Stephen Fry's Greek Retellings is an impressive feat of entertainment while being educationally rich.
There has evidently been an influx of Greek retellings through alternate perspectives after the hugely beloved Madeline Miller novels Circe and The Song of Achilles. Of course it would be silly to suggest there were none prior, in terms of fiction Helen by Margaret George, Lavinia by Ursula K. Le Guin, and others were critically acclaimed (just didn’t capture the market akin to Madeline Miller). This is not even mentioning the many retellings during the ancient days.
Stephen Fry’s retelling of these great myths isn’t here to provide a drastically different perspective, it’s not even a fictional retelling creating a modern twist, inventing things that weren’t in the original sources. This is pretty much a nonfictional book, retelling these narratives as accurately as possible with Fry’s modern language, wit, and so forth. The best equivalent would be Mythology by Edith Hamilton. However, Edith is better versed in terms of teaching, as the sources are there (better reference material), retellings are short and concise (which I say to its detriment), and Edith caps it off with her intelligence and insight.
Diving into Homer can be very overwhelming because there are so many references to tales outside of the Iliad and the Odyssey. Furthermore, it could be difficult to introduce people to the myths with Hesiod or Ovid’s writings. Stephen Fry is the solution. It isn’t perfect, but it’s damn excellent in what it intends to achieve. You can’t help but be enraptured by it all. Fry’s bouncing between so many different sources so smoothly, providing extra context through footnotes and so forth. I was somewhat hesitant reading this one because a friend of mine didn’t like it nearly as much as the others, but thankfully that wasn’t the case for me.
That said, this felt less impressive than Troy because of the abundance of sources there in comparison to this book. Here we got Odyssey, Agamemnon (plays by many playwrights of that time), and Aeneid, and maybe others (Telegony is touched upon) I haven’t noticed or simply forgot. In terms of the story, it retells well; it’s the Odyssey and various plays of Agamemnon, so yes, it’s wonderful to read. Fry’s conversational style, I think, was the best suited for Mythos because of the nature of the material, but I still enjoyed it how it was deployed here. I really enjoyed the last two chapters with Fry’s overall musings about certain topics and the series existence and caps off this great series wonderfully.
If I had to highlight a weakness, the conversational writing style can go against the tale Fry is exploring. Character voice can merge and feel less distinct (and less bite) because sometimes it’s too modern to its fault. However, this is a very minor grand scheme of things in comparison to its strengths. If you have an emotional anchor to the myths, you feel for characters, you understand the broad plot and the message it evokes, and yeah, a very minor “problem” in terms of the tales as a whole.
In conclusion, Fry’s retelling of Greek myths ends up as a success. It’s a fantastic primer to Greek mythology and everything it entails without sacrificing detail, which is one of the shortcomings of Edith Hamilton's work. When I read Troy many years ago, I read the Iliad soon afterwards, and it was such a wonderful experience, the same will be done again. I’m excited to get into the original tale of Homer after pausing it for so long (for no fault of its quality). I’m glad our generation has these books, as it’s so easy to recommend where to start with Greek myths that are accurate to the originals.
7.5/10