Ibbitson gives his honest opinion of Stephen Harper’s time as Prime Minister of Canada and what led him to that role. The book is the product of a year of research and Ibbitson is a writer skillful enough to write about a serious topic without taking himself too seriously. It is an easy read for anyone interested in the topic.
Harper had superior political strategic skills. By the 1980s, he had diagnosed what he thought was wrong with Canadian politics, and the book shows how he implemented his vision. Unfortunately, Stephen Harper was often dour, vindictive and mean. He treated his political opponents as enemies.
Stephen Harper is a Liberal from the suburbs of Toronto who moved to Calgary and became a Western Reform conservative with the fanaticism of a convert. He worked as a legislative assistant to a Progressive Conservative Member of Parliament in the Mulroney government. Disillusioned, he was involved in the birth of the Reform Party and worked as a legislative assistant to the first Reform MP before he became elected in his own right. In all this, I think Harper’s biggest accomplishment was, with Preston Manning, forming the Reform Party and destroying the old Progressive Conservative Party and then later, with Peter Mackay, merging with the old Progressive Conservative Party to make a new party with the Progressive taken out of it.
And I think he had a point. As an Ontarian and a general supporter of the Laurentian elite, I think that Canada needs strong spokespeople for Western interests, the resource industry, and who care less for Quebec. And as a liberal, I think that we need conservatives to keep us from our more trendy but ill-considered impulses.
The other big accomplishment of Harper’s was to find a central place for immigrants in Canada’s new conservatism. Harper realized that many new immigrants to Canada were more conservative on issues such as crime, refugees, and the welfare state than many native-born Canadians and so he discarded the racist or ethnically inclined elements of his coalition to actively welcome the contributions of these new Canadians. It was an example to the world.
Ten years later, I can say that I more or less hated Harper when he was in power, but now I have what I would consider a more balanced approach. He was a masterful politician, as politics is understood as a means of getting and exercising power. Moreover, Harper skillfully brought Canada through the 2008 economic crisis. Our banking system did not collapse and the recession in Canada was not nearly as deep or long-lasting as south of the border. Credit for that also belongs to the Liberal Finance Minister Paul Martin, as they both ensured that Canada’s banking system remained boring, stable and profitable. Harper kept the social conservatives in general and anti-abortionists in particular on a short leash. And he understood the problem with Canada’s Supreme Court. It goes on its own way with no real oversight. He rightly apologized for the residential schools for aboriginal children, but also made the chiefs’ pay public. There is more in the book.
Here is what I think he was still wrong about. Harper and the Conservatives were notoriously secretive, gagging government scientists from speaking out about climate change, for example. On climate change generally, he was a disaster. He decentralized the already decentralized Canadian federation, making it ever weaker. Harper fought with Elections Canada, trying to suppress the vote. When Obama killed the Keystone pipeline, he should have seen it for the blessing it was. Canada needs political will to move east-west instead of north-south. Harper was very jealous of President Obama because he knew Obama was more popular in Canada than he was. Further on foreign policy, he supported Israeli settlers over the rights of the Palestinians. He started hard on China but then made up. Maybe he should not have. Finally, when Putin launched the first invasion of Ukraine in 2014, Harper spoke tough but continued to underfund the military.
Ibbitson says that Harper permanently made Canada a more conservative place. I am not so sure about that. I think that Harper made the Conservative Party a more conservative place and Canada more polarized. Anyway, I enjoyed the book. Ten years gives some perspective, but maybe not enough. Now our nine years of Trudeau are almost over, and I think that all prime ministers have a best-before date. I think that, overall, though I would not have admitted at the time, Harper left Canada a stronger, more prosperous place. On the other hand, it is now a more politically nasty place, and he deserves much of the blame for that. The Laurentian elite is not dead, but now it has to share power.