couples therapy and before learning how to have healthy conflict. The book did lightly address betrayal trauma, but still seemed to suggest that the betrayed partner needed to learn how to fight right and empathize with her/his partner more than anything else.
I deeply appreciated the chapter in Part 2 about “standoffs.” A key element in the Gottman’s research is the fact that marriages centered around a hierarchy of power—where one person is in charge and makes the final decisions—are much more likely to fail. This chapter presented this point along with a description of the ways women throughout history have been used, abused, and subjugated because of power over dynamics. It was a very therapeutic chapter as well as a very practical one, offering strategies for overcoming this mindset which can lead to standoffs in conflict.
Overall, I think the actual material, the strategies, the data, and the guidelines, are all very helpful and will really help a lot of people. On the Gottman Institute website there is a free download available called A Better Way to Fight which is a simplified version of the main points in the book and looks incredibly helpful. They also have a couple of conflict courses you can take on their website which I would feel very comfortable recommending—but not to couples who have abuse dynamics in their relationship or to couples in which one partner is a recent victim of betrayal trauma.
November 12, 2025
Learning to Argue
Humans are rational and emotional beings. In the spectrum of emotions we can find some real dark ones, such as anger and resentment. When you give command to one of those you’ll have a resulting argument.
While we argue, we remain in a tunnel. Some people stay there and others come out to the light. This book is definitely for those who aim to reach the light...
“When we fight, we should try to create something better. That’s the ultimate goal of conflict: to create something better for yourself, for you and your partner, as a couple, and for the world.”
——————+++++++————++++++++—————
Aprender a Discutir
Os humanos são seres racionais e emocionais E do espectro das emoções constam, entre outras, algumas bem negras como a raiva e o ressentimento. Basta dar voz de comando a uma delas para gerar uma discussão.
Enquanto discutimos permanecemos num túnel. Há quem fique por lá e há quem saia dele para a luz. Este livro destina-se, claramente, aos que se propõem chegar à luz...
“Quando discutimos, devemos tentar criar algo melhor. Esse é o derradeiro objetivo do conflito: criar algo melhor para si mesmo, para si e para o seu par, enquanto casal, e para o mundo.”
Nota: A Edição portuguesa intitula-se “Saber Discutir — Como os Casais Felizes Transformam o Conflito em Harmonia”
Humans are rational and emotional beings. In the spectrum of emotions we can find some real dark ones, such as anger and resentment. When you give command to one of those you’ll have a resulting argument.
While we argue, we remain in a tunnel. Some people stay there and others come out to the light. This book is definitely for those who aim to reach the light...
“When we fight, we should try to create something better. That’s the ultimate goal of conflict: to create something better for yourself, for you and your partner, as a couple, and for the world.”
——————+++++++————++++++++—————
Aprender a Discutir
Os humanos são seres racionais e emocionais E do espectro das emoções constam, entre outras, algumas bem negras como a raiva e o ressentimento. Basta dar voz de comando a uma delas para gerar uma discussão.
Enquanto discutimos permanecemos num túnel. Há quem fique por lá e há quem saia dele para a luz. Este livro destina-se, claramente, aos que se propõem chegar à luz...
“Quando discutimos, devemos tentar criar algo melhor. Esse é o derradeiro objetivo do conflito: criar algo melhor para si mesmo, para si e para o seu par, enquanto casal, e para o mundo.”
Nota: A Edição portuguesa intitula-se “Saber Discutir — Como os Casais Felizes Transformam o Conflito em Harmonia”
November 20, 2023
A blueprint that doesn't give you impractical advice like "don't fight" but instead helps you fight constructively and effectively. Fighting the right way will leave both parties feeling like change is possible instead of lashing out anger. A plan to tell your partner what they can do to help you instead of laying on blame and "flooding" them which forces them to attack and defend their position. I particularly liked the quick reference guide in the back of the book which allows you to easily review key points keeping fights light, fair and civil. These are geared towards life partners but the skills will help in any relationship squabble from social to work possibly even with teenagers. My thanks to the publisher for the advance copy.
September 30, 2025
بسیار کتاب خوب و مفیدی بود، اما شخصا فکر میکنم این چنین کتابهایی زمانی واقعا در بهبود روابط موثر هستند که هر دو طرف یک رابطه برای خوندنش زمان بذارن.
خوندن فصل آخر (نتیجهگیری) رو حتی وقتی فرصت خوندن کل کتاب رو ندارید قطعا توصیه میکنم.
خوندن فصل آخر (نتیجهگیری) رو حتی وقتی فرصت خوندن کل کتاب رو ندارید قطعا توصیه میکنم.
February 15, 2024
I loved this book. It's so practical, it's so kind. I'm going to go back through and take notes. I'm sure I'll add more detail to this review. But for now, I highly recommend it!
August 24, 2024
A book where I wanted to highlight, bookmark and dogear every page. Immensely practical, relatable and helpful. Highly recommend. Now, as with all self help, comes the test of putting it into practice when the rubber hits the road lol! I feel this way about my favorite parenting book of all time — how to talk so kids will listen and listen so kids will talk. There was so so so much helpful content in that book that made total sense to me and that I wanted to implement and yet I still find myself making mistakes and not putting it into practice! 🫣😅 it’s a daily challenge to do better and be better but I thought this book was a great one!
November 14, 2025
Both very interesting and convincing. Could have lost 100 pages along the way... so 4,5
March 10, 2024
This book has some wonderful guidance. And I do wish that “fight” wasn’t in the title. The book truly seems to be about communicating during conflict, which applies to everyone. Fighting feels more volatile and this word may dissuade people from reading it because they feel it doesn’t apply to them. Especially those who can be conflict avoidant.
May 8, 2024
The Gottmans have excellent concepts for how to fight right in a relationship. Disagreement is a part of life, and this book is a helpful tool for people to gain an awareness of their own triggers and learn to navigate differences in a positive way.
However, examples of couples portrayed in the book were cringy and offensive. Maybe the way they fought and what they said was exaggerated to make a point for the book, but if the crude, harsh, and belittling manner in which those people spoke to their spouses is considered “normal” conflict, it left me feeling as though there is little hope for the human race.
However, examples of couples portrayed in the book were cringy and offensive. Maybe the way they fought and what they said was exaggerated to make a point for the book, but if the crude, harsh, and belittling manner in which those people spoke to their spouses is considered “normal” conflict, it left me feeling as though there is little hope for the human race.
October 23, 2024
My husband and I got married this year (yay!) and although we have a great relationship, both of us agree that communication can always improve! We read these sorts of books aloud together and found this to be one of Gottman's best books.
April 13, 2025
خب بیا مثل من از روی جلدش قضاوتش نکن، انگلیسیش جلد قشنگی داره ( با خطهای تیز تیز و نازک فرم یه قلب توپرو درآورده، به رنگ همه��ی رنگا که به نظرم به معنی وجود همهی حساس، خیلی جلد بهتریه تا جلد ترجمه فارسیش، باید عرض کنم که واقعا عاصیم از این گرافیستای بیسلیقه نوپا که تصویرای نصفه نیمه آماده رو برمیدارن کپی پیست میکنن.🤦🏻♀️
ترجمه عنوان هم راستش یه حالیه، جاهای عمومی جلد کتابو نامحسوس قایم میکردم معلوم نشه چی میخونم! 🤷🏻♀️
درست حسابی دعوا کن! خیلی بار منفی نداره بنظرتون؟ مگه جنگه؟ مینوشت درست دعوا کن بهتر نبود؟
یا به روش درست بحث کن.
بهرحال محتوای کتاب برای من خوب بود،
خوندنش سخت نیست ولی کتاب سبکیم نیست.
با خوندش بهتر میتونی شرایط ملتهب و عصبانیت شدید و فضای دعوا رو تحلیل کنی، الگوی دعوا کردن خودتو اطرافیانتو بشناسی و جالبتر اینکه ببینی الگوها مثل تیپ شخصیتی در مقابل یه الگوی دیگه چه پکیجی میشه:))) واقعا هیجانانگیزه که کامل دستت میاد چی به چیه، اگه قبلا حسش میکردی که میدونی مشکل کار کجاست حالا مطمعن میشی که درست دیده بودی.
و جالبتر حتی اینکه این مسئله برات باز میشه که دعوا کردن بد نیست و فرصتیه برای صمیمیت و نزدیکی بیشتر، برخلاف اینکه تو فرهنگ جا افتاده دعوا بده و رابطهها با دعوا کردن خراب میشه. برای خود من قابل پذیرش نبود همین مسئله یعنی با پوستو گوشتم قبولش نداشتم، چندباری پارتنرم اینو بهم گفته بود، ولی من همچنان میترسیدم دعوا بشه و اینجا یکم این ترسم کمتر شد واقعا،💁🏻♀️
ترجمه عنوان هم راستش یه حالیه، جاهای عمومی جلد کتابو نامحسوس قایم میکردم معلوم نشه چی میخونم! 🤷🏻♀️
درست حسابی دعوا کن! خیلی بار منفی نداره بنظرتون؟ مگه جنگه؟ مینوشت درست دعوا کن بهتر نبود؟
یا به روش درست بحث کن.
بهرحال محتوای کتاب برای من خوب بود،
خوندنش سخت نیست ولی کتاب سبکیم نیست.
با خوندش بهتر میتونی شرایط ملتهب و عصبانیت شدید و فضای دعوا رو تحلیل کنی، الگوی دعوا کردن خودتو اطرافیانتو بشناسی و جالبتر اینکه ببینی الگوها مثل تیپ شخصیتی در مقابل یه الگوی دیگه چه پکیجی میشه:))) واقعا هیجانانگیزه که کامل دستت میاد چی به چیه، اگه قبلا حسش میکردی که میدونی مشکل کار کجاست حالا مطمعن میشی که درست دیده بودی.
و جالبتر حتی اینکه این مسئله برات باز میشه که دعوا کردن بد نیست و فرصتیه برای صمیمیت و نزدیکی بیشتر، برخلاف اینکه تو فرهنگ جا افتاده دعوا بده و رابطهها با دعوا کردن خراب میشه. برای خود من قابل پذیرش نبود همین مسئله یعنی با پوستو گوشتم قبولش نداشتم، چندباری پارتنرم اینو بهم گفته بود، ولی من همچنان میترسیدم دعوا بشه و اینجا یکم این ترسم کمتر شد واقعا،💁🏻♀️
July 2, 2024
“Intimacy inevitably creates conflict.”
This book profoundly changed how I handle conflict in my relationship. The Gottmans' research-based insights and practical techniques emphasize empathy, effective communication, and addressing underlying issues. By applying their methods, I've transformed conflicts with my partner into opportunities for deeper connection and understanding, significantly strengthening our relationship for the better.
This book profoundly changed how I handle conflict in my relationship. The Gottmans' research-based insights and practical techniques emphasize empathy, effective communication, and addressing underlying issues. By applying their methods, I've transformed conflicts with my partner into opportunities for deeper connection and understanding, significantly strengthening our relationship for the better.
August 17, 2024
Genuinely helpful and practical. I would consider this a must read
March 13, 2024
I enjoyed this book. It was a very digestible non fiction. The book explored deeper themes of how our life experiences impact us in conflict and offered concrete tools. The information learned will be helpful to me personally and professionally!
December 26, 2023
Bitti be sonunda! Haaarika bir kitaptı ve ben de çevirmekten çok keyif aldım. Çiftler için gerçekten baş ucu kitabı!
July 11, 2024
Read this chapter by chapter each week with one of my couples therapy clients and it was super helpful & led to lots of good discussion. Will def use/recommend again in the future!
July 26, 2024
I love anything by the Gottman's. So much knowledge and advice in this book, I recommend to everyone!
April 12, 2025
This was a “don’t judge a book by its cover” moment for me. Written by two influential relationship scientists/clinical psychologists, this book takes a research based approach to describing the mechanics by which successful (and un-successful) relationships develop. I loved it. This book helped me understand my self better, and had helped me reason to *why* & *how* I can do relationships better.
June 20, 2024
Excellent book with actionable approaches for any couple. I respect all of Gottman approaches. They did a brilliant job focusing on the anatomy of successful conflict with compassion and acknowledgement that we are all going to get it wrong from time to time, including them.
May 13, 2025
This is a great book. I not only want to use it for my husband and I but also for my daughters seems like when we talk it goes south really fast. I was in the middle of a book and we had a fight and so I got to apply some things and it really helped. I think I want to go buy it though so I can have the paper back and be able to look to. I also liked how one couple had a copy of some of the steps on their fridge and they would go there to fightthat makes a lot of sense to me just like practicing any sport you’ve got to practice it right the correct way
April 25, 2024
I loved this — read it bc I always liked their research about the four horseman of divorce and thought this was great and thoughtful and practical
December 4, 2024
The Gottmans (and their research) are awesome. I was just kind of bored but had some good takeaways throughout. I think I’m just only wanting to read fiction these days
January 4, 2025
Lots of stories, excellent and clear writing and advice!
April 18, 2025
This was awesome, i want to read more of the Gottman's books now!
October 22, 2025
This was admittedly a weird choice for someone so aggressively single to pick up, but it was still super interesting.
Read
September 24, 2024Ah, I will certainly come back to this book!!
January 17, 2025
Good read.
October 1, 2025
I can only hope I'll remember everything when it matters
March 20, 2024
This book was something truly incredible to read, and yet very bittersweet. Although it didn’t touch on a lot I didn’t already have some concept of it out things in a perspective that really made me feel these subjects deeply. I only wish I had known sooner. One of the biggest things I think everyone can take from this is relationship myths. They are the following
Myths-
1: if we find a solution to the big fight we’re having right now everything will be fine no more problems (more than half of problems are perpetual)
2:if conflict exist in our relationship we’re not meant to be together (conflict is unavoidable have to learn to engage it on a fundamental level)
3:a conflict is a problem to be solved (we manage them through continuous dialogue, not resolve them)
4: one is right one is wrong (both partners are valid)
5: men at more logical women are more emotional (duh this is not true but is a stigma we often fall into)
6:the best conflict management is logical, rational and unemotional (common among conflict avoidance one can’t problem solve well without use and understanding of one’s emotions )
7: negative emotions are bad and should be avoided (we believe we can just outthink our emotions but this is not true. Don’t suppress the lows of life/relationships and don’t chase the highs)
8:nobody can hurt you unless you let them (the belief that at any time a person can have 100% control over their emotions is false example: “you chose to be hurt by that comment” “you chose to be effected by that action” why we can be more active in our reactions to things that doesn’t change how you feel about them. Just pretending something doesn’t hurt you won’t prevent it from doing so (an excuse to relive responsibility from one’s self) process what happened and repair it
9: you have to love yourself before loving someone else ( this idea is fundamentally flawed because no one loves themselves all the time, it’s a not human to doubt yourself. If this was the case most of us would be and should be single. It takes two to tango) we all have enduring vulnerabilities. Your partner should love you even when you don’t love yourself
10: to be allowed to have needs we have to justify or explain them. ( we live in a world where to have a need is to sin if we do have a need the only way to justify it is to prove how bad our partner has been to us. Humans are built to have needs it’s what makes us human. It’s our responsibility to communicate them. The biggest issue in a lot of relationships is not voicing your needs and expecting your partner to know what you need. This is fundamentally flawed in almost every way. Yes over time your partner will come to learn your needs more fluidly but communication must take precedence even in those situations. No one can read minds if they could we’d have a lot more to worry about then you not asking for something you need)
There’s so much more to this book and I encourage everyone to give it a read.
Myths-
1: if we find a solution to the big fight we’re having right now everything will be fine no more problems (more than half of problems are perpetual)
2:if conflict exist in our relationship we’re not meant to be together (conflict is unavoidable have to learn to engage it on a fundamental level)
3:a conflict is a problem to be solved (we manage them through continuous dialogue, not resolve them)
4: one is right one is wrong (both partners are valid)
5: men at more logical women are more emotional (duh this is not true but is a stigma we often fall into)
6:the best conflict management is logical, rational and unemotional (common among conflict avoidance one can’t problem solve well without use and understanding of one’s emotions )
7: negative emotions are bad and should be avoided (we believe we can just outthink our emotions but this is not true. Don’t suppress the lows of life/relationships and don’t chase the highs)
8:nobody can hurt you unless you let them (the belief that at any time a person can have 100% control over their emotions is false example: “you chose to be hurt by that comment” “you chose to be effected by that action” why we can be more active in our reactions to things that doesn’t change how you feel about them. Just pretending something doesn’t hurt you won’t prevent it from doing so (an excuse to relive responsibility from one’s self) process what happened and repair it
9: you have to love yourself before loving someone else ( this idea is fundamentally flawed because no one loves themselves all the time, it’s a not human to doubt yourself. If this was the case most of us would be and should be single. It takes two to tango) we all have enduring vulnerabilities. Your partner should love you even when you don’t love yourself
10: to be allowed to have needs we have to justify or explain them. ( we live in a world where to have a need is to sin if we do have a need the only way to justify it is to prove how bad our partner has been to us. Humans are built to have needs it’s what makes us human. It’s our responsibility to communicate them. The biggest issue in a lot of relationships is not voicing your needs and expecting your partner to know what you need. This is fundamentally flawed in almost every way. Yes over time your partner will come to learn your needs more fluidly but communication must take precedence even in those situations. No one can read minds if they could we’d have a lot more to worry about then you not asking for something you need)
There’s so much more to this book and I encourage everyone to give it a read.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 545 reviews