What do you think?
Rate this book
Sublimation
Doppelgängers, corporate intrigue, heartbreak, betrayal, and the harsh permanence of the border: Sublimation is a thrilling and provocative debut for fans of Severance that asks what you'd sacrifice for a different life from award-winning author Isabel J. Kim.
The border cuts you in two.
When you immigrate, you leave a copy of yourself behind, an instance. One person enters their new country; the other stays trapped at home.
Some instances keep in touch, call each other daily, keep their lives and minds in sync in the hopes of reintegrating and resuming a life as one person. Others, like Soyoung Rose Kang, leave home at ten years old and never speak to their other selves again. Rose, in America, never imagined going back to Korea until her grandfather died and her Korean instance called her home for the funeral.
She doesn’t know that Soyoung plans to steal her body and her life.
How far would you go to live the choice you didn’t make?
The border cuts you in two.
When you immigrate, you leave a copy of yourself behind, an instance. One person enters their new country; the other stays trapped at home.
Some instances keep in touch, call each other daily, keep their lives and minds in sync in the hopes of reintegrating and resuming a life as one person. Others, like Soyoung Rose Kang, leave home at ten years old and never speak to their other selves again. Rose, in America, never imagined going back to Korea until her grandfather died and her Korean instance called her home for the funeral.
She doesn’t know that Soyoung plans to steal her body and her life.
How far would you go to live the choice you didn’t make?
368 pages, Kindle Edition
First published June 2, 2026
About the author
Isabel J. Kim
34 books168 followersIsabel J. Kim lives near New York City in an apartment filled with books and swords. She is the author of numerous short stories and has won the Nebula, Locus, BSFA and the Shirley Jackson Awards. Her work has been translated into multiple languages and reprinted in multiple best of the year anthologies. When she’s not writing, she’s practicing law or podcasting. Find her at isabel.kim, @isabel.kim on Bluesky, or @isabeljkim on instagram.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 661 reviews
Review of advance copy received from NetGalley
⭐️ 4.5 ⭐️ What would you sacrifice for a different life?
The border cuts you in two.
In this world, you leave a copy of your self behind when you enter a new country. Some, choose to stay in contact with their copies, aka doppelgängers, while others never speak to their other selves again. Soyoung 'Rose' Kang chose to stay in America after leaving Korea at a young age but a tragic event calls her back home. What she doesn't know yet is that her other copy will try to steal her life and body back.
This book falls in the speculative fiction/sci-fi genre and this is Isabel J. Kims debut. It's making a lot of buzz amongst the sci-fi readers and possibly will turn into the next new sensation. I'm new to this genre, can't say I've read many books in this category. I can't believe this is a debut because the writing here was phenomenal. Kim is not new to writing, she has won a few awards for her short stories and I read somewhere that she is practicing law. She took the common core of biology, the process of mitosis (think splitting of a cell that produces genetically identical cells) and wrote an imaginative tale full of futuristic ideas and weaved complex themes of identity, immigration and impermanence of life into them. She's given so much thought to this idea of 'splitting' and how it would impact society, future generations, wars and our borders. Sublimation asks readers thought provoking questions that we probably asked ourselves a few times in our lifetime--what would you sacrifice for a different life? Can you lead two separate lives? Can we be someone else? Sublimation leaves no crumbs behind when it explores more intimate parts of ourselves--our hope, our desires, regrets.
This gem was packed with hard hitting themes of immigration, borders, homeland. Soyoung 'Rose' Kang split twenty years ago when her mother took a new job in the US, leaving Korea for good. Her 'instance' aka carbon copy, Soyoung remained with her biological mother at home in Korea. When their grandfather passes, 'Rose' returns to Korea and finds out that he left her the family home and that he wished for the two instances to re-integrate with each other. This becomes a challenging concern for both instances and serves as a catalyst that ignites the flame that moves the narrative forward. At the same time, we follow another linear story of the girls' childhood friends, YJ and his instance Yujin. They too, like Rose and Soyoung, split nearly 10 years ago with Yujin working for a STEM program while YJ becomes involved in the merge-break company responsible for the new mitosis fields that deal with re-integration processes. The two linear stories eventually converge in a climatic way and head into uncharted territories of emotional confrontation between the alternate selves. The central premise remains deeply rooted in process of emigration across a national border and it was quite a page turner.
This is a type of literary/speculative fiction that will make you think about choices, consequences and the 'what ifs'. What if another version of you/yourself lived a better life than you? What happens then and what would you do? How do you handle that knowledge or how do you move forward with your own life? What sacrifices would you make for a better life, a better self?
Narrators: Major Curda, Michelle H. Lee
Duration: 12 hours 47 minutes
Speed: 1.25x
Many thanks to NetGalley, Macmillan Audio and the author, Isabel J. Kim for an early ALC!
Publication date: June 2, 2026
The border cuts you in two.
In this world, you leave a copy of your self behind when you enter a new country. Some, choose to stay in contact with their copies, aka doppelgängers, while others never speak to their other selves again. Soyoung 'Rose' Kang chose to stay in America after leaving Korea at a young age but a tragic event calls her back home. What she doesn't know yet is that her other copy will try to steal her life and body back.
This book falls in the speculative fiction/sci-fi genre and this is Isabel J. Kims debut. It's making a lot of buzz amongst the sci-fi readers and possibly will turn into the next new sensation. I'm new to this genre, can't say I've read many books in this category. I can't believe this is a debut because the writing here was phenomenal. Kim is not new to writing, she has won a few awards for her short stories and I read somewhere that she is practicing law. She took the common core of biology, the process of mitosis (think splitting of a cell that produces genetically identical cells) and wrote an imaginative tale full of futuristic ideas and weaved complex themes of identity, immigration and impermanence of life into them. She's given so much thought to this idea of 'splitting' and how it would impact society, future generations, wars and our borders. Sublimation asks readers thought provoking questions that we probably asked ourselves a few times in our lifetime--what would you sacrifice for a different life? Can you lead two separate lives? Can we be someone else? Sublimation leaves no crumbs behind when it explores more intimate parts of ourselves--our hope, our desires, regrets.
This gem was packed with hard hitting themes of immigration, borders, homeland. Soyoung 'Rose' Kang split twenty years ago when her mother took a new job in the US, leaving Korea for good. Her 'instance' aka carbon copy, Soyoung remained with her biological mother at home in Korea. When their grandfather passes, 'Rose' returns to Korea and finds out that he left her the family home and that he wished for the two instances to re-integrate with each other. This becomes a challenging concern for both instances and serves as a catalyst that ignites the flame that moves the narrative forward. At the same time, we follow another linear story of the girls' childhood friends, YJ and his instance Yujin. They too, like Rose and Soyoung, split nearly 10 years ago with Yujin working for a STEM program while YJ becomes involved in the merge-break company responsible for the new mitosis fields that deal with re-integration processes. The two linear stories eventually converge in a climatic way and head into uncharted territories of emotional confrontation between the alternate selves. The central premise remains deeply rooted in process of emigration across a national border and it was quite a page turner.
This is a type of literary/speculative fiction that will make you think about choices, consequences and the 'what ifs'. What if another version of you/yourself lived a better life than you? What happens then and what would you do? How do you handle that knowledge or how do you move forward with your own life? What sacrifices would you make for a better life, a better self?
Narrators: Major Curda, Michelle H. Lee
Duration: 12 hours 47 minutes
Speed: 1.25x
Many thanks to NetGalley, Macmillan Audio and the author, Isabel J. Kim for an early ALC!
Publication date: June 2, 2026
July 8, 2026
An interesting concept though the execution flopped for me. In Sublimation, we live in a world where when someone immigrates, they leave a copy of themselves behind, called an instance. I can appreciate that Isabel Kim played around with ideas related to borders, identity, and self.
That said the writing was just too dry and heavy-handed for me to get into. Some of the prose felt like it was trying to elicit an emotional response but didn’t land. The writing, for me, made it hard to feel connected to any of the characters which disengaged me from the story overall. While I finish every book that I start (for better or worse), maybe read a little bit and see if you vibe with the prose style and then decide whether to commit to the book or not.
That said the writing was just too dry and heavy-handed for me to get into. Some of the prose felt like it was trying to elicit an emotional response but didn’t land. The writing, for me, made it hard to feel connected to any of the characters which disengaged me from the story overall. While I finish every book that I start (for better or worse), maybe read a little bit and see if you vibe with the prose style and then decide whether to commit to the book or not.
Read
May 6, 2026I received this audiobook through NetGalley.
Sublimation is a reflective, identity-driven speculative sci-fi story with strong writing and a medium pace. I enjoyed the Seoul, Korea setting and the cultural differences woven into the story, which made it feel distinct from what I usually read.
The mystery around the doppelgängers kept me engaged, though the mechanics sometimes felt a little abstract and left me slightly ungrounded. Still, that fit the overall themes of identity, memory, and what it means to become different versions of yourself.
The dual narration was strong and flowed naturally. Both narrators did a great job, though there were a few later moments where the narration overlapped. I wasn’t sure if that was intentional or a production issue, but it did pull me out.
Overall, this was a thoughtful, layered listen. I’d recommend it to readers who enjoy reflective speculative fiction, identity themes, and stories that leave room for interpretation.
Sublimation is a reflective, identity-driven speculative sci-fi story with strong writing and a medium pace. I enjoyed the Seoul, Korea setting and the cultural differences woven into the story, which made it feel distinct from what I usually read.
The mystery around the doppelgängers kept me engaged, though the mechanics sometimes felt a little abstract and left me slightly ungrounded. Still, that fit the overall themes of identity, memory, and what it means to become different versions of yourself.
The dual narration was strong and flowed naturally. Both narrators did a great job, though there were a few later moments where the narration overlapped. I wasn’t sure if that was intentional or a production issue, but it did pull me out.
Overall, this was a thoughtful, layered listen. I’d recommend it to readers who enjoy reflective speculative fiction, identity themes, and stories that leave room for interpretation.
June 20, 2026
You read an eagerly awaited book, a book you tagged shut-up-and-take-my-money" over a year ago, way before release date, as soon as you heard of it. You really wanted to read this book. You read and loved the short story it was based on, when it was just a short story in a sf magazine ( a very good magazine but still...) and you loved many other of the author's stories. A debut novel is so exciting, you want so much to love it. Then, itt's a slow going book, you keep putting it down, feeling disinterest, nevermind the style not being quite to your taste, but maybe it is you? And then you finish the book, and you are underwhelmed, against all your expectations and was that you again? Or maybe it was the book? Whichever case, it was certainly not helped by the "you" style of most of the chapters.
So, first, sorry for that paragraph above, I will stop now, but I was just trying to give you (you-you, not you meaning me the narrator, like in the book) an idea of the PoV style and why that might have been a problem for me (maybe it was the book, maybe it was me, keep your mind open). I do not know what to call the you-thing, it's not simple second person narrative. All throughout the book a lot of the chapters are written the style where the person is thinking of "you" when they think of themselves and it's a very omniscient almost style, where they are perfectly in touch with their feelings and motivations but writing about it as "you" rather than "I" but also almost like an omniscient third person narration where they are more introspective and aware than would be expected from a first person narration. This is not ALLL chapters, there is a logic to what narration format each chapter uses, depending on the status of the narrator so to speak (if they are an instance or not) and that is interesting (not totally novel or daring though). THe hard "you" format applies to about 85% of the text (number made up, just my feeling) but it is still annoying and in my modest opinion,even if the author wanted different narrative styles to different states of the POV she could have chosen differently (for example the you format instead for the merged characters which is a lot less of the narrative and if it is annoying, it is annoying for less chapters).The you narration was very tiring to me (but you do you, obviously. Some people actually LIKE this...)
A disclaimer of potential bias - I read and loved, a while ago, read and lovedthe original short story Homecoming is Just Another Word
for the Sublimation of the Self on Clarkesworld 174 that this is based on. That is also written in that PoV perspective, but in 6240 words a lot of things (and vague ideas and undefined personalities) work in ways that do not when extended to longer, 100+ kword novels. Incidentally the short story is basically the same action as the first 20% of the novel, the rest is totally novel. If in doubt, read the short story for a feel!
This is not the first time, not by far, that I read the first novel by an author whose short fiction I had previously loved and felt disappointed. Maybe it is me, maybe not. I do think shorter works require different skills and reward different things.
Another disclaimer of potential bias - I am an analytical reader of sf, the one who gets all interested in traffic jam predictions when you speak of flying cars (just imagine people trying to land in some spots at sunset!) and tries to do a quick cheeky l Fermi estimate, just for fun you know sometimes of some things (Ok, I am the kind of reader who knows what Fermi estimate is, and thinks it is fun and to do it sometimes and that is maybe hard core pretentious). This novel picks up a vague poetical idea used in the short story (the concept is instancing: that when people immigrate sometimes their bodies and minds duplicate so a copy immigrates and another stays behind and if they meet again and touch there is this risk they will merge) and world builds around it, and then goes all techno thriller about it and it felt like the more it elaborated it was like a small quilt being asked to cover a big bed, you pulled one way, it uncovered another area. The more it elaborated the more questions were raised that it never answered or addressed. The biggest one for example was what about conservation of energy and mass (because that is how my brain works and hey the "holy" conservation-symmetry laws is my ultimate hard limit and the breaking that the sf concept that I find more exciting. Seriously if mass-energy is not conserved, the consequences for tech!). Also, because that is also how my brain works, wait, what about the clothes, do instances come out naked, what is part of the instance, and can we use that to precisely replicate previous artifacts or rare elements? (sorry, but yeah come on, think of the potential! People would try to do this, to fill their pockets with stuff when immigrating just in case!). Or I dunno, what about duplicating elite athletes! Or historically marriageable princesses and such. This cloning people (and what they wore?!?) could be so much more fun as a sf setup than what it turned out to be.
The novel tries to address the historical worldbuilding of instantiation using prologues to the several chapters, reworking some stories most remarkably the Odyssey and the Garden of Eden biblical story. Sadly that did not work for me either. First sometimes it made no sense (why would Penelope have suitors if a copy of Odyssey stayed in Ithaca? Why keep that part of the story? And wait did Helen instance? If not, why? If she did, why fight a war at all?), another is that by reworking the myths as she wished the author was too precisely foreshadowing the meaning of the action to follow in a way that was not subtle at all, and heck felt tacky, too overdone, and since the myths are reworked it's the author not trusting the reader to do subtle or to not need handholding (I really am not the right reader for this book, unexpectedly...). It was too on the nose, too obvious, felt, for lack of a better word "cheap".
The technothriller part ended up being very underserved (I should have been reading one of those TBR Neal Stephenson's instead) and actually felt kind of naïve. Not helped by that I really did not care about those characters or their pains. (Ah, Soyoung-Rose who resents so much that people ask her where she is from and do not believe in New Jersey as being enough of a reply but thinks of somebody else "he’s some sort of brown, though Soyoung can’t tell where he’s from, exactly". Maybe New Jersey also, Soyoung, like you. The brown person might be from New Jersey, just as you). Ah, andthe romantic plot line, the ending was creepy to me. Maybe it will be romantic to some but that .
In all, I have no idea if I would recommend this book or not. I think part is a me problem, me a resident of the outlier archipelago and all, those bias disclaimers, I am the wrong reader for this (the holy conservation of energy-mass is getting ignored, heretics! That second person PoV choice!) but I also think, it is not totally a me problem. Objectively, it is not a perfect book, or not as a good an exploration of the concept as it could have been. This is a really daring book, but one that does not go deep enough into a lot of things it tries to explore (seriously, the Odyssey! Did Helen instance? Why did Penelope have suitors anyway?)
About the author's future novels, I dunno if I will read them. If she ever does the space opera universe novel some of her short stories seem to be set in, I know I will not be able to resist, no matter the narrative choices, just take my money again, I am in, just in case.... About other books, I do not know, I definitely need a break from "you-meaning-I" books, I am counting on future reviewers to talk about it before making up my mind. If it is any kind of sequel to this, am out.
So, first, sorry for that paragraph above, I will stop now, but I was just trying to give you (you-you, not you meaning me the narrator, like in the book) an idea of the PoV style and why that might have been a problem for me (maybe it was the book, maybe it was me, keep your mind open). I do not know what to call the you-thing, it's not simple second person narrative. All throughout the book a lot of the chapters are written the style where the person is thinking of "you" when they think of themselves and it's a very omniscient almost style, where they are perfectly in touch with their feelings and motivations but writing about it as "you" rather than "I" but also almost like an omniscient third person narration where they are more introspective and aware than would be expected from a first person narration. This is not ALLL chapters, there is a logic to what narration format each chapter uses, depending on the status of the narrator so to speak (if they are an instance or not) and that is interesting (not totally novel or daring though). THe hard "you" format applies to about 85% of the text (number made up, just my feeling) but it is still annoying and in my modest opinion,even if the author wanted different narrative styles to different states of the POV she could have chosen differently (for example the you format instead for the merged characters which is a lot less of the narrative and if it is annoying, it is annoying for less chapters).The you narration was very tiring to me (but you do you, obviously. Some people actually LIKE this...)
A disclaimer of potential bias - I read and loved, a while ago, read and lovedthe original short story Homecoming is Just Another Word
for the Sublimation of the Self on Clarkesworld 174 that this is based on. That is also written in that PoV perspective, but in 6240 words a lot of things (and vague ideas and undefined personalities) work in ways that do not when extended to longer, 100+ kword novels. Incidentally the short story is basically the same action as the first 20% of the novel, the rest is totally novel. If in doubt, read the short story for a feel!
This is not the first time, not by far, that I read the first novel by an author whose short fiction I had previously loved and felt disappointed. Maybe it is me, maybe not. I do think shorter works require different skills and reward different things.
Another disclaimer of potential bias - I am an analytical reader of sf, the one who gets all interested in traffic jam predictions when you speak of flying cars (just imagine people trying to land in some spots at sunset!) and tries to do a quick cheeky l Fermi estimate, just for fun you know sometimes of some things (Ok, I am the kind of reader who knows what Fermi estimate is, and thinks it is fun and to do it sometimes and that is maybe hard core pretentious). This novel picks up a vague poetical idea used in the short story (the concept is instancing: that when people immigrate sometimes their bodies and minds duplicate so a copy immigrates and another stays behind and if they meet again and touch there is this risk they will merge) and world builds around it, and then goes all techno thriller about it and it felt like the more it elaborated it was like a small quilt being asked to cover a big bed, you pulled one way, it uncovered another area. The more it elaborated the more questions were raised that it never answered or addressed. The biggest one for example was what about conservation of energy and mass (because that is how my brain works and hey the "holy" conservation-symmetry laws is my ultimate hard limit and the breaking that the sf concept that I find more exciting. Seriously if mass-energy is not conserved, the consequences for tech!). Also, because that is also how my brain works, wait, what about the clothes, do instances come out naked, what is part of the instance, and can we use that to precisely replicate previous artifacts or rare elements? (sorry, but yeah come on, think of the potential! People would try to do this, to fill their pockets with stuff when immigrating just in case!). Or I dunno, what about duplicating elite athletes! Or historically marriageable princesses and such. This cloning people (and what they wore?!?) could be so much more fun as a sf setup than what it turned out to be.
The novel tries to address the historical worldbuilding of instantiation using prologues to the several chapters, reworking some stories most remarkably the Odyssey and the Garden of Eden biblical story. Sadly that did not work for me either. First sometimes it made no sense (why would Penelope have suitors if a copy of Odyssey stayed in Ithaca? Why keep that part of the story? And wait did Helen instance? If not, why? If she did, why fight a war at all?), another is that by reworking the myths as she wished the author was too precisely foreshadowing the meaning of the action to follow in a way that was not subtle at all, and heck felt tacky, too overdone, and since the myths are reworked it's the author not trusting the reader to do subtle or to not need handholding (I really am not the right reader for this book, unexpectedly...). It was too on the nose, too obvious, felt, for lack of a better word "cheap".
The technothriller part ended up being very underserved (I should have been reading one of those TBR Neal Stephenson's instead) and actually felt kind of naïve. Not helped by that I really did not care about those characters or their pains. (Ah, Soyoung-Rose who resents so much that people ask her where she is from and do not believe in New Jersey as being enough of a reply but thinks of somebody else "he’s some sort of brown, though Soyoung can’t tell where he’s from, exactly". Maybe New Jersey also, Soyoung, like you. The brown person might be from New Jersey, just as you). Ah, andthe romantic plot line, the ending was creepy to me. Maybe it will be romantic to some but that .
In all, I have no idea if I would recommend this book or not. I think part is a me problem, me a resident of the outlier archipelago and all, those bias disclaimers, I am the wrong reader for this (the holy conservation of energy-mass is getting ignored, heretics! That second person PoV choice!) but I also think, it is not totally a me problem. Objectively, it is not a perfect book, or not as a good an exploration of the concept as it could have been. This is a really daring book, but one that does not go deep enough into a lot of things it tries to explore (seriously, the Odyssey! Did Helen instance? Why did Penelope have suitors anyway?)
About the author's future novels, I dunno if I will read them. If she ever does the space opera universe novel some of her short stories seem to be set in, I know I will not be able to resist, no matter the narrative choices, just take my money again, I am in, just in case.... About other books, I do not know, I definitely need a break from "you-meaning-I" books, I am counting on future reviewers to talk about it before making up my mind. If it is any kind of sequel to this, am out.
June 2, 2026
Happy release day to this excellent book!
//
6/1/26: I'll be back to revise this review a million times, but the book comes out tomorrow! I didn't read it right when I got the ARC, in large part because I was concussed and wanted to give it my full mental focus, and later because I was almost afraid that I wouldn't love it as much as I expected.
Now, however, I've read the book and want to come back on release week and celebrate how incredibly good and weird it is. I was worried that moving to novel length would mean that the story lost some of the essential Isabel J. Kim weirdness that I love so much in her short fiction, but no! The book is mostly in second person, with gorgeous fluidity about who's "you" at a given moment and shifts to third or first person that start to feel different and alien. There are interstitial folklore segments about everything from a Korean folk song to the Odyssey. People reflect about how they're made of meat (such a signature move that said "meat I mentioned" out loud to myself. This was a strange move, but so is the book (complimentary)).
Thematically, the narrative does magnificent work with a simple premise: in this world that's almost Earth, people sometimes split into two selves when they cross borders: one who goes to a new place, and one who stays behind. If they ever touch skin to skin later, they reintegrate back into one self, but until then, they have two separate lives. It's a fascinating window into personal desire and might-have-beens-- an instance is only created when a person thinks of their journey as finding a new home and future, not a temporary home, so sometimes the creation of another self reveals thoughts of leave-taking that a person hasn't known until that moment. I loved everything from the gnawing thoughts of whether a character's instance wants to reunite to the mundane details of two selves using each other as a sounding board for arguments.
If I have one tiny complaint, it's that the more "people should know this big secret" thriller elements are less weird, in that they could belong to another story. To me, lower and more specific stakes on that point would have played better with the personal character stakes-- but that's a preference point based in my general lukewarm response to thriller plots.
If I have compliments, I have a million, but I have to give particular congratulations to my favorite interstitial paragraph in the book, which has been haunting my thoughts constantly:
The re-imagining of folklore and religion in a world with instances is beautifully done, layering multiple versions of songs and stories together with the multiple selves who inhabit them. That story element could have been crafted for me in a lab, and I'm so glad it made the jump from the initial short story to the novel treatment.
Overall: this is my favorite debut novel I've seen in years, and I'm so excited to see what Isabel J. Kim writes next.
--
11/18/25: I just read the first POV segment last night, and waiting for the paper ARC in January/February so I can more fully engage with The Text (TM) is going to test my patience like nothing else. I (don't) apologize in advance for what a complete freak I'm going to be about this whole book. Second person writing? One great worldbuilding device with deep thematic implications? Emotions simmering just under the surface? She can't keep getting away with this.
--
The author's debut short story that this is based on absolutely slaps and you should read it immediately to acquaint yourself with this universe: "Homecoming is Just Another Word for the Sublimation of the Self"
I made a bunch of unhinged screaming noises when I saw the news that Isabel J. Kim had a book and media deal (Sci-Fi Novel ‘Sublimation’ Lands At Universal International Studios For TV Adaptation), but look, it's only because she's a genius and I have great taste.
Do we have a release date orany character names character details yet? Irrelevant. I can't wait to dive in.
//
6/1/26: I'll be back to revise this review a million times, but the book comes out tomorrow! I didn't read it right when I got the ARC, in large part because I was concussed and wanted to give it my full mental focus, and later because I was almost afraid that I wouldn't love it as much as I expected.
Now, however, I've read the book and want to come back on release week and celebrate how incredibly good and weird it is. I was worried that moving to novel length would mean that the story lost some of the essential Isabel J. Kim weirdness that I love so much in her short fiction, but no! The book is mostly in second person, with gorgeous fluidity about who's "you" at a given moment and shifts to third or first person that start to feel different and alien. There are interstitial folklore segments about everything from a Korean folk song to the Odyssey. People reflect about how they're made of meat (such a signature move that said "meat I mentioned" out loud to myself. This was a strange move, but so is the book (complimentary)).
Thematically, the narrative does magnificent work with a simple premise: in this world that's almost Earth, people sometimes split into two selves when they cross borders: one who goes to a new place, and one who stays behind. If they ever touch skin to skin later, they reintegrate back into one self, but until then, they have two separate lives. It's a fascinating window into personal desire and might-have-beens-- an instance is only created when a person thinks of their journey as finding a new home and future, not a temporary home, so sometimes the creation of another self reveals thoughts of leave-taking that a person hasn't known until that moment. I loved everything from the gnawing thoughts of whether a character's instance wants to reunite to the mundane details of two selves using each other as a sounding board for arguments.
If I have one tiny complaint, it's that the more "people should know this big secret" thriller elements are less weird, in that they could belong to another story. To me, lower and more specific stakes on that point would have played better with the personal character stakes-- but that's a preference point based in my general lukewarm response to thriller plots.
If I have compliments, I have a million, but I have to give particular congratulations to my favorite interstitial paragraph in the book, which has been haunting my thoughts constantly:
Odysseus, staring down the barrel of his past life, across the wine-dark sea. Nothing stops him, no gods, no monsters, no lovers, no ghosts of dead heroes or relatives, no enchanted feasts, no sirens, no sorceresses, no wayward crew. He going to get his life back. He is going to go back home.
The re-imagining of folklore and religion in a world with instances is beautifully done, layering multiple versions of songs and stories together with the multiple selves who inhabit them. That story element could have been crafted for me in a lab, and I'm so glad it made the jump from the initial short story to the novel treatment.
Overall: this is my favorite debut novel I've seen in years, and I'm so excited to see what Isabel J. Kim writes next.
--
11/18/25: I just read the first POV segment last night, and waiting for the paper ARC in January/February so I can more fully engage with The Text (TM) is going to test my patience like nothing else. I (don't) apologize in advance for what a complete freak I'm going to be about this whole book. Second person writing? One great worldbuilding device with deep thematic implications? Emotions simmering just under the surface? She can't keep getting away with this.
--
The author's debut short story that this is based on absolutely slaps and you should read it immediately to acquaint yourself with this universe: "Homecoming is Just Another Word for the Sublimation of the Self"
I made a bunch of unhinged screaming noises when I saw the news that Isabel J. Kim had a book and media deal (Sci-Fi Novel ‘Sublimation’ Lands At Universal International Studios For TV Adaptation), but look, it's only because she's a genius and I have great taste.
The book is set in a world where a process called “instancing” splits a person into two distinct copies: one who migrates and one who remains. The story unfolds when a woman who migrated returns to Seoul and must face her other self, while her childhood friend’s New York self draws her into a conspiracy to control the future of instancing, bringing both versions of him back into her life with global repercussions.
Do we have a release date or
previewed-decided-against
June 27, 2026While this has a cool premise, I just don’t think I can with a book that misuses two words in the first four pages. Especially when I’ve been meh on the author’s short stories thus far.
The errors, for the curious:
At the end of the first full paragraph, my God: “Commuters in nice clothing hurry past, using the food hall as a shortcut to the subway. Tourists examine the stalls and malinger.”
The tourists are pretending to be sick? No, of course they’re not; the author, editor, copyeditor and everyone else who laid hands on this manuscript are all evidently just unaware that “malinger” is not a fancy synonym for “linger.” It is a different word.
At the end of Chapter 1 (which is only four pages long!): “Something must have shifted in their heart, some secret admittance than their leave-taking is permanent, that their families have become foreign to them.”
Again, “admittance” and “admission” are not interchangeable. The former refers to being physically allowed into a place, the latter is what the author is looking for to mean admitting something to oneself. The misuse just immediately read as clunky to me, even before looking it up to check my instincts. (Reproducing this sentence I also note that “their heart” is singular, as if there is only one heart involved, but “their families” plural, because we’re talking multiple people with different families. And therefore, also, different hearts. Consistency, please.)
I think I’ll let this one go. Shame on Tor Publishing.
The errors, for the curious:
At the end of the first full paragraph, my God: “Commuters in nice clothing hurry past, using the food hall as a shortcut to the subway. Tourists examine the stalls and malinger.”
The tourists are pretending to be sick? No, of course they’re not; the author, editor, copyeditor and everyone else who laid hands on this manuscript are all evidently just unaware that “malinger” is not a fancy synonym for “linger.” It is a different word.
At the end of Chapter 1 (which is only four pages long!): “Something must have shifted in their heart, some secret admittance than their leave-taking is permanent, that their families have become foreign to them.”
Again, “admittance” and “admission” are not interchangeable. The former refers to being physically allowed into a place, the latter is what the author is looking for to mean admitting something to oneself. The misuse just immediately read as clunky to me, even before looking it up to check my instincts. (Reproducing this sentence I also note that “their heart” is singular, as if there is only one heart involved, but “their families” plural, because we’re talking multiple people with different families. And therefore, also, different hearts. Consistency, please.)
I think I’ll let this one go. Shame on Tor Publishing.
June 25, 2026
underrated type of book: one that will be off-putting to so many people but perfectly fits my own weird tastes ❤️
June 8, 2026
I never want to hear the word “instance” again.
I've liked the author's short fiction, and I was looking forward to this. Maybe I'm just bitter that Sublimation failed to live up to my expectations. I was into it for the first few chapters, but it went downhill from there.
The book starts off with the short story that birthed it. Soyoung's grandfather dies, and she calls her doppelganger Rose to break the news. Rose goes to Seoul for the funeral and the two proceed to have an incredibly awkward time. Soyoung wants to reintegrate, but Rose does not.
Somewhat comedically, Soyoung immediately regrets her decision to snatch Rose's wrist. Her reasons aren't very convincing. Boredom, jealousy, selfishness. I don't get why these people are so obsessed with their other selves. None of them are interesting.
“I’ve always wanted to know what it was like, to live somewhere else. To have been the one to leave. I wondered about you.”
That doesn't require reintegration. Soyoung had the resources to travel or move abroad. She can't relive her childhood, but she has a future which she refuses to consider.
Soyoung sees her friend Yujin's instance on TV. Amazingly, he's working on a instancing project called Mitosis. How fortuitous!
The book sort of shifts to a mystery/thriller at this point. The plot is prolonged by lack of communication, an uncomfortable romance subplot, and repetitive, discursive bullshit.
The techno-thriller/corporate espionage/whatever the fuck is diluted by the characters’ relentless introspection. The information YJ needs to get to the bottom of the Mitosis (de-integration) project is simply handed to him, in an asinine, roundabout way to stretch this out into a full novel.
Nothing much happens. They go hiking, to cafes, go to museums, they have snacks, generally fuck around, and everyone does a shitload of navel-gazing about instancing all while playing text tag.
Soyoung and YJ spend, like, five minutes talking about what to do about Mitosis. YJ wants to talk to his boss about it. That adds another hundred pages to the story. It's not clear what YJ thinks he'll get out of this. He doesn't even know, making shit up while that conversation is in progress.
It all comes to a head when
The text really tries to sell its conceit, but the fantastical instancing remains weirdly underdeveloped, and raises a ton of questions.
Instancing predominantly at immigration checkpoints and political borders is pretty narrow. What about someone running away from an abusive home? Or making any major, life-changing decision? This is something the book doesn't explore.
The whole Mitosis thing, being able to prevent instancing, doesn't seem that dire to me. If you didn't want to instance, or wanted to reverse, could you not grab the other you immediately after they popped up? Or couldn't they be forced to touch? TSA could just shove them together. The technology is solving a problem that doesn't really exist, and has far simpler and cheaper solutions. Unfortunately, a large portion of the text is devoted to justifying the technology, to trying to explain why it's equivalent to the atom bomb (as YJ says).
The way instancing is explained is anti-materialist, insisting on discrete physical and psychological processes. I would have preferred to do without rather than have it periodically dumped.
The question keeps coming up whether reintegration is a sort of murder. How has that not been addressed in the tens of thousands of years people have been instancing? Same with the other Philosophy of Instancing 101 that bloats the narrative. Why aren't these characters familiar with the discourse in their own universe? They're in their 30s and are just having these revelations?
It would have been interesting to contrast Soyoung/Rose's grandfather's instancing at the DMZ to her own. But, her grandfather's experience is dealt with in a sentence or two.
This cursory treatment persists throughout the book. Anything potentially hot-button is mentioned briefly; despite immigration being inherently political, this book isn't that concerned with it. Other than wikipedia-style reportage, which does little to humanize the matter with tepid asides such as, “The law doesn't care about the heart.” And, later, Soyoung's spontaneous, performative, self-interested radicalization.
“This is the American tradition, which spread like the other American diseases (capitalism, Starbucks, McDonald’s).”
Who is this catering to? Like every other opinion this book could have, the sentiment is trotted out for a moment before being hastily shoved back into the stable.
When political opinions do come up later in the book, they're unearned. Soyoung, after two hundred pages of being solely focused on her own bullshit, suddenly manifests strong opinions about the right to instantiate. Similarly, Rose never expressed any concern about "very, very unlucky" immigrants. Such groups are relegated to metatextual nods.
There is so much telling passed off as introspection. We don't see what actually drives the characters, what in their lives (other than locality) made them into these disaffected people, so it has to be told to us. Repeatedly. Actions and dialogue are followed with because, eliminating nuance or any need for the reader to interpret or infer anything.
For example:
Two paragraphs to reiterate what was conveyed in dialogue. We already know what Yujin wants and how he feels. It's been told to us before, many times. Within this long-winded explanation are sub-explanations of information we've known since the beginning of the book. This happens over and over and over again. Yujin keeps going on about it in following chapters, it's fucking tedious.
Characters imagine lots of shit mid-conversation. I imagine them like those Death Note edits where Light's internal dialogue is removed, just standing around in dead silence while L stares at him. This even happens when . Come the fuck on.
The Odyssey, Arirang, and other folkloric interludes serve as filler, repeatedly breaking up scenes, lengthening rather than illuminating. This shit crops up during . Time and time again, everything comes to a screeching halt so someone can ruminate.
The pacing and repetition reminds me a lot of fanfic and serialized works, where information is rehashed in chapters that are posted weeks, months, sometimes years apart. When read in quick succession, it stands out badly.
I just didn't care about the endless, juvenile philosophizing about some made up shit. The characters are all defined by having instantiated, rather than the circumstances that led to that happening. I think the latter would have been more compelling.
Sublimation does a lot of things, but none of them well. Not literary, or sci-fi, or thriller, or horror, or family drama. It's skimming it all while evading what lurks under the surface.
Where it does succeed is in highlighting the experiences of a certain class of East Asian immigrants, while occasionally recognizing that others exists. I would recommend Where Are You Really From by Elaine Hsieh Chou for a more diverse and poignant approach.
I've liked the author's short fiction, and I was looking forward to this. Maybe I'm just bitter that Sublimation failed to live up to my expectations. I was into it for the first few chapters, but it went downhill from there.
The book starts off with the short story that birthed it. Soyoung's grandfather dies, and she calls her doppelganger Rose to break the news. Rose goes to Seoul for the funeral and the two proceed to have an incredibly awkward time. Soyoung wants to reintegrate, but Rose does not.
Somewhat comedically, Soyoung immediately regrets her decision to snatch Rose's wrist. Her reasons aren't very convincing. Boredom, jealousy, selfishness. I don't get why these people are so obsessed with their other selves. None of them are interesting.
“I’ve always wanted to know what it was like, to live somewhere else. To have been the one to leave. I wondered about you.”
That doesn't require reintegration. Soyoung had the resources to travel or move abroad. She can't relive her childhood, but she has a future which she refuses to consider.
Soyoung sees her friend Yujin's instance on TV. Amazingly, he's working on a instancing project called Mitosis. How fortuitous!
The book sort of shifts to a mystery/thriller at this point. The plot is prolonged by lack of communication, an uncomfortable romance subplot, and repetitive, discursive bullshit.
The techno-thriller/corporate espionage/whatever the fuck is diluted by the characters’ relentless introspection. The information YJ needs to get to the bottom of the Mitosis (de-integration) project is simply handed to him, in an asinine, roundabout way to stretch this out into a full novel.
Nothing much happens. They go hiking, to cafes, go to museums, they have snacks, generally fuck around, and everyone does a shitload of navel-gazing about instancing all while playing text tag.
Soyoung and YJ spend, like, five minutes talking about what to do about Mitosis. YJ wants to talk to his boss about it. That adds another hundred pages to the story. It's not clear what YJ thinks he'll get out of this. He doesn't even know, making shit up while that conversation is in progress.
It all comes to a head when
The text really tries to sell its conceit, but the fantastical instancing remains weirdly underdeveloped, and raises a ton of questions.
Instancing predominantly at immigration checkpoints and political borders is pretty narrow. What about someone running away from an abusive home? Or making any major, life-changing decision? This is something the book doesn't explore.
The whole Mitosis thing, being able to prevent instancing, doesn't seem that dire to me. If you didn't want to instance, or wanted to reverse, could you not grab the other you immediately after they popped up? Or couldn't they be forced to touch? TSA could just shove them together. The technology is solving a problem that doesn't really exist, and has far simpler and cheaper solutions. Unfortunately, a large portion of the text is devoted to justifying the technology, to trying to explain why it's equivalent to the atom bomb (as YJ says).
The way instancing is explained is anti-materialist, insisting on discrete physical and psychological processes. I would have preferred to do without rather than have it periodically dumped.
The question keeps coming up whether reintegration is a sort of murder. How has that not been addressed in the tens of thousands of years people have been instancing? Same with the other Philosophy of Instancing 101 that bloats the narrative. Why aren't these characters familiar with the discourse in their own universe? They're in their 30s and are just having these revelations?
It would have been interesting to contrast Soyoung/Rose's grandfather's instancing at the DMZ to her own. But, her grandfather's experience is dealt with in a sentence or two.
This cursory treatment persists throughout the book. Anything potentially hot-button is mentioned briefly; despite immigration being inherently political, this book isn't that concerned with it. Other than wikipedia-style reportage, which does little to humanize the matter with tepid asides such as, “The law doesn't care about the heart.” And, later, Soyoung's spontaneous, performative, self-interested radicalization.
“This is the American tradition, which spread like the other American diseases (capitalism, Starbucks, McDonald’s).”
Who is this catering to? Like every other opinion this book could have, the sentiment is trotted out for a moment before being hastily shoved back into the stable.
When political opinions do come up later in the book, they're unearned. Soyoung, after two hundred pages of being solely focused on her own bullshit, suddenly manifests strong opinions about the right to instantiate. Similarly, Rose never expressed any concern about "very, very unlucky" immigrants. Such groups are relegated to metatextual nods.
There is so much telling passed off as introspection. We don't see what actually drives the characters, what in their lives (other than locality) made them into these disaffected people, so it has to be told to us. Repeatedly. Actions and dialogue are followed with because, eliminating nuance or any need for the reader to interpret or infer anything.
For example:
Two paragraphs to reiterate what was conveyed in dialogue. We already know what Yujin wants and how he feels. It's been told to us before, many times. Within this long-winded explanation are sub-explanations of information we've known since the beginning of the book. This happens over and over and over again. Yujin keeps going on about it in following chapters, it's fucking tedious.
Characters imagine lots of shit mid-conversation. I imagine them like those Death Note edits where Light's internal dialogue is removed, just standing around in dead silence while L stares at him. This even happens when . Come the fuck on.
The Odyssey, Arirang, and other folkloric interludes serve as filler, repeatedly breaking up scenes, lengthening rather than illuminating. This shit crops up during . Time and time again, everything comes to a screeching halt so someone can ruminate.
The pacing and repetition reminds me a lot of fanfic and serialized works, where information is rehashed in chapters that are posted weeks, months, sometimes years apart. When read in quick succession, it stands out badly.
I just didn't care about the endless, juvenile philosophizing about some made up shit. The characters are all defined by having instantiated, rather than the circumstances that led to that happening. I think the latter would have been more compelling.
Sublimation does a lot of things, but none of them well. Not literary, or sci-fi, or thriller, or horror, or family drama. It's skimming it all while evading what lurks under the surface.
Where it does succeed is in highlighting the experiences of a certain class of East Asian immigrants, while occasionally recognizing that others exists. I would recommend Where Are You Really From by Elaine Hsieh Chou for a more diverse and poignant approach.
Review of advance copy received from NetGalley
Womp dnf-ed at 76%. Short rtc
✶⋆.˚
pre-read : another approved anticipated release!! ✧｡٩(ˊᗜˋ )و✧*｡
✶⋆.˚
pre-read : another approved anticipated release!! ✧｡٩(ˊᗜˋ )و✧*｡
Read
April 24, 2025A big thank you to the author and publisher for an eARC of the book for a blurb!!
SUBLIMATION is an odyssey of choices and regrets, of people who would be and never were but also are, all at once, exploring immigration and separation, diaspora and the resulting split identities of cultural interweaving—both willing and unwilling. Kim masterfully blends the experimental and straight forward, jarring yet familiar, philosophical and theoretical, while exanimating placelessness and fractured identity through multilayered narratives. I have never felt more seen by a book in my life.
SUBLIMATION is an odyssey of choices and regrets, of people who would be and never were but also are, all at once, exploring immigration and separation, diaspora and the resulting split identities of cultural interweaving—both willing and unwilling. Kim masterfully blends the experimental and straight forward, jarring yet familiar, philosophical and theoretical, while exanimating placelessness and fractured identity through multilayered narratives. I have never felt more seen by a book in my life.
December 12, 2025
This was an absolute joy to read.
If you haven’t read the short story it’s based on, I highly recommend checking it out. If you like it, it’ll get you excited for the novel. If not…well, it’s a good representation of the style https://clarkesworldmagazine.com/kim_...
This book does a wonderful job digging into the personal character moments. The second-person keeps the reader close while also providing something of a dislocation effect, as it stars characters who are constantly wondering whether their lives would’ve been better if they’d taken the other branch of big life decisions. It’s that internal turmoil that provides the biggest interpersonal conflicts and the true emotional heart of the story.
There’s also a thriller plot that builds over the course of the story and takes center stage in the fourth act. I’m personally biased against thriller plots, so your mileage may vary, but I don’t think it’s exceptional here—it struggles to motivate the kind of world-shaking stakes that the characters feel it has.
That said…the quality of the writing and the interpersonal conflict is good enough to make this a five-star read even if the thriller element isn’t top-tier. The climax hits the character notes hard enough that it never feels like they drop into the background, even as the story gets plottier.
It’s a very good book, and an even better debut. I wish I had done a better job of reviewing it. Perhaps I’ll clean this up and try again later. But right now, I’m adding my recommendation to the stack.
17/20
If you haven’t read the short story it’s based on, I highly recommend checking it out. If you like it, it’ll get you excited for the novel. If not…well, it’s a good representation of the style https://clarkesworldmagazine.com/kim_...
This book does a wonderful job digging into the personal character moments. The second-person keeps the reader close while also providing something of a dislocation effect, as it stars characters who are constantly wondering whether their lives would’ve been better if they’d taken the other branch of big life decisions. It’s that internal turmoil that provides the biggest interpersonal conflicts and the true emotional heart of the story.
There’s also a thriller plot that builds over the course of the story and takes center stage in the fourth act. I’m personally biased against thriller plots, so your mileage may vary, but I don’t think it’s exceptional here—it struggles to motivate the kind of world-shaking stakes that the characters feel it has.
That said…the quality of the writing and the interpersonal conflict is good enough to make this a five-star read even if the thriller element isn’t top-tier. The climax hits the character notes hard enough that it never feels like they drop into the background, even as the story gets plottier.
It’s a very good book, and an even better debut. I wish I had done a better job of reviewing it. Perhaps I’ll clean this up and try again later. But right now, I’m adding my recommendation to the stack.
17/20
Review of advance copy received from Publisher
DNF pg. 152
I loved the concept of this one (because I loved Severance), but the plot felt like pulling teeth. I learned afterward that this novel is based on a short story written by the same author, and while I don't plan on reading it, I know without a doubt it would have worked far better in the shorter format. This was also told in the second-person narrative, which has never been my ideal narrative type.
I think the oddest part was the inclusion of snippets from the Odyssey. The author names these "separate" individuals, the parts of themselves that split when they choose to immigrate; these are called instances. Within the text of the Odyssey, there is a reference to "instances," and the author warps the text to make it as if instances have been a thing since ancient Greece, and that Odysseus himself had created an instance between the Iliad and the Odyssey. It could have been a clever addition; however, it felt too disjointed from the author's actual story.
I loved the concept of this one (because I loved Severance), but the plot felt like pulling teeth. I learned afterward that this novel is based on a short story written by the same author, and while I don't plan on reading it, I know without a doubt it would have worked far better in the shorter format. This was also told in the second-person narrative, which has never been my ideal narrative type.
I think the oddest part was the inclusion of snippets from the Odyssey. The author names these "separate" individuals, the parts of themselves that split when they choose to immigrate; these are called instances. Within the text of the Odyssey, there is a reference to "instances," and the author warps the text to make it as if instances have been a thing since ancient Greece, and that Odysseus himself had created an instance between the Iliad and the Odyssey. It could have been a clever addition; however, it felt too disjointed from the author's actual story.
2026
November 14, 2025ANHPI TBR
📱 Thank you to NetGalley and Tor Books
📱 Thank you to NetGalley and Tor Books
Read
May 16, 202605/2026 — I HAVE FINISHED THIS!!! When I first heard about this book at the New York Comic Con Tor event, I thought this would be an instant 5 stars. Severance x the immigration crisis?? In which your person severs (or "instances") whenever you cross borders if two parts of you are warring over whether to stay or leave? So ther one version of you goes and the other stays - but you both have the same memories and foundation until the point you instance.
Brilliant. Such a unique concept!
Now, I enjoyed the overall story but I LOVED the reflective tidbits woven between the storytelling. The reflections on how in an instancing world, our mythical stories would be drastically different (think: Odysseus), politics and shared borders would become much more complex (think: DMZ), and even our religious beliefs would be transformed (think: biblical stories).
Thank you Macmillan Audio for the ALC and Tor for the e-ARC!
Having both was extremely useful for this whirlwind of a book!
——
10/2025 I’m at NY ComicCon and they brought this book up at a TOR panel and holy hell I AM SO SAT. They pitched it as severance x immigration, so when you emigrate, you essentially sever yourself into two: the person you are in your birth country and person you become in your country of destination. !!! INCREDIBLE !!!
Brilliant. Such a unique concept!
Now, I enjoyed the overall story but I LOVED the reflective tidbits woven between the storytelling. The reflections on how in an instancing world, our mythical stories would be drastically different (think: Odysseus), politics and shared borders would become much more complex (think: DMZ), and even our religious beliefs would be transformed (think: biblical stories).
Thank you Macmillan Audio for the ALC and Tor for the e-ARC!
Having both was extremely useful for this whirlwind of a book!
——
10/2025 I’m at NY ComicCon and they brought this book up at a TOR panel and holy hell I AM SO SAT. They pitched it as severance x immigration, so when you emigrate, you essentially sever yourself into two: the person you are in your birth country and person you become in your country of destination. !!! INCREDIBLE !!!
Did Not Finish
May 11, 2026It's just not for me.
July 17, 2026
در جهان این کتاب (با اقتباس از یک افسانهی کهن)، عبور از مرز میتواند آدم را به دو نسخه تقسیم کند؛ یک نسخه در سرزمین مبدأ میماند و نسخهی دیگر در سرزمین تازه زندگی میکند. داستان دربارهی سویونگ و رز است؛ دو نسخه از یک نفر که بعد از مهاجرت مادرشان، یکی در کره مانده و دیگری در آمریکا بزرگ شده. مرگ پدربزرگ آنها باعث میشود رز بعد از سالها به کره برگردد، با نسخهی کرهای خودش روبهرو شود و مسئلهی ادغام دوبارهی این دو زندگی، خاطره، زبان، خانواده و هویت وسط بیاید. در کنار این، ماجرای خانهی پدربزرگ، وصیت او، رابطهی دو نسخه با خانواده و فاصلهای که مهاجرت میان آنها انداخته، خط اصلی روایت را میسازد.
ایدهی «نمونهسازی» یا جدا شدن یک نسخهی دیگر از آدم هنگام عبور از مرز، روی کاغذ واقعاً ظرفیت داستانی زیادی دارد. اما مشکل من این بود که کتاب خیلی زود خودش را لو میدهد. پیام اصلی از همان فصل اول روشن است و بعد از آن، بیشتر از اینکه داستان جلو برود، انگار نویسنده دارد همان ایده را بارها از زاویههای مختلف توضیح میدهد: مهاجرت یعنی چه، مرز چه بلایی سر هویت میآورد، آدم مهاجر کجایی است، دو زبانی و دو فرهنگی بودن چه زخمی در وجود آدم بهجای میگذارد و بازگشت به خانه اصلاً ممکن است یا نه.
برای همین بخش داستانی ماجرا اصلاً به من نچسبید. رابطهی سویونگ و رز، وصیت پدربزرگ، مسئلهی ادغام، خانه، خانواده و حتی تنش میان کره و آمریکا همه میتوانستند یک قصهی درگیرکننده بسازند، اما زیر لایهی پیام اصلی دفن شدهاند. به جای اینکه شخصیتها واقعاً زندگی کنند، خیلی وقتها شبیه حاملان یک شعارند. روایت بیشتر شبیه بیانیهی یک مهاجر دوتابعیتی دربارهی معنای دوتابعیتی بودن است تا یک داستان کامل و زنده. بیانیهای که شاید از نظر فکری برای خیلیها مهم و قابل احترام باشد، اما برای من به عنوان داستان کار نکرد.
مشکل دیگرم این بود که کتاب از همان ابتدا بیش از حد نسبت به معنای خودش آگاه است. همهچیز مدام به زبان، مرز، وطن، خاطره، خانواده، بازگشت و شکاف هویتی برمیگردد، اما کمتر لحظهای پیش میآید که خود داستان بتواند مستقل از این مفاهیم نفس بکشد. من ایده را میفهمیدم، حتی میتوانستم اهمیتش را هم ببینم، اما فهمیدن پیام برای دوست داشتن یک رمان کافی نیست. وقتی قصه زیر بار حرف اصلی له میشود، دیگر شخصیتها و اتفاقات نمیتوانند اثر عاطفی لازم را بسازند.
ایدهی «نمونهسازی» یا جدا شدن یک نسخهی دیگر از آدم هنگام عبور از مرز، روی کاغذ واقعاً ظرفیت داستانی زیادی دارد. اما مشکل من این بود که کتاب خیلی زود خودش را لو میدهد. پیام اصلی از همان فصل اول روشن است و بعد از آن، بیشتر از اینکه داستان جلو برود، انگار نویسنده دارد همان ایده را بارها از زاویههای مختلف توضیح میدهد: مهاجرت یعنی چه، مرز چه بلایی سر هویت میآورد، آدم مهاجر کجایی است، دو زبانی و دو فرهنگی بودن چه زخمی در وجود آدم بهجای میگذارد و بازگشت به خانه اصلاً ممکن است یا نه.
برای همین بخش داستانی ماجرا اصلاً به من نچسبید. رابطهی سویونگ و رز، وصیت پدربزرگ، مسئلهی ادغام، خانه، خانواده و حتی تنش میان کره و آمریکا همه میتوانستند یک قصهی درگیرکننده بسازند، اما زیر لایهی پیام اصلی دفن شدهاند. به جای اینکه شخصیتها واقعاً زندگی کنند، خیلی وقتها شبیه حاملان یک شعارند. روایت بیشتر شبیه بیانیهی یک مهاجر دوتابعیتی دربارهی معنای دوتابعیتی بودن است تا یک داستان کامل و زنده. بیانیهای که شاید از نظر فکری برای خیلیها مهم و قابل احترام باشد، اما برای من به عنوان داستان کار نکرد.
مشکل دیگرم این بود که کتاب از همان ابتدا بیش از حد نسبت به معنای خودش آگاه است. همهچیز مدام به زبان، مرز، وطن، خاطره، خانواده، بازگشت و شکاف هویتی برمیگردد، اما کمتر لحظهای پیش میآید که خود داستان بتواند مستقل از این مفاهیم نفس بکشد. من ایده را میفهمیدم، حتی میتوانستم اهمیتش را هم ببینم، اما فهمیدن پیام برای دوست داشتن یک رمان کافی نیست. وقتی قصه زیر بار حرف اصلی له میشود، دیگر شخصیتها و اتفاقات نمیتوانند اثر عاطفی لازم را بسازند.
Did Not Finish
May 23, 2026Unfortunately, this one didn't fully work for me. I requested it because the premise is SO GOOD, I still love it, but the execution failed to fulfill its potential. I got to 34%, so I gave it a good try, but this just failed to maintain my attention. I liked the first part a lot. I was very intrigued by Soyoung and Rose, and I was very curious about where things would go with them. I liked the introspective, more character-focused nature of the first part.
It loses me when we switch perspectives to another character, and it starts to dive into "thriller" territory. The interest I had in the story weakened and weakened, and my mind started glazing over it. I tried to lock back in several times, but it didn't work. That's when I knew I had to stop because I have so many other books to read; it doesn't make sense to push myself to finish a story I no longer care about.
Personally, this would've worked a lot better if it focused only on Soyoung and Rose. I don't feel like this needed to dive into a techno-thriller to be interesting. Soyoung and Rose, and the themes of identity, belonging, immigration, etc., were already compelling on their own. This would've even been great as a novella, shorter and punchier.
I did enjoy Isabel J. Kim's prose, and I think she has a strong perspective, so I will keep an eye on any other books she comes up with. As a debut, I think this was ambitious (complimentary), and I see a lot of people loving it, which is amazing. I wanted to be one of those people, but this isn't the version of the story that got me there. I still recommend checking it out because this has a really great concept.
Thanks to NetGalley, Pan Macmillan, and Picador for the early access to this ebook.
It loses me when we switch perspectives to another character, and it starts to dive into "thriller" territory. The interest I had in the story weakened and weakened, and my mind started glazing over it. I tried to lock back in several times, but it didn't work. That's when I knew I had to stop because I have so many other books to read; it doesn't make sense to push myself to finish a story I no longer care about.
Personally, this would've worked a lot better if it focused only on Soyoung and Rose. I don't feel like this needed to dive into a techno-thriller to be interesting. Soyoung and Rose, and the themes of identity, belonging, immigration, etc., were already compelling on their own. This would've even been great as a novella, shorter and punchier.
I did enjoy Isabel J. Kim's prose, and I think she has a strong perspective, so I will keep an eye on any other books she comes up with. As a debut, I think this was ambitious (complimentary), and I see a lot of people loving it, which is amazing. I wanted to be one of those people, but this isn't the version of the story that got me there. I still recommend checking it out because this has a really great concept.
Thanks to NetGalley, Pan Macmillan, and Picador for the early access to this ebook.
May 29, 2026
RTC
This will 100% not be a book for everyone, even if the premise sounds interesting, but it was 10000000% for me, both of them.
This will 100% not be a book for everyone, even if the premise sounds interesting, but it was 10000000% for me, both of them.
June 30, 2026
Overpromised and underdelivered. The concept was strong, but I wasn't a fan of the direction it ultimately took.
Did Not Finish
July 8, 2026My thanks to Pan Macmillan and NetGalley for a free DRC of "Sublimation" by Isable J. Kim.
A blend of Literary fiction and Science Fiction about how crossing a border with the intention of permanent leave creates a copy of one's self (here called instance) that stays behind.
This novel started so good. I loved the individual perspectives of Soyoung Kang that remained in South Korea and the version of herself that moved to the USA and called herself Rose.
Without spoillers I will say that things dramaticaly changed and I was not in a bright enough mental place to handle the level of psychological urnrest. This is a compliment to the author for managing to elicit such powerful reactions.
We also get the POV from Youjin's instance that lives and works in the USA. The bureaucracy of workplece took out so much out of me.
I appreciated so many reflections from the first part of the novel and while the rest did not worked for me, I plan to try more from the author in the future.
A blend of Literary fiction and Science Fiction about how crossing a border with the intention of permanent leave creates a copy of one's self (here called instance) that stays behind.
This novel started so good. I loved the individual perspectives of Soyoung Kang that remained in South Korea and the version of herself that moved to the USA and called herself Rose.
Without spoillers I will say that things dramaticaly changed and I was not in a bright enough mental place to handle the level of psychological urnrest. This is a compliment to the author for managing to elicit such powerful reactions.
We also get the POV from Youjin's instance that lives and works in the USA. The bureaucracy of workplece took out so much out of me.
I appreciated so many reflections from the first part of the novel and while the rest did not worked for me, I plan to try more from the author in the future.
July 9, 2026
This had so much potential, but went on and on without direction a bit too much.
Review of advance copy received from Edelweiss+
holy sh*t this book is good
June 3, 2026
Wow. I honestly can't remember the last time a book had me this compelled, this intrigued, and identifying so hard with some of the themes. I know I gush about a lot of books, but this ranks among the very best books I've read this year and it will be a book that stays on my mind for some time to come.
Sublimation is speculative fiction, set in an alternate version of the world where the decision to emigrate results in a version of a person going abroad to the new country, and a version staying behind. They call it instancing. Both "instances" share DNA and have the same memories up until the moment of instancing. The two can continue living separate lives, or, if they choose, can become singular again. Set against the backdrop of this world, instances Soyoung and Rose have been living apart for years when circumstances bring the back together in Korea. Rose intends to return to Korea for a brief visit before returning to her life in New York, but Soyoung wants more...
I loved this premise. There are more intricacies to what prompted an instantiation, and as I understood the idea a bit better I couldn't help but look at my own life and time abroad and wonder if and when I would have instantiated. I think I've pinpointed the moment. So this alone was compelling, but then to add to it the fact that instances could become one again, a singularity with the memories of both existing in the one body, and asking her characters to grapple with the question of to do or not to do--wow. It made for such a clever philosophical question wrapped up in excellent prose.
I also loved the question of identity that author Isabel J. Kim raises. Instances are literally the same, they split at a moment of decision (usually at a border crossing or border control) and from there go on to form new memories that shape their perspective and personality, etc. Can these two selves ever really reintegrate? Should they? What if one wants to and the other doesn't? I spent so much time thinking about this, about how my life and personality and outlook changed so much during my years abroad, so that when I finally returned to my hometown, I was like a different person. I wonder what my instances would have thought of one another.
And if the philosophy and identity weren't enough, this is also a thriller, with a shady corporation rolling out technologies advertised to help instances prevent reintegration, etc. but are they actually helping? I've only seen a few episodes, but this aspect reminded me more than once of the TV series Severance, and I think it'd appeal to fans of the show.
I loved this. I've worked it into multiple conversations with friends and colleagues. I think this would be a great book club book because there's just so much to discuss, and if you've read it, hit me up because I'm dying to hear other persepectives.
I was lucky enough to listen to an Advanced Copy from Macmillan Audio, and both narrators did a fantastic job giving voice to their characters. I would love to compare the print book with the audio, because the audiobook did some cool things during some intense sections of the book (spoiler territory, but I thought it was genius) and I'd love to see how it's represented on page. But I definitely recommend the audio experience!
*I received a gifted copy of the audiobook from Macmillan Audio; this review is entirely my own.
Sublimation is speculative fiction, set in an alternate version of the world where the decision to emigrate results in a version of a person going abroad to the new country, and a version staying behind. They call it instancing. Both "instances" share DNA and have the same memories up until the moment of instancing. The two can continue living separate lives, or, if they choose, can become singular again. Set against the backdrop of this world, instances Soyoung and Rose have been living apart for years when circumstances bring the back together in Korea. Rose intends to return to Korea for a brief visit before returning to her life in New York, but Soyoung wants more...
I loved this premise. There are more intricacies to what prompted an instantiation, and as I understood the idea a bit better I couldn't help but look at my own life and time abroad and wonder if and when I would have instantiated. I think I've pinpointed the moment. So this alone was compelling, but then to add to it the fact that instances could become one again, a singularity with the memories of both existing in the one body, and asking her characters to grapple with the question of to do or not to do--wow. It made for such a clever philosophical question wrapped up in excellent prose.
I also loved the question of identity that author Isabel J. Kim raises. Instances are literally the same, they split at a moment of decision (usually at a border crossing or border control) and from there go on to form new memories that shape their perspective and personality, etc. Can these two selves ever really reintegrate? Should they? What if one wants to and the other doesn't? I spent so much time thinking about this, about how my life and personality and outlook changed so much during my years abroad, so that when I finally returned to my hometown, I was like a different person. I wonder what my instances would have thought of one another.
And if the philosophy and identity weren't enough, this is also a thriller, with a shady corporation rolling out technologies advertised to help instances prevent reintegration, etc. but are they actually helping? I've only seen a few episodes, but this aspect reminded me more than once of the TV series Severance, and I think it'd appeal to fans of the show.
I loved this. I've worked it into multiple conversations with friends and colleagues. I think this would be a great book club book because there's just so much to discuss, and if you've read it, hit me up because I'm dying to hear other persepectives.
I was lucky enough to listen to an Advanced Copy from Macmillan Audio, and both narrators did a fantastic job giving voice to their characters. I would love to compare the print book with the audio, because the audiobook did some cool things during some intense sections of the book (spoiler territory, but I thought it was genius) and I'd love to see how it's represented on page. But I definitely recommend the audio experience!
*I received a gifted copy of the audiobook from Macmillan Audio; this review is entirely my own.
June 13, 2026
4.25⭐️ rounded up
Thanks @torbooks and @macmillan.audio for the gifted review copies.
This book made me think so much and despite some choppiness in the structure of the writing, this is an excellent, compelling debut that I never wanted to stop reading.
The concept will be fascinating to fans of multiverse, except in this conception different versions (called instances) of a person exist in the SAME timelines, but in different locations.
A person can “instance”, creating a separate replica of themselves, at border crossings, into/out of another country — under certain circumstances and conditions.
If two instances of a person touch, they merge back together into one new consciousness. A new technology called “merge break” prevents accidentally merging back.
I loved this for its exploration of how different a person’s life trajectory might change if they only grew up in a different country. I also really appreciate the focus on immigration and how instances are treated in their respective countries.
What would happen if the government or a private company were in control of the tech? Can you imagine it in the hands of the North Korean government or the US government?
The second half of the book switches from a more introspective tone to a more faced paced thriller-like plot. In that sense it was a little disjointed but I still loved the overall concept because I kept comparing it to my own life and how it could have been so different if my parents had not immigrated and decided to start new lives here.
I will note that I had to switch from audio to text format because I was having trouble distinguishing between the two primary POVs and each of their instances, and the mid-chapter breaks and interludes were hard to follow.
Thanks @torbooks and @macmillan.audio for the gifted review copies.
This book made me think so much and despite some choppiness in the structure of the writing, this is an excellent, compelling debut that I never wanted to stop reading.
The concept will be fascinating to fans of multiverse, except in this conception different versions (called instances) of a person exist in the SAME timelines, but in different locations.
A person can “instance”, creating a separate replica of themselves, at border crossings, into/out of another country — under certain circumstances and conditions.
If two instances of a person touch, they merge back together into one new consciousness. A new technology called “merge break” prevents accidentally merging back.
I loved this for its exploration of how different a person’s life trajectory might change if they only grew up in a different country. I also really appreciate the focus on immigration and how instances are treated in their respective countries.
What would happen if the government or a private company were in control of the tech? Can you imagine it in the hands of the North Korean government or the US government?
The second half of the book switches from a more introspective tone to a more faced paced thriller-like plot. In that sense it was a little disjointed but I still loved the overall concept because I kept comparing it to my own life and how it could have been so different if my parents had not immigrated and decided to start new lives here.
I will note that I had to switch from audio to text format because I was having trouble distinguishing between the two primary POVs and each of their instances, and the mid-chapter breaks and interludes were hard to follow.
June 21, 2026
What if you created another version of yourself when you crossed a border? What if you loved two entirely different lives but you could re-integrate with yourself once you have skin contact? Which version of yourself would you want to be, the one that leaves, or the one that stays?
Sublimation asks the reader these questions in a well-thought, climactic and engaging story following two young adults, and how the decisions they make affect not only their lives, but potentially the worlds.
This novel is a futuristic sci-fi, where upon crossing a border a replica of yourself is made. Soyoung immigrated to America from South Korea at a young age, but upon stepping on that plane, Rose, a version of herself goes to America while Soyoung stays behind. She’s reunited with herself years later at the funeral of her grandfather and must ask herself (literally) the question of whether to go on living separate lives or re-integrate so that all their memories are shared in one version of herself.
This book pulls the idea from references from notable works including Korean folklore, The Odyssey, and the story of Adam and Eve but expands it for a modern day story that will have you thinking about this book long after you set it down.
Her characters are fleshed out, and though the instances are the same person, each character has a distinct voice that could resonate with whichever way you answer the questions this book poises the reader. For me, having been adopted at a young age I always think about what my life would have been like if I hadn’t been adopted, and this book took that question and woven it into a beautiful story of family, belonging, immigration and who we are at our core.
I can’t recommend this book enough, and will avidly look forward to anything else Isabel J Kim writes!
Sublimation asks the reader these questions in a well-thought, climactic and engaging story following two young adults, and how the decisions they make affect not only their lives, but potentially the worlds.
This novel is a futuristic sci-fi, where upon crossing a border a replica of yourself is made. Soyoung immigrated to America from South Korea at a young age, but upon stepping on that plane, Rose, a version of herself goes to America while Soyoung stays behind. She’s reunited with herself years later at the funeral of her grandfather and must ask herself (literally) the question of whether to go on living separate lives or re-integrate so that all their memories are shared in one version of herself.
This book pulls the idea from references from notable works including Korean folklore, The Odyssey, and the story of Adam and Eve but expands it for a modern day story that will have you thinking about this book long after you set it down.
Her characters are fleshed out, and though the instances are the same person, each character has a distinct voice that could resonate with whichever way you answer the questions this book poises the reader. For me, having been adopted at a young age I always think about what my life would have been like if I hadn’t been adopted, and this book took that question and woven it into a beautiful story of family, belonging, immigration and who we are at our core.
I can’t recommend this book enough, and will avidly look forward to anything else Isabel J Kim writes!
May 29, 2026
4.5/5⭐️ "When your country is cracked in half and controlled by foreign powers, when your country is being mismanaged by a corrupt government, when you are escaping gang violence, when your minority group is part of a targeted genocide, then you worry about other things. You worry about any version of yourself getting out. You hope any versions of your children survive."
Sublimation is a powerful speculative fiction/scifi techno thriller where when people immigrate to another country they create an "instance" which is a duplicate self. This duplicate self is you, your heritage, your looks, and your memories until the paths of your lives and your choices change the two of you. It is explained differently in each culture. "The sibling-self, the changeling, and the one-who-does-not-return".
This story is broken up into five parts. The first part is admittedly slow but this is where the stage is set for the rest of the book. Once I got about 20-25% into this story, I couldn't put it down. The author does a fantastic job of capturing the immigrant experience, corporate culture, and longing for homeland. I loved the added snippets about Korean folklore, The Odyssey, and The Bible that are shaped to fit the narrative of a world with instances and foreshadow upcoming parts of the book and add tension to certain scenes.
I read 65% of the book with my physical ARC and read most of the rest with the audiobook (because I was busy but did not want to stop reading). The narrators are used in SUCH a cool way towards the end of the book (I can't explain more without spoilers) but I definitely think it added another level of experience for the reader.
While this book was certainly my cup of tea, it is not going to be for everyone. The writing style is unique and at times choppy but purposefully so. It is written in second person POV which is also going to be jarring for some readers. It also leans more speculative/scifi with lots of political and immigration commentary with the "thriller vibes" not really picking up towards the end.
I believe if you enjoyed Blake Crouch's or Thomas R. Weaver's work and can take the time to appreciate a slower unraveling in a story then you will love this too!
Thank you Tor and Macmillan Audio for the eARC, physical ARC, and ALC!
Sublimation is a powerful speculative fiction/scifi techno thriller where when people immigrate to another country they create an "instance" which is a duplicate self. This duplicate self is you, your heritage, your looks, and your memories until the paths of your lives and your choices change the two of you. It is explained differently in each culture. "The sibling-self, the changeling, and the one-who-does-not-return".
This story is broken up into five parts. The first part is admittedly slow but this is where the stage is set for the rest of the book. Once I got about 20-25% into this story, I couldn't put it down. The author does a fantastic job of capturing the immigrant experience, corporate culture, and longing for homeland. I loved the added snippets about Korean folklore, The Odyssey, and The Bible that are shaped to fit the narrative of a world with instances and foreshadow upcoming parts of the book and add tension to certain scenes.
I read 65% of the book with my physical ARC and read most of the rest with the audiobook (because I was busy but did not want to stop reading). The narrators are used in SUCH a cool way towards the end of the book (I can't explain more without spoilers) but I definitely think it added another level of experience for the reader.
While this book was certainly my cup of tea, it is not going to be for everyone. The writing style is unique and at times choppy but purposefully so. It is written in second person POV which is also going to be jarring for some readers. It also leans more speculative/scifi with lots of political and immigration commentary with the "thriller vibes" not really picking up towards the end.
I believe if you enjoyed Blake Crouch's or Thomas R. Weaver's work and can take the time to appreciate a slower unraveling in a story then you will love this too!
Thank you Tor and Macmillan Audio for the eARC, physical ARC, and ALC!
May 27, 2026
Thank you to Tor Books and NetGalley for the free e-ARC in exchange for an honest review
Go into acclaimed speculative author Isabel J. Kim’s debut novel with the right expectations to get the most out of SUBLIMATION. This is a literary sci-fi novel that will best appeal to readers who love literary fiction and appreciate deeply interior stories.
I love the instancing concept. Imagine if, every time you desire to emigrate or make into a home that which was not your first home, a version of yourself splits off, so that one of you is able to stay behind while the other goes to live that new life. What would that world look like in terms of things like immigration, citizenship, social media presence? Kim does a convincing job of imagining said world for us.
But the speculative world that the characters inhabit is not the main focus here. That would be on the internal struggles of the main character(s), childhood friends Soyoung and Yujin, each of whom have an instance who lives in the US. Half of each pair wants to reintegrate, which can be done by making skin-to-skin contact with your instance. The other half want to remain separate. Who will win out? There seem to be no good answers here.
At its heart, SUBLIMATION is a story about emigration/migration and the ways that those desires and what-ifs inform our identity. If you’ve read a lot of diaspora and immigrant stories, Soyoung and Yujin’s internal conflicts may be a bit disappointingly familiar, as they struggle to incorporate their various desires and experiences within themselves. I was certainly hoping for something a bit more novel.
It didn’t help that I never really ended up liking any of the (four?) main characters or deeply understanding them. It’s a challenging story premise to work with, making two pairs of characters distinct enough in their voices, thinking, and desires. Unfortunately, I didn’t really enjoy the time I spent with them. Both Soyoung-Rose and Yujin-YJ are a bit selfish, a bit passive, a bit afraid. That’s… fine, I guess—they are human, after all—but I didn’t feel like there was much difference in the voices of Soyoung and Rose, and Yujin and YJ. So it was like four times as much navel-gazing, but not four times the payoff.
With such a cool premise, SUBLIMATION could have gone in many different directions. However, Kim chose to use it to explore familiar themes of geographical/identity displacement, migration, and longing. The speculative aspect cedes center stage to the characters’ internal turmoil. This read more lit fic than sci-fi for me.
Go into acclaimed speculative author Isabel J. Kim’s debut novel with the right expectations to get the most out of SUBLIMATION. This is a literary sci-fi novel that will best appeal to readers who love literary fiction and appreciate deeply interior stories.
I love the instancing concept. Imagine if, every time you desire to emigrate or make into a home that which was not your first home, a version of yourself splits off, so that one of you is able to stay behind while the other goes to live that new life. What would that world look like in terms of things like immigration, citizenship, social media presence? Kim does a convincing job of imagining said world for us.
But the speculative world that the characters inhabit is not the main focus here. That would be on the internal struggles of the main character(s), childhood friends Soyoung and Yujin, each of whom have an instance who lives in the US. Half of each pair wants to reintegrate, which can be done by making skin-to-skin contact with your instance. The other half want to remain separate. Who will win out? There seem to be no good answers here.
At its heart, SUBLIMATION is a story about emigration/migration and the ways that those desires and what-ifs inform our identity. If you’ve read a lot of diaspora and immigrant stories, Soyoung and Yujin’s internal conflicts may be a bit disappointingly familiar, as they struggle to incorporate their various desires and experiences within themselves. I was certainly hoping for something a bit more novel.
It didn’t help that I never really ended up liking any of the (four?) main characters or deeply understanding them. It’s a challenging story premise to work with, making two pairs of characters distinct enough in their voices, thinking, and desires. Unfortunately, I didn’t really enjoy the time I spent with them. Both Soyoung-Rose and Yujin-YJ are a bit selfish, a bit passive, a bit afraid. That’s… fine, I guess—they are human, after all—but I didn’t feel like there was much difference in the voices of Soyoung and Rose, and Yujin and YJ. So it was like four times as much navel-gazing, but not four times the payoff.
With such a cool premise, SUBLIMATION could have gone in many different directions. However, Kim chose to use it to explore familiar themes of geographical/identity displacement, migration, and longing. The speculative aspect cedes center stage to the characters’ internal turmoil. This read more lit fic than sci-fi for me.
June 6, 2026
4.5 stars
Cover 5; characters 5; Plot 5; Pace 3; Intrigue 5; Logic 5; worldbuilding 5; Writing 4; Enjoyment 4
I honestly don't even know where to start with this book. This was clearly someone's thought experiment of "what if..." and they really fucking went with it. Clear to the deepest depths of society.
*It's also worth noting that this entire book is in second person, meaning YOU are all the characters. Typically I'm not a second person girlie, but it really worked here and visualizing myself as all of the characters really added something to the vibe of the story overall.*
Let's get the one negative out of the way. This book was too long for me. I needed it to be 50-70 pages shorter. There was just some things happening in the middle that made me actually say "can we just move on with it and get to the good parts already!". Now, that could be because my little chimp brain has been trained to enjoy one minute clips on IG and my attention span is shit. But I digress.
Everything else? Stupid good. This book gets philosophical. It digs deep into societal expectations of what we should want, what home means, what it's like to have two parts of our selves at war with one another, and are those parts better separated or as the whole? It deals with immigration status', what governments will do to keep their citizens in line, what people will do to versions of themselves in order to keep from having bad memories, and how much power we should give to corporations.
There were bits and pieces between chapters where a omniscient narrator talked about The Iliad, The Odyssey, The Bible, as well as a couple of fables. These were all made in the light of if they had existed in this alternate reality so we were getting glimpses of what those books would be like in this reality. There were parts of this that actually had me gasping. Especially the part about how some scholars believed that Like... I'm sorry, what? Such a great though on the authors part!
There was also a character who talked about their grandparents experiences with having split when fleeing Nazi Germany and how Like... that's absolutely WILD.
There were a few parts, especially toward the end, where they talk about what it would be like to have people who were fleeing war-torn countries to split. Because even though they didn't *want* to be in the middle of the war, part of themselves would still be distraught at leaving their homeland and everything they knew. There is talk about the moral implications of all of this.
One of my favorite little snippets was when when explaining what it was like to have two minds in one body they talked about those of us who already (in this reality) refer to ourselves as "we". This is one of those questions people sometimes ask. When you're talking to yourself with your inner thoughts are you an "I" person or a "we" person. I am a "we" person. So would I be more likely to create an instance if I were to leave the US? And if I did... would I want my instance to come back and re-join me?
Parts 4 & 5 of this book get into a bit of a thriller plot where we're really digging deep into what would happen if corporations and government are the ones who control instancing and it really adds a layer to everything previously discussed in the book.
Obviously... I liked it. I'm gonna be screaming from the rafters and continuing to lie awake in bed at night thinking about this book for a while.
Cover 5; characters 5; Plot 5; Pace 3; Intrigue 5; Logic 5; worldbuilding 5; Writing 4; Enjoyment 4
I honestly don't even know where to start with this book. This was clearly someone's thought experiment of "what if..." and they really fucking went with it. Clear to the deepest depths of society.
*It's also worth noting that this entire book is in second person, meaning YOU are all the characters. Typically I'm not a second person girlie, but it really worked here and visualizing myself as all of the characters really added something to the vibe of the story overall.*
Let's get the one negative out of the way. This book was too long for me. I needed it to be 50-70 pages shorter. There was just some things happening in the middle that made me actually say "can we just move on with it and get to the good parts already!". Now, that could be because my little chimp brain has been trained to enjoy one minute clips on IG and my attention span is shit. But I digress.
Everything else? Stupid good. This book gets philosophical. It digs deep into societal expectations of what we should want, what home means, what it's like to have two parts of our selves at war with one another, and are those parts better separated or as the whole? It deals with immigration status', what governments will do to keep their citizens in line, what people will do to versions of themselves in order to keep from having bad memories, and how much power we should give to corporations.
There were bits and pieces between chapters where a omniscient narrator talked about The Iliad, The Odyssey, The Bible, as well as a couple of fables. These were all made in the light of if they had existed in this alternate reality so we were getting glimpses of what those books would be like in this reality. There were parts of this that actually had me gasping. Especially the part about how some scholars believed that Like... I'm sorry, what? Such a great though on the authors part!
There was also a character who talked about their grandparents experiences with having split when fleeing Nazi Germany and how Like... that's absolutely WILD.
There were a few parts, especially toward the end, where they talk about what it would be like to have people who were fleeing war-torn countries to split. Because even though they didn't *want* to be in the middle of the war, part of themselves would still be distraught at leaving their homeland and everything they knew. There is talk about the moral implications of all of this.
One of my favorite little snippets was when when explaining what it was like to have two minds in one body they talked about those of us who already (in this reality) refer to ourselves as "we". This is one of those questions people sometimes ask. When you're talking to yourself with your inner thoughts are you an "I" person or a "we" person. I am a "we" person. So would I be more likely to create an instance if I were to leave the US? And if I did... would I want my instance to come back and re-join me?
Parts 4 & 5 of this book get into a bit of a thriller plot where we're really digging deep into what would happen if corporations and government are the ones who control instancing and it really adds a layer to everything previously discussed in the book.
Obviously... I liked it. I'm gonna be screaming from the rafters and continuing to lie awake in bed at night thinking about this book for a while.
June 4, 2026
3.75
This was such an unusual yet highly impactful way of exploring the immigrant experience. It is set in a world where people can split into two versions of themselves at a border: one self stays behind while the other moves forward to a new place. This only happens when someone is torn about the decision to cross.
This was a bit of a mind bend for me. As a recent migrant from the UK to Bulgaria this book made me THINK. I know for a fact I would have "instanced" when I left my home country and that realisation led me down a bizarre and thought-provoking path imagining what my life would look like across two split realities. So much grief and hope tangled up in a thousand questions. None of these questions about myself were resolved by the time I finished the book but it was food for thought!!
I really liked both of the two main characters (and their instances!) that we focused on, I completely felt the weight of their choices and decisions. I found myself trying to put myself in their shoes in every chapter. This book was written in the second person which I don't encounter often, but for this particular story I thought it was an apt choice.
I was hooked up until 60% after which I felt like the writing got a little bit choppy. I also didn't always follow the classical/biblical references that were often sandwiched in the middle of a chapter. It all got extremely convoluted at the end - which I believe was the point - but I'm also left with the impression that because of this, it's not going to be everyone's cup of tea!
A big thank you to Tor Books for the eARC!
This was such an unusual yet highly impactful way of exploring the immigrant experience. It is set in a world where people can split into two versions of themselves at a border: one self stays behind while the other moves forward to a new place. This only happens when someone is torn about the decision to cross.
This was a bit of a mind bend for me. As a recent migrant from the UK to Bulgaria this book made me THINK. I know for a fact I would have "instanced" when I left my home country and that realisation led me down a bizarre and thought-provoking path imagining what my life would look like across two split realities. So much grief and hope tangled up in a thousand questions. None of these questions about myself were resolved by the time I finished the book but it was food for thought!!
I really liked both of the two main characters (and their instances!) that we focused on, I completely felt the weight of their choices and decisions. I found myself trying to put myself in their shoes in every chapter. This book was written in the second person which I don't encounter often, but for this particular story I thought it was an apt choice.
I was hooked up until 60% after which I felt like the writing got a little bit choppy. I also didn't always follow the classical/biblical references that were often sandwiched in the middle of a chapter. It all got extremely convoluted at the end - which I believe was the point - but I'm also left with the impression that because of this, it's not going to be everyone's cup of tea!
A big thank you to Tor Books for the eARC!
June 4, 2026
4.5 rounded up!
Get your highlighter and tabs ready, this book is one to annotate!
In this alternate reality people split when they cross international borders, it all begins with intent. Soyoung Rose Kang immigrates to America at the age of ten and becomes Rose leaving Soyoung behind in Korea. What follows is an intense philosophical discussion surrounding identity and choice. It really picked up speed near the end and had me on the edge of my seat!
It’s been a long time since I have read a science fiction novel with such a fresh take!
Thank you Tor and NetGalley for this advance readers copy!
Get your highlighter and tabs ready, this book is one to annotate!
In this alternate reality people split when they cross international borders, it all begins with intent. Soyoung Rose Kang immigrates to America at the age of ten and becomes Rose leaving Soyoung behind in Korea. What follows is an intense philosophical discussion surrounding identity and choice. It really picked up speed near the end and had me on the edge of my seat!
It’s been a long time since I have read a science fiction novel with such a fresh take!
Thank you Tor and NetGalley for this advance readers copy!
Displaying 1 - 30 of 661 reviews