What do you think?
Rate this book
Primacy or World Order : American Foreign Policy Since the Cold War
Book by Hoffman, Stanley
331 pages, Hardcover
First published January 1, 1978
42 people want to read
About the author
Stanley Hoffmann
68 books18 followersHoffmann was born in Vienna in 1928, and moved to France with his family the following year. A French citizen since 1947, Hoffmann spent his childhood between Paris and Nice before studying at Sciences Po. He followed an academic career in the United States and founded Harvard's Center for European Studies in 1968.
Hoffmann also participated as a political expert in the film The World According to Bush, dealing with the vicissitudes of the Bush administration after the 2000 presidential election.
Hoffmann also participated as a political expert in the film The World According to Bush, dealing with the vicissitudes of the Bush administration after the 2000 presidential election.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 of 1 review
September 15, 2025
Stanley Hoffmann’s Primacy or World Order (1978) stands as a significant intervention in the debates of the late Cold War era concerning the direction of U.S. foreign policy and the broader possibilities for international order. Written at a time of uncertainty following Vietnam, détente, and shifting balances of power, Hoffmann’s work probes the intellectual and practical foundations of American diplomacy. With characteristic erudition, Hoffmann combines historical analysis, normative inquiry, and policy critique to interrogate the tension between the pursuit of U.S. primacy and the aspiration for a cooperative global order.
At its core, the book grapples with the contradictions inherent in the American role as both a hegemonic power and a self-proclaimed architect of world order. Hoffmann situates U.S. foreign policy within the intellectual legacies of Wilsonianism, realism, and Cold War containment, carefully exposing how these traditions pull policymakers in divergent directions. His central argument is that the United States faces a choice between maintaining dominance through unilateralism and force projection—what he calls “primacy”—and working toward a genuinely multilateral framework of international cooperation, or “world order.” This dichotomy is not merely strategic but moral and structural, reflecting broader questions about how states should wield power in an increasingly interdependent world.
Hoffmann is particularly critical of the persistence of primacy in U.S. policymaking. He contends that a fixation on military strength and unilateral influence undermines America’s credibility, strains its resources, and exacerbates global instability. By contrast, he champions the pursuit of world order through institutions, diplomacy, and recognition of pluralism in global politics. In doing so, Hoffmann anticipates many themes that would later animate the literature on globalization, complex interdependence, and liberal institutionalism. Yet his treatment is tempered by realism; Hoffmann does not indulge in utopian expectations of a perfectly harmonious international society. Instead, he calls for pragmatic steps toward cooperation that acknowledge enduring power rivalries.
Stylistically, Primacy or World Order exemplifies Hoffmann’s strengths as both a scholar and public intellectual. His prose is accessible without sacrificing analytical rigor, and his synthesis of history, theory, and policy renders the book as much a work of political philosophy as of international relations. The text also reflects his broader intellectual project: to hold American foreign policy accountable not only to strategic imperatives but also to normative standards of justice and responsibility.
The book’s limitations stem largely from its historical context. Written before the end of the Cold War, Hoffmann’s assessment of Soviet-American relations and his cautious optimism about détente can appear dated. Moreover, his prescriptions for institutional reform, though principled, lacked the political feasibility required for implementation in the late 1970s. Nevertheless, these limitations should not overshadow the enduring value of Hoffmann’s insights. His framing of the choice between primacy and order continues to resonate in contemporary debates about U.S. hegemony, whether in the post–Cold War unipolar moment or the current era of multipolar contestation.
Primacy or World Order is a landmark contribution to the study of international relations and foreign policy. Hoffmann succeeds in clarifying the stakes of American strategy while pushing readers to consider the ethical as well as strategic consequences of global leadership. The work remains a vital resource for scholars and policymakers alike, reminding us that the pursuit of power and the pursuit of order need not be mutually exclusive but are in constant tension—and that how this tension is resolved carries profound implications for the stability of the international system.
GPT
At its core, the book grapples with the contradictions inherent in the American role as both a hegemonic power and a self-proclaimed architect of world order. Hoffmann situates U.S. foreign policy within the intellectual legacies of Wilsonianism, realism, and Cold War containment, carefully exposing how these traditions pull policymakers in divergent directions. His central argument is that the United States faces a choice between maintaining dominance through unilateralism and force projection—what he calls “primacy”—and working toward a genuinely multilateral framework of international cooperation, or “world order.” This dichotomy is not merely strategic but moral and structural, reflecting broader questions about how states should wield power in an increasingly interdependent world.
Hoffmann is particularly critical of the persistence of primacy in U.S. policymaking. He contends that a fixation on military strength and unilateral influence undermines America’s credibility, strains its resources, and exacerbates global instability. By contrast, he champions the pursuit of world order through institutions, diplomacy, and recognition of pluralism in global politics. In doing so, Hoffmann anticipates many themes that would later animate the literature on globalization, complex interdependence, and liberal institutionalism. Yet his treatment is tempered by realism; Hoffmann does not indulge in utopian expectations of a perfectly harmonious international society. Instead, he calls for pragmatic steps toward cooperation that acknowledge enduring power rivalries.
Stylistically, Primacy or World Order exemplifies Hoffmann’s strengths as both a scholar and public intellectual. His prose is accessible without sacrificing analytical rigor, and his synthesis of history, theory, and policy renders the book as much a work of political philosophy as of international relations. The text also reflects his broader intellectual project: to hold American foreign policy accountable not only to strategic imperatives but also to normative standards of justice and responsibility.
The book’s limitations stem largely from its historical context. Written before the end of the Cold War, Hoffmann’s assessment of Soviet-American relations and his cautious optimism about détente can appear dated. Moreover, his prescriptions for institutional reform, though principled, lacked the political feasibility required for implementation in the late 1970s. Nevertheless, these limitations should not overshadow the enduring value of Hoffmann’s insights. His framing of the choice between primacy and order continues to resonate in contemporary debates about U.S. hegemony, whether in the post–Cold War unipolar moment or the current era of multipolar contestation.
Primacy or World Order is a landmark contribution to the study of international relations and foreign policy. Hoffmann succeeds in clarifying the stakes of American strategy while pushing readers to consider the ethical as well as strategic consequences of global leadership. The work remains a vital resource for scholars and policymakers alike, reminding us that the pursuit of power and the pursuit of order need not be mutually exclusive but are in constant tension—and that how this tension is resolved carries profound implications for the stability of the international system.
GPT
Displaying 1 of 1 review