This book’s most telling remark appears not in its main chapters but in its Postscript, written in early 2025, when the Trump administration had begun to trash positive policies toward sub-Saharan Africa (along with trashing institutions of the US itself). The remark is that the US government has begun to resemble African governments. This is illustrated by Trump administration moves to hollow out the civil service, put staff loyalty ahead of competence, grant loyalists (and the Big Man himself) immunity from criminal prosecution and to stage displays of armed force and wealth. Other comparable features come to mind as well, from weak tax systems to skewed macro-economics to political rule by gerontocracies (for a book calling for more political input by younger people, that's not irrelevant). The point is that, in drawing parallels with the US, the author puts conventional prejudices about Africa in a fresh light. Bad politics aren’t unique to Africa. But its pseudo-democratic authoritarianism summons up a spectre looming large today over the United States of America.
The book's author, a veteran of the Obama years in the realm of US policy-making and promotion, offers some pointed remarks about that realm, probably with readers in and near that realm in mind, stating that “US policymakers are ill equipped” to cope with African realities, using poor lenses to see what’s happening.
She routinely pulls her punches, however, such as in playing down the real basis for African anger at US actions and inactions. She sidesteps discussion of key instruments of US leverage – the Bretton Woods Institutions, the aid industry and military/security forces – and their consequences for African public services and citizens, especially young people. Those are missed opportunities. For attention to those matters might help explain why and how US-backed policies have routinely failed to generate jobs for young people – a fundamental concern for them, and for the author, who implies, with good reason, that job creation in Africa has never been a major concern of the US or its World Bank and IMF.
The author notes other US missteps, such as in the case of Zambia. The US failed to help the country reach a deal on its debt, and further failed to move policy beyond HIV-AIDS to boost job creation, the chief priority for Zambians. Other shortcomings, such on curbing illicit financial flows to offshore circuits protected by the US, go unmentioned.
She warns against “hazards of relying on elite relationships” and advocates “more diplomatic attention to African societies—not just governments”. Sound advice. But it isn’t easy to square that with a plea to engage with Africans in the pinstriped lobbies of the African Union headquarters.
For me the category “youth” seems too slippery or amorphous to explain politics convincingly – even where a demographic bulge and mass politics loom large. Categorizations (and self-attributions) along lines of gender, race, class, ethnicity, religious persuasion, et cetera can usually bear more analytical weight. But this book’s accounts of youth activism in cyberspace and in the streets remind us of needs to factor age and generational struggles into our explanations.
[ review posted 10 September 2025 ]